A rectangular solar panel has a length of 11 inches shorter than 4 times it’s width if the perimeter of the panel is 218 inches what are the dimensions of the panel

Answer:

y = -2x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Equation of -x +2y =4

Point of (-2,1)

-x + 2y = 4

y = x/2 + 2 or y = 1/2x + 2

Which means the equation's slope is m = 1/2.

The slope of the perpendicular line is negative inverse which is m = -2.

Now we have an equation of y = -2x + a.

Use (-2, 1) to find a:

1 = (-2)(-2) + a

a = -3

y = - 2x - 3

Answer:

The correct answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

17(n+31)=300

Step-by-step explanation:

17 times the sum of a number, n and 31 is 17(n+31)

and then set that equal to 300

Answer: x=6/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4.

Step-by-step explanation:

(x^2 + 7x - 9) + (3x^2 - 2x) + (x^2 + 7x - 9) + (3x^2 - 2x)

x^2 + 7x - 9 + 3x^2 - 2x + x^2 + 7x - 9 + 3x^2 - 2x

Rearranging order:

3x^2 + 3x^2 + x^2 + x^2 + 7x + 7x - 2x - 2x - 9 - 9

Combine like terms

8x^2 + 10x - 18

Answer:

it's 2

Step-by-step explanation:

a= -3/4

b=0

c=2

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 1.713

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

A researcher wants to test if the mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is

different from $110,000

Mean of the Population  μ = $110,000

Sample size 'n' = 53

Mean of the sample x⁻ = $114,000.

standard deviation of the Population = $17,000,

Level of significance = 0.01

Null hypothesis :

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

H₀:  x⁻ =  μ

Alternative Hypothesis :  x⁻ ≠  μ

Step(ii):-

Test statistic

                 [tex]Z = \frac{x^{-}-mean }{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

                 [tex]Z = \frac{114000-110000}{\frac{17000}{\sqrt{53} } }[/tex]

                Z =  1.7130

Tabulated value Z = 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

The calculated Z- value =  1.7130 < 2.576 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference between the  mean annual salary of all lawyers in a city is  different from $110,000

Answer:

b = 4,

m = 4/3,

y = 4x/3 + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see the line intercepts the x-axis in (-3,0) and the y-axis in (0,4). So, using the fact that the line equation in the slope-intercept form is:

[tex]y = mx+b[/tex]

We can substitute the points we know:

→ (0,4):

[tex]y = mx+b\\\\4 = m\cdot0+b\\\\4 = 0+b\\\\\boxed{b=4}[/tex]

→ (-3,0):

[tex]y = mx+b\\\\0 = -3m + 4\\\\3m = 4\\\\\boxed{m = \dfrac{4}{3}}[/tex]

So, the line equation in form requested is:

[tex]\boxed{y=\dfrac{4}{3}x+4}[/tex]

The area of a rectangle is the product of length and width thus the area will be 1358 square meters.

A rectangle is a geometrical figure in which opposite sides are equal.

The angle between any two consecutive sides will be 90 degrees.

The perimeter of the rectangle = 2( length + width).

It is known that,

Area of rectangle = length × width.

Area = 97 x 14 = 1358 sqare meters

Hence "The area of a rectangle is the product of length and width thus the area will be 1358 square meters".

For more about rectangles,

https://brainly.com/question/15019502

#SPJ5

Answer:

A negative number, a negative integer, a negative multiple of 3, etc.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

integer

???????

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure

Answer:

10 apples

Step-by-step explanation:

if Person a bought twice as many apples as person b then it would be ten considering 10 x 2 = 20

eqaution: 10 divided by 2

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think the answer is 2.07

Answer:

58926938427

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Folow the PEMDAS rules wich show the order in which to do things:

Parenthesis first, then Exponent, then Multiplication/Division and finally Additiion and Subtraction. Therefore we solve whats in parenthesis first then work from there

567x237 is 134,379 and 467x939 is 438,513

now that we solved whats in parenthesis multiply the remaining values:

134,379x438,513=58,926,938,427

58,926,938,427 is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Z = -6.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

[tex]\mathbf{H_o :p= 0.28}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{H_o :p < 0.28}[/tex]

Since the alternative hypothesis is less than 0.28, then this is a left-tailed hypothesis.

Sample sixe n = 800

[tex]\hat p[/tex] = 0.217

The standard error [tex]S.E(p) = \sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]S.E(p) = \sqrt{\dfrac{0.28(1-0.28)}{800}}[/tex]

[tex]S.E(p) \simeq0.015[/tex]

Since this is a single proportional test, the test statistics can be computed as:

[tex]Z = \dfrac{\hat p - p}{\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \dfrac{0.217- 0.28}{0.01}[/tex]

Z = -6.3

Answer:

a in table → b on number line

b in table → c on number line

c in table → a on number line

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, we see the points are square roots. A square root of a number is a value, that when multiplied by itself, gives the number. For example, 4 × 4 = 16, so the square root of 16 is 4.

We can apply this logic easily by simplifying the square root, or multiplying integers with each other (aka "squaring" the integers) and seeing which result is closest to the value inside the square root.

Simplifying the square root won't help here, if we don't know basic values such as √3 or √2. So, we can just multiply an integer with itself and see if that value is closer to the value inside the square root.

For point a, we see the number inside the root is 27. We can start multiplying:

25 is the closest value to 27 here. So, we know the point is somewhere around 5, and since 27 is slightly larger than 25, the point is slightly larger than 5. So, point a in the table is most likely point b on the number line.

For point b, we see the number inside the root is 32. We can start multiplying:

36 is the closest value to 32 here. So, we know the point is somewhere around 6, and since 32 is smaller than 36, the point is lesser than 6. So, point b in the table is most likely point c on the number line.

For point c, we see the number inside the root is 16. We can start multiplying:

16 is right on the dot! That means that the square root of 16 is 4, which leaves us with point a on the number line.

Answer:

Linear graph

y = 3x + 21

Step-by-step explanation:

The fraction of the shape which is shaded in simplest form is 1/3.

The square in the diagram provided has a total of 12 boxes .

The number of shaded part is 4

To calculate the shaded fraction of the shape we have to use the formula:

Number of shaded part/ Total number of boxes present.

= 4/12

We can divide the numerator and denominator by 4 to get the simplest form.

= 1/3

The fraction of the shape which is shaded in simplest form is therefore

= 1/3.

Read more about Fraction here https://brainly.com/question/17743912

Answer:

a) 0.0977

b) 0.3507

c) No it is not unusual for a broiler to weigh more than 1610 grams

Step-by-step explanation:

Mean = 1395 grams

Standard deviation = 200 grams. Use the TI-84 Plus calculator to answer the following.

We solve using z score formula

z = (x-μ)/σ, where x is the raw score, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation.

(a) What proportion of broilers weigh between 1160 and 1250 grams?

For x = 1160

z = 1160 - 1395/300

= -0.78333

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x = 1160) = 0.21672

For x = 1250 grams

z = 1250 - 1395/300

z = -0.48333

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x = 1250) = 0.31443

The proportion of broilers weigh between 1160 and 1250 grams is

0.31443 - 0.21672

= 0.09771

≈ 0.0977

(b) What is the probability that a randomly selected broiler weighs more than 1510 grams?

For x = 1510

= z = 1510 - 1395/300

z = 0.38333

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x<1510) = 0.64926

P(x>1510) = 1 - P(x<1510) = 0.35074

Approximately = 0.3507

(c) Is it unusual for a broiler to weigh more than 1610 grams?

For x = 1610

= z = 1610 - 1395/300

z = 0.71667

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(x<1610) = 0.76321

P(x>1610) = 1 - P(x<1610) = 0.23679

No it is not unusual for a broiler to weigh more than 1610 grams

Answer:

|0.254 ≤ p ≤ 0.286|

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

In a made up poll :

Proportion of people who like dark chocolate than milk chocolate (p) = 27%

Margin of Error = 1.6%

Hence,

p ± margin of error

27% ± 1.6%

(27 - 1.6)% ; (27 + 1.6)%

25.4% ; 28.6%

0.254 ; 0.286

Therefore ;

Lower bound = 0.254

Upper bound = 0.286

Expressing p as an absolute value Inequality ;

|0.254 ≤ p ≤ 0.286|

Let's solve this question as simply as we can

Step 1:

Add your odd numbers which is one with one

There are many ways in which we can classify numbers, Such as using the terms odd numbers and even numbers and a example of an odd number is one as it can not be divided by 2.

ex. 1 divided by 2 = 0.5

Step 2:

Now after adding our odd number you should turn up with an even number which we know as two.

Even numbers can be divided by 2

ex. 2 divided by 2 = 1

Answer is = 2

your answer should be 1/3 if I did my math right

Answer:

53.3 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

∆DEF and ∆RSQ are similar. We know this, because the ratio of their corresponding sides are equal. That is:

DE corresponds to RS

EF corresponds to SQ

DF corresponds to RQ.

Also <D corresponds to <R, <E corresponds to <S, and <F corresponds to <Q.

The ratio of their corresponding sides = DE/RS = 6/3 = 2

EG/SQ = 8/4 = 2

DF/RQ = 4/2 = 2.

Since the ratio of their corresponding sides are equal, it means ∆DEF and ∆RSQ are similar.

Therefore, their corresponding angles would be equal.

Thus, m<Q = m<F

Let's find angle F

m<F = 180 - (98 + 28.7)

m<F = 53.3°

Since <F corresponds to <Q, therefore,

m<Q = 53.3°

Answer:

There are 64 trucks!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

multiply it by .12 then it says for 12 months, multiply it by 12 then

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It’s 40 I’m pretty sure because of the square. That’s how I was taught.