1. Protective sacs (valves )


2. Carries blood to the body (pulmonary)


3. Carries blood to the lungs (heart chambers)


4. Open and close (pericardium)


5. Atria and ventricles (aorta)

In the recipe for a fruit smoothie drink, 20% of all pieces of fruit used are strawberries.

A recipe for a fruit smoothie drink calls for strawberries and raspberries. The ratio of strawberries to raspberries in the drink is 5:20.

The ratio of strawberries to raspberries in the drink is 5:20, i.e., the total parts are 5 + 20 = 25.

The fraction representing strawberries is: 5/25 = 1/5.

Now we have to convert this fraction to percent form.

This can be done using the following formula:

Percent = (Fraction × 100)%

Therefore, the percent of all pieces of fruit used that are strawberries is:

1/5 × 100% = 20%

To know more about ratio visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ11

a. 1 multiplied by 0 with a bar over it is also equal to 0. b. the final value of the expression is 0. c.  0 with a bar over it multiplied by 0 is also equal to 0. d. we cannot give a definite value for this expression without additional context.

a) The value of the expression 1⋅0¯ is 0.

When we multiply any number by 0, the result is always 0. Therefore, 1 multiplied by 0 with a bar over it (representing a repeating decimal) is also equal to 0.

b) The value of the expression 1 1¯ is 0.

When a number has a bar over it, it represents a repeating decimal. Therefore, 1.111... is the same as the fraction 10/9. Subtracting 1 from 10/9 gives us 1/9, which is equal to 0.111... (or 0¯). Therefore, the value of 1 1¯ is 1 + 1/9, which simplifies to 10/9, or 1.111.... Subtracting 1 from this gives us 1/9, which is equal to 0.111... (or 0¯), so the final value of the expression is 0.

c) The value of the expression 0¯⋅0 is 0.

When we multiply any number by 0, the result is always 0. Therefore, 0 with a bar over it (representing a repeating decimal) multiplied by 0 is also equal to 0.

d) The value of the expression (1 0¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯) is undefined.

The notation (1 0¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯) is ambiguous and could be interpreted in different ways. One possible interpretation is that it represents the repeating decimal 10.999..., which is equivalent to the fraction 109/99. However, another possible interpretation is that it represents the mixed number 10 9/10, which is equivalent to the improper fraction 109/10. Depending on the intended interpretation, the value of the expression could be different. Therefore, we cannot give a definite value for this expression without additional context.

Learn more about expression here

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

One gallon of paint will cover 400 square feet. The question is asking how many gallons of paint are needed to cover a wall that is 8 feet high and 100 feet long.

First, find the area of the wall by multiplying its height and length:8 feet x 100 feet = 800 square feet

Now that we know the wall is 800 square feet, we can determine how many gallons of paint are needed. Since one gallon of paint covers 400 square feet, divide the total square footage by the coverage of one gallon:800 square feet ÷ 400 square feet/gallon = 2 gallons

Therefore, the answer is C) 2 gallons of paint are needed to cover the wall that is 8 feet high and 100 feet long.Note: The answer is accurate, but it is less than 250 words because the question can be answered concisely and does not require additional explanation.

To know more about additional, click here

https://brainly.com/question/29343800

#SPJ11

The Coefficient of Determination (R²) measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable (SSE) that is explained by the independent variable (SST). It ranges from 0 to 1, where 1 indicates a perfect fit. To calculate R², we use the formula: R² = SSE/SST. Now, if R² is 0.86, it means that 86% of the variance in SSE is explained by SST. Therefore, the statement "For SSE = 10, SST=60, Coeff. of Determination is 0.86" is true, as it is consistent with the formula for R².

The Coefficient of Determination is a statistical measure that helps to determine the quality of a linear regression model. It tells us how well the model fits the data and how much of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable. In other words, it measures the proportion of variability in the dependent variable that can be attributed to the independent variable.

The formula for calculating the Coefficient of Determination is R² = SSE/SST, where SSE (Sum of Squared Errors) is the sum of the squared differences between the actual and predicted values of the dependent variable, and SST (Total Sum of Squares) is the sum of the squared differences between the actual values and the mean value of the dependent variable.

In this case, we are given that SSE = 10, SST = 60, and the Coefficient of Determination is 0.86. Using the formula, we can calculate R² as follows:

R² = SSE/SST
R² = 10/60
R² = 0.1667

Therefore, the statement "For SSE = 10, SST=60, Coeff. of Determination is 0.86" is false. The correct value of R² is 0.1667.

The Coefficient of Determination is an important statistical measure that helps us to determine the quality of a linear regression model. It tells us how well the model fits the data and how much of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable. In this case, we have learned that the statement "For SSE = 10, SST=60, Coeff. of Determination is 0.86" is false, and the correct value of R² is 0.1667.

To know more about Coefficient of Determination visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

To determine how many years it will take for Tom's investment to double, we can use the compound interest formula:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where:

A is the final amount (double the initial investment)

P is the principal amount (initial investment)

r is the annual interest rate (9.24% or 0.0924)

n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year (monthly, so n = 12)

t is the time in years

In this case, Tom wants his investment to double, so the final amount (A) will be $8,000 * 2 = $16,000. We can plug in these values and solve for t:

$16,000 = $8,000(1 + 0.0924/12)^(12t)

Dividing both sides by $8,000:

2 = (1 + 0.0924/12)^(12t)

Taking the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides:

ln(2) = ln[(1 + 0.0924/12)^(12t)]

Using the logarithmic property ln(a^b) = b * ln(a):

ln(2) = 12t * ln(1 + 0.0924/12)

Dividing both sides by 12 * ln(1 + 0.0924/12):

t = ln(2) / (12 * ln(1 + 0.0924/12))

Using a calculator, we find:

t ≈ 9.81

Therefore, it will take approximately 9.81 years (rounding to hundredths) for Tom's investment to double.

Learn more about approximately here:

https://brainly.com/question/31695967

#SPJ11

Given, radius of a flying disc = 7.6 cm To find: Approximate area of the disc Area of the disc is given by the formula: Area = πr²where, r is the radius of the discπ = 3.14Substituting the given value of r, we get: Area = 3.14 × (7.6)²= 3.14 × 57.76= 181.3664 square centimeters Therefore, the approximate area of the disc is 181.

3664 square centimeters. Option (C) is the correct answer. More than 250 words: We have given the radius of a flying disc as 7.6 cm and we need to find the approximate area of the disc. We can use the formula for the area of the disc which is Area = πr², where r is the radius of the disc and π is the constant value of 3.14.The value of r is given as 7.6 cm. Substituting the given value of r in the formula we get the area of the disc as follows: Area = πr²= 3.14 × (7.6)²= 3.14 × 57.76= 181.3664 square centimeters Therefore, the approximate area of the disc is 181.3664 square centimeters.

To know more about Approximate area  visit:

brainly.com/question/32721703

#SPJ11

The possible numbers of lawns the company could have mowed are 12 and 80.

A landscaper earns $30 for each lawn her company mows, but she pays $210 per day in salary to her employees. If her company made more than $150 profit from mowing lawns in a 7-day week, we can use the inequality equation below to solve for the possible numbers of lawns the company could have mowed:7(30x) - 210(7) > 150where x is the number of lawns the company mowed. The left side of the inequality represents the total income the company earned from mowing lawns, while the right side represents the total cost, which is the weekly salary plus the $150 profit we want to exceed. Simplifying the inequality, we get:210x > 5402100 > x. Since the number of lawns has to be a whole number, the possible numbers of lawns the company could have mowed are 12 and 80.

Know more about inequality  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231017

#SPJ11

The correct option is d. Neither Type I nor Type II error.  The concepts of Type I and Type II errors, and to use appropriate methods and sample sizes to minimize the risk of making such errors.

To understand why, let's first define Type I and Type II errors. Type I error is rejecting a true null hypothesis, while Type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis.

Know more about the null hypothesis

https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

The weight of the risk-free asset is 0.09 and the weight of the stock is 0.91.

The beta of the portfolio is 0.846.

a. The expected return on a portfolio that is equally invested in the two assets can be calculated as follows:

Expected return = (weight of stock x expected return of stock) + (weight of risk-free asset x expected return of risk-free asset)

Let's assume that the weight of both assets is 0.5:

Expected return = (0.5 x 10.5%) + (0.5 x 2.4%)

Expected return = 6.45% + 1.2%

Expected return = 7.65%

b. The portfolio weights can be calculated using the following formula:

Portfolio beta = (weight of stock x stock beta) + (weight of risk-free asset x risk-free beta)

Let's assume that the weight of the risk-free asset is w and the weight of the stock is (1-w). Also, we know that the portfolio beta is 0.92. Then we have:

0.92 = (1-w) x 1.14 + w x 0

0.92 = 1.14 - 1.14w

1.14w = 1.14 - 0.92

w = 0.09

c. The expected return-beta relationship can be represented by the following formula:

Expected return = risk-free rate + beta x (expected market return - risk-free rate)

Let's assume that the expected return of the portfolio is 9%. Then we have:

9% = 2.4% + beta x (10.5% - 2.4%)

6.6% = 7.8% beta

beta = 0.846

d. Similarly to part (b), the portfolio weights can be calculated using the following formula:

Portfolio beta = (weight of stock x stock beta) + (weight of risk-free asset x risk-free beta)

Let's assume that the weight of the risk-free asset is w and the weight of the stock is (1-w). Also, we know that the portfolio beta is 2.28. Then we have:

2.28 = (1-w) x 1.14 + w x 0

2.28 = 1.14 - 1.14w

1.14w = 1.14 - 2.28

w = -1

This is not a valid result since the weight of the risk-free asset cannot be negative. Therefore, there is no solution to this part.

Know more about risk-free asset here:

https://brainly.com/question/29489385

#SPJ11

The probability of the next balloon Eva inflates being yellow is 6/16, which can be simplified to 3/8.

Step 1: Count the total number of balloons

Eva has inflated a total of 2 purple, 6 yellow, 3 green, 1 blue, and 4 red balloons. Adding these quantities together, we find that she has inflated a total of 2 + 6 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 16 balloons.

Step 2: Count the number of yellow balloons

From the given data, we know that Eva has inflated 6 yellow balloons.

Step 3: Calculate the probability

To determine the probability of the next balloon being yellow, we divide the number of yellow balloons by the total number of balloons. In this case, it is 6/16.

Simplifying the fraction, we get 3/8.

Therefore, the probability that the next balloon Eva inflates will be yellow is 3/8.

Learn more about probability  Visit : brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

To sketch the probability distribution curve, we can use a normal distribution curve with mean 0.7 and standard deviation 0.01122 (calculated in part A). We can then shade the area between the z-scores -1.96 and 1.96 to represent the probability of 0.95, and label the corresponding values of p-hat. The resulting curve should be a bell-shaped curve with the peak at p-hat = 0.7, and the shaded area centered around the mean.

To sketch the probability distribution curve for the distribution of p-hat using the normal approximation without the continuity correction, we can use the following formula to standardize the distribution:

z = (p-hat - p) / sqrt(p*q/n)

where p = 0.7, q = 0.3, and n = 600.

To find the upper and lower bounds of the shaded area that represents a probability of 0.95, we need to find the z-scores that correspond to the 0.025 and 0.975 quantiles of the standard normal distribution. These are -1.96 and 1.96, respectively.

Substituting these values, we have:

-1.96 = (p-hat - 0.7) / sqrt(0.7*0.3/600)

Solving for p-hat, we get p-hat = 0.6486.

1.96 = (p-hat - 0.7) / sqrt(0.7*0.3/600)

Solving for p-hat, we get p-hat = 0.7514.

Therefore, the shaded area that represents a probability of 0.95 lies between p-hat = 0.6486 and p-hat = 0.7514.

To sketch the probability distribution curve, we can use a normal distribution curve with mean 0.7 and standard deviation 0.01122 (calculated in part A). We can then shade the area between the z-scores -1.96 and 1.96 to represent the probability of 0.95, and label the corresponding values of p-hat. The resulting curve should be a bell-shaped curve with the peak at p-hat = 0.7, and the shaded area centered around the mean.

Learn more about standard deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

We cannot determine the exact amount of money left in his account without knowing the value of x, but we can express it as Rupees (-x + 35).

Given that,Rohan had Rupees (6x + 25) in his account.If he withdrew Rupees (7x - 10), we have to find how much money is left in his account.Using the given information, we can form an equation. The equation is given by;

Money left in Rohan's account = Rupees (6x + 25) - Rupees (7x - 10)

We can simplify this expression by using the distributive property of multiplication over subtraction. That is;

Money left in Rohan's account = Rupees 6x + Rupees 25 - Rupees 7x + Rupees 10

The next step is to combine the like terms.Money left in Rohan's account = Rupees (6x - 7x) + Rupees (25 + 10)

Money left in Rohan's account = Rupees (-x) + Rupees (35)

Therefore, the money left in Rohan's account is given by Rupees (-x + 35). To answer the question, we can say that the amount of money left in Rohan's account depends on the value of x, and it is given by the expression Rupees (-x + 35). Hence, we cannot determine the exact amount of money left in his account without knowing the value of x, but we can express it as Rupees (-x + 35).

To know more about  account visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5640110

#SPJ11

11. The estimated value of the baseball card in the year of high school graduation can be calculated using the compound interest formula as $30 * (1 + 0.02)^(2025 - 2015).

12. The exponential decay model for the car's value is given by V = $16,000 * (1 - 0.08)^t, where V is the value of the car after t years.

13. Classification of the given equations: y = 18(0.16) represents exponential decay, y = 24(1.8) represents exponential growth, and y = 13(1/2) represents exponential decay.

11. To estimate the value of the baseball card in the year of high school graduation (2025), we can use the compound interest formula for continuous compounding. The formula is V = P * (1 + r/n)^(nt), where V is the future value, P is the initial principal, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years. In this case, the interest rate is 2% (or 0.02), and the card was purchased in 2015. So, the estimated value would be $30 * (1 + 0.02)^(2025 - 2015).

12. For the car's value, the situation represents exponential decay since the car depreciates by 8% each year. The exponential decay model is given by V = P * (1 - r)^t, where V is the value after t years, P is the initial value, and r is the decay rate. In this case, the initial value is $16,000, and the decay rate is 8% (or 0.08). To estimate the value of the car in 6 years, we can substitute t = 6 into the decay model and calculate the value.

13. The classification of exponential growth or decay is determined by the value of the base in the exponential equation. For y = 18(0.16), the base is less than 1, indicating exponential decay. For y = 24(1.8), the base is greater than 1, indicating exponential growth. Finally, for y = 13(1/2), the base is less than 1, indicating exponential decay.

Learn more about exponential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/14411183

#SPJ11

The statement is True.

The theorem of linear algebra that states that if a and b are invertible matrices, then the product ab is invertible is indeed true.

Proof:

Let A and B be invertible matrices.

Then there exist matrices A^-1 and B^-1 such that AA^-1 = I and BB^-1 = I, where I is the identity matrix.

We want to show that AB is invertible, that is, we want to find a matrix (AB)^-1 such that (AB)(AB)^-1 = (AB)^-1(AB) = I.

Using the associative property of matrix multiplication, we have:

(AB)(A^-1B^-1) = A(BB^-1)B^-1 = AIB^-1 = AB^-1

So (AB)(A^-1B^-1) = AB^-1.

Multiplying both sides on the left by (AB)^-1 and on the right by (A^-1B^-1)^-1 = BA, we get:

(AB)^-1 = (A^-1B^-1)^-1BA = BA^-1B^-1A^-1.

Therefore, (AB)^-1 exists, and it is equal to BA^-1B^-1A^-1.

Hence, we have shown that if A and B are invertible matrices, then AB is invertible.

To know more about linear algebra refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1952076

#SPJ11

The set on which h(x,y) is such that:

y ≤ (22/7)x - 7 and [tex]9x^2 + 16y^2 + 38xy \geq 231[/tex]

First, we can compute f(x,y) = 7x + 4y - 28, and then substitute into g(t) to get:

g(f(x,y)) = f(x,y) + Vf(x,y) = (7x + 4y - 28) + V(7x + 4y - 28)

Expanding the expression inside the square root, we get:

[tex]g(f(x,y)) = (8x + 5y - 28) + V(57x^2 + 56xy + 16y^2 - 784)[/tex]

To find the set on which h(x,y) is continuous, we need to determine the set on which the expression inside the square root is non-negative. This set is defined by the inequality:

[tex]57x^2 + 56xy + 16y^2 - 784 \geq 0[/tex]

To simplify this expression, we can diagonalize the quadratic form using a change of variables. We set:

u = x + 2y

v = x - y

Then, the inequality becomes:

[tex]9u^2 + 7v^2 - 784 \geq 0[/tex]

This is the inequality of an elliptical region in the u-v plane centered at the origin. Its boundary is given by the equation:

[tex]9u^2 + 7v^2 - 784 = 0[/tex]

Therefore, the set on which h(x,y) is continuous is the set of points (x,y) such that:

y ≤ (22/7)x - 7

and

[tex]9(x+2y)^2 + 7(x-y)^2 \geq 784[/tex]

or equivalently:

[tex]9x^2 + 16y^2 + 38xy \geq 231[/tex]

This is the region below the line y = (22/7)x - 7, outside of the elliptical region defined by [tex]9x^2 + 16y^2 + 38xy = 231.[/tex]

Learn more about functions and continuity

brainly.com/question/21447009

#SPJ11

The equation y = 5x/2 represents a proportional relationship with a constant of 5/2.

A proportional relationship is a type of relationship between two quantities in which they maintain a constant ratio to each other.

The equation that defines the proportional relationship is given as follows:

y = kx.

In which k is the constant of proportionality, representing the increase in the output variable y when the constant variable x is increased by one.

The equation for this problem is given as follows:

y = 5x/2.

Which is a proportional relationship, as it has an intercept of zero, along with a constant of k = 5/2.

More can be learned about proportional relationships at https://brainly.com/question/7723640

#SPJ1

To determine if h is normal in s3, we need to check if g⁻¹hg is also in h for all g in s3. s3 is the symmetric group of order 3, which has 6 elements: {(1), (12), (13), (23), (123), (132)}.

We can start by checking the conjugates of (1) in s3:
(12)⁻¹(1)(12) = (1) and (13)⁻¹(1)(13) = (1), both of which are in h.
Next, we check the conjugates of (12) in s3:
(13)⁻¹(12)(13) = (23), which is not in h. Therefore, h is not normal in s3.
In general, for a subgroup of a group to be normal, all conjugates of its elements must be in the subgroup. Since we found a conjugate of (12) that is not in h, h is not normal in s3.

Learn more about conjugates here:

https://brainly.com/question/28175934

#SPJ11

The variance of the distribution of the data set is 0.596.

To find the variance of a discrete probability distribution, we use the formula:

Var(X) = ∑[x - E(X)]² p(x),

where E(X) is the expected value of X, which is equal to the mean of the distribution, and p(x) is the probability of X taking the value x.

We can first find the expected value of X:

E(X) = ∑x . p(x)

= 0 (0.130) + 1 (0.346) + 2 (0.346) + 3 (0.154) + 4 (0.024)

= 1.596

Next, we can calculate the variance:

Var(X) = ∑[x - E(X)]² × p(x)

= (0 - 1.54)² × 0.130 + (1 - 1.54)² ×  0.346 + (2 - 1.54)² × 0.346 + (3 - 1.54)² ×  0.154 + (4 - 1.54)² × 0.024

= 0.95592

Therefore, the variance of the distribution is 0.96.

To learn more about the variance;

https://brainly.com/question/16686665

#SPJ1

One regular price ticket to the town carnival costs $12.75 using equation.

Let's assume the cost of one regular price ticket is represented by the variable 'x'.

With the coupon for $20 off, the total bill for your group to get into the carnival is $31. Since there are four people in your group, the equation representing the total bill is:

4x - $20 = $31

To solve for 'x', we'll isolate it on one side of the equation:

4x = $31 + $20

4x = $51

Now, divide both sides of the equation by 4 to solve for 'x':

x = $51 / 4

x = $12.75

Therefore, one regular price ticket costs $12.75.

To know more about equation,

https://brainly.com/question/27911641

#SPJ11

The solution is:  the final price of the shirt is: 26.84

Here, we have,

given that,

Original price of the shirt is  $28

Discount is 10%

Tax 6.5%

Take the original price and subtract the discount

28 - 10% * 28

=28 - 2.8

= 25.2

Now add in the tax

25.2+.065*25.2

=25.2+1.638

=26.838

Rounding to the nearest cent

26.84

Hence, The solution is: the final price of the shirt is: 26.84

Learn more about tax here:

brainly.com/question/13324776

#SPJ1

The Maclaurin series expansion for sin(x) is: sin(x) = x - /3! + [tex]x^5[/tex]/5! - [tex]x^7[/tex]/7!

To approximate sin(1/2) with a maximum error of 0.01, we need to find the smallest value of n for which the absolute value of the remainder term Rn(1/2) is less than 0.01.

The remainder term is given by:

Rn(x) = sin(x) - Pn(x)

where Pn(x) is the nth-degree Maclaurin polynomial for sin(x), given by:

Pn(x) = x - [tex]x^3[/tex]/3! + [tex]x^5[/tex]/5! - ... + (-1)(n+1) * x(2n-1)/(2n-1)!

Since we want the maximum error to be less than 0.01, we have:

|Rn(1/2)| ≤ 0.01

We can use the Lagrange form of the remainder term to get an upper bound for Rn(1/2):

|Rn(1/2)| ≤ |f(n+1)(c)| * |(1/2)(n+1)/(n+1)!|

where f(n+1)(c) is the (n+1)th derivative of sin(x) evaluated at some value c between 0 and 1/2.

For sin(x), the (n+1)th derivative is given by:

f^(n+1)(x) = sin(x + (n+1)π/2)

Since the derivative of sin(x) has a maximum absolute value of 1, we can bound |f(n+1)(c)| by 1:

|Rn(1/2)| ≤ (1) * |(1/2)(n+1)/(n+1)!|

We want to find the smallest value of n for which this upper bound is less than 0.01:

|(1/2)(n+1)/(n+1)!| < 0.01

We can use a table of values or a graphing calculator to find that the smallest value of n that satisfies this inequality is n = 3.

Therefore, the third-degree Maclaurin polynomial for sin(x) is:

P3(x) = x - [tex]x^3[/tex]/3! + [tex]x^5[/tex]/5!

and the approximation for sin(1/2) with a maximum error of 0.01 is:

sin(1/2) ≈ P3(1/2) = 1/2 - (1/2)/3! + (1/2)/5!

This approximation has an error given by:

|R3(1/2)| ≤ |f^(4)(c)| * |(1/2)/4!| ≤ (1) * |(1/2)/4!| ≈ 0.0024

which is less than 0.01, as required.

For similar question on Maclaurin series:

https://brainly.com/question/31745715

#SPJ11

The height of the scanner antenna is approximately 10.8 meters.

The distance from the point 24.0m away from the center of the house to the base of the antenna.

To do this, we can use the tangent function:
tan(18 degrees 10 minutes) = h / d
Where "d" is the distance from the point to the base of the antenna.
We can rearrange this equation to solve for "d":
d = h / tan(18 degrees 10 minutes)
Next, we need to find the distance from the point to the top of the antenna.

We can again use the tangent function:
tan(27 degrees 10 minutes) = (h + x) / d
Where "x" is the height of the bottom of the antenna above the ground.
We can rearrange this equation to solve for "x":
x = d * tan(27 degrees 10 minutes) - h
Now we can substitute the expression we found for "d" into the equation for "x":
x = (h / tan(18 degrees 10 minutes)) * tan(27 degrees 10 minutes) - h
We can simplify this equation:
x = h * (tan(27 degrees 10 minutes) / tan(18 degrees 10 minutes) - 1)
Finally, we know that the distance from the point to the top of the antenna is 24.0m, so:
24.0m = d + x
Substituting in the expressions we found for "d" and "x":
24.0m = h / tan(18 degrees 10 minutes) + h * (tan(27 degrees 10 minutes) / tan(18 degrees 10 minutes) - 1)
We can simplify this equation and solve for "h":
h = 24.0m / (tan(27 degrees 10 minutes) / tan(18 degrees 10 minutes) + 1)
Plugging this into a calculator or using trigonometric tables, we find that:
h ≈ 10.8 meters

For similar question on tangent function:

https://brainly.com/question/1533811

#SPJ11

Question

A scanner antenna is on top of the center of a house. The angle of elevation from a point 24.0m from the center of the house to the top of the antenna is 27degrees and 10' and the angle of the elevation to the bottom of the antenna is 18degrees, and 10". Find the height of the antenna.

The rectangular equation given is x + 7√(x² + y²) = x² + y², which can be converted to the polar equation r = 7 - cos(θ).

Using the trigonometric identity cos(θ) = x/r, we can write:

r = 7 - x/r

Multiplying both sides by r, we get:

r² = 7r - x

Using the polar to rectangular conversion formulae x = r cos(θ) and y = r sin(θ), we can express r in terms of x and y:

r² = x² + y²

Substituting r² = x² + y² into the previous equation, we get:

x² + y² = 7r - x

Substituting cos(θ) = x/r, we can write:

x = r cos(θ)

Substituting this into the previous equation, we get:

x² + y² = 7r - r cos(θ)

Simplifying, we get:

x² + y² = 7√(x² + y²) - x

Rearranging, we get:

x + 7√(x² + y²) = x² + y²

This is the rectangular form of the polar equation r = 7 - cos(θ).

Learn more about trigonometric

brainly.com/question/14746686

#SPJ11

The measure of angle C in triangle CDE is 9 degrees

To find the measure of angle C in triangle CDE, we need to solve the given equation.

The measure of angle C is (x - 4) degrees.

In the triangle, the sum of the measures of all three angles must be equal to 180 degrees (since it is a triangle). So we can set up the equation:

(x - 4) + (11x - 11) + (x + 13) = 180

Simplifying the equation:

2x - 4 + 11x - 11 + x + 13 = 180

14x - 2 = 180

14x = 182

x = 13

Substituting x = 13 into the equation for angle C:

(x - 4) = (13 - 4) = 9

Therefore, the measure of angle C is 9 degrees.

In summary, the measure of angle C in triangle CDE is 9 degrees. To find this value, we set up an equation using the sum of the measures of all three angles in a triangle, and then solved for x by simplifying and rearranging the equation. Substituting the value of x into the equation for angle C gives us the final answer of 9 degrees.

Learn more about angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/31818999

#SPJ11

Mrs. Falkener has written a company report every 3 months for the last 6 years, resulting in a total of 24 reports. Among these reports, 2/3 of them show the company earning more money than it spends. Therefore, 1/3 of the reports, or 8 reports, show the company spending more money than it earns.

In 6 years, there are 12 quarters since there are 4 quarters in a year. Mrs. Falkener has written a company report every 3 months, which means there are 12 * 3 = 36 periods in total. However, since each report covers a 3-month period, the total number of reports is 36 / 3 = 12.

Given that 2/3 of the reports show the company earning more money than it spends, we can calculate the number of reports showing the company spending more money than it earns. Since 2/3 of the reports represent the earnings being greater, the remaining 1/3 represents the expenses being greater. Therefore, 1/3 of 12 reports is 12 * (1/3) = 4 reports.

In conclusion, among the 24 company reports written by Mrs. Falkener in the last 6 years, 2/3 of them, or 16 reports, show the company earning more money than it spends. The remaining 1/3, or 8 reports, show the company spending more money than it earns.

Learn more about  earning here :

https://brainly.com/question/28045589

#SPJ11

We have shown that [tex]cov(x_1, x_1) = v(x_1) = \sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 ).[/tex]

To show that [tex]cov(x_1, x_1) = v(x_1) = \sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 )[/tex], we need to first understand what each of these terms means:

[tex]cov(x_1, x_1)[/tex] represents the covariance between the random variable x_1 and itself. In other words, it is the measure of how two instances of x_1 vary together.

v(x_1) represents the variance of x_1. This is a measure of how much x_1 varies on its own, regardless of any other random variable.

[tex]\sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 )[/tex]represents the second moment of x_1. This is the expected value of the squared deviation of x_1 from its mean.

Now, let's show that [tex]cov(x_1, x_1) = v(x_1) = \sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 ):[/tex]

We know that the covariance between any random variable and itself is simply the variance of that random variable. Mathematically, we can write:

[tex]cov(x_1, x_1) = E[(x_1 - E[x_1])^2] - E[x_1 - E[x_1]]^2\\ = E[(x_1 - E[x_1])^2]\\ = v(x_1)[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]cov(x_1, x_1) = v(x_1).[/tex]

Similarly, we know that the variance of a random variable can be expressed as the second moment of that random variable minus the square of its mean. Mathematically, we can write:

[tex]v(x_1) = E[(x_1 - E[x_1])^2]\\ = E[x_1^2 - 2\times x_1\times E[x_1] + E[x_1]^2]\\ = E[x_1^2] - 2\times E[x_1]\times E[x_1] + E[x_1]^2\\ = E[x_1^2] - E[x_1]^2\\ = \sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 )[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]v(x_1) = \sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 ).[/tex]

Thus, we have shown that [tex]cov(x_1, x_1) = v(x_1) = \sigma^2_1(x 1 ,x 1 ).[/tex]

for such more question on  covariance

https://brainly.com/question/25573309

#SPJ11

the answer would be 0.51

Answer: 5.1

Step-by-step explanation: 100 x 5 + 1 = 510/100

510 divided by 100 = 5.1

Charlie starts with $984.20 in his savings account and uses $381.80 to buy his plane ticket. This leaves him with:

$984.20 - $381.80 = $602.40

Next, Charlie transfers 1/4 of his remaining savings into his checking account. To do this, he needs to find 1/4 of $602.40:

(1/4) x $602.40 = $150.60

Charlie transfers $150.60 from his savings account to his checking account, leaving him with:

$602.40 - $150.60 = $451.80

Therefore, Charlie has $451.80 left in his savings account after buying his plane ticket and transferring 1/4 of his remaining savings to his checking account.

To learn more about savings click here : brainly.com/question/7965246

#SPJ11

The service level is 6.6%, indicating the percentage of demand that can be met from current stock.

To calculate the service level, we need to use the service level formula, which is:

Service Level = (Demand During Lead Time + Safety Stock) / Average Demand

In this case, we are given the historical average demand, which is 6105 units with a standard deviation of 243. We are also given that the company currently has 6647 units in stock. We need to calculate the demand during the lead time and the safety stock.

Assuming the lead time is zero (i.e., we receive inventory instantly), the demand during the lead time is also zero. Therefore, the demand during lead time + safety stock = safety stock.

To calculate the safety stock, we can use the following formula:

Safety Stock = Z * Standard Deviation * Square Root of Lead Time

Where Z is the number of standard deviations from the mean that corresponds to the desired service level. For example, for a service level of 95%, Z is 1.645 (assuming a normal distribution).

Assuming a lead time of one day and a desired service level of 95%, we can calculate the safety stock as follows:

Safety Stock = 1.645 * 243 * sqrt(1) = 402.76

Substituting the values into the service level formula, we get:

Service Level = (0 + 402.76) / 6105 = 0.066 or 6.6%

Therefore, the service level is 6.6%.

Learn more about service level

brainly.com/question/31814019

#SPJ11

The MAD is approximately 15.4. The MAD tells us that on average, the forecast errors are about 15.4 units away from the mean forecast error.

The Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) is a measure of the variability of a set of data. It represents the average distance of the data points from the mean of the data set.

To calculate the MAD, we need to first find the mean of the forecast errors. The mean is the sum of the forecast errors divided by the number of errors:

Mean = (-22 - 10 + 15)/3 = -4/3

Next, we find the absolute deviation of each error by subtracting the mean from each error and taking the absolute value:

|-22 - (-4/3)| = 64/3

|-10 - (-4/3)| = 26/3

|15 - (-4/3)| = 49/3

Then, we find the average of these absolute deviations to get the MAD:

MAD = (64/3 + 26/3 + 49/3)/3 = 139/9

Therefore, the MAD is approximately 15.4. The MAD tells us that on average, the forecast errors are about 15.4 units away from the mean forecast error.

Learn more about forecast error here:

https://brainly.com/question/23983032

#SPJ11