Absolute value graphing pls help on all preferably step by step

Answer:

2, 2

Step-by-step explanation:

As the diagram number goes up by 1, it looks like the number of tiles goes up by 2; 4 + 2 = 6, 6 + 2 = 8, etc. This means that the growth, or slope, is 2; the number of tiles is 2 times the diagram number. But, we can't stop there, because 1 times 2 is 2, not 4, and 2 times 2 is 4, not 6. Well, what is 4 - 2, and what is 6 - 4? The answer to both of these expressions is 2. This tells us that we also have to add 2.

Here's me checking my work on all of the values in the table:

1 × 2 = 2 and 2 + 2 = 4

2 × 2 = 4 and 4 + 2 = 6

3 × 2 = 6 and 6 + 2 = 8

4 × 2 = 8 and 8 + 2 = 10

If you need more help with that, let me know. :)

The solution to this system is `x = [1, 1/4, 1/16]`, which is a nonzero vector in the -4-eigenspace.

One possible solution is the following matrix:

```
A = [[-4, 0, 0],
    [1, -4, 0],
    [0, 1, -4]]
```

We can verify that the eigenvalue -4 has algebraic multiplicity 3 by computing the characteristic polynomial:

```
det(A - lambda*I) = (-4 - lambda) * (-4 - lambda) * (-4 - lambda)
```

where `I` is the 3x3 identity matrix. Therefore, the eigenvalue -4 has geometric multiplicity 1, since the -4-eigenspace is a line.

To find the eigenvector associated with this eigenvalue, we solve the equation `(A - (-4)*I)x = 0`, or equivalently, `Ax = (-4)x`. This gives us the following system of equations:

```
-4x1 = 0
x1 - 4x2 = 0
x2 - 4x3 = 0
```

The solution to this system is `x = [1, 1/4, 1/16]`, which is a nonzero vector in the -4-eigenspace.

Visit to know more about Nonzero vector:-

brainly.com/question/30195939

#SPJ11

Answer:

The circumference is 8π yards, or about 25.13 yards. Since we need to use 3.14 for π, the circumference of the pond is about 8 × 3.14 = 25.12 yards.

To answer your question, let's start with a quick review of the alternating series estimation theorem. So, we need to find the smallest integer value of n that is greater than log(B/0.00005) - 1.

This theorem states that if we have an alternating series and the absolute value of the terms decrease in size as we move through the series, then the error of approximating the sum of the series with the nth partial sum is less than or equal to the absolute value of the (n+1)th term.
In other words, if we add up the first n terms of an alternating series and call that partial sum S_n, then the true sum S is somewhere between S_n and S_n+1, and the error in approximating S with S_n is at most |a_n+1|, where a_n+1 is the (n+1)th term in the series.
Now, to apply this to your question, we need to know a few more things. Specifically, we need to know what the alternating series in question looks like, and what the terms of the series are. We also need to know what it means for the series to be convergent.
So, let's say that the alternating series in question is of the form:
a_1 - a_2 + a_3 - a_4 + ...
According to the alternating series estimation theorem, we need to find the smallest value of n such that |a_n+1| < 0.00005. That is, we need to find the smallest value of n such that:
|(-1)^(n+2)b_n+1| < 0.00005
Since b_n decreases as n gets larger, we know that b_n+1 < b_n, so we can simplify this inequality to:
(-1)^(n+2)b_n+1 < 0.00005
Now, we could solve this inequality explicitly, but since we don't know what the b_n values are, it's easier to approximate the answer. Since we want the error to be less than 0.00005, we know that the (n+1)th term must be smaller than 0.00005. So, we can set up an inequality like this:
b_n+1 < 0.00005
we can use the largest value of b_n that we know of (let's call it B) to get an upper bound on n. That is:
B < b_n for all n
So, we can solve for n as follows:
b_n+1 < 0.00005
B < b_n for all n
B < b_n+1 for all n (since b_n decreases as n gets larger)
B < 0.00005
n+1 > log(B/0.00005)
n > log(B/0.00005) - 1
So, we need to find the smallest integer value of n that is greater than log(B/0.00005) - 1. This will give us the number of terms we need to add up in order to approximate the sum of the series to within an error of 0.00005.

To determine how many terms we need to add in a convergent alternating series to find the sum with an error less than 0.00005, we will use the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem. The theorem states that if we have a converging alternating series, the absolute error in the approximation by the sum of the first n terms is less than or equal to the absolute value of the (n+1)-th term.
Here's a step-by-step explanation:
1. Identify the series as an alternating series, which means it should have the form (-1)^n * a_n, where a_n is a sequence of positive numbers.
2. Make sure the series is convergent by checking that a_n is decreasing and approaches zero as n approaches infinity.
3. Apply the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem by setting the (n+1)-th term less than the desired error, which in this case is 0.00005: |(-1)^(n+1) * a_(n+1)| < 0.00005.
4. Solve for n in the inequality above to determine the minimum number of terms needed to achieve the desired error.
By following these steps, you will find the number of terms you need to add in the convergent alternating series to obtain a sum with an error less than 0.00005.

Visit here to learn more about Alternating Series Estimation Theorem:

brainly.com/question/31418152

#SPJ11

The probability that 32 randomly selected laptops will have a mean replacement time of 3.1 years or less is 0.0122 or approximately 1.22%. This suggests that it is unlikely that the manager's suppliers have been giving him laptop computers with lower-than-average quality.

To find the probability that 32 randomly selected laptops will have a mean replacement time of 3.1 years or less, we can use the central limit theorem. This theorem states that as sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the sample means approaches a normal distribution, regardless of the shape of the population distribution.

First, we need to calculate the standard error of the mean, which is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution. We can use the formula:

standard error = standard deviation / square root of sample size

Substituting the given values, we get:

standard error = 0.5 / sqrt(32) = 0.0884

Next, we need to standardize the sample mean using the formula:

z = (x - mu) / standard error

where x is the sample mean, mu is the population mean (given as 3.3 years), and standard error is the calculated value.

Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (3.1 - 3.3) / 0.0884 = -2.26

Finally, we need to find the probability that a standard normal distribution is less than or equal to -2.26. Using a standard normal table or calculator, we find this probability to be 0.0122 or approximately 1.22%.

Find more about standard normal distribution

brainly.com/question/15245631

#SPJ11

The complete sentence is,

Once you solve for ONE of the variables in a system, then you must substitute the value of that variable in an equation to solve for the remaining variable.

We have to given that;

To find the method after, Once you solve for ONE of the variables in a system,

Hence, We get;

The correct method is,

Once you solve for ONE of the variables in a system, then you must substitute the value of that variable in an equation to solve for the remaining variable.

Learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

Answer:  equation 3x (-4) = -12 has a solution of x = 1, which can be represented on the number line between -2 and -3.

Step-by-step explanation: Based on the number line and the answer choices provided, it appears that the equation modeled on the number line is:

C) 3x (-4) = -12

This equation can be interpreted as "what number multiplied by 3 and then multiplied by -4 will give a result of -12". Solving for x, we get:

3x (-4) = -12

-12x = -12

x = -12/-12

x = 1

Therefore, the equation 3x (-4) = -12 has a solution of x = 1, which can be represented on the number line between -2 and -3.

Expression 5 + (12.8 ÷ 3.2) represents the phrase 5 + the quotient of 12. 8 and 3. 2 and option (a) is the correct answer.

Expressions refer to a phrase with at least two numbers or variables with any mathematical operations such as addition, exponents, etc. x - 6, 9 + 4y, and 6a are all examples of mathematical expressions.

Equations refer to a sentence when two expressions are equated with the help of '='. x - 6 = 6a is an example of an equation.

In phrase 5+ the quotient of 12. 8 and 3. 2

We divide the phrase into different mathematical operations.

The first operation is of addition with 5, we can write the beginning as 5 + ...

The next operation is division in the phrase the quotient of 12. 8 and 3. 2 which is added to the expression and we get 5 + (12.8 ÷ 3.2)

And we get our answer.

Learn more about Expressions:

https://brainly.com/question/25968875

#SPJ4

The complete question might be :

Which expression represents the phrase 5+ the quotient of 12. 8 and 3. 2?

a. 5 + (12.8 ÷ 3.2)

b. 5 - (12.8 + 3.2)

c. 5 + (12.8 * 3.2)

d. none of the above

Mary is shipping her makeup kits in boxes with dimensions of 1/2 ft x 1/2 ft x 1/2 ft. The shipping box dimensions are 1 1/2 ft wide, 3 ft long, and 2 ft high.

To determine how many makeup kit boxes can fit in each shipping box, we need to find the volume of both boxes and divide the volume of the shipping box by the volume of the makeup kit box.

First, we'll find the volume of the makeup kit box:

[tex]Volume = length × width × height = (1/2 ft) × (1/2 ft) × (1/2 ft) = 1/8 cubic feet[/tex]

Next, we'll find the volume of the shipping box:

[tex]Volume = length × width × height[/tex]

= (3 ft) × (1 1/2 ft) × (2 ft) = 3 ft × 3/2 ft × 2 ft = 9 cubic feet

Now, we'll divide the volume of the shipping box by the volume of the makeup kit box:

[tex]Number of makeup kit boxes = Volume of shipping box ÷ Volume of makeup kit box[/tex]

= 9 cubic feet ÷ 1/8 cubic feet = 72

Therefore, Mary can ship 72 makeup kit boxes in each shipping box.

Learn more about shipping here:

https://brainly.com/question/11449177

#SPJ11

1) A statistically significant F test means that at least one variable in the model is statistically significant, but that does not mean that all of the variables in the model are statistically significant.
Select one: True

2) A high p-value (greater than alpha) indicates a significant predictor in the regression.
Select one: False

In statistics, a process known as test static is used to determine the significance of the observed result. A hypothesis test is also used for this test. Everywhere in statistical analysis, the P-value or probability value notion is applied. It establishes the statistical significance and significance testing measure. Let's go into detail about the P-value's definition, calculation, table, interpretation, and how to utilise it to determine the significance level, among other things, in this post.

learn more about significance level,

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The missing fifth number in the set of data given is option E: 18, solved by using the fact that median and mean are equal.

Mean and median are the two measures of central tendency in which median can be found by arranging the data in ascending or descending order. The given data can be arranged in ascending order as follows:

8, 14, 14, 16, x. (we need to find x, we are still unaware)

As the median is the mid value of the given data. Here, median must be 14.

Next, the mean of the data can be calculated by adding all the values together and dividing them by the total number of values: The formula for finding the mean is:

Mean = ∑X/n

where, X is the sample value, and n is the total number of values in the data.

Thus, Mean= 14 + 8 + 16 + 14/5

= 52 + x/ 5.

Now, we have been told that mean and median are equal. Using this fact:

Mean = Median

=52 + x/ 5 = 14

Solving for x in this case, we get

x = 18

Therefore, the possible values for the missing fifth number is 18.

To know more about mean, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ4

Answer:  A ≈ 201.06 cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

        We can use the given formula for a sphere's area to solve.

Given formula:

     A = 4πr²

Subsiute given radius:

     A = 4π(4 cm)²

Square:

     A = 4π(16 cm²)

Multiply:

     A = 201.0619298 cm²

Round:

     A ≈ 201.06 cm²

The values of x and y are y = 27 and x = 18 & x = 3 and y = 12

The triangles are similar by SAS and SSS

Given that the triangles are similar

So, we have

12/y = 4/9 and x/12 = 6/4

When evaluated, we have

4y = 12 * 9 and 4x = 12 * 6

Divide both sides by the coefficients of x and y

So, we have

y = 27 and x = 18

For the similar trapezoid, we have

(2x + 1)/3 = (4x + 9)/9 and 3/4 = 9/y

So, we have

6x + 3 = 4x + 9 and 3y = 4 * 9

Evaluate

2x = 6 and 3y = 36

So, we have

x = 3 and y = 12

For the first pair of triangles, the triangles are similar by SAS because of the following corresponding sides and angles

For the second pair of triangles, the triangles are similar by SSS because  the corresponding sides have the same scale factor of 1.5

i.e. RP/NM = 3/2 = 1.5, PN/LM = 6/4 = 1.5 and RN/LN = 9/6 = 1.5

Read more about similar triangles at

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The surface area, in square feet, of the toy box is 1116

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Dimensions  14 ft, 12 ft and 15 ft

The surface area, in square feet, of the toy box is calculated as

Surface area = 2 * (lw + lh + wh)

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Surface area = 2 * (14 * 12 + 14 * 15 + 12 * 15)

Evaluate

Surface area = 1116

Hence, the surgface area is 1116

Read more about surface area at

https://brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

Answer: Ur answer will be A.

The equation of the table of values is f(x) = 2x

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The table of values

On the table of values, we can see that

The x values are multiplied by 2 to get the y values

When represented as a function. we have

f(x) = 2 * x

Evaluate the product

f(x) = 2x

Hence, the function equation is f(x) = 2x

Read more about function at

https://brainly.com/question/1415456

#SPJ1

Answer:

-3 + 8 = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

-8 + 3 = -5

3 + (-8) = -5

-3 + 8 = 5

8 + 3 = 11

Therefore, the vector product of u and v is [-4, 7, -4].

The vector product, also known as the cross product, of two vectors u and v is defined as a vector that is perpendicular to both u and v. Its magnitude is equal to the area of the parallelogram formed by the two vectors, and its direction is given by the right-hand rule.

To calculate the vector product of two vectors u and v using the formula u x v = [u2v3 - u3v2, u3v1 - u1v3, u1v2 - u2v1], we need to take the second and third components of u and v, and cross multiply them. Then, we subtract the result of the third component of u multiplied by the second component of v from the second component of u multiplied by the third component of v. This gives the first component of the resulting vector. Similarly, we can calculate the second and third components of the resulting vector.

In this problem, the vectors u and v are given as:

u = [2, 3, 1]

v = [1, -2, -2]

Substituting these values into the formula for the vector product, we get:

u x v = [u2v3 - u3v2, u3v1 - u1v3, u1v2 - u2v1]

u x v = [(2)(-2) - (3)(-2), (3)(1) - (2)(-2), (1)(-2) - (2)(1)]

u x v = [-4 + 6, 3 + 4, -2 - 2]

u x v = [2, 7, -4]

To know more about vector,

https://brainly.com/question/30907119

#SPJ11

Therefore, approximately 70.2% of the variation in the data about the regression line is unexplained.

The coefficient of determination, denoted as R², is the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable(s). Therefore, the percentage of the variation in the data about the regression line that is unexplained can be found by subtracting the coefficient of determination from 1 and then multiplying the result by 100.

Percentage of variation unexplained = (1 - R^2) x 100%

Substituting R² = 0.298, we get:

Percentage of variation unexplained = (1 - 0.298) x 100%

Percentage of variation unexplained = 0.702 x 100%

Percentage of variation unexplained = 70.2%

To know more about regression line,

https://brainly.com/question/29753986

#SPJ11

The APR charged by Advance America is approximately 443.2%.

Convert the loan term of 14 days to a fraction of a year.

There are 365 days in a year, so the fraction of a year for a 14-day loan is 14/365.

Simple interest is calculated with the following formula:

S.I. = (P × APR × T)/100,

Here P = Principal, R = Rate of Interest in % per annum, and T = Time, usually calculated as the number of years.

As per the question, we have:

P = $100, S.I. = $17 and T = 14/365.

Substitute the values in the formula,

17 = (100 × APR × 14/365)/100

APR = (365 × 17)/14

APR = 443.2 %

Therefore, the APR is about 443.2%.

Learn more about the simple interest here:

brainly.com/question/22621039

#SPJ1

To find the value of the standard normal random variable z, called zo, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator with a standard normal distribution function.

(a) P(Z < zo) = 0.7819
Looking at a standard normal distribution table, we can find the closest value to 0.7819, which is 0.78 in the table. The corresponding value of z is 0.80. Therefore, zo = 0.80.
(b) P(-20 < x < zo) = 0.4015
Since we are given a range of values for x, we need to convert this to a range of values for z using the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation. For the standard normal distribution, μ = 0 and σ = 1.
P(-20 < x < zo) = P((-20 - 0) / 1 < (x - 0) / 1 < (zo - 0) / 1)
= P(-20 < z < zo)
Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the probabilities corresponding to -20 and zo, which are 0.0000 and 0.6554, respectively. Then, we can subtract the probability of z < -20 from the probability of z < zo to get the probability of -20 < z < zo.
P(-20 < z < zo) = P(z < zo) - P(z < -20) = 0.6554 - 0.0000 = 0.6554
However, this is not equal to the given probability of 0.4015. Therefore, there must be an error in the question or in the given probability.
(e) P(-20 < z < 0) = 0.4659
Since we are given a range of values for z, we can look up the probabilities corresponding to -20 and 0 in a standard normal distribution table, which are 0.0000 and 0.5000, respectively. Then, we can subtract the probability of z < -20 from the probability of z < 0 to get the probability of -20 < z < 0.
P(-20 < z < 0) = P(z < 0) - P(z < -20) = 0.5000 - 0.0000 = 0.5000
Therefore, zo is not needed for this part of the question.

Learn more about standard normal random variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/14782203

#SPJ11

Answer:

56 of them were rookies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x = the number of rookies; y = the number of veterans.

We have the total number of people:

x + y = 252 (1)

The ratio x/y = 2/7 is equal to:

7x = 2y, so x = 2y/7

Substituting x into (1):

2y/7 + y = 252

9y/7 = 252

y = 252 × 7/9 = 196

So substituting y into (1):

x + 196 = 252

x = 252 - 196 = 56.

There were 56 rookies in the camp.

To find the number of rookies in the camp, we will use the given ratio and the total number of people in the camp.

Step 1: Write down the ratio of rookies to veterans, which is 2:7.

Step 2: Add the two parts of the ratio together: 2 + 7 = 9 parts.

Step 3: Divide the total number of people in the camp by the total number of parts. In this case, there are 252 people and 9 parts: 252 / 9 = 28. This means each part represents 28 people.

Step 4: Multiply the number of people per part by the number of parts for rookies to find the total number of rookies: 2 parts (rookies) * 28 people per part = 56 rookies.

So, there were 56 rookies in the camp.

Visit here to learn more about ratio:

brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ11

Answer:

try to get am math tutor........

Our estimate for f(1.2) is 1.1 which satisfies differential equation.

To find the equation of the tangent line to the curve y = f(x) through the point (1,1), we first need to find the value of f(1) at x = 1. To do this, we can solve the differential equation given:

[tex]dy/dx = xy/2[/tex]

Separating the variables, we get:

[tex]dy/y = x/2 dx[/tex]

Integrating both sides, we get:

[tex]ln|y| = x^2/4 + C[/tex]

Where C is the constant of integration. To find the value of C, we can use the initial condition that f(1) = 1:

ln|1| = 1/4 + C

C = -1/4

So our equation for f(x) is:
[tex]ln|y| = x^2/4 - 1/4[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]y = e^(x^2/4 - 1/4)[/tex]

To find the equation of the tangent line through the point (1,1), we need to find the slope of the tangent line at x = 1. To do this, we take the derivative of f(x) and evaluate it at x = 1:

[tex]f'(x) = (1/2)x e^(x^2/4 - 1/4)f'(1) = (1/2)(1) e^(1/4 - 1/4) = 1/2[/tex]

So the slope of the tangent line at x = 1 is 1/2. Using the point-slope form of a line, we get:

[tex]y - 1 = 1/2(x - 1)[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

y = 1/2 x + 1/2

To estimate the value of f(1.2), we can use our tangent line equation. Plugging in x = 1.2, we get:

[tex]y = 1/2(1.2) + 1/2 = 1.1[/tex]

So our estimate for f(1.2) is 1.1.

Learn more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30267790

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex] \sqrt{ { (- 3 - 2)}^{2} + {(1 - ( - 1))}^{2} } [/tex]

[tex] \sqrt{ {( - 5)}^{2} + {2}^{2} } [/tex]

[tex] \sqrt{25 + 4} = \sqrt{29} [/tex]

The exponent of 3 in the prime factorization of 109! is 76.

To find the exponent of 3 in the prime factorization of 109!, we need to first determine how many factors of 3 there are in the prime factorization of each number from 1 to 109. We can do this by dividing each number by 3 and adding up the quotient (ignoring any remainder) until the quotient becomes less than 3. For example, for the number 27, we divide 27 by 3 to get 9, then divide 9 by 3 to get 3, then divide 3 by 3 to get 1. So the exponent of 3 in the prime factorization of 27 is 3.

Doing this for all the numbers from 1 to 109, we get:

- There are 36 numbers that have at least one factor of 3.
- There are 12 numbers that have at least two factors of 3.
- There are 4 numbers that have at least three factors of 3.
- There is 1 number (81) that has at least four factors of 3.

To find the exponent of 3 in the prime factorization of 109!, we need to add up the number of factors of 3 in each of these numbers:

- The 36 numbers with at least one factor of 3 contribute a total of 36 factors of 3.
- The 12 numbers with at least two factors of 3 contribute a total of 24 factors of 3 (since each one has 2 factors of 3).
- The 4 numbers with at least three factors of 3 contribute a total of 12 factors of 3 (since each one has 3 factors of 3).
- The 1 number with at least four factors of 3 contributes 4 factors of 3.

So the total number of factors of 3 in the prime factorization of 109! is 36 + 24 + 12 + 4 = 76. Therefore, the exponent of 3 in the prime factorization of 109! is 76.

Learn more about Prime Factorization here: brainly.com/question/29775157

#SPJ11

All the correct expressions that could be used to find the volume of the hamster house are,

⇒ (1 × 3 × 4) + (6 × 3 × 2)

Given that;

One rectangular prism has a length of 1 foot, a width of 3 feet and a height of 4 feet.

And, The second rectangular prism has a length as 6 feet, a width as 3 feet, and a height of 2 feet.

Hence, the Volume of first rectangular prism is,

⇒ 1 × 3 × 4

And,  Volume of a second rectangular prism is,

⇒ 6 × 3 × 2

Thus, All the correct expressions that could be used to find the volume of the hamster house are,

⇒ (1 × 3 × 4) + (6 × 3 × 2)

Read more about rectangles here:

https://brainly.com/question/2607596

#SPJ1