Answer:
True
Explanation:
A compass rose is a diagram that shows the directions of north, south, east, and west on a map or chart. It is usually represented as a circular design with arrows pointing towards the four cardinal directions, and sometimes includes additional intermediate directions such as northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest. The compass rose is a common feature on maps and charts used for navigation, as it helps to orient the user and provide a reference for determining the direction of travel. Therefore, the statement "A compass rose indicates the directions north, south, east, and west" is true.
Answer: TRUE
Explanation:
What is a characteristic that pulled the Greek city-states together?
national anthem
poetry of Homer
food growth and preparation
Answer:
Poetry of Homer
Explanation:
Homer was a Greek poet who lived in the 8th century BCE and is known for his epic poems, "The Iliad" and "The Odyssey". These works were incredibly influential in Greek culture and helped to unite the various city-states. The events and themes in Homer's poetry provided a shared identity and cultural touchstone for the Greeks, even as they engaged in constant warfare with each other.
Which was a failed attempt at world peace organized by the U.S. during the 1920's?
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
Two events in 1920 kicked off the era of change that Americans experienced. On August 18 the Nineteenth Amendment was passed, giving women the right to vote. And on November 2 the first commercially licensed radio broadcast was heard, from KDKA in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
ANSWER ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER
What challenge did soldiers face on the eastern front?
A. Supply lines were completely shut down.
B. The summer heat was intense and slowed progress.
C. Underdeveloped roads slowed troop movements.
D. Most major battles were fought on the eastern front.
Answer:
A and B
Explanation:
pls mrk me brainliest
Describe five of the geometric figures that von Petzinger found in the European caves.
Why is the repetition of images over time and in different places important?
What are the challenges of studying and understanding these early forms of communication?
Answer:Triangle: This geometric figure is one of the most commonly found shapes in the European caves. It is often depicted in a variety of sizes and orientations.
Cross: Another common shape found in the European caves is the cross. It can be depicted in many different styles, including simple and complex designs.
Circle: The circle is also a frequently found shape in the cave art. It can be depicted as a simple outline or as a complex pattern.
Zigzag: The zigzag shape is often found in the cave art of northern Spain. It is typically depicted as a series of sharp angles that create a jagged line.
Diamond: The diamond shape is also common in the European caves. It is often depicted in a variety of sizes and orientations, and sometimes features additional geometric patterns within the shape.
The repetition of images over time and in different places is important because it suggests that these geometric figures were meaningful and significant to the people who created them. It may indicate the existence of a shared symbolic language or system of communication that was used across different communities and time periods.
The challenges of studying and understanding these early forms of communication include a lack of contextual information, such as written records or cultural artifacts, that could help to explain the meanings behind these images. The fact that these images were created thousands of years ago also makes it difficult to know exactly what the creators were trying to convey, as their worldview and cultural context may have been vastly different from our own. Finally, interpreting the meanings of these images requires a certain level of subjectivity and speculation, as we can never know for certain what the original intent behind them was.
Explanation:
why were the equal rights for all Americans still not fully enforced after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? List the barriers
Answer:
Despite the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, equal rights for all Americans were still not fully enforced due to several barriers, including:
Resistance from state and local governments: Even though the federal government passed the Civil Rights Act, many state and local governments were resistant to change and slowed to implement of new policies.
Discrimination in housing: Although the Civil Rights Act banned discrimination in housing, many landlords and real estate agents continued discriminating against minorities, especially in areas with high racial tension.
Workplace discrimination: The Civil Rights Act made it illegal to discriminate against employees based on their race, gender, or religion, but many employers continued to engage in discriminatory hiring and promotion practices.
Limited enforcement: Despite legal protections, many minority groups lacked the resources to challenge discrimination in the courts, and some government agencies failed to enforce the law vigorously.
Deep-seated prejudice and racism: Even though the Civil Rights Act sought to change laws, it did not necessarily change people's attitudes. Many Americans continued to hold deep-seated prejudices and racist beliefs, making it difficult to accept equal rights for all.
Explanation:
during the han dynasty people thought a poem should be meaningful to later
generations. How does this poem meet that goal?
Han poetry has a strong folk ballad tradition influence, which is seen in the poetry collections Nineteen Old Poems and the yuefu of the Music Bureau.
Who holds a position of significance in the Han dynasty?The peasant rebel leader Liu Bang, also known as Emperor Gao or Gaodi (reigned from 202 to 195 BC), is credited with founding the Han empire. Emperor Wu, also known as Wudi, ruled for 54 years, making him the dynasty's longest-reigning emperor (141–87 BC).The three-tiered social structure in Han China was unique. The top of this hierarchy was made up of aristocrats and officials, then skilled people like farmers and ironworkers. Unskilled labourers like slaves and servants made up the lowest social class. In every hierarchy, the emperor was at the top.The People's Republic of China, where they make up roughly 92% of the population, is home to the majority of the estimated 1.4 billion Han Chinese people that live in the world.To learn more about Han dynasty, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/20903726
Which rivers flowed through the area disputed by the Ottomans and Safavids?
Answer:
The area disputed by the Ottomans and Safavids is the region of Mesopotamia, and the two rivers that flow through it are the Tigris and Euphrates.
Explanation:
Read the quote about government in Iran.
“We thought that Mr. Khatami’s victory was a victory for us as well. The election of a more democratic government seemed to be a bright new beginning . . . But within less than a year of the election, the journalists, reformists, and intellectuals began to be persecuted by hard-liners in the judiciary and Intelligence Ministry . . .”
—Camella Entekhabifard, “Tehran’s Eternal Youth,” New York Times
Based on this quote, how does Camella Entekhabifard feel about the Iranian government?
A.
She supports reforms and was disappointed when they did not come about.
B.
She supports hard-liners who want the Supreme Leader to have more power.
C.
She believes reformers should be silenced to keep Iran's government strong.
D.
She supports a more democratic government but opposes freedom of speech.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP!!!
Camella Entekhabifard feel about the Iranian government is A. She supports reforms and was disappointed when they did not come about.
Camella Entekhabifard is disappointed with the Iranian government. She thought that the election of a more democratic government would be a positive change, but the persecution of journalists, reformists, and intellectuals by hard-liners in the judiciary and Intelligence Ministry made her lose hope in the government's ability to bring about meaningful reforms.
An animal is sheltered with only dog and cats and has a radius of cats to dogs that is 9 to 7
If the shelter οnly hοuses dοgs and cats, the ratiο οf dοgs tο tοtal animals is 7:16. Hence, οptiοn C is cοrrect.
What is ratiο?A ratiο in mathematics demοnstrates hοw many times οne number is present in anοther. Fοr instance, if a bοwl οf fruit cοntains eight οranges and six lemοns, the ratiο οf οranges tο lemοns is eight tο six (that is, 8:6, which is equivalent tο the ratiο 4:3). The ratiο οf οranges tο the tοtal amοunt οf fruit is 8:14, and the ratiο οf lemοns tο οranges is 6:8 (οr 3:4). (οr 4:7).
A ratiο can have any number οf quantities, such as cοunts οf peοple οr things οr measurements οf length, weight, time, etc. Bοth numbers must be pοsitive in mοst situatiοns.
Ratiο οf cats tο dοg = 9:7
Tοtal number οf cats = 9x
Tοtal number οf dοgs = 7x
Tοtal animals = 9x + 7x = 16x
Ratio of dogs to total animal = [tex]\dfrac{7x}{16x}[/tex]
Ratio of dogs to total animal = [tex]\dfrac{7}{16}[/tex]
= 7:16
Thus, If the shelter only houses dogs and cats, the ratio of dogs to total animals is 7:16. Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about ratio
https://brainly.com/question/13419413
#SPJ1
Complete question:
An animal shelter has a ratio of cats to dogs that is 9:7. If the shelter only houses dogs and cats, what is the ratio of dogs to total animals?
A. 7:9
B. 7:2
C. 7:16
D. 9:16
Was the camp completed before the Japanese prisoners arrived
Answer:
No, they were not completed before Japanese prisoners arrived.
Explanation:
The internment camps were hastily erected, and the government was in a rush to quickly relocate Japanese-Americans during World War II in fear of national security after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, hence the camps were not completed before the arrival of the forced internees.
Why did Amos become a prophet?
Select one:
a.
He progressively grew more and more frustrated and had to say something about the problems in Israel.
b.
His family and friends encouraged him to use his voice.
c.
The leaders of Samaria wanted his unique perspective.
d.
All of the above.
Answer:
the answer is d because it all correct
Please please please answer soon I'm timed 39 minutes I'll give brainly!!!! What was one reason European countries wanted to establish colonies in Africa? Africa had limited resources, so Europe could sell raw materials in Africa. Africa had limited trade routes, so Europe could develop new routes in Africa. Africa had large populations that European countries could employ as laborers. Africa was filled with dense forests that would discourage other countries from settling.
One reason European countries wanted to establish colonies in Africa was that Africa had abundant natural resources such as gold, diamonds, copper, rubber, ivory, and other valuable minerals that European countries could extract and exploit for their own economic gain
Reason European countries wanted to establish colonies in AfricaThe fact that Africa was rich in natural riches, including gold, diamonds, copper, rubber, ivory, and other valuable minerals, which European nations could take and use for their own economic advantage, was one of the reasons why they desired to establish colonies there.
The exploitation of these resources was viewed as a chance for European nations to gain more power and wealth.
Moreover, colonies in Africa offered European nations captive markets to sell their manufactured goods, which drove them to seek out additional markets for their products.
Learn more about colonies at:https://brainly.com/question/2094573
#SPJ1
This assignment requires you to use themes from the readings and debate critically the meaning, scope, and/or practices. Critique does not simply mean your opinion; it must be well-reasoned and backed up it has to be ( 3 to 4 pages long) by reconstructing the arguments and ideas from the readings. In these shorter essays, you are expected to make a strong argument about a specific week's readings, and to support this argument with theoretical and empirical evidence. External sources are not required for the short papers.
You must include thesis statement, 4 body paragraphs and other reading and a conclusion to wrap up your debate
Question: Define settler colonialism. In making your definition, discuss and highlight what you think is the most
I’ll give more brainly points
Explanation:
Settler colonialism is a type of colonialism where colonizers establish permanent and self-governing communities in a foreign land, usually with the intent to displace or eliminate the indigenous population. This type of colonialism involves the acquisition of land, the exploitation of natural resources, and the imposition of cultural and political domination on the indigenous population. The settler colonial project involves a form of occupation that seeks to erase the pre-existing society and replace it with a new society based on the settlers’ own culture and values.
In settler colonialism, the land is the central resource, and the colonizers seek to extract resources from it for their own benefit. The indigenous population is viewed as an obstacle to this project, and their removal or elimination is often seen as necessary for the success of the settler colonial project. This type of colonialism is different from other forms of colonialism, such as extractive colonialism or trading colonialism, which do not involve the establishment of permanent settlements.
One of the most significant impacts of settler colonialism is the erasure of indigenous culture and knowledge. As the settlers seek to establish their own culture and values, they often suppress or destroy the culture and knowledge of the indigenous population. This erasure can have long-lasting impacts on the indigenous population, including loss of identity and a sense of displacement.
Another impact of settler colonialism is the dispossession of indigenous land and resources. The settlers often acquire land through violent means, including wars and treaties, and use it for their own purposes, such as agriculture, mining, or urban development. This dispossession can lead to the loss of traditional livelihoods and subsistence practices, as well as the degradation of the environment.
Settler colonialism also involves the imposition of colonial structures of governance and law on the indigenous population. The settlers often create their own systems of governance and law that prioritize their own interests and values over those of the indigenous population. This can lead to the marginalization and exclusion of the indigenous population from political and economic decision-making processes.
In conclusion, settler colonialism is a type of colonialism that involves the establishment of permanent and self-governing settlements in a foreign land, with the intent to displace or eliminate the indigenous population. This type of colonialism has significant impacts on the indigenous population, including the erasure of culture and knowledge, dispossession of land and resources, and imposition of colonial governance and law. It is important to understand and critique the impacts of settler colonialism in order to work towards decolonization and the recognition of indigenous rights and sovereignty.
Explain the different and similar roles of government regulation of technology as outlined in the John Burke and J.P. Nettl readings.
Explanation:
The John Burke and J.P. Nettl readings present different perspectives on the role of government regulation of technology, but both authors highlight the importance of government intervention in ensuring that technology is used for the benefit of society.
Burke argues that government regulation is necessary to prevent the negative consequences of technological innovation, such as pollution, and to ensure that technological progress benefits society as a whole. He suggests that the government should work with businesses to develop regulations that encourage innovation while minimizing negative externalities. Burke also emphasizes the importance of democratic participation in decision-making about technological innovation to ensure that the public interest is served.
On the other hand, Nettl takes a more critical view of government regulation and argues that government intervention can hinder technological progress. He suggests that centralized economic systems, such as those in the Soviet Union, are less efficient at allocating resources and fostering innovation than market-based systems. Nettl also suggests that government regulation can stifle innovation by creating barriers to entry for new firms and limiting competition.
Despite these differences, both Burke and Nettl highlight the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of technological innovation. Both authors recognize that government regulation can help to ensure that technology is used in ways that benefit society while minimizing negative externalities. Additionally, both authors acknowledge the potential for unintended consequences of technological innovation and emphasize the importance of democratic participation in decision-making to ensure that the public interest is served.
In summary, while Burke and Nettl present different perspectives on the role of government regulation of technology, they both emphasize the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of technological innovation and ensuring that technology is used for the benefit of society.
look at the picture
Answer:
Explanation:
The Boston Tea Party was a political protest that occurred on December 16, 1773, in Boston, Massachusetts. The most characteristic feature of the Boston Tea Party was the colonists' act of dumping crates of British tea into Boston Harbor. This action was a defiant response to the Tea Act, which had been passed by the British Parliament and was seen by the colonists as an unjust imposition of taxes without representation. The Boston Tea Party is also significant for the spirit of resistance and rebellion that it embodied, as well as for its role in galvanizing support for the American Revolution.
Which of the following is one of the main ways that interest groups participate in Supreme Court cases?
Question 32 options:
a)
filing amicus curiae briefs
b)
lobbying the justices
c)
giving monetary contributions to the court
d)
protesting in front of the Supreme Court building
Answer:
a
Explanation:
what legislation put immigration under the control of the department of homeland security ?
Answer:
The homeland legislation act of 2002
Explanation:
Answer:
Homeland Security Act of 2002 | Homeland Security. A . gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Question 4
Which BEST describes Martin Luther's original goal in writing the Ninety-Five Theses?
A to defend himself from charges of heresy
B to persuade non-Christians to convert to Christianity
C to start a new Protestant religion
D to call for reform within the Catholic Church
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Luther's Ninety-Five Theses were a list of criticisms and objections to various practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church, particularly the sale of indulgences, which were seen as corrupt and exploitative. Luther's intent was to spark a debate and discussion within the Church about these issues and to encourage reforms that would address these concerns. His initial goal was not to break away from the Catholic Church or to establish a new religion, but rather to reform the existing Church from within. However, his criticisms eventually led to a broader reformation movement and the establishment of Protestantism as a separate branch of Christianity.
Introduction—Provide an overview of both the Federalists’ and Anti-Federalists’ positions on the government. Reference key thinkers and political writings of each position. Briefly state, for each branch of government, whether the Federalists and Anti-Federalists of early America would support its current power and capabilities. Later in your paper, you’ll go into more detail about why they would or wouldn’t.
Answer:
During the formation of the United States of America, two major factions emerged: the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were supporters of a strong central government, while the Anti-Federalists believed in decentralized power, giving more autonomy to individual states. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, while the Anti-Federalists included influential thinkers like Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams.
Regarding the current power and capabilities of each branch of government, the Federalists would likely support the current power and capabilities of the Executive Branch, as they believed in a strong executive power. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists would likely have concerns about the current power and capabilities of the Executive Branch, as they were wary of centralized power and feared that it could lead to tyranny.
In terms of the Legislative Branch, the Federalists would support its current power and capabilities, as they believed in a strong national government with a robust legislative branch. The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely have concerns about the current power and capabilities of the Legislative Branch, as they feared that it could become too powerful and infringe on the autonomy of individual states.
Finally, regarding the Judicial Branch, the Federalists would support its current power and capabilities, as they believed in a strong, independent judiciary to interpret and enforce the law. The Anti-Federalists would likely also support the Judicial Branch, as they recognized the importance of a fair and impartial legal system.
In the following sections of this paper, we will explore in more detail why the Federalists and Anti-Federalists would or wouldn't support the current power and capabilities of each branch of government.
Explanation:
Answer: During the early years of American democracy, two groups emerged with distinct perspectives on the role and scope of the federal government: the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued for a strong central government that could effectively govern the states and protect the nation's interests. They supported the ratification of the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.
On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams, feared that a strong central government would become tyrannical and infringe upon the rights of individuals and states. They believed that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights that would protect citizens' individual freedoms and that states should retain more power.
Regarding the current power and capabilities of each branch of government, Federalists would likely support the executive branch's extensive powers and the ability of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution broadly
brainlieast is very much appreciated.
What state borders California to the north?
Mexico
Oregon
Arizona
Nevada
Unlimited Attempts Remain
Multiple Choice
Multiple choice questions offer three to five choices per question. You just need to click in the bubble next to your answer choice. Make sure you have read the question or instructions carefully.
Answer: Oregon borders California to the north.
Explanation:
Mexico is not a state of the U.S.
Arizona is to the east of California.
Nevada is also to the east.
Oregon is to the north.
Hope this helps!!! :)
Not long after Elie and his father are separated from his mother, they are greeted by a family member who asks if they have news of his wife and children. Elie responds, "Yes, my mother did hear from them. Reizel is fine. So are the children...". What does this statement show about Elie's transformation through his experiences so far?
He still has hope that their extended family is fine.
He can still remember hearing the good news about the man's wife and children.
He believes that giving the man hope is more important than telling the truth.
He thinks lying to the man will help them get a better work detail.
He can still remember hearing the good news about the man's wife and children show about Elie's transformation through his experiences so far.
What is transformation?Transformation is the process of changing or developing something, such as an idea, attitude, or object, in a significant and often radical way. It involves a fundamental change in structure, form, or outlook, leading to a dramatic alteration in appearance, behavior, or character. Transformation is a process that can be applied to many different types of situations, including physical, mental, and spiritual contexts. It is often seen as a journey of self-discovery and growth, allowing individuals to explore the different facets of their identity and to reach their true potential.
To learn more about transformation
https://brainly.com/question/10783581
#SPJ1
what are some ways the Congress.gov website has enhanced citizen participation in the political process?
1. Increased Accessibility: Congress.gov provides citizens with easy access to information about proposed and current legislation, as well as other activities taking place in Congress.
What is legislation?Legislation is the process of making or enacting laws. It is the act of making official rules and regulations that are enforced by a governing body. Legislation is important for setting out the laws that must be followed in a given society and for providing a framework for governing.
This makes it easier for citizens to stay informed and engaged in the political process.
2. Improved Transparency: Congress.gov provides transparency about how their representatives are voting and how Congress is working. This encourages citizens to hold their representatives accountable and to better understand what their representatives are doing on their behalf.
3. Enhanced Citizen Participation: Congress.gov provides resources for citizens to contact their representatives and provide feedback, offer support for or oppose legislation, or suggest amendments. This encourages citizens to be more involved in the political process.
4. Improved Communication: Congress.gov provides a platform for citizens to communicate with their representatives and to learn more about the political pro
To learn more about legislation
https://brainly.com/question/12561643
#SPJ1
In a feudal system, who has the greatest authority?
sheriff
noble
king
soldieri
Answer:
King.
Explanation:
However, this can be dependent on the structure of any given country/kingdom. In a Feudal hierarchy pyramid, the King (monarchy) has the most power, followed by Vassals, who provide troops to the king, followed by Knights (professional soldiers), and then Peasants (common folk, drafted soldiers).
In terms of how the king receive the greatest authority, it is in combination with the standard religion in the region, as well as the relations the ruling entity has with those with power. One of the most important aspect to understand about the kinghood is that most kings use some form of religion to assert their authority, also commonly referred to as The Divine Right of Kings, which worked in most religious demographics, essentially giving legitimacy to the ruling entity through giving oneself the right to rule based on a common belief.
On the topic of vassals and knights, it is important to understand that both sides provide not only loyalty, but also some sort of benefit to each other. Kings typically would look for loyalty and the usage of a vassals resources, whether for their land for food, or their population for taxes and conscription when in the season of war. Vassals would then typically draw troops from either conscription, or from knights, which are seasoned soldiers who have been trained (most likely throughout their whole life) to be professional soldiers, and typically provide their own sets of equipment for usage. However, it is noteworthy that professional armies were extremely expensive to maintain, and so only large and rich communities and nations could afford such expenditures (such as France, for example).
Sheriffs, on the other hand, is not talked about in many cases when describing the feudal system, as they mostly served a local community role in maintaining the status quo in regions controlled by the king.
~
Learn more about the feudal system, here:
https://brainly.com/question/19008677
Explain the concept of Separation of Powers and how it protects and preserves the rule of law.
Answer:
Separation of powers is a fundamental principle of democratic governance that seeks to prevent concentration of power in any one branch of government. The concept was introduced by the French philosopher Montesquieu and is enshrined in many modern constitutions. According to the principle, the government is divided into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judiciary - with each branch having a specific function and being independent of the other branches.
The legislative branch is responsible for making laws, the executive branch is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws, and the judiciary branch is responsible for interpreting and applying the laws. Each branch is accountable to the people through various checks and balances.
This separation of powers ensures that no single branch of government can become too powerful, and that each branch can serve as a check on the others. For example, the legislature can pass laws, but the executive can veto them. The judiciary can strike down laws that are unconstitutional. This system of checks and balances helps prevent abuse of power and ensures that no one branch can dominate the others.
By dividing the power of government, the separation of powers also protects the rule of law. The rule of law is the principle that all individuals, including those in positions of power, are subject to the law and no one is above the law. The separation of powers helps to uphold this principle by ensuring that no single individual or group can become too powerful and exempt from the law.
In summary, the concept of separation of powers is a critical component of democratic governance. It helps prevent concentration of power in any one branch of government, ensures that each branch of government has a specific function, and preserves the rule of law by preventing abuse of power.
Explanation:
What tactic involved "Blitzkrieg"?
a. Pushing through all of the army through a narrow line of territory into the heart of the enemy.
b. Pushing through an army of a wide front line into the heart of the enemy.
c. Surprise attack on a country.
d. Go in, go out!
The tactic involved "Blitzkrieg" is best described as surprise attack on a country. The Option C is correct.
What was the strategy called Blitzkrieg?Blitzkrieg is a term used to describe an offensive strategy that uses mobile and maneuverable forces such as armored tanks and air support to strike a quick, focused blow at an enemy.
Such an attack should result in a quick victory while minimizing the loss of soldiers and artillery. Blitzkrieg is most famous for describing Nazi Germany's successful tactics in the early years of World War II, when German forces swept through Poland, Norway, Belgium, Holland, and France with astonishing speed and force.
Read more about Blitzkrieg
brainly.com/question/10404230
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP
Why did President Wilson have a hard time getting the population to believe that neutrality was the best option during the war?
A) There was a large French presence in America, and people were afraid to go against it.
B) The Germans had attacked American ships that were trading with the Allies.
C) Many people were immigrants and as such sided with their homeland, which caused civilian conflicts.
D) All the propaganda displayed encouraged siding with one country or the other, which people did.
Answer:
ITS B
Explanation:
What power did the judiciary act of 1789 grant to the Supreme Court in regards to state government
Answer:
See Below
Explanation:
The Judiciary Act of 1789 granted the Supreme Court the power to hear appeals from the state courts in certain cases involving federal law. Specifically, the act provided that the Supreme Court had the power to review the decisions of state courts on any question of federal law, including the interpretation and application of the United States Constitution and federal statutes.
This meant that if a case was decided in state court, but it involved a question of federal law, the losing party could appeal to the Supreme Court for review. The Supreme Court could then decide whether the state court's decision was consistent with federal law, and if not, it could reverse or modify the decision.
The power of the Supreme Court to review state court decisions on federal law issues is known as appellate jurisdiction, and it is a key part of the system of checks and balances established by the Constitution. The Judiciary Act of 1789 helped to clarify the scope of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and establish its role as the final arbiter of federal law in the United States.
Learn more about the Judiciary Act of 1789 here :
brainly.com/question/29548303
look at the picture
The solution for this question is option c. Congress repealed the Alien and Sedition Acts is not a consequence of the War of 1812.
what was the war of 1812?
The War of 1812 was a military conflict fought between the United States and Great Britain and their respective allies from 1812 to 1815.
The main causes of the war were British interference with American trade, impressment of American sailors into the British navy, and British support of Native American tribes that were resisting American expansion into their lands.
The war was fought on land and sea, with notable battles including the Battle of New Orleans, the Battle of Lake Erie, and the burning of Washington, D.C.
The war ended with the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1814, which restored the status quo ante bellum, or the situation before the war. The war is significant in American history because it solidified American independence from Great Britain and set the stage for westward expansion and territorial acquisition in the 19th century.
To know more about war of 1812 visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13899658
#SPJ1
Isabella d'Este is a patron. Based on your interpretation of her letters, what is your explanation of the patronage system?
The Marchesa of Mantua and a significant figure in Italian Renaissance culture was Isabella d'Este. She was a political figure who ruled Mantua as regent for her husband and son in the early 16th century. She is renowned as a trendsetter and patron of the arts, popularizing clothes and artistic forms.
What does Isabella de Este ask of him in her letter to whom?Leonardo spent many months in Mantua beginning in late 1499, where he met Isabella and created a full portrait drawing of her. The marchioness wrote to the artist in the years that followed to request that he work on other paintings and projects.
Mother of seven children, Isabella d'Este (Gonzaga) was a prominent and intelligent politician, philanthropist, and patron of the arts. She was referred to as "The First Lady of the Renaissance" and was linked to almost every Italian tsar either via marriage or birth.
To know more about Isabella de Este, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/410446
#SPJ1
DIRECTIONS: Matching Match each item with the correct statement.
G
1. a Republican president who opposed patronage
2. composer who was called the "King of Ragtime"
3. founder of the Tuskegee Institute
4. believed wealthy Americans should use their
wealth to help people help themselves
5. argued that society progressed because only
the fittest people survived
6. Journalist who launched a crusade against
lynching
7. perhaps the best-known American realist
painter
8. Populist and Democratic presidential nominee
In 1896
9. wrote that "color discrimination is barbarism"
10. opened Hull House in Chicago
A. Andrew Carnegie
B. W.E.B. Du Bois
C. James A. Garfield
D. Thomas Eakins
E. Jane Addams
F. Scott Joplin
G. William Jennings Bryan
H. Ida B. Wells
I. Herbert Spencer
J. Booker T. Washington
Conkling and President Garfield engaged in a heated and public feud over favoritism in Conkling's native New York after the Republican win in November 1880.
Whose moniker "king of ragtime" was it?Scott Joplin, an African-American pianist and composer, is known as the "King of Ragtime". He played a role in the acceptance of a new musical period. His well-known ragtime song, The Maple Leaf Rag, was first released in 1899, which you might be familiar with.
What did Booker T. Washington bring to the Tuskegee community?Washington advocated tenacity, hard effort, and a practical education as means of obtaining financial independence. His energy and vision helped Tuskegee grow into a significant African-American presence and educational center.
James A. Garfield- a Republican president who was against favoritism
Scott Joplin- A musician dubbed the "King of Ragtime"
Booker T Washington- The founder of the Tuskegee
Andrew Carnegie- thought that affluent Americans should use their riches to enable others to assist themselves
Herbert Spencer- asserted that civilization developed because only the strongest individuals lived.
Ida B Wells- Writer who led an anti-lynching campaign
Thomas Eakins- Maybe the most well-known realist painter in America
Grover Cleveland and James B Weaver- Populist and Democratic presidential nominee In 1896
Du Bois- Wrote that "color discrimination" is a barbarism
Jane Adams- inaugurated Hull House in Chicago
Learn more about Scott Joplin: https://brainly.com/question/3045794
#SPJ1