A rectangular garden has a walkway around it. The area of the garden is ​4(4.5x+3.5​). The combined area of the garden and the walkway is 5.5​(6x+5​). Find the area of the walkway around the garden as the sum of two terms.

Translate the solid circle 2 units to the left and 2 units down and dilate the solid circle by a scale factor of 2. and the circles are similar

(a) To move the solid circle exactly onto the dashed circle, we need to perform the following transformations:

Therefore, the blank spaces should be filled as follows:

Translate the solid circle 2 units to the left and 2 units down.

Dilate the solid circle by a scale factor of 2.

(b) Yes, the original solid circle and the dashed circle are not similar, because they have different radii.

This is because all circles are similar

Read more about transformation at

https://brainly.com/question/27224272

#SPJ1

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of unitary method comes out to be during the 4-second period, the tram's elevation changed by 3 metres every second.

To complete the assignment, use the iii . -and-true basic technique, the real variables, and any pertinent details gathered from basic and specialised questions. In response, customers might be given another opportunity to sample expression the products. If these changes don't take place, we will miss out on important gains in our knowledge of programmes.

Here,

By dividing the overall elevation change (12 metres) by the total time required (4 seconds),

it is possible to determine the change in the tram's elevation every second. We would then have the average rate of elevation change per second.

=> Elevation change equals 12 metres

=> Total duration: 4 seconds

=>  12 meters / 4 seconds

=> 3 meters/second

As a result, during the 4-second period, the tram's elevation changed by 3 metres every second.

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1  

The total amount of money received by each child after splitting $9 among 15 children is equal to $0.60.

Total number of children is equal to 15

Total amount of money distributed among 15 children = $9

To find out how much each child receives,

We can divide the total amount of money by the number of children.

In this case, there are 15 children and $9 to split.

So, the amount of money each child receives is equal to,

(Total amount of money )/ ( total number of children )

= $9 ÷ 15

= $0.60

Therefore, amount of money received by each child in the group of 15 children is equal to $0.60.

Learn more about children here

brainly.com/question/159555

#SPJ4

Answer:

2.07 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Hypotenuse = 2 cm

Adjacent side = a

Formula

cos θ = Hypotenuse/Adjacent side

cos 15 = 2/a

Note

The value of cos 15 is approximately 0.965.

0.965 = 2/a

a = 2/0.965

a = 2.07 cm ( approximately )

The current in the circuit when the resistance is 12 ohms is 40 amps.

What is fraction?

A fraction is a mathematical term that represents a part of a whole or a ratio between two quantities.

We can use the inverse proportionality formula to solve this problem, which states that:

current (in amps) x resistance (in ohms) = constant

Let's call this constant "k". We can use the information given in the problem to find k:

24 amps x 20 ohms = k

k = 480

Now we can use this constant to find the current when the resistance is 12 ohms:

current x 12 ohms = 480

current = 480 / 12

current = 40 amps

Therefore, the current in the circuit when the resistance is 12 ohms is 40 amps.

To learn more about fraction from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

To determine if each ordered pair is a point of intersection between the line x - y = 6 and the circle y² - 26 = -x², we need to substitute the values of x and y in both equations and see if they are true for both.

For the ordered pair (1, -5):

x - y = 6 becomes 1 - (-5) = 6, which is true.

y² - 26 = -x² becomes (-5)² - 26 = -(1)², which is false.

Therefore, (1, -5) is not a point of intersection.

For the ordered pair (1, 5):

x - y = 6 becomes 1 - 5 = -4, which is false.

y² - 26 = -x² becomes (5)² - 26 = -(1)², which is true.

Therefore, (1, 5) is a point of intersection.

For the ordered pair (5, -1):

x - y = 6 becomes 5 - (-1) = 6, which is true.

y² - 26 = -x² becomes (-1)² - 26 = -(5)², which is false.

Therefore, (5, -1) is not a point of intersection.

So the answer is:

(1,-5) - No

(1,5) - Yes

(5,-1) - No

to know more about equations

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

Answer: there is only one number

Answer:

Solo hay un número primo que se puede escribir como suma de dos números primos y también como diferencia de dos números primos.

Espero haber ayudado :D

The value of x for the intersecting chords is derived to be 1.9 and the segment FS is equal to 18

The property of intersecting chords states that in a circle, if two chords intersect, the product of the lengths of the segments of one chord is equal to the product of the lengths of the segments of the other chord.

UF × FS = VF × FT

8(10x - 1) = 9 × 16

80x - 8 = 144

80x = 144 + 8 {collect like terms}

80x = 152

x = 152/80 {divide through by 80}

x = 1.9

FS = 10(1.9) - 1 = 18

Therefore, the value of x for the intersecting chords is derived to be 1.9 and the segment FS is equal to 18

Read more about intersecting chords here:https://brainly.com/question/13950364

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its a rectanlge

(1) m∠1=45°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°)

(2) m∠1=180°-129°=51°(sum of two interior angles on the same side is equal to the exterior angle)

(3) m∠1= 152°-115°=37°

(4) m∠1=88°m∠2=42° m∠3=113°

An angle is a geometric figure formed by two rays that share a common endpoint, called the vertex. The measure of an angle is typically expressed in degrees or radians, and it describes the amount of rotation needed to bring one of the rays into coincidence with the other.

A triangle is a closed two-dimensional shape with three straight sides and three angles.

(1) m∠1=45°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°)

(2) m∠1=180°-129°=51°(sum of two interior angles on the same side is equal to the exterior angle)

(3) m∠1= 152°-115°=37°(sum of two interior angles on the same side is equal to the exterior angle)

(4) m∠1=88°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°),m∠2=42°(vertically opposite angle theorem), m∠3=113°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°)

Learn more about angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ1

The probability that a rainfall event exceeds the mean by more than 2 standard deviations is approximately 0.0498.

a. The exponential distribution with a mean of 2.725 hours can be expressed as λ = 1/2.725. Using this parameter, we can calculate the probabilities as follows:

P(X ≥ 2) = [tex]e^{(-λ2) }= e^{(-1/2.7252)[/tex] ≈ 0.4800

P(X ≤ 3) = 1 - [tex]e^{(-λ3)} = 1 - e^{(-1/2.7253)[/tex] ≈ 0.6674

P(2 ≤ X ≤ 3) = [tex]e^{(-λ2)} - e^{(-λ3)} = e^{(-1/2.7252)} - e^{(-1/2.7253)}[/tex] ≈ 0.1474

b. The standard deviation of an exponential distribution is equal to the mean, so 2 standard deviations above the mean would be 2*2.725 = 5.45 hours. The probability that a rainfall event exceeds this duration can be calculated as follows:

P(X > 5.45) =[tex]e^{(-λ5.45)} = e^{(-1/2.7255.45)}[/tex] ≈ 0.0498

Therefore, the probability that a rainfall event exceeds the mean by more than 2 standard deviations is approximately 0.0498.

Learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Suppose that rainfall duration follows an exponential distribution with mean value 2.725 hours.

a. What is the probability that the duration of a particular rainfall event is at least 2 hours? At most 3 hours? Between 2 and 3 hours? (.4800, .6674, .1474)

b. What is the probability that rainfall duration exceeds the mean value by more than 2 standard deviations? (.0498)

The two column proof is written as follows

Statement                                                           Reason

MA = XR                                           given (opposite sides of rectangle)

MK = AR                                           given (opposite sides of rectangle)

arc MA = arc RK                               Equal chords have equal arcs

arc MK = arc AK                               Equal chords have equal arcs

An arc is a portion of the circumference of a circle, and a chord is a line segment that connects two points on the circumference.

If two chords in a circle are equal in length, then they will cut off equal arcs on the circumference. This is because the arcs that the chords cut off are subtended by the same central angle.

Learn more on circle theorem at:

https://brainly.com/question/6240879

#SPJ1

Therefore, the correct answer is (B) No, she needs 1/2 cup more.

To determine if Patricia has enough rice cereal for her recipe, we need to calculate the total amount of rice cereal she has after all her actions and compare it to the 3 cups required for the cereal clusters.

Initially, Patricia had 5 cups of rice cereal. She used 3 cups to make granola bars, leaving her with 2 cups. She then borrowed 0.5 cup from her friend, which brings her total to 2.5 cups.

Finally, she needs 3 cups of rice cereal for the cereal clusters recipe. Since she only has 2.5 cups, she does not have enough rice cereal and needs to get more. Therefore, the correct answer is B) No, she needs 1/2 cup more.

She then borrows 0.5 cup, so she now has 2 + 0.5 = 2.5 cups.

needs 3 - 2.5 = 0.5 cups more.

To know more about amount visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22661325

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Correct answer is sinA/3.2=sin110°/4.6

Becca made a mistake while constructing triangle DEF by using the angles 50°, 65°, and 65°. The mistake she made was violating the triangle inequality theorem.

According to the theorem, the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. In other words, if we add the lengths of two sides of a triangle, it must be greater than the length of the third side.

Since Becca only used angles to construct the triangle, she did not consider the side lengths of the triangle. Therefore, there is a possibility that the triangle she constructed does not satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, and it may not be a valid triangle.

In order to ensure the triangle is valid, Becca needs to consider the side lengths while constructing the triangle. She could use trigonometric ratios or a ruler and protractor to measure the side lengths and angles accurately.

To know more about triangle inequality theorem here

https://brainly.com/question/1163433

#SPJ4

Para entender mejor esta función, podemos expandirla y simplificarla:

f(x) = (x+2)(-x+6)

f(x) = [tex]-x^2 + 4x + 12[/tex]

Esta es una función cuadrática, lo que significa que tiene la forma de una parábola. El término cuadrático ([tex]-x^2[/tex]) hace que la parábola tenga una concavidad hacia abajo, lo que significa que el valor máximo de la función se encuentra en el vértice de la parábola.

Podemos encontrar el valor del precio de venta que maximiza la ganancia utilizando la fórmula x = -b/(2a), donde "a" es el coeficiente del término cuadrático y "b" es el coeficiente del término lineal.

En este caso, a = -1 y b = 4, por lo que:

x = -4/(2-1)

x = -4/-2

x = 2

Por lo tanto, el precio de venta que maximiza la ganancia es de 2 por unidad. Si se venden las unidades a este precio, la ganancia total sería de:

f(2) = [tex]-2^2 + 4(2) + 12[/tex]

f(2) = -4 + 8 + 12

f(2) = 16 dólares

Es importante tener en cuenta que la función f(x) también puede ser utilizada para calcular la ganancia total para cualquier precio de venta "x". Por ejemplo, si se venden las unidades a 3 por unidad, la ganancia sería:

f(3) = [tex]-3^2 + 4(3) + 12[/tex]

f(3) = -9 + 12 + 12

f(3) = 15 dólares

for such more question on mejor esta

https://brainly.com/question/1030576

#SPJ11

The company should use the adjusted R² approach to select variables for their recommendation system, as it will better account for the influence of multiple variables and help create a more accurate model for predicting subscriber's movie ratings.

To build a successful movie recommendation system for the online media streaming company, it's important to consider the appropriate statistical approach for selecting variables.

In this case, the company should use the adjusted R² approach instead of the p-value approach.

The adjusted R² approach is more suitable for this scenario because it measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable (subscriber's ratings) that is predictable from the independent variables (movie and subscriber data).

Adjusted R² takes into account the number of variables and adjusts for overfitting, which is important when dealing with a large dataset, like the one the streaming company has.

It helps in identifying the most influential factors and creating a model that better predicts movie ratings.
On the other hand, the p-value approach focuses on the statistical significance of individual variables, which might lead to including variables that are significant but not necessarily the best predictors for movie ratings.

This could result in a less accurate recommendation system.

For similar question on proportion.

https://brainly.com/question/11941144

#SPJ11

The perimeter and the area of the regular polygon are 20 inches and 27.53 square inches.

The figure representing a regular polygon with five sides of same length, whose perimeter and area is well described by following formulas:

Perimeter

p = n · l

Area

A = (n · l · a) / 2

Where:

Where the apothema is:

a = 0.5 · l / tan (180° / n)

If we know that l = 4 in and n = 5, then the perimeter and the area of the polygon are:

Perimeter

p = 5 · (4 in)

p = 20 in

Area

a = 0.5 · (4 in) / tan (180° / 5)

a = 0.5 · (4 in) / tan 36°

a = 2.753 in

A = [5 · (4 in) · (2.753 in)] / 2

A = 27.53 in²

To learn more on area of regular polygons: https://brainly.com/question/12291395

#SPJ1

Answer:

C and D

Step-by-step explanation:

cosA = [tex]\frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{AB}{AC}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{4}{5}[/tex] ⇒ C

sinA = [tex]\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{BC}{AC}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex] ⇒ D

The statement that is true about Evan's expression is that it represents a linear function of the amount of medicine in his bloodstream, where the initial amount is 100 milligrams and the rate of change is -0.4 milligrams per minute.

What is the equivalent expression?

Equivalent expressions are expressions that perform the same function despite their appearance. If two algebraic expressions are equivalent, they have the same value when we use the same variable value.

The expression 100 - 0.4m represents the amount of medicine in Evan's bloodstream after m minutes, where the amount of medicine decreases by 0.4 milligrams each minute.

The coefficient of the variable m (-0.4) represents the rate of change of the amount of medicine in Evan's bloodstream per minute. It tells us that for every one minute that passes, the amount of medicine in his bloodstream decreases by 0.4 milligrams.

The constant term (100) represents the initial amount of medicine in Evan's bloodstream before the medicine starts to decrease.

Therefore, the statement that is true about Evan's expression is that it represents a linear function of the amount of medicine in his bloodstream, where the initial amount is 100 milligrams and the rate of change is -0.4 milligrams per minute.

To learn more about the equivalent expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer:

The formula for the area of a trapezoid is:

Area = (b1 + b2) / 2 x h

where b1 and b2 are the lengths of the two parallel bases, and h is the height.

We are given that the area of the trapezoid is 96 ft, the height is 8 ft, and one of the bases (b1) is 11 ft. We can use this information to find the length of the other base (b2).

Substituting the given values into the formula for the area of a trapezoid, we get:

96 = (11 + b2) / 2 x 8

Multiplying both sides by 2 and dividing by 8, we get:

24 = 11 + b2

Subtracting 11 from both sides, we get:

b2 = 13

Therefore, the length of the other base is 13 ft.

The correct statement about scale factor is the radius of the larger can will be 8 inches. (option c).

Let's first consider the dimensions of the small can of tomato paste. We are given that it has a radius of 2 inches and a height of 4 inches. Therefore, its volume can be calculated using the formula for the volume of a cylinder, which is V = πr²h, where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height. Substituting the given values, we get:

V_small = π(2²)(4) = 16π cubic inches

Using these dimensions, we can calculate the volume of the larger can using the same formula:

V_large = π(6²)(12) = 432π cubic inches

Now, let's compare the volumes of the small and large cans. We have:

V_large = 432π cubic inches > 16π cubic inches = V_small

Therefore, we can conclude that the volume of the larger can is greater than the volume of the smaller can. But is it three times greater? Let's compare:

V_large = 432π cubic inches 3

V_small = 3(16π) cubic inches = 48π cubic inches

We see that 432π cubic inches is not equal to 48π cubic inches, so option b) is not correct.

Finally, let's consider the radius of the larger can. We found earlier that it is 6 inches, which is greater than the radius of the smaller can, but it is not 8 inches. Therefore, option c) is correct.

To know more about scale factor here

https://brainly.com/question/30215119

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

A small can of tomato paste has a radius of 2 inches and a height of 4 inches. Suppose the larger, commercial-size can has dimensions that are related by a scale factor of 3. Which of these true?

a) The radius of the larger can will be 5 inches.

b) The volume of the larger can will be 3 times the volume of the smaller can

c) The radius of the larger can will be 8 inches.

d) The volume of the larger can is 3 times the volume of smaller can

This means that we can be 95% confident that the true population means examination score falls within this range based on the sample data.

The confidence interval estimate of the population means examination score can be calculated using the sample mean and the margin of error. The margin of error depends on the level of confidence and the sample size.

For example, if a sample of 100 applications provided a sample mean score of 80, and a 95% confidence level is used, the confidence interval estimate of the population mean examination score would be:

Margin of error = (critical value) x (standard error)

The critical value for a 95% confidence level with 99 degrees of freedom is 1.984. The standard error can be calculated using the formula:

Standard error = (standard deviation) / sqrt(sample size)

If the standard deviation of the examination scores is known, it can be used in the formula. If not, the sample standard deviation can be used as an estimate.

Assuming a sample standard deviation of 10, the standard error would be:

[tex]Standard\  error = \frac{10} { \sqrt{(100)}} = 1[/tex]

Therefore, the margin of error would be:

Margin of error = 1.984 x 1 = 1.984

The confidence interval estimate of the population means examination score would be:

80 ± 1.984, or between 78.016 and 81.984.

This means that we can be 95% confident that the true population means examination score falls within this range based on the sample data.

learn more about confidence intervals,

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The 95% confidence interval for the population mean examination score would be between 72.23 and 77.77, to the

nearest whole number.

To determine the confidence interval estimate of the population mean examination score based on a sample mean

provided to the nearest whole number, we need to know the sample size and the level of confidence.

Assuming a normal distribution and a level of confidence of 95%, we can use the following formula to calculate the

confidence interval estimate:

Confidence interval = sample mean +/- (critical value) x (standard error)

The critical value can be found using a t-distribution table or a calculator, based on the sample size and degrees of

freedom (n-1). For a sample size of 30 or more, we can use the z-score instead of the t-score.

The standard error is the standard deviation of the sample divided by the square root of the sample size.

For example, if a sample of 50 applications provided a sample mean of 75, and the standard deviation was 10, the

standard error would be 10/sqrt(50) = 1.41.

Assuming a level of confidence of 95%, the critical value for a sample size of 50 and degrees of freedom of 49 would be 1.96.

Therefore, the confidence interval estimate would be:

75 +/- 1.96 x 1.41 = 75 +/- 2.77

for such more question on confidence interval

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ11

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all we use the "law of sines"

to get the measure/length we need the opposing angle of it of the side, now in this case the missing side is x

and its opposing angle is missing so using common sense, the sum of angles in the triangle is 180°

180°=70°+51°+ x

x = 180°-121°

=59°

Using law of sines:

(sides are represented by small letters/capital letters are the angles)

a/sinA= b/sinB= c/sinC

We have one given side which is "9"

so,

9/sin70= x/sin59

doing the criss-cross method,

9×sin59=sin70×x

9×sin59/sin70=x

x=8.2 (answer 1)

I hope this was helpful <3

Using the fact that the triangles are similar we can see that the value of x is  36

We can see that the triangles are similar due to the same interior angles, then ther is a scale factor k between them.

So we can write:

20*k = 48

k = 48/20 = 2.4

Then:

x = 15*2.4

x = 36

That is the value of x.

Learn more about similar triangles at:

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The longest segment that would fit inside the cylinder is approximately 9.06 centimeters.

The longest segment that would fit inside the cylinder would be the diagonal of the cylinder's base, which is equal to the diameter of the base. The diameter of the base is equal to twice the radius, so it is 6 cm. Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find the length of the diagonal:

[tex]diagonal^2 = radius^2 + height^2 \\diagonal^2 = 3^2 + 8^2 \\diagonal^2 = 9 + 64 \\diagonal^2 = 73 \\diagonal = sqrt(73)[/tex]

Therefore, the longest segment that would fit inside the cylinder is approximately 8.54 cm (rounded to the nearest hundredth).
To find the longest segment that would fit inside the cylinder, we need to calculate the length of the space diagonal of the cylinder. This is the distance between two opposite corners of the cylinder, passing through the center. We can use the Pythagorean theorem in 3D for this calculation.

The terms we'll use are:
- Radius (r): 3 cm
- Height (h): 8 cm

To find the space diagonal (d), we can use the following formula:

[tex]d = \sqrt{r^2 + r^2 + h^2}[/tex]
Plug in the values:

[tex]d = \sqrt{((3 cm)^2 + (3 cm)^2 + (8 cm)^2)} d = \sqrt{(9 cm^2 + 9 cm^2 + 64 cm^2)} d = \sqrt{(82 cm^2)}[/tex]
d ≈ 9.06 cm

Learn more about cylinder here:

https://brainly.com/question/23991640

#SPJ11

The longest segment that can fit inside the cylinder is. [tex]$\sqrt{73}$ cm[/tex].

The longest segment that can fit inside a cylinder is a diagonal that connects two opposite vertices of the cylinder.

The length of this diagonal by using the Pythagorean theorem.

Pythagorean theorem or Pythagoras' theorem is a fundamental relation in Euclidean geometry between the three sides of a right triangle.

It states that the area of the square whose side is the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares on the other two sides.

This theorem can be written as an equation relating the lengths of the sides a, b and the hypotenuse c, often called the Pythagorean equation:[1]

[tex]{\displaystyle a^{2}+b^{2}=c^{2}.}[/tex]

The theorem is named for the Greek philosopher Pythagoras, born around 570 BC.

The theorem has been proven numerous times by many different methods – possibly the most for any mathematical theorem.

The proofs are diverse, including both geometric proofs and algebraic proofs, with some dating back thousands of years.

Consider a right triangle with legs equal to the radius.

[tex]$r$[/tex] and the height [tex]$h$[/tex] of the cylinder, and with the diagonal as the hypotenuse.

Then, by the Pythagorean theorem, the length of the diagonal is:

[tex]$\sqrt{r^2 + h^2} = \sqrt{3^2 + 8^2} = \sqrt{73}$[/tex]

For similar questions on cylinder

https://brainly.com/question/23935577

#SPJ11

The psychologist finds that the estimated Cohen's d is  0.32, the t statistic is 2. 83, and r² is 0.073.  Using r² and the extension of Cohen's guidelines for interpreting the effect size using r², there is a small treatment effect.   job seeker finds that the estimated Cohen's d is 0.88, the t statistic is 7. 78, and r² is 0.479.Using r² and the extension of Cohen's guidelines for interpreting the effect size with r², there is a large treatment effect

To calculate the estimated Cohen's d, we use the formula

d = (M - M0) / SD

where M is the mean of the treatment group (job seekers who received training on using the Internet to find job listings), M0 is the mean of the control group (typical job seeker), and SD is the pooled standard deviation of the two groups. Using the given values, we have

M = 8.7 months

M0 = 7.4 months

SD = 4.1 months

So, d = (8.7 - 7.4) / 4.1 = 0.32

Using Cohen's guidelines for interpreting effect size with Cohen's d, a value of 0.2 is considered a small effect, 0.5 a medium effect, and 0.8 a large effect. Therefore, with an estimated Cohen's d of 0.32, there is a small treatment effect.

To calculate r², we use the formula

r² = t² / (t² + df)

where t is the t statistic, df is the degrees of freedom (n-2 for a two-group design), and n is the sample size. Using the given values for the Internet training group, we have

t = 2.83

n = 81

df = 79

So, r² = 2.83² / (2.83² + 79) = 0.073

Using the extension of Cohen's guidelines for interpreting effect size with r², a value of 0.01 is considered a small effect, 0.09 a medium effect, and 0.25 a large effect. Therefore, with an r² of 0.073, there is a small treatment effect.

For the job seekers who received training on interview skills, we can calculate Cohen's d and r² in a similar way

d = (M - M0) / SD = (8.1 - 7.4) / 0.8 = 0.88

t = 7.78

n = 81

df = 79

r² = 7.78² / (7.78² + 79) = 0.479

Using Cohen's guidelines for interpreting effect size with Cohen's d, a value of 0.2 is considered a small effect, 0.5 a medium effect, and 0.8 a large effect. Therefore, with an estimated Cohen's d of 0.88, there is a large treatment effect.

Using the extension of Cohen's guidelines for interpreting effect size with r², a value of 0.01 is considered a small effect, 0.09 a medium effect, and 0.25 a large effect. Therefore, with an  r² of 0.479, there is a medium to large treatment effect.

To know more about estimated Cohen's d:

https://brainly.com/question/31427772

#SPJ4

Answer:.317

.091

Small to med

Med

.875

.431

Large

Large

Step-by-step explanation:

Since cosine is negative and a is in quadrant III, we know that sine is positive. We can use the Pythagorean identity to solve for sine:

sin^2(a) + cos^2(a) = 1

sin^2(a) + (-5/9)^2 = 1

sin^2(a) = 1 - (-5/9)^2

sin^2(a) = 1 - 25/81

sin^2(a) = 56/81

Taking the square root of both sides:

sin(a) = ±sqrt(56/81)

Since a is in quadrant III, sin(a) is positive. Therefore:

sin(a) = sqrt(56/81) = (2/3)sqrt(14)