6 + x = 6 help please

Answer:

52 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Distance driven = 364 miles

Total time taken = 7 hours

Required:

Average speed of Chad

SOLUTION:

Average speed is the number of miles covered per hour.

Thus:

Average speed = distance covered / time taken to cover the distance

Average speed = [tex] \frac{364}{7} = 52 mph [/tex].

Chad's average speed is 52 miles per hour.

Answer:

The answer is

[tex] \huge y = - x - 6[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

To find an equation of a line when given the slope and a point we use the formula

[tex]y - y_1 = m(x - x_1)[/tex]

From the question we have

[tex]y + 7 = - 1(x - 1) \\ y + 7 = - x + 1 \\ y = - x + 1 - 7[/tex]

We have the final answer as

[tex]y = - x - 6[/tex]

Hope this helps you

Answer:

a) 0.0977

b) 0.3507

c) No it is not unusual for a broiler to weigh more than 1610 grams

Step-by-step explanation:

Mean = 1395 grams

Standard deviation = 200 grams. Use the TI-84 Plus calculator to answer the following.

We solve using z score formula

z = (x-μ)/σ, where x is the raw score, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation.

(a) What proportion of broilers weigh between 1160 and 1250 grams?

For x = 1160

z = 1160 - 1395/300

= -0.78333

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x = 1160) = 0.21672

For x = 1250 grams

z = 1250 - 1395/300

z = -0.48333

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x = 1250) = 0.31443

The proportion of broilers weigh between 1160 and 1250 grams is

0.31443 - 0.21672

= 0.09771

≈ 0.0977

(b) What is the probability that a randomly selected broiler weighs more than 1510 grams?

For x = 1510

= z = 1510 - 1395/300

z = 0.38333

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x<1510) = 0.64926

P(x>1510) = 1 - P(x<1510) = 0.35074

Approximately = 0.3507

(c) Is it unusual for a broiler to weigh more than 1610 grams?

For x = 1610

= z = 1610 - 1395/300

z = 0.71667

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x<1610) = 0.76321

P(x>1610) = 1 - P(x<1610) = 0.23679

No it is not unusual for a broiler to weigh more than 1610 grams

Answer:

12.9x - 9

your welcome

Answer:

The correct answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=5

Step-by-step explanation:

10x + 3 = 9 x -2

10•x + 3 = 9•x -2

Answer:

4 - 5y - 2y + 16

like terms

20 - 7y

Answer:

4-5y)-(2y-16)=0

Step-by-step explanation:We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

(-5y+4)-(2y-16)=0

We get rid of parentheses

-5y-2y+4+16=0

We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

-7y+20=0

We move all terms containing y to the left, all other terms to the right

-7y=-20

y=-20/-7

y=2+6/7

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

156/12

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 1.713

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

A researcher wants to test if the mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is

different from $110,000

Mean of the Population  μ = $110,000

Sample size 'n' = 53

Mean of the sample x⁻ = $114,000.

standard deviation of the Population = $17,000,

Level of significance = 0.01

Null hypothesis :

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

H₀:  x⁻ =  μ

Alternative Hypothesis :  x⁻ ≠  μ

Step(ii):-

Test statistic

                 [tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

                 [tex]Z = \frac{114000-110000}{\frac{17000}{\sqrt{53} } }[/tex]

                Z =  1.7130

Tabulated value Z = 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Answer:

Hey man! Just saw this and that answer is not correct! I see how you were thinking tho. Here is how it should be graphed.

Step-by-step explanation:

I have marked the correct dots in green.

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a line with points; (2, 5) (3, 8).

1. Find the slope of the given line

The formula for finding the slope is:

[tex]\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2} - x_{1}}[/tex]

Substitute in the values;

[tex]x_{1} = 2\\y_{1} = 5\\x_{2} = 3\\y_{2} = 8[/tex]

[tex]\frac{8-5}{3-2}[/tex]

simplify;

[tex]\frac{3}{1}[/tex]

= 3

2. Find the slope of the parallel line;

Remember, when two lines are parallel, they run alongside each other, of infinitely long, but they never touch. Hence two parallel lines have the same slope. Therefore, the slope of a line that is parallel to the given one will also have the same slope as the given one, which is 3.

Answer:

y = -2x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Equation of -x +2y =4

Point of (-2,1)

-x + 2y = 4

y = x/2 + 2 or y = 1/2x + 2

Which means the equation's slope is m = 1/2.

The slope of the perpendicular line is negative inverse which is m = -2.

Now we have an equation of y = -2x + a.

Use (-2, 1) to find a:

1 = (-2)(-2) + a

a = -3

y = - 2x - 3

The area of a rectangle is the product of length and width thus the area will be 1358 square meters.

A rectangle is a geometrical figure in which opposite sides are equal.

The angle between any two consecutive sides will be 90 degrees.

The perimeter of the rectangle = 2( length + width).

It is known that,

Area of rectangle = length × width.

Area = 97 x 14 = 1358 sqare meters

Hence "The area of a rectangle is the product of length and width thus the area will be 1358 square meters".

For more about rectangles,

https://brainly.com/question/15019502

#SPJ5

Answer:

a in table → b on number line

b in table → c on number line

c in table → a on number line

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, we see the points are square roots. A square root of a number is a value, that when multiplied by itself, gives the number. For example, 4 × 4 = 16, so the square root of 16 is 4.

We can apply this logic easily by simplifying the square root, or multiplying integers with each other (aka "squaring" the integers) and seeing which result is closest to the value inside the square root.

Simplifying the square root won't help here, if we don't know basic values such as √3 or √2. So, we can just multiply an integer with itself and see if that value is closer to the value inside the square root.

For point a, we see the number inside the root is 27. We can start multiplying:

25 is the closest value to 27 here. So, we know the point is somewhere around 5, and since 27 is slightly larger than 25, the point is slightly larger than 5. So, point a in the table is most likely point b on the number line.

For point b, we see the number inside the root is 32. We can start multiplying:

36 is the closest value to 32 here. So, we know the point is somewhere around 6, and since 32 is smaller than 36, the point is lesser than 6. So, point b in the table is most likely point c on the number line.

For point c, we see the number inside the root is 16. We can start multiplying:

16 is right on the dot! That means that the square root of 16 is 4, which leaves us with point a on the number line.

Answer:

it's 2

Step-by-step explanation:

a= -3/4

b=0

c=2

Answer:

b = 4,

m = 4/3,

y = 4x/3 + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see the line intercepts the x-axis in (-3,0) and the y-axis in (0,4). So, using the fact that the line equation in the slope-intercept form is:

[tex]y = mx+b[/tex]

We can substitute the points we know:

→ (0,4):

[tex]y = mx+b\\\\4 = m\cdot0+b\\\\4 = 0+b\\\\\boxed{b=4}[/tex]

→ (-3,0):

[tex]y = mx+b\\\\0 = -3m + 4\\\\3m = 4\\\\\boxed{m = \dfrac{4}{3}}[/tex]

So, the line equation in form requested is:

[tex]\boxed{y=\dfrac{4}{3}x+4}[/tex]

Answer:

401

Step-by-step explanation:

301 + 73 + 27

Using the correct order of operations, you would start by adding 301 to 73. Then you'd add 27 to that sum.

Using the associative property of addition, you change the grouping to add 73 and 27 first since that equals 100, and it's easy to add 100 to 301 mentally.

301 + 73 + 27 =

= 301 + (73 + 27)

= 301 + 100

= 410

Answer:

|0.254 ≤ p ≤ 0.286|

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

In a made up poll :

Proportion of people who like dark chocolate than milk chocolate (p) = 27%

Margin of Error = 1.6%

Hence,

p ± margin of error

27% ± 1.6%

(27 - 1.6)% ; (27 + 1.6)%

25.4% ; 28.6%

0.254 ; 0.286

Therefore ;

Lower bound = 0.254

Upper bound = 0.286

Expressing p as an absolute value Inequality ;

|0.254 ≤ p ≤ 0.286|

Answer:

the factors of prime numbers are only 1 and itself

Answer:

A factor number can only be divided by itself or 1 meaning it cant be a factor anything more than that.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A negative number, a negative integer, a negative multiple of 3, etc.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

integer

???????

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure

Answer:

Banzhaf power index for each voter

Voter A = 3/4 = 0.75

Voter B = 0/4 = impossible

Voter C = 1/4 = 0.25

Step-by-step explanation:

using the Banzhaf power index for each voter

{76: 52, 39, 31, 25, 9}

Voter A = 52

Voter B = 39

Voter C = 31

Voter D = 25

Voter E = 9

lets calculate the Banzhaf power index for Voters A to C

A B = 52 + 39 ≥ 76

B C = 39 + 31 ≤ 76

A C = 52 + 31 ≥ 76

A B C = 52 + 39 + 31 ≥ 76

Lets consider critical

A B  : A is critical  because without A the sum < 76

B C :  B is not critical because without B the sum is still < 76

A C : C is critical because without C the sum < 76

A B C : A is critical as B + C < 76

           B is not critical as A + C ≥ 76

           C is not critical as A + B ≥ 76

Number of times critical : For A = 3, For B = 0 , For C = 1

Banzhaf power index for each voter

Voter A = 3/4 = 0.75

Voter B = 0/4 = impossible

Voter C = 1/4 = 0.25

Answer:

17(n+31)=300

Step-by-step explanation:

17 times the sum of a number, n and 31 is 17(n+31)

and then set that equal to 300

Answer:

Linear graph

y = 3x + 21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4.

Step-by-step explanation:

(x^2 + 7x - 9) + (3x^2 - 2x) + (x^2 + 7x - 9) + (3x^2 - 2x)

x^2 + 7x - 9 + 3x^2 - 2x + x^2 + 7x - 9 + 3x^2 - 2x

Rearranging order:

3x^2 + 3x^2 + x^2 + x^2 + 7x + 7x - 2x - 2x - 9 - 9

Combine like terms

8x^2 + 10x - 18