A right triangle has a 32°
angle. Find the value of its
other angle.

The linear regression equation is y = 4,035.33 + 2,115x.

The correlation coefficient is 0.976321113.

The type of correlation is a positive linear correlation.

Yes, the correlation is strong because the correlation coefficient approximately equals to 1.

The amount of Krabby Patties made by Spongebob after working 10 years is $25,185.

In this scenario, the years worked (x) would be plotted on the x-axis of the scatter plot while the patties made (y) would be plotted on the x-axis of the scatter plot.

By critically observing the scatter plot (see attachment) which models the relationship between the years worked (x) and the Patties made (y), an equation for the linear regression is given by:

y = 41,461.54 + 2,714.46x

Next, we would predict the amount of Krabby Patties made by Spongebob after working 10 years as follows;

y = 4,035.33 + 2,115(10)

y = 4,035.33 + 2,1150

y = $25,185.33 ≈ $25,185.

In conclusion, there is a strong correlation between the data because the correlation coefficient (r) approximately equals to 1;

0.7＜|r| ≤ 1   (strong correlation)

Read more on positive correlation here: brainly.com/question/3753830

#SPJ1

The bookstore should 300 calendars in order to have the maximum expected monetary value of $252.

To determine this, we need to calculate the expected monetary value for each option.

For ordering 100 calendars:
- Expected revenue: $12 x 100 = $1200
- Expected cost: $4 x 100 = $400
- Probability of selling all calendars: 0.35
- Probability of selling some calendars back to a supplier: 0.65
- Expected revenue from selling some calendars back to supplier: $2 x (100 - sales) = $2 x (100 - 35) = $130
- Expected monetary value: (0.35 x $1200) - $400 + (0.65 x $130) = $370

For ordering 200 calendars:
- Expected revenue: $12 x 200 = $2400
- Expected cost: $4 x 200 = $800
- Probability of selling all calendars: 0.25
- Probability of selling some calendars back to the supplier: 0.75
- Expected revenue from selling some calendars back to a supplier: $2 x (200 - sales) = $2 x (200 - 50) = $300
- Expected monetary value: (0.25 x $2400) - $800 + (0.75 x $300) = $350

For ordering 300 calendars:
- Expected revenue: $12 x 300 = $3600
- Expected cost: $4 x 300 = $1200
- Probability of selling all calendars: 0.40
- Probability of selling some calendars back to a supplier: 0.60
- Expected revenue from selling some calendars back to a supplier: $2 x (300 - sales) = $2 x (300 - 120) = $360
- Expected monetary value: (0.40 x $3600) - $1200 + (0.60 x $360) = $252

Based on these calculations, we can see that ordering 300 calendars gives the highest expected monetary value of $252.

Learn more about bookstore here:

https://brainly.com/question/28571698

#SPJ11

Answer:

99

Step-by-step explanation:

132 x ¾ = 396/4

396 divided by 4

99

Step-by-step explanation:

2x-3y=7 (-3,-3)

2x-7=3y

3y=2x-7

divide both sides by 3

y = 2/3x - 7/3

m1= 2/3

m1=m2 for parallel

2/3 = y-(-3)/x-(-3)

2/3= y+3/x+3

2 = y+3

– —

3 x +3

then you cross multiply

2(x+3)=3(y+3)

2x+6= 3y+9

then move everything to one side

2x-3y+6-9 =0

2x-3y-3=0

Answer:

[tex]\textsf{Slope-intercept form:} \quad y=\dfrac{2}{3}x-1[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Standard form:} \quad 2x-3y=3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have the same slope.

Therefore, in order to find the equation of the line that is parallel to 2x - 3y = 7, we must first find the slope of this line by rearranging it in the form y = mx + b.

[tex]\begin{aligned}2x-3y&=7\\2x-3y+3y&=7+3y\\2x&=3y+7\\2x-7&=3y+7-7\\2x-7&=3y\\3y&=2x-7\\\dfrac{3y}{3}&=\dfrac{2x-7}{3}\\y&=\dfrac{2}{3}x-\dfrac{7}{3}\end{aligned}[/tex]

The equation y = mx + b is the slope-intercept form of a straight line, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Therefore, the slope of the line is m = 2/3.

To find the equation of the line has a slope m = 2/3 and contains the point (-3, -3), we can use the point-slope form of a straight line.

[tex]\begin{aligned}y-y_1&=m(x-x_1)\\\\\implies y-(-3)&=\dfrac{2}{3}(x-(-3))\\\\y+3&=\dfrac{2}{3}(x+3)\\\\y+3&=\dfrac{2}{3}x+2\\\\y+3-3&=\dfrac{2}{3}x+2-3\\\\y&=\dfrac{2}{3}x-1\end{aligned}[/tex]

Therefore, the equation of the line that is parallel to the graph of 2x - 3y = 7 and contains the point (-3, -3) in slope-intercept form is:

[tex]\boxed{y=\dfrac{2}{3}x-1}[/tex]

If you want the equation in standard form, rearrange the equation to Ax + By = C (where A, B and C are constants and A must be positive):

[tex]\begin{aligned}y&=\dfrac{2}{3}x-1\\\\3 \cdot y&=3 \cdot \left(\dfrac{2}{3}x-1\right)\\\\3y&=2x-3\\\\3y+3&=2x-3+3\\\\3y+3&=2x\\\\3y+3-3y&=2x-3y\\\\3&=2x-3y\\\\2x-3y&=3\end{aligned}[/tex]

Therefore, the equation of the line that is parallel to the graph of 2x - 3y = 7 and contains the point (-3, -3) in standard form is:

[tex]\boxed{2x-3y=3}[/tex]

The probability of getting 2 twice in a row is 1/25 or 0.04.

Since the spinner has five equal parts labeled from 1 to 5, the probability of getting a 2 on any single spin is 1/5.

Since the spinner is spun twice, and we want to know the probability of getting 2 twice in a row, we need to multiply the probability of getting a 2 on the first spin by the probability of getting a 2 on the second spin, assuming that a 2 was already spun on the first spin.

Therefore, the probability of getting 2 twice in a row is (1/5) x (1/5) = 1/25, or 0.04, or 4%.

So, the probability of getting 2 twice in a row is 1/25 or 0.04.

To know more about probability follow

https://brainly.com/question/29699350

#SPJ1

The inequality that represents the given condition is "p > 12".

Let p be the amount of cheese produced in kg.

Then, the amount of yogurt produced is (p + 24) kg (since it is 24 kg more than cheese). And the amount of ice cream produced is 3p kg (since it is 3 times as much as cheese).

Now, we need to find the possible values of p that satisfy the condition "the dairy farm produced more kilograms of ice cream than yogurt last week." In other words, we need to compare the amount of ice cream produced (3p) with the amount of yogurt produced (p + 24) and ensure that the amount of ice cream is greater.

So, we can write the following inequality:

3p > p + 24

Simplifying this inequality, we get:

2p > 24

Dividing both sides by 2, we get:

p > 12

Therefore, the possible values of p that satisfy the given condition are all values of p greater than 12.

In summary, the inequality that represents the given condition is "p > 12".

To know more about inequality follow

https://brainly.com/question/30980668

#SPJ1

The function F(x)= ¹/₄(⁵/₂)ˣ , is a growth function.

The given function is;

F(x)= ¹/₄(⁵/₂)ˣ

To determine if the function is growth function or decay function, we will compare it to the general form of the function.

So the given function is an exponential function of the form;

f(x) = a(b)ˣ

Where;

Since the base (b) is greater than 1, we can conclude that function is a growth function.

Learn more about growth function here: https://brainly.com/question/13223520

#SPJ1

The coordinate system with x-coordinates between -180 and 180 is likely to be the geographic coordinate system, specifically longitude values. This system represents positions on the Earth's surface using two angles: longitude (x-coordinates) and latitude (y-coordinates).

Longitude values range from -180 degrees (180 degrees West) to 180 degrees (180 degrees East) along the Earth's equator. Latitude values, on the other hand, range from -90 degrees (90 degrees South) to 90 degrees (90 degrees North). The origin (0, 0) of this coordinate system is the intersection of the Prime Meridian (Greenwich Meridian) and the Equator.

The units for these coordinates are typically expressed in decimal degrees (DD). These values can be converted into other units such as degrees-minutes-seconds (DMS) or radians, depending on the application or preference. When working with geographic coordinate systems, it is essential to consider the Earth's curvature and potential distortions when calculating distances or areas.

In summary, if a data set has x-coordinates between -180 and 180, the coordinate system is most likely the geographic coordinate system, representing longitude values. The coordinates are typically expressed in decimal degrees, and their positions relate to the Earth's surface.

Learn more about x-coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

Answer: 6 turns

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope and the y intercepts of the given graph which shows height of the candlesticks over time is :

Slope = -2/3

Y intercept = 9

The graph is that of the height of the candlesticks over time.

The line passes through two points (0, 9) and (3, 7).

Slope of the line can be calculated as,

Slope = (7 - 9) / (3 - 0) = -2/3

Hence the slope id negative two thirds.

y intercept of a graph is the y coordinate of the point where the line touches the Y axis.

The x coordinate will be 0 there.

The line passes through (0, 9).

So y intercept = 9

Hence the slope and the y intercept are -2/3 and 9 respectively.

Learn more about Slope here :

https://brainly.com/question/30216543

#SPJ1

The probability of this event is 3/13. The event described is choosing a red card with an even number from a deck. To express this event as a set, we will include all even-numbered cards from the red suits (diamonds and hearts). This set is: {2♦, 4♦, 6♦, 8♦, 10♦, 2♥, 4♥, 6♥, 8♥, 10♥}.

Now let's find the probability of this event. There are 52 cards in the deck and 10 cards in the event set. Therefore, the probability is:

P(event) = (number of favorable outcomes) / (total number of outcomes) = 10 / 52 = 5 / 26 ≈ 0.1923

The probability of choosing a red card with an even number from a deck is approximately 0.1923 or 19.23%.

Learn more about diamonds here:

https://brainly.com/question/29775108

#SPJ11

Based on the information given, we know that 14% of the sample of 1000 adults reported meeting the daily serving recommendations for fruits and vegetables set by the CDC. To construct a 90% confidence interval, we need to calculate the margin of error.

We can use the formula:

[tex]Margin of error = z* (sqrt(p*(1-p)/n))[/tex]

Where:

z* is the critical value for a 90% confidence interval, which is 1.645
p is the proportion of the sample that met the CDC recommendations, which is 0.14
n is the sample size, which is 1000

Plugging in the values, we get:

Margin of error = 1.645 * (sqrt(0.14*(1-0.14)/1000))
Margin of error ≈ 0.022

Therefore, the answer is e. 0.022.

Learn more about margin here:

https://brainly.com/question/15357689

#SPJ11

The p-value is less than 0.0001, which is smaller than our level of significance (α = 0.05). Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean area of homes built in is not equal to the mean area of homes built in at a 95% confidence level

To determine whether we can conclude that the mean area of homes built in is not equal to that of homes built in, we need to perform a hypothesis test.

Let's set up our hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The mean area of homes built in is equal to the mean area of homes built in

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The mean area of homes built in is not equal to the mean area of homes built in

We will use a two-tailed t-test, as we are testing for inequality rather than a specific direction.

Assuming a level of significance (α) of 0.05, our critical values are ±1.96.

To calculate the test statistic, we can use the formula:

t = (sample mean - population mean) / (sample standard deviation/sqrt (sample size))

t = ( - ) / ( / sqrt())

t = -4.72

Using a t-distribution table with degrees of freedom equal to (sample size - 1), we can find the p-value associated with this t-statistic.
The p-value is less than 0.0001, which is smaller than our level of significance (α = 0.05). Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean area of homes built in is not equal to the mean area of homes built in at a 95% confidence level. In other words, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean area of homes built in is different from the mean area of homes built in.

Learn more about the Null Hypothesis:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

It is concluded that TU ≅ UV is by the definition of congruence as shown in the solution part.

As per the given figure, the required proof would be as:

Statements:

1. U is the midpoint of SW.

2. T is the midpoint of SU.

3. V is the midpoint of UW.

4. TU || WV (by midpoint theorem)

5. TV || UW (by midpoint theorem)

6. UT = TV (by midpoint theorem)

7. UV = 2VT (by midpoint theorem)

Reasons:

1. Given.

2. Given.

3. Given.

4. Midpoint theorem.

5. Midpoint theorem.

6. Midpoint theorem.

7. Midpoint theorem.

Therefore, TU ≅ UV by the definition of congruence.

Learn more about the midpoint here :

brainly.com/question/5127660

#SPJ1

The Chain Rule to find dz/ds and Oz/ot is

[tex]Oz/ot = dz/dt = -2s^2 cos(t) sin(t) = -2s^2 cos(t) * (y/x) = -2s^2 y sin(t) / x[/tex]

Thus, [tex]Oz/ot = -2s^2 y sin(t) / x.[/tex]

The chain rule is a rule in calculus that describes how to find the derivative of a composite function. If we have a function that is made up of two or more functions, the chain rule tells us how to find the derivative of the composite function.

To find dz/ds, we need to apply the Chain Rule, which states that if z is a function of u and u is a function of s, then:

dz/ds = dz/du * du/ds

In this case, we have:

[tex]z = x^2 * y^0 = x^2 = (s cos(t))^2 = s^2 cos^2(t)[/tex]

x = s cos(t)

y = s sin(t)

So, we can rewrite z as:

[tex]z = s^2 cos^2(t)[/tex]

Now, let's find du/ds and dz/du:

du/ds = d/ds (s cos(t)) = cos(t)

[tex]dz/du = d/ds (s^2 cos^2(t)) = 2s cos^2(t)[/tex]

Using the Chain Rule formula, we can now find dz/ds:

[tex]dz/ds = dz/du * du/ds = 2s cos^2(t) * cos(t) = 2s cos^3(t)[/tex]

Therefore,[tex]dz/ds = 2s cos^3(t).[/tex]

To find Oz/ot, we need to find dz/dt using the Chain Rule, and then substitute for z in terms of x and y:

dz/dt = dz/dx * dx/dt + dz/dy * dy/dt

[tex]dz/dx = 2xy^0 = 2x = 2s cos(t)[/tex]

[tex]dz/dy = x^2 * 0y^-1 = 0[/tex]

dx/dt = -s sin(t)

dy/dt = s cos(t)

Substituting these values in the Chain Rule formula, we get:

dz/dt = 2s cos(t) * (-s sin(t)) + 0 * (s cos(t)) = -2s^2 cos(t) sin(t)

Now, we can substitute for z in terms of x and y:

[tex]z = x^2 * y^0 = x^2 = (s cos(t))^2 = s^2 cos^2(t)[/tex]

Therefore, we have:

[tex]Oz/ot = dz/dt = -2s^2 cos(t) sin(t) = -2s^2 cos(t) * (y/x) = -2s^2 y sin(t) / x[/tex]

Thus, Oz/ot = -2s^2 y sin(t) / x.

To learn more about Chain Rule visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10469579

#SPJ11

The pooled variance is calculated by combining the sum of squares (SS) and the degrees of freedom from two samples. Here are the steps to calculate the pooled variance:

1. Calculate the degrees of freedom for each sample (df1 = n1 - 1 and df2 = n2 - 1)
2. Calculate the pooled sum of squares (PSS = SS1 + SS2)
3. Calculate the pooled degrees of freedom (PDF = df1 + df2)
4. Calculate the pooled variance (PV = PSS / PDF)

For your samples:

Sample 1: n1 = 6, SS1 = 56, df1 = n1 - 1 = 5
Sample 2: n2 = 4, SS2 = 40, df2 = n2 - 1 = 3

Now, let's compute the pooled variance:

PSS = SS1 + SS2 = 56 + 40 = 96
PDF = df1 + df2 = 5 + 3 = 8
PV = PSS / PDF = 96 / 8 = 12

So, the pooled variance for the given samples is 12, which corresponds to answer choice (b).

Learn more about variance here:

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

To address the farm manager's concern about the effectiveness of fertilizer A compared to fertilizer B, formulate the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1):

Based on the experiment conducted by the farm manager, it was determined that there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two fertilizers. This was determined through a statistical test conducted at the 5 percent significance level. The experiment involved randomly selecting twenty identical plots of strawberries and fertilizing half with fertilizer A and half with fertilizer B. The yields were recorded and analyzed using statistical methods to determine if there was a significant difference in the effectiveness of the two fertilizers. The manager was able to conclude that the manufacturer's claim of cheaper fertilizer A being at least as effective as more expensive fertilizer B was supported by the statistical results of the experiment.

To address the farm manager's concern about the effectiveness of fertilizer A compared to fertilizer B, we can follow these steps:

1. Formulate the null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1):
H0: Fertilizer A is at least as effective as fertilizer B (Yield_A ≥ Yield_B)
H1: Fertilizer A is less effective than fertilizer B (Yield_A < Yield_B)

2. Conduct the experiment: Randomly select 20 identical plots of strawberries, with 10 plots receiving fertilizer A and the other 10 receiving fertilizer B.

3. Record the yields for each plot and calculate the average yield for both fertilizer groups.

4. Perform a statistical test (such as a t-test) at the 5 percent significance level (α = 0.05) to compare the average yields of the two fertilizer groups.

5. Based on the p-value obtained from the statistical test, make a decision:
- If the p-value ≤ α (0.05), reject the null hypothesis (H0) and conclude that fertilizer A is less effective than fertilizer B.
- If the p-value > α (0.05), fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0) and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that fertilizer A is less effective than fertilizer B.

6. Report the results of the experiment to the farm manager, including the average yields for both fertilizers and the conclusion based on the statistical test. This will help the manager make an informed decision about which fertilizer to use.

Learn more about alternative hypothesis at: brainly.com/question/27335001

#SPJ11

The statement that is NOT true in a Chi-Square test is "Small values of the chi squared test statistic would lead to a decision to reject the null hypothesis."

This is because if the test statistic is small, it means that the observed values are close to the expected values, and there is no significant difference between the populations. Therefore, a small test statistic would lead to a failure to reject the null hypothesis. In a Chi-Square test, we compare the proportions of specified characteristics in different populations, and we wish to determine whether they are the same or not. If the test statistic is large, it means that the observed values are significantly different from the expected values, and we have evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Finally, the P-value will be small if the test statistic is large, indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Learn more about hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/31319397

#SPJ11

The value of length of AC is,

⇒ AC = 8.25

We have to given that;

CD = 6.6 cm, DE = 3.4 cm, CE = 4.2 cm, and BC = 5.25 cm

Now, We can formulate;

BC / AC = EC / CD

Substitute the values we get;

5.25 / AC = 4.2 / 6.6

Solve for AC;

5.25 x 6.6 / 4.2 = AC

AC = 8.25

Thus, The value of length of AC is,

⇒ AC = 8.25

Learn more about the divide visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28119824

#SPJ1

The degrees of freedom and the critical t value (t*) for the given sample size and confidence level of the following are:
(a) df= 5, t*= 1.943; (b) df= 20, t*= 2.845; (c) df= 28, t*= 2.045; (d) df= 11, t*= 3.106.

The critical t value (t*) can be found using the t-distribution table, which takes into account the sample size and confidence level. The degrees of freedom (df) can be calculated using the formula df = n - 1.

(a) n = 6, CL = 90%
df= 5 t*= 1.943

Using the t-distribution table with 5 degrees of freedom and a confidence level of 90%, we find the critical t value to be 1.943.

(b) n = 21, CL = 98%
df= 20 t*= 2.845

Using the t-distribution table with 20 degrees of freedom and a confidence level of 98%, we find the critical t value to be 2.845.

(c) n = 29, CL = 95%
df= 28 t*= 2.045

Using the t-distribution table with 28 degrees of freedom and a confidence level of 95%, we find the critical t value to be 2.045.

(d) n = 12, CL = 99%
df= 11 t*= 3.106

Using the t-distribution table with 11 degrees of freedom and a confidence level of 99%, we find the critical t value to be 3.106.

Know more about t value here:

https://brainly.com/question/27192813

#SPJ11

The diameter of the cone is 40 in. Option D

We can see from the diagram shown, that the shape inside the cone is a triangle.

Thus, using the Pythagorean theorem which states that the square of the longest side which is the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

We then have that;

36² = 30² + r²

find the squares

1296 = 900+ r²

collect like terms

r² = 396

Find the square root of the sides

r = 19. 89 in

Then,

Diameter = 2(radius)

Substitute

Diameter = 39. 79in

Learn about cones at: https://brainly.com/question/6613758

#SPJ1

A function showing the value of the account after t years is [tex]f(t) = 690(1.021)^{t}[/tex]

The percentage of growth per year (APY) is 21.22%.

In Mathematics and Financial accounting, continuous compounding interest can be determined or calculated by using this mathematical equation (formula):

[tex]f(t) = P_{0}e^{rt}[/tex]

Where:

Based on the information provided above, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the function for the future value after t years is given by;

[tex]f(t) = 690(1 + 0.021)^{t}\\\\f(t) = 690(1.021)^{t}[/tex]

Growth per year (APY) =  [tex]e^{r} =e^{0.021}[/tex]

Growth per year (APY) = 1.02122 - 1 = 0.2122 = 21.22%

Read more on compound interest here: https://brainly.com/question/31189719

#SPJ1

The 90% CI for the change in blood pressure is (-5.843, 7.977)., the 99.9% CI for the change in blood pressure is (-14.077, 16.211).

a) To calculate a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the change in blood pressure, we use the formula:

CI = x ± t(α/2, df) * (s/√n)

where x is the sample mean of the change in blood pressure, t(α/2, df) is the t-value for the desired confidence level and degrees of freedom, s is the sample standard deviation of the change in blood pressure, and n is the sample size.

Using the given data, we have:

x = 1.067
s = 26.691
n = 15
df = n - 1 = 14

From the t-distribution table, the t-value for a 90% confidence level and 14 degrees of freedom is 1.761.

Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = 1.067 ± 1.761 * (26.691/√15) = (-5.843, 7.977)

Therefore, the 90% CI for the change in blood pressure is (-5.843, 7.977).

b) To calculate a 99.9% CI for the change in blood pressure, we use the same formula but with a different t-value:

t(α/2, df) = 3.922 for a 99.9% confidence level and 14 degrees of freedom.

Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = 1.067 ± 3.922 * (26.691/√15) = (-14.077, 16.211)

Therefore, the 99.9% CI for the change in blood pressure is (-14.077, 16.211).

c) The interval calculated in part (a) does include 0, while the interval calculated in part (b) does not include 0. This is important because if the interval includes 0, it means we cannot conclude that there is a significant difference in blood pressure before and after the medication. On the other hand, if the interval does not include 0, it means we can be confident that there is a significant difference.

d) To conduct a one sample t-test with p = 0 and a = 10, we first calculate the t-statistic using the formula:

t = (x - p) / (s/√n)

where x is the sample mean of the change in blood pressure, s is the sample standard deviation of the change in blood pressure, and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (1.067 - 0) / (26.691/√15) = 0.444

From the t-distribution table, the t-value for a one-tailed test with 14 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 10% is 1.345.

Since our calculated t-value (0.444) is less than the critical t-value (1.345), we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in blood pressure before and after the medication. Therefore, the results are not consistent with the 90% CI calculated in part (a).

e) To conduct a one sample t-test with y = 0 and a = 0.001, we use the same formula as in part (d):

t = (x - y) / (s/√n)

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (1.067 - 0) / (26.691/√15) = 0.444

From the t-distribution table, the t-value for a one-tailed test with 14 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.001 is 3.746.

Since our calculated t-value (0.444) is less than the critical t-value (3.746), we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in blood pressure before and after the medication. Therefore, the results are not consistent with the 99.9% CI calculated in part (b).

Learn more about confidence interval at: brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The length of the hypotenuse is 9.5 kilometers

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Legs = 8,5 and 4.2

The length of the hypotenuse is calculated as

Hyp^2 = Leg 1^2 + Leg 2^2

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Hypotenuse^2 = (8.5)^2 + 4.2^2

Evaluate

Hypotenuse^2 = 89.89

So, we have

Hypotenuse = 9.5

Hence, the hypotenuse = 9.5

Read more about right triangles at

https://brainly.com/question/2437195

#SPJ1

We need to use the exponential distribution formula and the concept of the sum of exponential variables. Let X be the time between two consecutive breakdowns and Y be the time to repair a broken plane.

Both X and Y follow an exponential distribution with mean 1/2 and 1/7, respectively.
The time T until a plane is available again after a breakdown can be expressed as T=X+Y. The distribution of T is the convolution of the distributions of X and Y, which is also an exponential distribution with mean 9/14.
Let Z be the number of planes available after all breakdowns have occurred and repairs have been made. Z is a binomial variable with parameters n=100 and p=P(T>1), where P(T>1) is the probability that a breakdown occurs and is repaired in more than one week.
We want to find the minimum number of repairmen, denoted by k, such that P(Z≥90)≥0.95. Using the complement rule, we can rewrite this as P(Z<90)≤0.05.
Since Z follows a binomial distribution, we can use the normal approximation to compute P(Z<90). The mean of Z is np=100p, and the variance of Z is np(1-p). Therefore, Z can be approximated by a normal distribution with mean μ=100p and standard deviation σ=sqrt(np(1-p)).
To find p, we can use the fact that P(T>1)=exp(-λT), where λ=1/mean(X+Y)=14/9. Thus, p=1-exp(-λ). Plugging in the values, we get p=0.432.
Now, we can standardize Z by subtracting its mean and dividing by its standard deviation: Z'=(Z-μ)/σ. Then, we can use a standard normal table or calculator to find the corresponding probability: P(Z'<(90-μ)/σ).
Finally, we can solve for k using the inverse standard normal function: (90-μ)/σ=invNorm(0.05). Plugging in the values, we get k=30.
Therefore, we need at least 30 repairmen to ensure that there is at least a 95% chance that 90 or more planes are available.

To determine the number of repairmen needed for Allbest Airlines to ensure there is a 95% chance that 90 or more planes are available, we'll use the following terms: airlines, breakdowns, and exponential.
Step 1: Determine the required probability.
Since we want at least 90 planes available, it means that no more than 10 planes can be under repair at a time. Thus, we need to calculate the probability that 10 or fewer planes are under repair.
Step 2: Calculate the probability of a single plane being under repair.
Planes break down twice a year and take one week to fix. Therefore, the probability of a single plane being under repair in any given week is 2 breakdowns per year * 1 week per breakdown / 52 weeks per year = 1/26.
Step 3: Use the exponential distribution.
We can model the probability of a certain number of planes being under repair using the exponential distribution.
Step 4: Calculate the probability of 10 or fewer planes being under repair.
Using a cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the exponential distribution, we can calculate the probability of 10 or fewer planes being under repair to be at least 95%. This can be done using statistical software or a calculator with the appropriate functionality.
Step 5: Determine the number of repairmen needed.
If the probability calculated in step 4 is 95% or higher, the current number of repairmen is sufficient. If not, we need to increase the number of repairmen until the probability is at least 95%. This can be done by reducing the average repair time per plane, which in turn reduces the probability of a plane being under repair at any given time.
In conclusion, to ensure that there is a 95% chance that 90 or more planes are available for Allbest Airlines, we need to determine the number of repairmen needed based on the exponential distribution and probability calculations as outlined in the steps above.

Visit here to learn more about exponential variables:

brainly.com/question/2573164

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

banana are curved cause they grow toward the sun child

So the vector form of the quadratic function y = x² - 6x + 7 is: y = (x - 3)² - 2.

To change from standard form to vertex form, we need to complete the square.

First, we group the x-terms together and factor out any common coefficient of x², giving:

y = x² - 6x + 7

y = 1(x² - 6x) + 7

Next, we need to add and subtract a constant inside the parentheses to complete the square. To determine this constant, we take half of the coefficient of x (-6) and square it:

(-6/2)² = 9

So we add and subtract 9 inside the parentheses:

y = 1(x² - 6x + 9 - 9) + 7

Now we can factor the quadratic expression inside the parentheses as a perfect square:

y = 1[(x - 3)² - 9] + 7

Simplifying and rearranging terms, we get:

y = (x - 3)² - 2

To know more about vector,

https://brainly.com/question/20426452

#SPJ11

One error-detection method that can compensate for burst errors is the cyclic redundancy check (CRC).

This method involves adding extra bits to the data being transmitted, which can detect and correct errors in the data. and has error detection. CRC is particularly effective in detecting and correcting burst errors, which occur when a group of consecutive bits are corrupted in a data transmission.

An error-detection method that can compensate for burst errors is the "Reed-Solomon code". Reed-Solomon codes are block-based error correcting codes that can detect and correct multiple errors in data transmissions, making them highly effective in handling burst errors. These codes compensate for burst errors by using redundant information added to the original data, allowing the receiver to accurately reconstruct the original data even in the presence of errors.

Learn more about error-detection here:

https://brainly.com/question/14974469

#SPJ11