A researcher reports a 98% confidence interval for the proportion of Drosophila in a population with mutation Adh-F to be [0.34, 0.38). Therefore, there is an approximate probability of 0.98 that the proportion of Drosophola with this mutation is between 0.34 and 0.38.1. True 2. False

Answer:

x < 6

Step-by-step explanation:

5x < 21 +9

5x < 30

x < 30/5

x < 6

so the value of x is 5,4,3,2,1, 0, -1, ....

Answer: x<6

Step-by-step explanation:

For this problem, we approach it as if it had an equal sign instead of an inequality.

5x-9<21      [add 9 on both sides]

5x<30         [divide 5 on both sides]

x<6

She will receive a lot more money because she is already retired from work already and will win as bit more money

Answer:

So the formula for mean is you add up all of the numbers and divide by the number of numbers, that will give you the mean/average. So that means that (12+25+33+N)/4 = 120. We can simplify by first adding all of the numbers and multiplying both sides by 4 which will cancel out the four on the right side.

70+N/4 = 120

480 = 70+N

So then we subtract 70 from both sides.  Then we get 410 = N.

The answer is

Answer:

-4 · [tex]4^{7}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is B. 24

Explanation:

If you consider the shaded part of the rectangle is a triangle the best way to calculate the area of this is by calculating the total area or space occupied by this triangle. This can be done if you multiply the base by the height and divide the result in 2 or b x h / 2.

6 squares (base) x 8 squares (height) = 48 / 2 = 24 squares

Also, the shaded area is approximately the half area of all the rectangle, in this case, you can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying side x side or length by width. This means 6 squares x 8 squares = 48 squares (total area), which divided by 2 (shaded area) is also equal to 24.

Answer:

B, 24.

Step-by-step explanation:

I solved it with my teacher

Answer:

(-3,18) and (-1,6)

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]x^2-2x+3=-6x\\<=> x^2+4x+3 = 0\\<=> (x+2)^2 -4+3=0\\<=> (x+2)^2-1^2 = 0\\<=> (x+2+1)(x+2-1) = 0\\<=> (x+1)(x+3) = 0\\<=> x+1 = 0 \ or \ x+3 = 0\\<=> x = -1 \ or \ x=-3[/tex]

so the solutions are

(-3,-6*-3=18) that we can write (-3,18)

and

(-1,-6*-1=6) that we can write (-1,6)

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know if the first set of numbers is all in one set, but I'll do my best to give you an answer.

Really all you need to do is use PEMDAS for the first question.

(Parentheses, exponents, multiply, divide, add, subtract. In that order)

[tex]1 2 + 8 \div (9 - 5) \\ 12 + 8 \div 4 \\ 12 + 2 \\ 14[/tex]

Then to simplify that fraction next to it, notice that 0.018 is 3x 0.06.

that's a 3:1 ratio, so it ends up simplifying to this:

[tex] \frac{3}{1} [/tex]

Lastly, to solve the division of that fraction. If you divide by a fraction, you multiply whatever it's dividing by its inverse.

So...

[tex] \frac{5}{7} \div \frac{2}{5} \\ \frac{5}{7} \times \frac{5}{2} \\ \frac{25}{14} [/tex]

Answer:

It's the option D

6 root 2 units

Options:

The supplier products have a lower mean than claimed

The supplier is more accurate than they claimed

The supplier products have a higher mean than claimed

The supplier is less accurate than they have claimed

Answer:

The supplier is less accurate than they have claimed

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence Interval for supplier claim, CI = (20.45, 21.05)

Confidence Interval for your claim, CI = (20.48, 21.02)

Calculate the mean of the Confidence Interval for the supplier's claim:

[tex]\bar{X_s} = \frac{20.45 + 21.05}{2} \\\bar{X_s} = \frac{41.50}{2}\\\bar{X_s} = 20.75[/tex]

Calculate the mean of the Confidence Interval for your claim :

[tex]\bar{X_y} = \frac{20.48 + 21.02}{2} \\\bar{X_y} = \frac{41.50}{2}\\\bar{X_y} = 20.75[/tex]

Both the supplier and you have the equal mean

Margin of Error by the supplier = 21.05 - 20.75 = 0.30

Margin of Error by you = 21.02 - 20.75 = 0.27

Since the margin of error for the supplier is more, you can conclude that the suppler is less accurate than they have claimed.

The question is incomplete! Complete question along with answer and step by step explanation is provided below.

Question:

Supplier claims that they are 95% confident that their products will be in the interval of 20.45 to 21.05. You take samples and find that the 95% confidence interval of what they are sending is 20.48 to 21.02. What conclusion can be made?

The supplier products have a lower mean than claimed

The supplier is more accurate than they claimed

The supplier products have a higher mean than claimed

The supplier is less accurate than they have claimed

Answer:

The margin of error reported by the supplier is greater as compared to the actual margin of error. A greater margin of error results in less accuracy.

Therefore, we can conclude that the supplier is less accurate than they have claimed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Supplier claims that they are 95% confident that their products will be in the interval of 20.45 to 21.05.

The mean is given by

Mean = (Upper limit + Lower limit)/2

Mean = (21.05 + 20.45)/2

Mean = (41.50)/2

Mean = 20.75

The margin of error in this case is

MoE = Upper limit - Mean

MoE = 21.05 - 20.75

MoE = 0.30

You take samples and find that the 95% confidence interval of what they are sending is 20.48 to 21.02.

The mean is given by

Mean = (Upper limit + Lower limit)/2

Mean = (21.02 + 20.48)/2

Mean = (41.50)/2

Mean = 20.75

The margin of error in this case is

MoE = Upper limit - Mean

MoE = 21.02 - 20.75

MoE = 0.27

As you can notice the margin of error reported by the supplier is greater as compared to the actual margin of error. A greater margin of error results in less accuracy.

Therefore, we can conclude that the supplier is less accurate than they have claimed.

Answer:

-10

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-\dfrac{3}{5}x=6 \\\\\\x=\dfrac{6}{-\dfrac{3}{5}} \\\\\\x=6\times -\dfrac{5}{3} \\\\\\x=-10[/tex]

Hope this helps!

Answer:

x = -10

Step-by-step explanation:

So first and easily we have to multiply to --> -3/5x = 6

After that you just do the regular formula -->

Factor divided by the x

6 / (-3/5) = -10

-10

Hope this helps

The complete question is;

The height of water in a bathtub,h, is a function of time,t. Let P represent this function. Height is measured in inches and time in minutes.

Match each statement in function notation with a description.

A: P(0) = 0

B: P(4) = 10

C: P(10) = 4

D: P(20) = 0

1:After 20 minutes, the bathtub is empty.

2:The bathtub starts out with no water.

3:After 10 minutes, the height of the water is 4 inches.

4:The height of the water is 10 inches after 4 minutes.

Answer:

-option D is the correct answer for sentence 1.

-option A is the correct answer for sentence 2.

-option C is the correct answer for sentence 3.

-option B is the correct answer for sentence 4

Step-by-step explanation:

The height of water in a bathtub h is a function of time t.

-If t = 20 minutes, then height of water represented by P is empty so, P(20) = 0. Thus, option D is the correct option for sentence 1.

-The bath tub starts out with no water. Thus, P(0) = 0. So option A is the correct option for sentence 2.

-After 10 minutes, the height of the water is 4 inches. Thus, P(10) = 4. So, option C is the correct option for sentence 3.

- The height of the water is 10 inches after 4 minutes. Thus, P(4) = 10. So option B is the correct answer for sentence 4

Answer

A. 18(3/4)π

Explanation

In the attached file

Answer:

a) C. The population must be normally distributed.

b) P(x < 65.8) = 0.8159

c) P(x > 64.2) = 0.3015

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal probability distribution

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

In this question:

[tex]\mu = 62, \sigma = 14, n = 11, s = \frac{14}{\sqrt{11}} = 4.22[/tex]

(a) What must be true regarding the distribution of the population in order to use the normal model to compute probabilities regarding the sample me

n < 30, so the distribution of the population must be normal.

The correct answer is:

C. The population must be normally distributed.

(b) Assuming the normal model can be used, determine P(x < 65.8).

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 65.8. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{65.8 - 62}{4.22}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 0.9[/tex]

[tex]Z = 0.9[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.8159.

So

P(x < 65.8) = 0.8159

(c) Assuming the normal model can be used, determine P(x > 64.2).

This is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 64.2. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{64.2 - 62}{4.22}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 0.52[/tex]

[tex]Z = 0.52[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.6985.

1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

So

P(x > 64.2) = 0.3015

Answer:

  4 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

For three visits, the electrician earned $40 × 3 = $120 in "per-visit" charges. For working x hours, he earned 20x in "per-hour" charges. The total of these came to 50x:

  120 +20x = 50x

  120 = 30x . . . . . . . . subtract 20x

  4 = x . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 30

The electrician worked 4 hours that day.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

1:4 = 3:12

Answer:

12 cups of water

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of fertilizer is 1. To get to 3 you times it by 3. Therefore to find how much water you need you'd have to do the same to the other side of the ratio, times it by three. So it would be 3:12

113/32

Step-by-step explanation:

7 squared is 49, 4 cubed is 64, 2 to the 5th power is 32.

49 plus 64 is 113 divided by 32

3.53125

Step-by-step explanation:

7^2+4^3/2^5

= 49+64/32

= 113/32

= 3.53125

Answer:

Option C is correct.

The 437 county residents were a random sample of all county residents.

a) If p is the proportion of Hispanics in the county,

The null hypothesis is represented as

H₀: p = 0.16

The alternative hypothesis is represented as

Hₐ: p ≠ 0.35

b) The model of the test is two-tailled, one-proportion test. And it satisfies all of the required conditions for an hypothesis test.

c) The sketch of the region of acceptance is presented in the attached image to this answer. (z < -4.09 and z > 4.09).

Test statistic = -4.09

p-value = 0.000043

d) We can conclude that the proportion of the county that are Hispanics is different from the proportion of the country that are Hispanics.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the question, it was clearly stated that the 437 county residents are a random sample of the residents in the county, hence, it is evident that option C is the right statement.

a) For hypothesis testing, the first thing to define is the null and alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis plays the devil's advocate and usually takes the form of the opposite of the theory to be tested. It usually contains the signs =, ≤ and ≥ depending on the directions of the test.

While, the alternative hypothesis usually confirms the the theory being tested by the experimental setup. It usually contains the signs ≠, < and > depending on the directions of the test.

For this question, the county supervisor wants to check if proportion of the county that are Hispanics is different from the proportion of the whole nation that are Hispanics. (0.16).

Hence, the null hypothesis is that there isn't enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of the county that are Hispanics is different from the proportion of the whole nation that are Hispanics. That is, there is no significant difference between the proportion of the county that are Hispanics and the proportion of the whole nation that are Hispanics. (0.16).

The alternative hypothesis will now be that enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of the county that are Hispanics is different from the proportion of the whole nation that are Hispanics (0.16).

Mathematically,

The null hypothesis is represented as

H₀: p = 0.16

The alternative hypothesis is represented as

Hₐ: p ≠ 0.16

b) To do this test, we will use the z-distribution because although, no information on the population standard deviation is known, the sample size is large enough.

Hence, the model of this test is two-tailled, one-proportion test.

And the major conditions for an hypothesis test is that

- The sample must be a random sample extracted from the population, with each variable in the sample independent from one another. This is already clearly given in the question.

- The sample must be a normal distribution sample or approximate a normal distribution.

The conditions to check this is that

np ≥ 10

and

np(1-p) ≥ 10

p = sample proportion = (44/437) = 0.101

np = 437×0.101 = 44 ≥ 10

np(1-p) = 437×0.101×(1-0.101) = 39.7 ≥ 10

The two conditions are satisfied, hence, we can conclude that this distribution at least approximates a normal distribution.

c) So, we compute the t-test statistic

z = (x - μ)/σₓ

x = sample proportion = 0.101

μ = p₀ = The proportion we are comparing against = 0.16

σₓ = standard error = √[p(1-p)/n]

where n = Sample size = 437

σₓ = √[0.101×0.899/437] = 0.0144145066 = 0.0144

z = (0.101 - 0.16) ÷ 0.0144

z = -4.093 = -4.09

checking the tables for the p-value of this z-statistic

Degree of freedom = df = n - 1 = 437 - 1 = 436

Significance level = 0.05 (when the significance level isn't stated, 0.05 is used)

The hypothesis test uses a two-tailed condition because we're testing in both directions (greater than or less than).

p-value (for z = -4.09, at 0.05 significance level, df = 436, with a two tailed condition) = 0.000043

The sketch of the region of acceptance is presented in the attached image to this answer. (z < -4.09 and z > 4.09).

d) The interpretation of p-values is that

When the (p-value > significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and when the (p-value < significance level), we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

So, for this question, significance level = 0.05

p-value = 0.000043

0.000043 < 0.05

Hence,

p-value < significance level

This means that we reject the null hypothesis, accept the alternative hypothesis & say that there is enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of the county that are Hispanics is different from the proportion of the whole nation that are Hispanics.

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

if N=2.0

4.9 N=4.9×2=9.8

9.8/1.4=7

which is an integer.

so N=2.0

Answer:

Yes, they are consistent.

A 99​% confidence interval is consistent with a​ two-sided test with significance level alpha=0.01 because if a​ two-sided test with this significance level does not reject the null​ hypothesis, then the confidence interval does contains the value in the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, they are consistent.

A 99​% confidence interval is consistent with a​ two-sided test with significance level alpha=0.01 because if a​ two-sided test with this significance level does not reject the null​ hypothesis, then the confidence interval does contains the value in the null hypothesis.

The critical values of the confidence level are equivalent to the critical values in the hypothesis test. In the case that the conclusion of the test is to not reject the null hypothesis, the test statistic falls within the acceptance region: its value is within the critical values of the two-sided test.

Then, it is also within the critical values of the confidence interval and the sample mean (or other measure) will be within the confidence interval bounds.

Answer:

(a) The formula to calculate the amount of money (A) that Aizuddin must pay the bank after n years, with the original amount of borrowed money is 6300 RM, interest of 8%, compounded annually, is described as following:

A = principal x (1 + rate)^(time in year)

A = 6300 x (1 + 8/100)^n

(b) The amount of interest charged (AC) that Aizuddin must pay after n years:

AC = A - 6300

AC = 6300 x (1 + 8/100)^n - 6300

AC = 6300 x [(1 + 8/100)^n - 1]

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Confidence interval is written as

Sample proportion ± margin of error

Margin of error = z × √pq/n

Where

z represents the z score corresponding to the confidence level

p = sample proportion. It also means probability of success

q = probability of failure

q = 1 - p

p = x/n

Where

n represents the number of samples

x represents the number of success

From the information given,

n = 451

x = 1.5/100 × 451 = 7

p = 7/451 = 0.02

q = 1 - 0.02 = 0.98

To determine the z score, we subtract the confidence level from 100% to get α

α = 1 - 0.97 = 0.1

α/2 = 0.01/2 = 0.03

This is the area in each tail. Since we want the area in the middle, it becomes

1 - 0.03 = 0.97

The z score corresponding to the area on the z table is 2.17. Thus, Thus, the z score for a confidence level of 97% is 2.17

Therefore, the 97% confidence interval is

0.02 ± 2.17√(0.02)(0.98)/451

= 0.02 ± 0.014

b) x represents the number of members of the 50 Plus Fitness Association who ran and died in the same eight–year period.

P represents the proportion of members of the 50 Plus Fitness Association who ran and died in the same eight–year period.

The distribution that should be used is the normal distribution

Answer:

$5073.37

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use the simple interest rate (appreciation) formula: A = P(1 + r)^t

Because it gives us 3 months, we need to put it in terms of years. That will give us 1/4 of a year:

A = 5000(1 + 0.06)^0.25

When you plug that into the calc, you should get 5073.37 as your final answer!

Answer:  b) Each sold the same number of vehicles

Step-by-step explanation:

This question is only asking for the quantity of vehicles (not the total amount earned) so we can disregard the second matrix and find the sum of each row in the first matrix.

Kelly: 8 + 2 + 6 = 16

Scott: 7 + 8 + 1 = 16

Mark: 10 + 4 + 2 = 16

The total number of vehicles sold by each person is the same

Answer:

Induction

Step-by-step explanation:

Induction reasoning refers to conjectures which is what you will need for this

The Inductive reasoning allows to use observation to find the next three

values in the number pattern 1, 4, 7, 10, . . .

The correct answer is option (B)

For given example,

We have been given the number pattern 1, 4, 7, 10, . . .

Here, 4 - 1 = 3                             ..................(i)

7 - 4 = 3                                       ..................(ii)

10 - 7 = 3                                      ..................(iii)

From (i), (ii) and (iii),

the common difference between consecutive terms is 3.

The next three values would be,

10 + 3 = 13

13 + 3 = 16

16 + 3 = 19

So, the number pattern would be 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, . . .

Therefore, an Inductive reasoning allows to use observation to find the next three values in the number pattern 1, 4, 7, 10, . . .

The correct answer is option (B)

Learn more about the inductive reasoning here:

https://brainly.com/question/8419798

#SPJ2

Answer:

r = 4.2805cm

Step-by-step explanation:

ok first the shape its made of two slant height and and an arc of degree 70°

The total perimeter = 28cm

The formula for the total perimeter= 2l + 2πl(70/360)

Where l is the radius of the shape.

But l = 2r

So

= 2l + 1.2217l

= 3.2217l

28 = 3.2217l

l = 28/3.2217

l = 8.691

Recall that l = 2r

8.691= 2r

r = 8.691/2

r = 4.2805cm

Answer:

rational

Step-by-step explanation:

it's rational because a rational number * a irrational number is always irrational. a rational number times a rational number = a rational number. here are examples:

case 1 irrational times rational:

root two * 4 = 5.65685424949

case 2  rational times rational

8 * 5 = 40

Answer:

9cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of a Triangle [tex]=\dfrac12$ X Base X Height[/tex]

[tex]Given:\\$Area of \triangle GHK =117cm^2\\$Base = 26cm\\Therefore:\\117=\dfrac12$ X 26 X h\\117=13h\\Divide both sides by 13 to obtain h\\h=117 \div 13\\$Height of Triangle GHK, h=9cm[/tex]

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Corrected Question

A cylinder with a base diameter of x units has a volume of  [tex]\pi x^3[/tex] cubic units

Which statements about the cylinder are true? Check all that apply.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the Base Diameter = x

Therefore: Base radius [tex]=\dfrac{x}{2}$ units[/tex]

Area of the base [tex]=\pi r^2 =\pi (\dfrac{x}{2})^2 =\dfrac{\pi x^2}{4}$ square units[/tex]

Volume =Base Area X Height

[tex]\pi x^3 =\dfrac{\pi x^2}{4} X h\\$Height, h = \pi x^3 \div \dfrac{\pi x^2}{4}\\=\pi x^3 \times \dfrac{4}{\pi x^2}\\h=4x$ units[/tex]

Therefore:

Answer:

1) The null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

Subindex 1: 2012 population proportion and Subindex 2: 2010 population proportion.

2) The sample proportion for 2012 is p1=0.41.

The sample proportion for 2010 is p2=0.35.

3) There is enough evidence to support the claim that there is significant difference between the population proportions of the two years.

4) The 95% confidence interval for the difference between proportions is (0.016, 0.104).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that there is significant difference between the population proportions of the two years.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=1000 has a proportion of p1=0.41.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=410/1000=0.41[/tex]

The sample 2, of size n2=900 has a proportion of p2=0.35.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=315/900=0.35[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.06.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.41-0.35=0.06[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{410+315}{1000+900}=\dfrac{725}{1900}=0.3816[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.3816*0.6184}{1000}+\dfrac{0.3816*0.6184}{900}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0002+0.0003}=\sqrt{0.0005}=0.0223[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.06-0}{0.0223}=\dfrac{0.06}{0.0223}=2.69[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=2\cdot P(z>2.69)=0.007[/tex]

As the P-value (0.007) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that there is significant difference between the population proportions of the two years.

We want to calculate the bounds of a 95% confidence interval.

For a 95% CI, the critical value for z is z=1.96.

The margin of error, using the results previously calculated, is:

[tex]MOE=z \cdot s_{p1-p2}=1.96\cdot 0.0223=0.0437[/tex]

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

[tex]LL=(p_1-p_2)-z\cdot s_{p1-p2} = 0.06-0.0437=0.016\\\\UL=(p_1-p_2)+z\cdot s_{p1-p2}= 0.06+0.0437=0.104[/tex]

The 95% confidence interval for the difference between proportions is (0.016, 0.104).

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

1 book = $4

2 books = 2*$4

3 books = 3*$4

4 books = 4*$4

5 books = 5*$4

This can be shown as:  y=4x

y=ax+b is linear function, Irena is right