A person pushes a grocery cart with a force of 300 N for 5 m, resulting in a speed of 3 m/s. The work done by friction is approximately -1140 J. (Answer: B)
The work done by friction can be calculated using the equation: work = force × distance × cos(θ), where θ is the angle between the force and the direction of motion.
In this case, the force of friction opposes the motion and is in the opposite direction of the pushing force. Since the pushing force is 20" below the horizontal, the angle θ is 20°. Therefore, the work done by friction is given by: work = (-300 N) × (5 m) × cos(20°).
Calculating this expression gives a result of approximately -1140 J. Hence, the correct answer is (B) -1140 J, indicating that the work done by friction is negative, as it acts against the motion of the cart.
Learn more about Friction click here :brainly.com/question/13680415
#SPJ11
what happened when 1000 baseballs fell from an airplane
It's impossible to answer this question accurately without additional information about the circumstances under which the 1000 baseballs fell from an airplane.
If the baseballs were dropped from a high altitude, they would initially accelerate as they fell due to gravity. As they fell through the air, they would also experience air resistance, which would cause their speed to gradually decrease.
Upon reaching the ground, the baseballs would likely bounce and scatter in various directions, depending on the surface they landed on and their individual trajectories.
It's important to note that dropping objects from an airplane is generally unsafe and illegal, as it can pose a significant danger to people and property on the ground.
To know more about altitude refer here
https://brainly.com/question/54166811#
#SPJ11
is an object with a temperature of 273.2 k hotter than, colder than, or at the same temperature as an object with a temperature of 0°c?
The temperature of 273.2 K is measured in the Kelvin scale, which is an absolute temperature scale where 0 K represents absolute zero (the lowest possible temperature).
The temperature of 0°C is measured in the Celsius scale, where 0°C represents the freezing point of water.
To compare these temperatures, we need to convert 0°C to the Kelvin scale:
0°C + 273.15 = 273.15 K
Now we have two temperatures: 273.2 K and 273.15 K.
Since 273.2 K is slightly higher than 273.15 K, we can conclude that the object with a temperature of 273.2 K is slightly hotter than the object with a temperature of 0°C.
In summary, the object with a temperature of 273.2 K is hotter than the object with a temperature of 0°C.
To know more about temperature refer here
https://brainly.com/question/7510619#
#SPJ11
What electric field strength would store 13.0J of energy in every 6.00mm^3 of space? (in V/m)
To determine the electric field strength (E) that would store a given amount of energy per unit volume, we can use the equation:
Energy density (u) = (1/2) * ε₀ * E²
Where:
u is the energy density in Joules per cubic meter (J/m³)
ε₀ is the vacuum permittivity, approximately 8.85 × 10^(-12) C²/(N·m²)
E is the electric field strength in volts per meter (V/m)
In this case, the energy stored per unit volume is given as 13.0 J in 6.00 mm³ of space. We need to convert the volume to cubic meters before proceeding with the calculation:
Volume (V) = 6.00 mm³ = 6.00 × 10^(-9) m³
Now, we can rearrange the equation to solve for the electric field strength (E):
E = √(2 * u / ε₀)
Substituting the given values:
E = √(2 * (13.0 J / 6.00 × 10^(-9) m³) / 8.85 × 10^(-12) C²/(N·m²))
Calculating this expression:
E ≈ 1.29 × 10^11 V/m
Therefore, the electric field strength that would store 13.0 J of energy in every 6.00 mm³ of space is approximately 1.29 × 10^11 V/m.
To know more about electric field strength refer here
https://brainly.com/question/3405913#
#SPJ11
In the expression for the energy E of (10-1-13) both ʼn and the normal mode frequencies depend, in general, on the volume V of the solid. Use the Debye approximation to find the equation of state of the solid; i.e., find the pressure p as a function of V and T. What are the limiting cases valid when T < OD and when T» OD? Express your answer in terms of the quantity γ= V dÐD OD dv En......aN = 3N - Nn + Σ n.hw, (10.1.13) OD = ħwmax/k.
The Debye approximation is used to derive the equation of state for a solid, relating pressure (p) to volume (V) and temperature (T). It considers the volume dependence of normal mode frequencies, and the resulting equation involves terms related to the number of particles and the Boltzmann constant.
To find the equation of state, we differentiate the energy expression, E = 3NkT - Nnħʼn + Σ nħw, with respect to volume V while holding the temperature T constant. This differentiation allows us to calculate the pressure p as ∂E/∂V.
The Debye frequency OD is defined as OD = ħwmax/k, where wmax represents the maximum frequency of the distribution.
The resulting equation of state provides a relationship between pressure p, volume V, and temperature T for the solid. It incorporates terms such as the number of particles N, the Boltzmann constant k, and the frequencies of the normal modes.
To learn more about frequency, visit: brainly.com/question/2973926
#SPJ11
a radioactive substance is dissolved in a large body of water so that s γ-rays are emitted per cm3/sec throughout the water. (a) show that the uncollided flux at any point in the water is given by
The uncollided flux at any point in the water can be calculated using the formula: Flux = (emitted γ-rays per unit volume) x (distance traveled by the γ-rays without collision).
This formula is based on the fact that the uncollided flux at any point in the water is directly proportional to the number of γ-rays emitted per unit volume and the distance traveled by the γ-rays without collision. The more γ-rays emitted per unit volume and the longer the distance they travel without collision, the higher the uncollided flux will be at any point in the water.
The formula is derived by considering the exponential attenuation of γ-rays as they travel through the water. The uncollided flux at any point will depend on the initial emission rate (s) and how much the γ-rays have been attenuated as they travel through the water. This attenuation can be described by the exponential function e^(-μx), where μ represents the attenuation coefficient, and x represents the distance traveled.
To know more about traveled visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29264897
#SPJ11
a spring with spring constant 140 n/mn/m and unstretched length 0.4 mm has one end anchored to a wall and a force ff is applied to the other end.
If the force F does 250 J of work in stretching out the spring, what is its final length?
If the force F does 250 J of work in stretching out the spring, what is the magnitude of F at maximum elongation?
The final length of the spring after the force F does 250 J of work is 0.95 m (or 950 mm), the magnitude of the force F at maximum elongation is approximately 133.1 N.
What is Magnification?
Magnification is a measure of the apparent size of an object compared to its actual size. It is commonly used in optics to describe how much larger or smaller an image appears relative to the original object.
In general, magnification is defined as the ratio of the size of the image produced by an optical system to the size of the object itself. It can be calculated using the following formula:
Magnification = Size of the image / Size of the object
The work done by a force (W) can be calculated using the formula W = (1/2) * k * Δx², where k is the spring constant and Δx is the change in length of the spring.
Given that the work done by the force F is 250 J, we can rearrange the formula to solve for Δx:
Δx = √((2 * W) / k)
Substituting the values of W = 250 J and k = 140 N/m, we find:
Δx = √((2 * 250 J) / 140 N/m) ≈ 0.9496 m
Therefore, the final length of the spring is approximately 0.95 m (or 950 mm).
To determine the magnitude of the force F at maximum elongation, we can use the formula F = k * Δx. Substituting the values of k = 140 N/m and Δx = 0.9496 m, we find:
F = 140 N/m * 0.9496 m ≈ 133.1 N
Therefore, the magnitude of the force F at maximum elongation is approximately 133.1 N.
To know more about magnitude, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2596740#
#SPJ4
a reduction in stockholders’ equity on the balance sheet would result from
A reduction in stockholders' equity on the balance sheet can occur due to several factors, including net losses, dividend payments, stock repurchases, or changes in accounting methods.
Stockholders' equity represents the residual interest in a company's assets after deducting liabilities.
A decrease in stockholders' equity can result from net losses incurred by the company, which reduce the retained earnings portion of equity. Additionally, dividend payments to shareholders decrease retained earnings and, consequently, stockholders' equity.
Another factor is stock repurchases, where a company buys back its own shares, reducing the number of outstanding shares and, consequently, the shareholders' ownership in the company. Changes in accounting methods, such as the reclassification of certain items, can also lead to a reduction in stockholders' equity.
These factors contribute to a decrease in the overall value attributable to shareholders' investment in the company.
Learn more about Equity click here :brainly.com/question/19054394
#SPJ11
a 50 kg box is resting on a horizontal surface find the magnitude of the upward applied force, in [n], necessary to lift the box at a constant speed of 2 m/s.
The magnitude of the upward applied force necessary to lift the box at a constant speed of 2 m/s is 490 N.
Assuming there is no friction between the box and the surface, the only force acting on the box is the gravitational force, which is equal to the weight of the box:
F_gravity = m * g
F_gravity = 50 kg * 9.8 m/s^2
F_gravity = 490 N
Since the box is lifted at a constant speed of 2 m/s, the net force acting on the box is zero. Therefore, the upward applied force must be equal in magnitude to the gravitational force:
F_applied = F_gravity
F_applied = 490 N
To know more about gravitational force refer here
https://brainly.com/question/3841670#
#SPJ11
Can anyone make me a summary of strenght weight and elastic strenght?
Strength, weight, and elastic strength are all concepts related to the physical properties and abilities of materials.
Strength refers to the ability of a material to withstand applied forces without deformation or failure. It is a measure of the material's resistance to breaking or undergoing permanent changes in shape. Strong materials can handle higher stresses and strains before reaching their limits.
Weight, on the other hand, is a measure of the force exerted by gravity on an object. It is dependent on the mass of the object and the acceleration due to gravity. Weight is a scalar quantity, typically measured in units of force such as Newtons or pounds.
Therefore, strength relates to a material's ability to resist forces, weight refers to the force of gravity on an object, and elastic strength denotes the maximum stress a material can endure without permanent deformation.
For more details regarding elastic strength, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32354035
#SPJ1
A point on a rotating object has an initial angular velocity ω0 and rotates with an angular acceleration α0 for a time interval from t=0 to time t=t0. The point then rotates at a constant angular speed until time t=t1. What is the angular displacement of the point from t=0 to t=t1? Express your answer in terms of ω0, α0, t0, t1, and/or any fundamental constants as appropriate.
So, the answer is apparently
ω0t0+1/2α0t20+(ω0+α0t0)t1
Why tho? Can someone show me the work? Because the way to get this answer seems to neglect the fact that the second displacement is actually w0(t1-t0)
But, should it not be
The correct expression for the angular displacement from t=0 to t=t1 is
θ = (1/2)α0t0^2 + ω0t1
Let's break down the problem and derive the expression for the angular displacement of the point from t=0 to t=t1.
From t=0 to t=t0:
During this time interval, the point undergoes an angular acceleration α0. We can use the kinematic equation for angular motion to find the angular displacement (θ1) during this time interval. The equation is:
θ1 = ω0t0 + (1/2)α0t0^2
The first term ω0t0 represents the initial angular displacement, and the second term (1/2)α0t0^2 represents the additional displacement due to the angular acceleration α0.
From t=t0 to t=t1:
After the time t=t0, the point rotates at a constant angular speed, which means there is no further angular acceleration. During this time interval, the point's angular displacement is simply the product of its angular velocity ω0 and the time interval (t1 - t0):
θ2 = ω0(t1 - t0)
Total angular displacement:
To find the total angular displacement (θ) from t=0 to t=t1, we need to sum up the angular displacements from the two time intervals:
θ = θ1 + θ2
θ = ω0t0 + (1/2)α0t0^2 + ω0(t1 - t0)
Now, let's simplify this expression:
θ = ω0t0 + (1/2)α0t0^2 + ω0t1 - ω0t0
θ = ω0t0 - ω0t0 + (1/2)α0t0^2 + ω0t1
θ = (1/2)α0t0^2 + ω0t1
So, the correct expression for the angular displacement from t=0 to t=t1 is:
θ = (1/2)α0t0^2 + ω0t1
This expression correctly accounts for the additional angular displacement due to the angular acceleration during the time interval t=0 to t=t0 and the angular displacement during the constant angular speed period from t=t0 to t=t1.
Learn more about angular displacement here
https://brainly.com/question/12972672
#SPJ11
explain logically (using words) why conservation of momentum must be a consequence of newton’s 3rd law. 3b: show that newton’s 2nd law can be rewritten in terms of momentum like so;
Conservation of momentum is a consequence of Newton's third law because when two objects interact, they exert equal and opposite forces on each other.
These forces result in a change in momentum for each object, but the total momentum of the system remains constant.
Newton's second law can be rewritten in terms of momentum by stating that the rate of change of momentum of an object is equal to the net force acting on it. This formulation emphasizes the relationship between force and the resulting change in momentum.
Newton's third law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. When two objects interact, they exert forces on each other. These forces are equal in magnitude but act in opposite directions. According to the law of conservation of momentum, the total momentum of a system remains constant in the absence of external forces.
Consider two objects with masses m1 and m2. When these objects interact, the force exerted by object 1 on object 2 is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force exerted by object 2 on object 1. These forces cause changes in momentum for each object. However, since the forces are equal and opposite, the changes in momentum are also equal and opposite. As a result, the total momentum of the system remains constant, demonstrating the conservation of momentum.
Newton's second law states that the rate of change of momentum of an object is equal to the net force acting on it. Mathematically, this can be expressed as F = ma, where F is the net force, m is the mass of the object, and a is the acceleration. By rearranging this equation, we can express it in terms of momentum as F = dp/dt, where dp represents the change in momentum and dt represents the change in time. This formulation highlights that the force acting on an object is directly related to the rate of change of its momentum.
Learn more about Newton's law : brainly.com/question/31363485
#SPJ11
An electron moves to the right in the plane of the page at velocity 0.5×10 m/s. A magnetic field of 2 tesla is also in the plane of the page at an angle of 30° above the direction of
motion. The magnitude and direction of the force on the charge are.
(a) 8×10-° N, out of the page
(b) 8×10-° N, into the page
(c) 8x10-10 N along the page
(d) 8×10-12 N, into the page
(e) 8x10-12 N, out of the page
The magnitude and direction of the force on the electron can be determined using the formula for the magnetic force on a moving charged particle.
Given the velocity of the electron, the magnetic field strength, and the angle between the velocity and the magnetic field, we can calculate the force. The correct answer is (d) 8×10-12 N, into the page.
The formula for the magnetic force on a moving charged particle is given by F = q * v * B * sin(θ), where F is the force, q is the charge of the particle, v is the velocity of the particle, B is the magnetic field strength, and θ is the angle between the velocity and the magnetic field.
In this case, the electron has a negative charge, and its velocity is 0.5×10 m/s to the right in the plane of the page. The magnetic field has a strength of 2 tesla and is at an angle of 30° above the direction of motion.
Since the electron has a negative charge, the force on it will be in the opposite direction to the velocity. Therefore, the force will be into the page.
Using the formula for the magnetic force, we can calculate the magnitude of the force by substituting the given values: F = (1.6 × 10^-19 C) * (0.5 × 10 m/s) * (2 T) * sin(30°).
Learn more about magnetic force : brainly.com/question/31321824
#SPJ11
a quantum of radiation has an energy of 2.0 kev. what is its frequency? (h = 6.63 1034 js and 1 ev = 1.60 1019 j)
The frequency of the quantum of radiation is approximately 4.83 x 10^(17) Hz.
To find the frequency of a quantum of radiation with an energy of 2.0 keV, we can use the equation relating energy (E) and frequency (ν) of a quantum of radiation:
E = h * ν
Where E is the energy, h is Planck's constant (approximately 6.63 x 10^(-34) J·s), and ν is the frequency.
Given that the energy of the quantum is 2.0 keV, we need to convert it to joules. Since 1 eV is equal to 1.60 x 10^(-19) J, we have:
2.0 keV = 2.0 x 10^(3) eV = 2.0 x 10^(3) x 1.60 x 10^(-19) J = 3.20 x 10^(-16) J
Now we can rearrange the equation to solve for the frequency:
ν = E / h
Substituting the known values, we have:
ν = (3.20 x 10^(-16) J) / (6.63 x 10^(-34) J·s)
≈ 4.83 x 10^(17) Hz
Therefore, the frequency of the quantum of radiation is approximately 4.83 x 10^(17) Hz.
It's important to note that the energy and frequency of a quantum of radiation are directly proportional, as stated by Planck's equation. The higher the energy, the higher the frequency, and vice versa. This relationship is fundamental to understanding the behavior of electromagnetic radiation and the quantization of energy in quantum mechanics.
Learn more about radiation here
https://brainly.com/question/24469662
#SPJ11
astronauts conduct a spacewalk at an altitude of 150 km above the earth's surface. their gravitational acceleration is what percentage of the acceleration due to gravity at sea level?
The gravitational acceleration at an altitude of 150 km above the Earth's surface is approximately 95.30% of the acceleration due to gravity at sea level.
The acceleration due to gravity decreases as you move away from the Earth's surface. It follows an inverse square relationship with distance from the center of the Earth.
To calculate the percentage of the gravitational acceleration at an altitude of 150 km compared to the acceleration due to gravity at sea level, we can use the formula:
Percentage = ([tex]g_{altitude} / g_{sea level[/tex]) * 100
where [tex]g_{altitude[/tex] is the gravitational acceleration at the given altitude and [tex]g_{sea level[/tex] is the gravitational acceleration at sea level.
The gravitational acceleration at sea level is approximately 9.8 [tex]m/s^2[/tex].
To calculate the gravitational acceleration at an altitude of 150 km, we need to consider that the radius of the Earth is about 6,371 km.
Using the formula for the gravitational acceleration at a given altitude (h) above the Earth's surface:
[tex]g_{altitude} = g_{sea level} * (R_{earth} / (R_{earth} + h))^2[/tex]
Substituting the values:
[tex]g_{altitude[/tex] = 9.8 [tex]m/s^2[/tex] * [tex](6,371 km / (6,371 km + 150 km))^2[/tex]
[tex]g_{altitude[/tex] ≈ 9.8 [tex]m/s^2[/tex]* [tex](6,371 km / 6,521 km)^2[/tex]
[tex]g_{altitude[/tex] ≈ 9.8 [tex]m/s^2[/tex] *[tex]0.9753^2[/tex]
[tex]g_{altitude[/tex] ≈ 9.8 [tex]m/s^2[/tex] * 0.9511
[tex]g_{altitude[/tex] ≈ 9.3518[tex]m/s^2[/tex]
Now we can calculate the percentage:
Percentage = (9.3518[tex]m/s^2[/tex] / 9.8 [tex]m/s^2[/tex]) * 100
Percentage ≈ 95.30%
To know more about acceleration refer here
https://brainly.com/question/2303856#
#SPJ11
How much of Dalton's atomic model is still considered accurate
Dalton's atomic theory is still mostly true, and it forms the framework of modern chemistry.
Key Points:
Dalton's atomic theory was the first complete attempt to describe all matter in terms of atoms and their properties.Dalton based his theory on the law of conservation of mass and the law of constant composition.The first part of his theory states that all matter is made of indivisible atoms.The second part of the theory says all atoms of a given element are identical in mass and properties.The third part says compounds are combinations of two or more different types of atoms.The fourth part of the theory states that a chemical reaction is a rearrangement of atoms.Parts of the theory had to be modified based on the discovery of subatomic particles and isotopes.
To know more about Dalton's atomic model,
https://brainly.com/question/27822832
draw the free-body diagram of curiosity consider that the terrain in the upper side b is smoother than the lower side a, such that friction coefficient at μbμb = 0.80 μaμa
The acceleration on side b (ab) is 0.80 times the acceleration on side a (aa).
For side b:
The normal force is equal to the weight of the box, which is mg, where m is the mass of the box (10 kg) and g is the acceleration due to gravity. Thus, N = mg.
The force of friction on side b can be written as:
[tex]Fb = \mu b * mg[/tex].
Since [tex]\mu b = 0.80 * \mu a[/tex],
we have [tex]Fb = 0.80 * \mu a * mg[/tex].
Using Newton's second law, Fb = ma. Substituting the force of friction expression, we get:
[tex]0.80 * \mu a * mg = ma.a = 0.80 * \mu a * g.[/tex]
For side a:
The force of friction on side a (Fa) is given by[tex]Fa = \mu a * mg[/tex].
Using Newton's second law, Fa = ma. Substituting the force of friction expression, we get:
[tex]\mu a * mg = ma.[/tex]
Simplifying the equation, we find:
[tex]a = \mu a * g.[/tex]
Comparing the accelerations on side b (ab) and side a (aa), we have:
[tex]ab = 0.80 * \mu a * g, \\aa = \mu a * g.[/tex]
To know more about acceleration, here
brainly.com/question/2303856
#SPJ4
--The complete Question is, A box of mass 10 kg is placed on a ramp inclined at an angle of 30 degrees to the horizontal. The terrain on the upper side of the ramp, denoted as side b, is smoother than the lower side, denoted as side a. The friction coefficient on side b is 0.80 times the friction coefficient on side a. If the box starts sliding down from rest, what is the acceleration of the box on side b compared to side a? --
Rank each satellite based on its period. Rank from largest to smallest.
1) m = 200 kg, L = 5000 m, v = 160 m/s;
2) m = 400 kg, L = 2500 m, v = 80 m/s;
3) m = 800 kg, L = 10,000 m, v = 40 m/s;
4) m = 200 kg, L= 5000 m, v = 120 m/s;
5) m = 100 kg, L = 2500 m, v = 160 m/s;
6) m = 300 kg, L = 10,000 m, v = 80 m/s;
Ranking the satellites based on period we get,
3) m = 800 kg, L = 10,000 m, v = 40 m/s; (period = 157.08 minutes)
6) m = 300 kg, L = 10,000 m, v = 80 m/s; (period = 78.54 minutes)
1) m = 200 kg, L = 5000 m, v = 160 m/s; (period = 39.27 minutes)
4) m = 200 kg, L= 5000 m, v = 120 m/s; (period = 26.18 minutes)
2) m = 400 kg, L = 2500 m, v = 80 m/s; (period = 19.63 minutes)
5) m = 100 kg, L = 2500 m, v = 160 m/s; (period = 9.82 minutes)
The period of a satellite is given by the formula:
T = 2π(L/v)
where T is the period, L is the distance from the center of the Earth, and v is the velocity of the satellite. The larger the distance and slower the velocity, the longer the period.
Using this formula, we can calculate the periods of each satellite:
1) T = 2π(5000/160) = 39.27 minutes
2) T = 2π(2500/80) = 19.63 minutes
3) T = 2π(10000/40) = 157.08 minutes
4) T = 2π(5000/120) = 26.18 minutes
5) T = 2π(2500/160) = 9.82 minutes
6) T = 2π(10000/80) = 78.54 minutes
Ranking these periods from largest to smallest, we get:
3) m = 800 kg, L = 10,000 m, v = 40 m/s; (period = 157.08 minutes)
6) m = 300 kg, L = 10,000 m, v = 80 m/s; (period = 78.54 minutes)
1) m = 200 kg, L = 5000 m, v = 160 m/s; (period = 39.27 minutes)
4) m = 200 kg, L= 5000 m, v = 120 m/s; (period = 26.18 minutes)
2) m = 400 kg, L = 2500 m, v = 80 m/s; (period = 19.63 minutes)
5) m = 100 kg, L = 2500 m, v = 160 m/s; (period = 9.82 minutes)
Therefore, the satellite with the largest period is number 3, and the satellite with the smallest period is number 5.
Learn more about "satellites ":
https://brainly.com/question/28103637
#SPJ11
In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom, what is the de Broglie wavelength for the electron when it is in the n = 3 level?
Express your answer using three significant figures.
In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom, the de Broglie wavelength (λ) for the electron in the n = 3 level cannot be directly determined. The Bohr model provides information about the energy levels.
The Bohr model describes the behavior of electrons in hydrogen atoms based on the idea of quantized energy levels and circular orbits. Each energy level is characterized by a principal quantum number (n), with higher values of n representing higher energy levels. However, the Bohr model does not provide information about the exact velocity of the electron in a specific energy level.
To calculate the de Broglie wavelength of an electron, we need to know its momentum, which is determined by both its mass and velocity. In the absence of information about the velocity of the electron in the n = 3 level, we cannot calculate its momentum and subsequently determine its de Broglie wavelength using the de Broglie wavelength equation.
Therefore, without additional details or assumptions regarding the velocity of the electron in the n = 3 level, we cannot determine its de Broglie wavelength within the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom.
To learn more about energy , click here: brainly.com/question/24324075
#SPJ11
A small plastic sphere with a charge of 9 nC is near another small plastic sphere with a charge of 7 nC. If they repel each other with a 8.7 x 10^-5 N force, what is the distance between them?
Express your answer in cm
To determine the distance between the two charged spheres, we can use Coulomb's law, which states that the force between two charged objects is given by:
F = k * (|q1| * |q2|) / r^2
Where:
- F is the force between the charges
- k is the electrostatic constant (k = 9 x 10^9 N m^2/C^2)
- |q1| and |q2| are the magnitudes of the charges on the spheres
- r is the distance between the centers of the spheres
Given that the force is 8.7 x 10^-5 N, the charge on the first sphere is 9 nC (9 x 10^-9 C), and the charge on the second sphere is 7 nC (7 x 10^-9 C), we can rearrange the formula to solve for the distance r:
r = √((k * |q1| * |q2|) / F)
Substituting the values:
r = √((9 x 10^9 N m^2/C^2 * 9 x 10^-9 C * 7 x 10^-9 C) / (8.7 x 10^-5 N))
Simplifying the expression:
r = √((567 x 10^-18 N m^2/C^2) / (8.7 x 10^-5 N))
r = √(6.517 x 10^-14 m^2/C^2)
Now, we convert the result to centimeters:
r = √(6.517 x 10^-14 m^2/C^2) * (100 cm/m)
r ≈ 8.08 x 10^-7 m * 100 cm/m
r ≈ 8.08 x 10^-5 cm
Therefore, the distance between the charged spheres is approximately 8.08 x 10^-5 cm.
To know more about distance refer here
https://brainly.com/question/13034462#
#SPJ11
The coordinate of a particle in meters is given by x(t) = 16t − 3. 0t3, where the time t is in
seconds. The particle is momentarily at rest at t
The particle is momentarily at rest so the time is given for the particle x(t) = 16t - 3t³ is t = 4/3 seconds.
Although the idea of time seems simple, physicists concur that it is a difficult topic to completely comprehend. The most common definition of time in sciences is that it is measured in seconds, minutes, hours, etc. However, defining "time" is a more challenging topic for physicists to discuss. Time is a measure of change in a physical quantity in terms of physics, such as the position of the sun in the sky or a heartbeat. It is a magnitude that is used to estimate the length of several occurrences that are not identical. Another everlasting, infinitely divisible, and quantifiable line is time.
A fundamental idea that is present in many different fields of study is time. Time, for instance, is relevant to theories of velocity and speed. It is a variable that is also used to determine the location and motion of objects. It helps to grasp these ideas and enables them to be researched and understood at a deeper level by studying time more thoroughly. The second is the accepted standard unit (SI unit) of time.
x(t) = 16t - 3t³
So velocity is given by derivative of speed
v(t) = 16 - 9t² = 0
16 = 9t²
4 = 3t
t = 4/3.
The time at rest is t = 4/3 seconds.
Learn more about Time:
https://brainly.com/question/17846658
#SPJ4
Which of the following can spread out the diffraction pattern formed by a beam of monochromatic light, on a screen behind a diffraction grating?
a) Decrease the distance between the diffraction grating and the screen.
b) Decrease the number of slits on the diffraction grating.
c) Decrease the frequency of the light.
d) Increase the separation between two neighboring slits on the diffraction grating.
e) none of the above
The correct answer is e) none of the above.
The diffraction pattern formed by a beam of monochromatic light on a screen behind a diffraction grating is determined by the properties of the diffraction grating itself and the wavelength of the light. The options listed do not affect the spreading out of the diffraction pattern:
a) Decreasing the distance between the diffraction grating and the screen does not affect the spreading out of the diffraction pattern. It may affect the overall size of the pattern on the screen, but it does not change the spreading out of the pattern itself.
b) Decreasing the number of slits on the diffraction grating would actually result in a narrower and less spread out diffraction pattern, but it would not spread it out further.
c) Decreasing the frequency of the light (which corresponds to increasing the wavelength) would actually result in a wider diffraction pattern, but it would not spread it out further.
d) Increasing the separation between two neighboring slits on the diffraction grating would also affect the spacing of the interference pattern produced by the grating, but it would not spread out the diffraction pattern further.
In summary, none of the listed options would spread out the diffraction pattern formed by a beam of monochromatic light on a screen behind a diffraction grating.
To know more about wavelength refer here
https://brainly.com/question/3792752#
#SPJ1
use the de broigle relation to find the wavelength of a golf ball of mass 60 grams
Due to the golf ball's stationary state (zero velocity), its momentum is zero, resulting in an undefined wavelength according to the de Broglie relation.
According to the de Broglie relation, the wavelength (λ) of a particle can be determined using the equation:
λ = h / p
Where λ is the wavelength, h is the Planck's constant (approximately 6.626 x 10^(-34) J·s), and p is the momentum of the particle.
To find the wavelength of a golf ball with a mass of 60 grams, we need to convert the mass to kilograms. Since 1 kilogram is equal to 1000 grams, the mass of the golf ball is 0.06 kilograms.
The momentum of an object can be calculated using the formula:
p = m * v
Where p is the momentum, m is the mass, and v is the velocity.
Given that the golf ball is not moving, its velocity is 0 m/s. Therefore, the momentum of the golf ball is also 0.
Substituting these values into the de Broglie relation equation, we have:
λ = h / 0
Since any number divided by 0 is undefined, we cannot determine the wavelength of a golf ball with a mass of 60 grams using the de Broglie relation.
In conclusion, due to the golf ball's stationary state (zero velocity), its momentum is zero, resulting in an undefined wavelength according to the de Broglie relation.
Learn more about wavelength here
https://brainly.com/question/10728818
#SPJ11
at what temperature does a process with [delta]h = 30. kj and [delta]s = 900. j become spontaneous? (give the answer in 3 sig figs)
To determine at what temperature a process with ΔH = 30. kJ and ΔS = 900. J becomes spontaneous, we can use the equation ΔG = ΔH - TΔS.
For a process to be spontaneous, ΔG must be negative. So we can rearrange the equation to solve for the temperature at which ΔG is equal to zero:
ΔG = ΔH - TΔS
0 = 30. kJ - T(900. J)
T = 33.3 KJ/mol ÷ 0.9 KJ/mol/K
T = 37,000 K
Therefore, at a temperature of 37,000 K (rounded to 3 sig figs), the process with ΔH = 30. kJ and ΔS = 900. J becomes spontaneous.
To know more about equation visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/31898690
#SPJ11
hold converging and diverging lens 3 and 4 near your eye and move the lenses from side to side. in which case do objects move with the lens
Objects appear to move with the lens when using a diverging lens (concave lens) near the eye and moving it from side to side.
When using a converging lens (convex lens) near the eye and moving it from side to side, objects in the environment will appear to move in the opposite direction. This is because the converging lens focuses light rays to form an inverted image, causing the perceived motion of objects to be opposite to the direction of lens movement. On the other hand, when using a diverging lens (concave lens) near the eye and moving it from side to side, objects in the environment will appear to move in the same direction as the lens movement. This occurs because the diverging lens causes light rays to diverge, creating a virtual upright image that seems to move along with the lens.
To learn more about diverging lens : brainly.com/question/28348284
#SPJ11
If the westernmost Gandalf Island has rocks dated at 32 million years old, calculate the average rate of motion of these islands. SHOW WORK
If the westernmost Gandalf Island has rocks dated at 32 million years old the average rate of motion of these islands is Distance from the rift and age of seafloor sample, option A.
A piece of land enclosed by water is called an island. Although they are completely encircled by water, continents are not regarded as islands because of their size. Australia, the smallest continent, is larger than Greenland, the biggest island, by more than three times. In the oceans, lakes, and rivers of the world, there are many islands. Their size, environment, and types of living things all differ widely.
Some islands, like the Aleutian Islands in the American state of Alaska, are always chilly and covered with ice. Some are located in warm, tropical seas, like Tahiti. Thousands of kilometres separate many islands, like Easter Island in the South Pacific, from the closest continent. Other islands, like the Greek Cyclades in the Aegean Sea, are clustered together in what are known as archipelagoes.
Learn more about Gandalf Island:
https://brainly.com/question/13490795
#SPJ4
Complete question:
If the westernmost Gandalf Island has rocks dated at 32 million years old, calculate the average rate of motion of these islands.
-Distance from the rift and age of seafloor sample
-Type of rock and distance from the rift
-Age of the continent and depth of the water
-Age of the seafloor sample and age of the continent
What is the magnitude μ=|μ⃗ | of the magnetic moment for the orbiting electron?
Express your answer in terms of e, v, and r.
I = −ev/2πr
A=πr2
The magnetic moment of an orbiting electron can be expressed as μ = IA, where I is the current and A is the area of the orbit. For a circular orbit, the current can be expressed as I = -ev/2πr. The area of the orbit is given by A = πr^2. Combining these equations, the magnetic moment isμ = -(e/2m)rv, where m is the mass of the electron.
The magnetic moment of an orbiting electron is given by the formula μ = IA, where I is the current flowing in the loop and A is the area of the loop. For a circular orbit, the current is given by I = -ev/2πr, where e is the charge of the electron, v is its velocity, and r is the radius of the orbit. The negative sign in the formula for current indicates that the current flows in the opposite direction to the motion of the electron.
The area of the circular orbit is given by A = πr^2, where r is the radius of the orbit. Substituting the expression for current and area into the formula for magnetic moment, we obtain:
μ = IA = (-ev/2πr)πr^2 = -e/2mr(rv)
where m is the mass of the electron. This equation shows that the magnitude of the magnetic moment is proportional to the product of the radius of the orbit, the velocity of the electron, and its charge. It also shows that the magnetic moment is negative, indicating that it is opposite in direction to the angular momentum of the electron. This is known as the "spin magnetic moment" of the electron, and is one of the fundamental properties of the electron.
To learn more about magnetic moment click here: brainly.com/question/29314081
#SPJ11
When set down on its suspension system,a 5.0 kg machine deflects the springs by 0.50 mm. In operation,the machine is subjected to a 10 N force oscillating at 1750 rpm typical electric motor speed.What is the amplitude of the machine's displacement oscillation?
To determine the amplitude of the machine's displacement oscillation, we can use the concept of the spring-mass system.
Given:
Mass of the machine (m) = 5.0 kg
Deflection of the springs (x) = 0.50 mm = 0.50 * 10^-3 m
Force applied (F) = 10 N
Motor speed (ω) = 1750 rpm
The force applied to the machine in operation creates an oscillation in the system. We can relate the force, mass, and displacement using Hooke's Law and the equation for simple harmonic motion.
1. Hooke's Law:
According to Hooke's Law, the force exerted by a spring is proportional to the displacement. Mathematically, it can be expressed as:
F = -k * x
where F is the force applied, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.
2. Simple Harmonic Motion:
In a simple harmonic motion, the displacement of the mass can be described as:
x(t) = A * cos(ωt)
where x(t) is the displacement at time t, A is the amplitude of the oscillation, ω is the angular frequency (2π times the frequency), and t is the time.
To determine the amplitude (A) of the displacement oscillation, we need to relate the force, mass, spring constant, and displacement.
First, let's find the spring constant (k) using Hooke's Law:
F = -k * x
k = -F / x
k = -10 N / (0.50 * 10^-3 m)
Next, let's calculate the angular frequency (ω) using the motor speed:
ω = (2π * frequency)
The frequency can be calculated by converting the motor speed from rpm to Hz:
frequency = 1750 rpm / 60 s
Now, we can calculate the angular frequency:
ω = (2π * frequency)
Finally, we can determine the amplitude (A) of the displacement oscillation:
A = x / cos(ωt)
Substituting the given values:
A = (0.50 * 10^-3 m) / cos(ωt)
Please note that the value of A will depend on the specific time (t) at which we want to calculate the amplitude. In this case, the amplitude will vary over time as the machine undergoes oscillations.
If you provide a specific time (t), I can help you calculate the amplitude at that particular moment.
To know more about oscillation refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30111348#
#SPJ11
find the average power dissipated in the 40 ω resistor in the circuit if ig=5cos105ta . express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.
the average power dissipated in the 40 ω resistor in the circuit is 250 W (with three significant figures).
he average power dissipated in the 40 ω resistor in the circuit with ig=5cos(105t)A as the current source.Vrms = (1/sqrt(2)) * 200 = 141.4 V
The given values are:Resistance: R = 40 ω Current: ig(t) = 5cos(105t) A The rms value of the current, I_rms, can be found by dividing the peak current (in this case, 5 A) by the square root of 2:
I_rms = 5 / √2 ≈ 3.536 A
The average power dissipated in a resistor can be found using the formula P = I_rms² * R, where P is the power, I_rms is the rms current, and R is the resistance.
P = (3.536 A)² * 40 ω ≈ 499.2 W
To know more about power visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4257439
#SPJ11
how do we measure the mass of an extrasolar planet quizlet
The mass of an extrasolar planet can be measured using various techniques, including the radial velocity method, transit photometry, and gravitational microlensing.
The radial velocity method involves measuring the tiny wobbles of the star caused by the gravitational pull of the planet as it orbits around it. As the planet orbits, it causes the star to move slightly back and forth in space, which can be detected through changes in the star's spectrum. By analyzing these changes, scientists can determine the mass and orbit of the planet.
Transit photometry involves measuring the slight dip in a star's brightness as a planet passes in front of it. The depth and duration of the dip can provide information about the size and mass of the planet.
Gravitational microlensing is another method used to measure the mass of extrasolar planets. This method involves observing how the gravity of a planet or star bends the light from a more distant star. The amount of bending can provide information about the mass and position of the planet.
Overall, measuring the mass of extrasolar planets can be challenging due to their great distances from Earth and the limitations of current technology. However, these techniques have allowed scientists to discover and study thousands of planets beyond our solar system.
To know more about gravitational pull,
https://brainly.com/question/6839945
#SPJ11
resolution improves when the wavelength of the illuminating light decreases.
TRUE
FALSE
The statement "resolution improves when the wavelength of the illuminating light decreases" is false because The resolution of an optical system is determined by the diffraction limit.
What is diffraction?
Diffraction is a phenomenon in physics that occurs when waves encounter an obstacle or pass through an aperture, causing them to spread out and bend around the edges of the obstruction. It is a characteristic behavior exhibited by all types of waves, including light, sound, and water waves.
When a wave encounters an obstacle or passes through a narrow opening, the wavefronts are altered and deviate from their original path. This causes the wave to spread out into regions of constructive and destructive interference, leading to a pattern of alternating light and dark regions.
The resolution of an optical system is determined by the diffraction limit, which is governed by the numerical aperture and the wavelength of the illuminating light. According to the Rayleigh criterion, the minimum resolvable detail is approximately equal to the wavelength of light divided by twice the numerical aperture. Therefore, as the wavelength of the illuminating light decreases, the resolution of the system actually improves.
When the wavelength decreases, the diffraction effects become more pronounced, causing the light to spread out less and allowing finer details to be resolved. This is why shorter wavelength light, such as blue or ultraviolet light, can provide higher resolution compared to longer wavelength light, such as red or infrared light.
In summary, a decrease in the wavelength of the illuminating light leads to an improvement in resolution, allowing for the visualization of finer details in an optical system.
To know more about Diffraction, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12290582#
#SPJ4