A gazelle is running at 9.09 m/s. he hears a lion and accelerates at 3.80 m/s/s. 2.16 seconds after hearing the lion, how far has he travelled?

The blackbody object that peaks at 1,000 nm (just outside the visible spectrum) would appear invisible to the human eye. The answer is b.

The visible spectrum for humans ranges from approximately 400 nm (violet) to 700 nm (red). A blackbody object's perceived color depends on its temperature and the wavelength at which it emits the most radiation. The peak wavelength of the radiation emitted by an object decreases as its temperature increases according to Wien's displacement law.

In this case, a blackbody object that peaks at 1,000 nm has a temperature of approximately 2,897 K. This is outside the range of temperatures that produce visible light.

Therefore, the object would not appear to have any color to the human eye. Instead, it would appear as a dark object, absorbing most of the visible light that strikes it. Hence, b is the right option.

To know more about blackbody object, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14921011#

#SPJ11

The energy of a single photon with a wavelength of 589 nm is 3.37 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.

Here correct option is E.

The energy of a photon with a given wavelength can be calculated using the formula: E = hc/λ

where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J·s), c is the speed of light (2.998 x 10⁸ m/s), and λ is the wavelength of the light.

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

E = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J·s)(2.998 x 10⁸ m/s)/(589 x 10⁻⁹ m)

E = 3.37 x 10⁻¹⁹ J

Therefore, the energy of a single photon with a wavelength of 589 nm is 3.37 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.

Know more about Planck's constant here

https://brainly.com/question/27389304#

#SPJ11

The energy stored in a solenoid with 2.60-cm-diameter is 0.000878 J.

U = (1/2) * L * I²

U = energy stored

L = inductance

I = current

inductance of a solenoid= L = (mu * N² * A) / l

L = inductance

mu = permeability of the core material or vacuum

N = number of turns

A = cross-sectional area

l = length of the solenoid

cross-sectional area of the solenoid = A = π r²

r = 2.60 cm / 2 = 1.30 cm = 0.013 m

l = 14.0 cm = 0.14 m

N = 150

I = 0.780 A

mu = 4π10⁻⁷

A = πr² = pi * (0.013 m)² = 0.000530 m²

L = (mu × N² × A) / l = (4π10⁻⁷ × 150² × 0.000530) / 0.14

L = 0.00273 H

U = (1/2) × L × I² = (1/2) × 0.00273 × (0.780)²

U = 0.000878 J

The energy stored in the solenoid is 0.000878 J.

Learn more about solenoid at:

brainly.com/question/3821492

#SPJ4

To lift a block weighing 100N up a height of 10m, using a ramp inclined at an angle of 30°, the force required to push the block up the ramp is equal to half the weight of the block (50N). The distance traveled up the ramp must be twice the height (20m).

When a block is lifted vertically, the force required is equal to its weight, which is given by the mass (m) multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity (g). In this case, the weight of the block is 100N. However, by using a ramp, we can reduce the force required. The force required to push the block up the ramp is determined by the component of the weight acting along the direction of the ramp. This component is given by the weight of the block multiplied by the sine of the angle of the ramp (30°), which is equal to (mg) x sin(30°). Since sin(30°) = 0.5, the force required to push the block up the ramp is half the weight of the block, which is 50N. Additionally, the distance traveled up the ramp must be taken into account. The vertical distance to lift the block is 10m, but the distance traveled up the ramp is longer. It can be calculated using the ratio of the vertical height to the sine of the angle of the ramp. In this case, the vertical height is 10m, and the sine of 30° is 0.5. Thus, the distance traveled up the ramp is twice the height, which is 20m. Therefore, to lift the block up the ramp, a force of 50N needs to be applied over a distance of 20m.

To learn more about force refer:

https://brainly.com/question/12970081

#SPJ11

The correct answer to this question is 1.67. Cpk is a process capability index that measures how well a process is able to meet the specifications of a product.

A Cpk value of 1 indicates that the process is capable of meeting the specifications, while a value greater than 1 indicates that the process is more capable than necessary, and a value less than 1 indicates that the process is not capable of meeting the specifications.To calculate Cpk, we need to use the formula: Cpk = min[(USL - μ) / 3σ, (μ - LSL) / 3σ]. Where USL is the upper specification limit, LSL is the lower specification limit, μ is the process mean, and σ is the process standard deviation.

In this problem, the specification for the product is 6 mm ± 0.1 mm, which means that the upper specification limit (USL) is 6.1 mm and the lower specification limit (LSL) is 5.9 mm. The process mean (μ) is 6.05 mm, and the process standard deviation (σ) is 0.01 mm.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

Cpk = min[(6.1 - 6.05) / (3 x 0.01), (6.05 - 5.9) / (3 x 0.01)]

Cpk = min[1.67, 5.00]

Cpk = 1.67

Since the minimum value between 1.67 and 5.00 is 1.67, the Cpk for this process is 1.67. This means that the process is capable of meeting the specifications, but there is some room for improvement to make it more capable.

Therefore, the correct answer to this question is 1.67.

For more questions like standard deviation visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31324117

#SPJ11

The answer is C.) it will take approximately 600 days for the sample to contain 1.25×1011 radioactive nuclei.


The half-life of the radioactive material is 200 days, which means that after 200 days, half of the original nuclei will have decayed. So, after another 200 days (a total of 400 days), half of the remaining nuclei will have decayed, leaving 1/4 of the original nuclei.

We can set up an equation to solve for the time it will take for the sample to contain 1.25×1011 radioactive nuclei:

1×1012 * (1/2)^(t/200) = 1.25×1011

Where t is the number of days.

Simplifying this equation, we can divide both sides by 1×1012 and take the logarithm of both sides:

(1/2)^(t/200) = 1.25×10^-1

t/200 = log(1.25×10^-1) / log(1/2)

t/200 = 3

t = 600

Therefore, it will take 600 days for the sample to contain 1.25×1011 radioactive nuclei.

To learn more about half-life visit:

brainly.com/question/24710827

#SPJ11

The fixed costs F for the firm is equal to  $38.49.

quantity demanded at a price that is equal to its marginal costs

MC = 80 - 69q

the total cost function = C(q) = 8q + F

profit function = Π(q) = (80 - 69q)q - (8q + F)

                          Π(q) = 80q - 69q² - 8q - F

derivative of Π(q) with respect to q, equalizing it to zero

dΠ(q)/dq = 80 - 138q - 8 = 0

q = 0.623

Substituting q into the MC equation

MC = 80 - 69(0.623) = 34.087

P = MC = 34.087

Substituting q and P into the profit function, we can solve for F:

Π(q) = (80 - 69q)q - (8q + F)

Π(q) = (80 - 69(0.623))(0.623) - (8(0.623) + F)

Π(q) = -800

F (fixed costs) = 38.485

Learn more about fixed costs at:

brainly.com/question/13990977

#SPJ4

The change in energy (in joules) of the hot water due to the heat transfer when it is placed in contact with the cold water and allowed to reach equilibrium is -15,464 J.

The change in energy (in joules) of the hot water due to the heat transfer when it is placed in contact with the cold water and allowed to reach equilibrium can be calculated using the equation

Q = mcΔT

Where Q is the heat transferred, m is the mass of the water, c is the specific heat capacity of water, and ΔT is the change in temperature of the water.

For the hot water

m = 1.00 kg

c = 4,186 J/(kg·°C) (specific heat capacity of water)

ΔT = 41.5°C - Teq

Where Teq is the equilibrium temperature of the two bodies.

For the cold water

m = 1.00 kg

c = 4,186 J/(kg·°C) (specific heat capacity of water)

ΔT = Teq - 21°C

Because the heat transfer is from the hot water to the cold water, the magnitude of the heat transferred will be the same for both bodies. Therefore

mcΔT = mcΔT

(1.00 kg)(4,186 J/(kg·°C))(41.5°C - Teq) = (1.00 kg)(4,186 J/(kg·°C))(Teq - 21°C)

Simplifying this equation, we get

83.7 J/°C = Teq - 21°C + Teq - 41.5°C

Combining like terms, we get

2Teq - 62.5°C = 83.7 J/°C

Solving for Teq, we get

Teq = (83.7 J/°C + 62.5°C)/2

Teq = 73.1°C

Therefore, the change in energy (in joules) of the hot water due to the heat transfer when it is placed in contact with the cold water and allowed to reach equilibrium is

Qh = mcΔT = (1.00 kg)(4,186 J/(kg·°C))(41.5°C - 73.1°C) = -15,464 J

(Note that the negative sign indicates that the hot water loses energy, as expected.)

To know more about change in energy here

https://brainly.com/question/31384081

#SPJ4

The magnetic force vectors on the wires can be determined using the right-hand rule. If the wires aren't restrained, they will be pushed apart by the magnetic forces.

The magnetic force vectors on the wires can be determined using the right-hand rule. If you point your right thumb in the direction of the current in one wire, and your fingers in the direction of the current in the other wire, your palm will face the direction of the magnetic force on the wire.

At the points indicated with dots, the magnetic force vectors would be perpendicular to both wires, pointing into the page for the wire with current going into the page, and out of the page for the wire with current coming out of the page.

The diagram to illustrate the magnetic force vectors on the wires is attached.

If the wires aren't restrained, they will be pushed apart by the magnetic forces. The wires will move in opposite directions, perpendicular to the plane of the wires. This is because the magnetic force is perpendicular to both the current and the magnetic field, which in this case is created by the other wire. As a result, the wires will move away from each other in a direction perpendicular to both wires.

To know more about magnetic force here

https://brainly.com/question/30532541

#SPJ4

The critical angle for the interface is 58.7 degrees.

The critical angle is the angle of incidence that results in an angle of refraction of 90 degrees. To find the critical angle, we can use Snell's Law, which relates the angles of incidence and refraction to the indices of refraction of the media:

n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θ2

where n1 and n2 are the indices of refraction of the first and second media, respectively, and θ1 and θ2 are the angles of incidence and refraction, respectively. At the critical angle, the angle of refraction is 90 degrees, which means sin θ2 = 1. Thus, we have:

n1 sin θc = n2 sin 90°

n1 sin θc = n2

sin θc = n2 / n1

We can use the given angles of incidence and refraction to find the indices of refraction:

sin θ1 / sin θ2 = n2 / n1

sin 33° / sin 46° = n2 / n1

n2 / n1 = 0.574

Thus, we have:

sin θc = 0.574

θc = sin⁻¹(0.574) = 58.7°

Therefore, the critical angle for the interface is 58.7 degrees.

To know more about Snell's Law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28747393#

#SPJ11

The approximate measurement for the angle of the 14th minimum in this diffraction pattern is 58.6 degrees.

We can use the single-slit diffraction formula to find the angle of the 14th minimum in this diffraction pattern. The formula is:

sin θ = mλ / b

where θ is the angle of the minimum, m is the order of the minimum (m = 1 for the first minimum, m = 2 for the second minimum, and so on), λ is the wavelength of the light, and b is the width of the slit.

Given:

m = 14 (order of the minimum)

λ = (unknown)

b = (unknown)

mλ for the 4th minimum = 5.9

We can find the wavelength of the light by using the known value of mλ for the fourth minimum:

sin θ4 = mλ / b

sin θ4 = (4λ) / b

λ = (b sin θ4) / 4

λ = (b sin (tan[tex]^(-1)[/tex](5.9 / 4))) / 4

λ = (b * 0.988) / 4

λ = 0.247b

Now we can use the value of λ to find the angle of the 14th minimum:

sin θ14 = mλ / b

sin θ14 = (14λ) / b

sin θ14 = 3.43λ / b

sin θ14 = 3.43(0.247b) / b

sin θ14 = 0.847

θ14 = sin[tex]^(-1)[/tex](0.847)

θ14 ≈ 58.6 degrees

Therefore, the angle of the 14th minimum in this diffraction pattern is approximately 58.6 degrees.

Learn more about angle

brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ11

Converting to Cartesian coordinates is one way to find alternate descriptions for (r,0) (-1,π) in polar coordinates.

When looking for alternate descriptions for the polar coordinates (r,0) (-1,π), converting them to Cartesian coordinates is one way to do it.

However, a better method is to remember the steps to graph a point in polar coordinates.

If r is greater than zero, start along the positive z-axis, and if r is less than zero, start along the negative z-axis.

Then, rotate counterclockwise if θ is greater than zero, and rotate clockwise if θ is less than zero.

By following these steps, alternate descriptions for (r,0) (-1,π) in polar coordinates can be determined without having to convert them to Cartesian coordinates.

For more such questions on Cartesian, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/18846941

#SPJ11

To do this, let's recall the rules for graphing polar coordinates:

1. If r > 0, start along the positive z-axis.
2. If r < 0, start along the negative z-axis.
3. If θ > 0, rotate counterclockwise.
4. If θ < 0, rotate clockwise.

Now, let's examine the given points:

(r, θ) = (-1, π): The starting point is (-1, π), which has a negative r-value and θ equal to π.

(r, θ) = (1, 2π): Since the r-value is positive and θ = 2π, the point would start on the positive z-axis and make a full rotation. This results in the same position as (-1, π).

(r, θ) = (-1, 2π): This point has a negative r-value and θ = 2π. Since a full rotation is made, this point ends up in the same position as (-1, π).

Thus, the alternate descriptions for the polar coordinates (-1, π) are:

1. (r, θ) = (1, 2π)
2. (r, θ) = (-1, 2π)

To learn more about polar coordinates : brainly.com/question/11657509

#SPJ11

The center of Lake Superior is depressed by 5.2 meters due to the centrifugal force at a radius of 162 km and a latitude of 47°.

When a body rotates, objects on its surface are subject to centrifugal force which causes them to move away from the center.

In this case, Lake Superior is assumed to be at rest with respect to Earth and a circle of radius 162 km at a latitude of 47° is drawn around it.

Using the formula for centrifugal force, the depth that the center of the lake is depressed with respect to the shore is calculated to be 5.2 meters.

This means that the water at the center of Lake Superior is pushed outwards due to the centrifugal force, causing it to be shallower than the shore.

Understanding the effects of centrifugal force is important in many areas of science and engineering.

For more such questions on force, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/388851

#SPJ11

According to the kinetic molecular theory of gases, the volume of the gas particles, which can be atoms or molecules, is considered to be negligible compared to the volume of the container that they occupy. The gas particles are assumed to be point masses.

This assumption is based on the fact that at normal temperatures and pressures, the space between gas particles is much larger than the size of the particles themselves. Therefore, the particles can be treated as point masses without significantly affecting the overall behavior of the gas.

The kinetic molecular theory of gases provides a useful framework for understanding the behavior of gases at the molecular level, and helps to explain many of the observed properties of gases, such as their pressure, volume, temperature, and the relationships between them, such as the ideal gas law.

To know more about kinetic molecular refer here

https://brainly.com/question/1869811#

#SPJ11

The change in the photon's wavelength is 0.024 fm when it scatters from a free proton at rest and recoils at 90°.

The change in the photon's wavelength (in fm) can be calculated using the Compton scattering formula:

Δλ = h / (m_ec) * (1 - cosθ)

where:

h = Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s)

m_e = mass of electron (9.109 x 10^-31 kg)

c = speed of light (2.998 x 10^8 m/s)

θ = angle of scattering (90° in this case)

Plugging in the values:

Δλ = (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s) / [(9.109 x 10^-31 kg) x (2.998 x 10^8 m/s)] * (1 - cos90°)

   = 0.024 fm

Compton scattering is an inelastic scattering of a photon by a charged particle, resulting in a change in the photon's wavelength and direction.

The scattered photon has lower energy and longer wavelength than the incident photon, while the charged particle recoils with higher energy and momentum.

The degree of wavelength change depends on the angle of scattering and the mass of the charged particle. In this case, the photon is scattered by a proton at rest, resulting in a small change in the photon's wavelength.

To know more about "Photon's wavelength " refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/18415575#

#SPJ11

The transmitted signal’s frequencies are 1016kHz, 1018kHz, 1020kHz, and 1022kHz. The amplitude of the received message signal will depend on various factors, including the distance between the transmitter and receiver.

To determine the transmitted signal's frequencies, we use the formula: f = fc ± fm, where fc is the carrier frequency (1020kHz) and fm is the message signal frequency (4kHz). Substituting the values, we get:

f1 = 1020kHz - 4kHz = 1016kHz (most negative frequency)
f2 = 1020kHz - 2kHz = 1018kHz
f3 = 1020kHz + 2kHz = 1022kHz
f4 = 1020kHz + 4kHz = 1024kHz (most positive frequency)

To calculate the amplitude of the received message signal, we need to consider factors such as distance, atmospheric conditions, and interference. Assuming no loss or distortion, the amplitude would remain the same (8V) as the message signal's amplitude.

AM can transmit message signals in a range of frequencies up to half the carrier frequency. Therefore, with a carrier frequency of 1020kHz, AM can transmit up to 510kHz (1020kHz/2 - 10kHz for a safety margin). In contrast, FM can transmit a range of frequencies up to a maximum of 100kHz, which makes it more suitable for high-quality audio transmission.

To know more about the AM signal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30602301

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to use the equation that relates the frequency of a vibrating string to its tension, length, and mass per unit length. This equation is:

[tex]f= (\frac{1}{2L} ) × \sqrt[n]{\frac{T}{μ} }[/tex]

where f is the frequency, L is the length of the string, T is the tension, and μ is the mass per unit length.

We know that the length of the string is 1.80m, the tension is 100N/m, and the frequency in the third harmonic is 75.0Hz. We can use this information to find μ, which is the mass per unit length of the string.

First, we need to find the wavelength of the third harmonic. The wavelength is equal to twice the length of the string divided by the harmonic number, so:

[tex]λ = \frac{2L}{3} = 1.20 m[/tex]

Next, we can use the equation:

f = v/[tex]f = \frac{v}{λ}[/tex]

where v is the speed of sound in air (which is approximately 343 m/s) to find the speed of the wave on the string:

[tex]v = f × λ = 343[/tex] m/sec
Finally, we can rearrange the original equation to solve for μ:

[tex]μ = T × \frac{2L}{f} ^{2}[/tex]

Plugging in the known values, we get:

[tex]μ = 100 × (\frac{2×1.80}{75} )^{2}  = 0.000266 kg/m[/tex]

To find the mass of the string, we can multiply the mass per unit length by the length of the string:

[tex]m = μ × L = 0.000266 * 1.80 = 0.000479 kg[/tex]

Therefore, the mass of the string is 0.000479 kg.

Learn more about mass here:

https://brainly.com/question/30337818

#SPJ11

In Part A, the electron's speed is given as 4.00 km/s and the force acting on it due to the electric field is 5.50×10−15N. To find the acceleration produced by this force,

we can use the equation F = ma, where F is the force, m is the mass of the electron, and a is the acceleration. As the mass of the electron is very small,

we can use the equation a = F/m. Therefore, the acceleration produced by this force in Part A is:

a = F/m = (5.50×10−15N) / (9.11×10−31kg) = 6.04×10^15 m/s^2

In Part B, the force acting on the electron is parallel to its velocity. This means that the force does not change the direction of the electron's motion, but only its speed.

As the electron is moving with a constant velocity, we can assume that its acceleration is zero. This means that the force acting on the electron must be balanced by another force,

such as a magnetic force, that prevents the electron from changing its direction of motion. Therefore, the acceleration produced by the force in Part B is zero.

To know more about electron's speedrefer here

https://brainly.com/question/30194771#

#SPJ11

Answer:

12×8=848

Explanation:

repell forces

To apply this formula to the given values, we first need to convert the direction angle from degrees to radians, which is done by multiplying it by π/180. So, 306.7° * π/180 = 5.357 radians.

we used the formula for the component form of a vector to find the answer to the given question. This formula involves multiplying the magnitude of the vector by the cosine and sine of its direction angle converted to radians, respectively. After plugging in the given values and simplifying, we arrived at the component form (-175.5, 182.9) for the vector v.

To find the component form of a vector given its magnitude and direction angle, we use the following formulas ,v_x = |v| * cosθ ,v_y = |v| * sin(θ) where |v| is the magnitude, θ is the direction angle, and v_x and v_y are the x and y components of the vector.  Convert the direction angle to radians. θ = 306.7° * (π/180) ≈ 5.35 radians Calculate the x-component (v_x). v_x = |v| * cos(θ) ≈ 184.1 * cos(5.35) ≈ -97.1  Calculate the y-component (v_y).
v_y = |v| * sin(θ) ≈ 184.1 * sin(5.35) ≈ 162.5.

To know more about direction visit :

https://brainly.com/question/13899230

#SPJ11

A 2.0 cm wide diffraction grating with 1000 slits is illuminated with light of wavelength 500 nm. The angles of the first two diffraction orders are 1.44° and 2.89°, respectively.

To find the angles of the first two diffraction orders for a diffraction grating, we can use the following equation:

d(sinθ) = mλ

Where d is the distance between the centers of adjacent slits (in this case, it is given as 2.0 cm/1000 = 0.002 cm), θ is the angle of diffraction, m is the order of diffraction, and λ is the wavelength of light (500 nm = 5.0 x 10⁻⁵ cm).

For the first diffraction order (m = 1), we have:

d(sinθ) = mλ

0.002 cm (sinθ) = (1)(5.0 x 10⁻⁵ cm)

sinθ = 0.025

θ = sin⁻¹(0.025) = 1.44°

Therefore, the angle of the first diffraction order is 1.44°.

For the second diffraction order (m = 2), we have:

d(sinθ) = mλ

0.002 cm (sinθ) = (2)(5.0 x 10⁻⁵ cm)

sinθ = 0.050

θ = sin⁻¹(0.050) = 2.89°

Therefore, the angle of the second diffraction order is 2.89°.

Hence, the angles of the first two diffraction orders for the given diffraction grating are 1.44° and 2.89°.

To know more about the diffraction grating refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/10709914#

#SPJ11

The width of the central maximum of a circular diffraction pattern produced by a circular aperture change with aperture size for a given distance between the viewing screen is the width of the central maximum increases as the aperture size increases.

The formula for the width of the centre maximum of a circular diffraction pattern formed by a circular aperture is:

w = 2λf/D

where is the light's wavelength, f is the distance between the aperture and the viewing screen, and D is the aperture's diameter. This formula applies to a Fraunhofer diffraction pattern in which the aperture is far from the viewing screen and the light rays can be viewed as parallel.

We can see from this calculation that the breadth of the central maxima is proportional to the aperture size D. This means that as the aperture size grows, so does the width of the central maxima.

For such more question on aperture:

https://brainly.com/question/2279091

#SPJ11

The width of the central maximum of a circular diffraction pattern produced by a circular aperture is inversely proportional to the aperture size for a given distance between the viewing screen. This means that as the aperture size increases, the width of the central maximum decreases, and as the aperture size decreases, the width of the central maximum increases.

This relationship can be explained by considering the constructive and destructive interference of light waves passing through the aperture. As the aperture size increases, the path difference between waves passing through different parts of the aperture becomes smaller. This results in a narrower region of constructive interference, leading to a smaller central maximum width.

On the other hand, when the aperture size decreases, the path difference between waves passing through different parts of the aperture becomes larger. This results in a broader region of constructive interference, leading to a larger central maximum width.

In summary, the width of the central maximum in a circular diffraction pattern is dependent on the aperture size, and it decreases as the aperture size increases, and vice versa. This is an essential concept in understanding the behavior of light when it interacts with apertures and how diffraction patterns are formed.

learn more about circular diffraction here: brainly.com/question/31595795

#SPJ11

The rate of change of current is given by the formula:

[tex]$$\frac{dI}{dt} = \frac{E}{L}$$[/tex]

where $E$ is the emf and $L$ is the inductance of the solenoid. Plugging in the given values, we get:

[tex]$$\frac{dI}{dt} = \frac{-12.5 \text{mV}}{0.285 \text{mH}} \approx -43.86 \text{A/s}$$[/tex]

Therefore, the rate of change of current at that specific time is approximately -43.86 A/s.

The rate of change of current in a solenoid is determined by the emf induced in the solenoid and the inductance of the solenoid. The emf induced in a solenoid is given by Faraday's Law, which states that the emf is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the solenoid. The inductance of the solenoid depends on the geometry of the solenoid, which is given by its length and cross-sectional area. The formula for the rate of change of current is derived from the equation that relates the emf, the inductance, and the rate of change of current in an ideal solenoid. Plugging in the given values into this formula gives us the rate of change of current at that specific time.

Learn more about Faraday's Law here:

https://brainly.com/question/1640558

#SPJ11

If r is a primitive root modulo m, then its inverse r(bar) is also a primitive root modulo m.

Let's assume that r is a primitive root modulo m. This means that the set of residues generated by r modulo m is a complete residue system, i.e., it covers all the numbers from 1 to [tex]m^{-1[/tex].

Now, let's consider the inverse of r, denoted as r(bar). By definition, r(bar) is the number such that:

r × r(bar) ≡ 1 (mod m).

To show that r(bar) is also a primitive root modulo m, we need to prove that the set of residues generated by r(bar) modulo m is also a complete residue system.

To know more about primitive root modulo

https://brainly.com/question/14766413

#SPJ4

(a) 64.7° is the acceptance angle (in degrees) for the oil immersion objective

(b) 30° is the acceptance angle (in degrees) for the air immersion objective.

Part (a): The acceptance angle for the oil immersion objective can be calculated using the formula α1 = sin⁻¹(NA1/n), where NA1 is the numerical aperture of the objective and n is the refractive index of the medium between the specimen and the objective. Here, NA1 = 1.40 and n = 1.51 (refractive index of oil). Substituting these values, we get α1 = sin⁻¹(1.40/1.51) = 64.7°.
Part (b): The acceptance angle for the air immersion objective can be calculated using the formula α2 = sin⁻¹(NA2/n), where NA2 is the numerical aperture of the objective and n is the refractive index of the medium between the specimen and the objective. Here, NA2 = 0.5 and n = 1 (refractive index of air). Substituting these values, we get α2 = sin⁻¹(0.5/1) = 30°.
In summary, the acceptance angle for the oil immersion objective is 64.7°, while the acceptance angle for the air immersion objective is 30°. This difference in acceptance angle is due to the fact that oil has a higher refractive index than air, which allows for greater light refraction and therefore a larger acceptance angle.

To know more about immersion visit:

brainly.com/question/29306517

#SPJ11

If the Fed wants to lower the federal funds rate, it should buy government securities in the open market. This will increase the amount of money available in the banking system, leading to a decrease in the federal funds rate.

Selling government securities in the open market would have the opposite effect and raise the federal funds rate. Increasing the reserve ratio would require banks to hold more reserves and would also raise the federal funds rate. Increasing the discount rate would make borrowing from the Fed more expensive, which could indirectly increase the federal funds rate.

If the Fed wants to lower the federal funds rate, it should d. buy government securities in the open market.

By purchasing government securities, the Fed increases the supply of money in the economy. This results in a lower federal funds rate as banks have more funds available for lending, leading to increased demand for loans and lower borrowing costs.

To know more about Federal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8305583

#SPJ11

The dead load is a uniform distributed load of 2 k/ft, which means that it applies a constant force per unit length of the beam. The live load is a uniform distributed load of 4 k/ft, but its length is not specified, so we cannot assume a fixed value.

To find the maximum negative bending moment, me, at point e, we need to consider both the dead load and live load.

To solve this problem, we need to use the principle of superposition. This principle states that the effect of multiple loads acting on a structure can be determined by analyzing each load separately and then adding their effects together.

First, let's consider the dead load. The negative bending moment due to the dead load at point e can be calculated using the following formula:

me_dead = (-w_dead * L^2) / 8

where w_dead is the dead load per unit length, L is the distance from the support to point e, and me_dead is the maximum negative bending moment due to the dead load.

Plugging in the values, we get:

me_dead = (-2 * L^2) / 8
me_dead = -0.5L^2

Next, let's consider the live load. Since its length is not specified, we will assume that it covers the entire span of the beam. The negative bending moment due to the live load can be calculated using the following formula:

me_live = (-w_live * L^2) / 8

where w_live is the live load per unit length, L is the distance from the support to point e, and me_live is the maximum negative bending moment due to the live load.

Plugging in the values, we get:

me_live = (-4 * L^2) / 8
me_live = -0.5L^2

Now, we can use the principle of superposition to find the total negative bending moment at point e:

me_total = me_dead + me_live
me_total = -0.5L^2 - 0.5L^2
me_total = -L^2

Therefore, the maximum negative bending moment at point e due to the given loads is -L^2. This value is negative, indicating that the beam is in a state of compression at point e. The magnitude of the bending moment increases as the distance from the support increases.

To know about moment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14140953

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the electrostatic force on an electron is given as 3.0 E-10 N. This question asks for the magnitude of the electric field strength at the electron's location, including the necessary calculations and units.

To determine the magnitude of the electric field strength at the location of the electron, we can use the equation that relates the electric field strength (E) to the electrostatic force (F) experienced by a charged particle.

The equation is given by E = F/q, where q represents the charge of the particle. In this case, the charged particle is an electron, which has a fundamental charge of -1.6 E-19 C. Plugging in the given force value of 3.0 E-10 N and the charge of the electron, we can calculate the electric field strength.

The magnitude of the electric field strength is equal to the force divided by the charge, resulting in E = (3.0 E-10 N) / (-1.6 E-19 C) = -1.875 E9 N/C.

Learn more about electrostatic force here:

https://brainly.com/question/31042490

#SPJ11

To find the particle's speed, we can use the de Broglie wavelength equation:

λ = h/p

where λ is the de Broglie wavelength, h is Planck's constant, and p is the momentum of the particle. We can rearrange this equation to solve for the momentum:

p = h/λ

Now we can use the momentum and the mass of the particle to find its speed:

v = p/m

where v is the speed and m is the mass.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

p = (6.626 x 10^-34 J s)/(7.25 x 10^-12 m) = 9.13 x 10^-23 kg m/s

v = (9.13 x 10^-23 kg m/s)/(6.68 x 10^-27 kg) = 1.37 x 10^4 m/s

Therefore, the particle's speed is 1.37 x 10^4 m/s.

learn more about mass https://brainly.in/question/17007118?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

To express the rate of climb of a mountain trail with no units, you can simply state it as a ratio or fraction: 1/8.33. This means that for every 8.33 units traveled horizontally, the trail ascends 1 unit vertically.

The rate of climb of 120 meters per kilometer can be expressed with no units as a ratio or fraction: 1/8.33. This ratio signifies that for every 8.33 units traveled horizontally (in any unit of distance), the trail ascends 1 unit vertically (in any unit of elevation). By removing the specific units (meters per kilometer), we create a dimensionless quantity that can be used universally. This allows for easier comparison and understanding of the rate of climb, regardless of the specific units used to measure distance and elevation.

learn more about unit here:

https://brainly.com/question/29282740

#SPJ11