According to the Margaret Mead’s studies, Women cannot survive without following leadership of men are sociologists most likely to say about the role of women in societies.
Who is sociologist?The examination of societal life, social modification, and the societal causes and consequences of human conduct is adverted to as sociology.
Sociologists study the structure of organizations, groups, and communities, as well as how people interact in them.
Each of the civilizations Mead researched had a distinct pattern of male and female conduct, all of which differed from gender role expectations in the United States at the time.
She discovered a receptive, polite and cooperative attitude among the Arapesh, both males and females. He believed that the Women cannot live on without favorable leadership of men.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about the sociologist, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/606515
#SPJ2
Answer: C. Women can take on roles that are sensitive or aggressive.
1.
Traffic laws..
A) promote safety in the driving
environment.
B)
contribute to a common
understanding among users of the
roadway.
C) keep order and movement in traffic.
D) All of the above are correct.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
This is because if you look at the questions and think about all the types of traffic laws you can infer that the answer is D
Explain, the principal of Res-judicata and limitation .
Answer: Overview. Generally, res judicata is the principle that a cause of action may not be relitigated once it has been judged on the merits. "Finality" is the term which refers to when a court renders a final judgment on the merits.
Explanation:
How many amendments in the american bill of rights
There are 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights.
There are 10 amendments in the American bill of rights. It outlines the rights of Americans in connection to their government. It contains many kinds of the rights which protect the interest of people.
What is bill of rights?The Bill of Rights is made up of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. It lays out Americans' rights in relation to their government.
Individual civil rights and liberties are protected, including freedom of speech, press, and religion.
Thus, there are 10 amendment in the American bill of rights.
For further details about bill of rights, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13278960
#SPJ4
List and explain three separate laws that targeted respective ethnic groups
Answer:
Naturalization Act of 1790 -- est standards for who could become an american citizen → caucasians only
Chinese Exclusion act of 1882 -- excluded Chinese laborers from entering US
Immigration Act of 1917 -- restricted immigation from Asia, created Asiatic Barred Zone
Explanation:
quizlet
The major three laws that targeted respective ethnic groups are the Naturalization Act of 1790, the Chinese exclusion act of 1882, and the Immigration Act of 1917.
What do you mean by laws?Laws refer to the rules, and practices that are binding for a society or a country.
The major three laws that specifically target ethnic groups are the Naturalization Act of 1790 which set standards for who can become a citizen of America.
Chinese exclusion act states the exclusions of Chinese laborers from entering the U.S and the immigration Act of 1917 restricts immigration from Asia creating an Asiatic barred zone.
Learn more about Laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
Can someone please explain what is the difference between a revocable and irrevocable trust and what is a probate process? Why do I need a trust?
Answer:
The difference between a revocable and irrevocable trust would be; A revocable living trust becomes irrevocable when the grantor dies because he's no longer available to make changes to it. But a revocable trust can be designed to break into separate irrevocable trusts at the time of the grantor's death for the benefit of children or other beneficiaries.
What is the term for political authority claimed by an election winner as reflecting the approval of the people?.
Answer:
Mandate.
Explanation:
Mandate is a political authority by winning an election from the party to carry out policies.
What is the difference between declaration and statement?
Answer:
A statement can be a clear expression of something in speech or writing.
Declaration formal or explicit statement or announcement.
The difference between a declaration and a statement is that a declaration is a written or oral indication of a fact, opinion, or belief while a statement is a declaration or remark.
What do you mean by Declaration?A declaration is a written statement, affirmed to be true under penalty of perjury by any person who has a thorough knowledge of the affairs of the court case.
A statement can be a clear expression of something in speech or writing.A declaration is an official or explicit statement or declaration.Thus, The difference between a declaration and a statement is that a declaration is a written or oral indication of a fact, on the other hand a statement is a declaration or remark.
To learn more about declaration:
https://brainly.com/question/6296354
#SPJ4
Why do we often say that a corporation is subject to "double taxation"?
Answer:
We often say that a corporation is subject to " double taxation " because the corporation legal entities and datas are seperated from their shareholders.
What is an adjustment or change that can replace the negative effects of burning fossil fuels for energy?
Water irrigation
Solar Power
Digging for oil
Burning wood
Pelz help A. S. A. P. Really need help!
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Solar power can serve as a substitute for fossil fuels and can also counteract the effects of burning fossil fuels by using thermal energy.
In what ways does our adversarial trial
system differ from the inquisitorial system? In what ways are the systems
similar?
You are charged with a crime in a very small, isolated town. You hire one of the two attorneys in town to defend you (the other one is his brother, the prosecutor). You ask for a jury trial, and they bring in four people to decide your fate. Are these four a legitimate jury?
In the given case, when an individual wants a jury trial, they summon four individuals to decide the destiny, these four are not a legitimate jury, as the jury should consist of six to twelve persons.
What is the significance of legitimate jury?The defense of debtor-defendants, defeating foolish legislation, upholding the rights of private persons in legal disputes with the government, and safeguarding litigants from overbearing and repressive judges were some of the justifications put out for civil jury trials.
Almost all juries are able to come to a unanimous decision. In some sorts of situations, it is a verdict that receives the support of 11 out of 12 jurors is admissible. A hung jury is one that cannot reach a consensus after the jury has deliberated or considered for numerous hours or days.
To learn more about the legitimate jury, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ2
YOUR DECISION - As a defense attorney, your job is to create
reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds about Daniel's intent to lure
Christopher to his death. Besides the facts presented above, other
important details about this case include the following: (1) Jose, the
prosecution's main witness, was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser
charge of voluntary manslaughter in return for his testimony, and (2)
Jose was dating Christopher's sister at the time of the murder. What
argument will you make before the jury to create reasonable doubt?
Answer:
this is for the set up this is the first one I saw
Namibia’s legal system is a said to be hybrid
Answer:
Namibia's sophisticated legal system displays pluralism. A hybrid legal system, it combines African customary laws and post-Independence state laws with elements of Roman-Dutch common law, English common law, and South African law. Overall, Namibia belongs to the family of common law legal systems.
Suppose that the president proposes a new law aimed at reducing healthcare costs. All americans are required to eat one apple daily
If the President should sign such a law in place the effect would be:
A. The value of the marginal product of apple pickers increases.B. The equilibrium price of apples increases.E. The marginal product of apple pickers increases.What would be the effect of the Presidents policy on the economy?By asking that the consumption of apples be increased, it would lead to a rise in the demand for apples in the country.
When this happens, it means that the revenue of apple growers would rise in the country due to increased demand.
Complete question:
Suppose that the president proposes a new law aimed at reducing healthcare costs: All Americans are required to eat one apple daily.
Which of the following statements correctly describes the effect of this apple-a-day law? Check all that apply.
A. The value of the marginal product of apple pickers increases.
B. The equilibrium price of apples increases.
C. The demand for apples remains unchanged.
D. The demand for apple pickers remains unchanged.
E. The marginal product of apple pickers increases.
F. The wage of apple pickers increases
Read more on demand here: https://brainly.com/question/1245771
Which type of rights ensure equal treatment under the law?
O substantive rights
O procedural rights
O unenumerated rights
O civil rights
Civil rights ensure equal treatment under the law.
If someone sits on my car and causes damages what tort have they committed?
Answer:
ASSAULT
Personal injury law protects your right to control what does or does not touch your body. An assault is an act, or threat to act, that is intended to put a person in fear of imminent non-consensual physical touching. The tort of assault protects people from the fear that they will be physically harmed. Actual physical contact is not required, and in fact, if there is physical contact, the assault becomes a battery.
Note that this is different than what many people are familiar with in the context of criminal law, where assault and battery are terms that are defined by specific criminal legislation, which defines the criminal penalties imposed for engaging in certain acts, rather than the right to monetary recovery which is governed by personal injury law
Should habitual offender laws (3-Strikes laws), be used as a sentencing option in US Courts? Are they effective at reducing crime?
Which is not a valid use of a reassignment?
O a. Coach is relieved of coaching duties and reassigned to
alumni relations for the remainder of his contract
O b. Coach is moved to another position after making a claim of
racial discrimination
O c. Coach has a losing record and is asked to choose between
reassignment or resignation
d. All of the above are valid uses of reassignment
Valid use of reassignment is D. All of the above are valid uses of reassignment.
What is reassignment?Reassignment involves the allocation of a different role or position to a person other than the initial role or position.
While reassignments are common at the workplace, recently, there is an increasing reassignment of s.xes.
Thus, valid use of reassignment may involve a coach being relieved of coaching duties for alumni relations or racial discrimination and choosing reassignment or resignation.
Learn more about handling workplace issues at https://brainly.com/question/24673911
Do you think capital punishment should be a viable sentencing option for heinous crimes
Answer:
Yes, I feel as thou people who are found guilty of a heinous act need to be viable to capital punishment. I say this because the long term affect a crime like that can have on someone. It can cause serious damage and resault in self harm or worse for the victim/ victims familys. There is a never ending line of heinous crimes but being viable for capital sentencing may help stop that line.
Explanation:
Hope This Helps
Have A Great Day
~Zero~
Discuss how drugs and substance abuse in prisons can affect the safety of inmates and staff.
Do you need to get permission to cite a song title
Alice approaches you for advice. she informs you that she owes many people a lot of money and wishes to apply for Her own voluntary surrender. she asks if you could perhaps, as her best friend, help her to write a formal letter to give to her brother, stating that she can no longer pay her debts to him. discuss what this action above is called and refer to a relevant legislation. also advise alice as to whether she will succeed in her action to apply for voluntary surrender.
This process which Alice wants to take is known as insolvency,
What is Voluntary Surrender?This refers to the repossession which involves the return of items that were conditions for a loan.
Hence, we can note that this involves telling your lenders that you are unable to make payments on a loan and because Alice is in insolvency, then it would be worth noting that collateral would have to be repossessed as she cannot pay her brother.
Read more about insolvency here:
https://brainly.com/question/1142634
Trial courts in the federal judicial system are called.
Answer:
The constitution created the Supreme Court and authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system's present form, 94 district-level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
The Rio Treaty of 1947 was a defense agreement between
O the United States and Brazil.
O the United States and Japan.
O North America and South America.
O the nations that border the Atlantic Ocean.
The purpose of the Rio Treaty of 1947 was to act as a defense agreement between North America and South America.
What was the Rio Treaty?This was an agreement between the United States and several countries in South America.
The purpose of this was to form a defense alliance during the Cold War that would protect member states from attacks by nonmembers.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on the Cold War at https://brainly.com/question/856013.
Answer:The purpose of the Rio Treaty of 1947 was to act as a defense agreement between North America and South America.
What was the Rio Treaty?
This was an agreement between the United States and several countries in South America.
The purpose of this was to form a defense alliance during the Cold War that would protect member states from attacks by nonmembers.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on the Cold War at brainly.com/question/856013.
what is the concept ethics ?
What is the definition of ethics?
The term ethics can refer to any philosophical theory of what is morally right and wrong, morally good and evil, and any system or code of moral norms, principles, or values, as well as the philosophical study of moral right and wrong, moral good and bad. The three ethical theories (utilitarian ethics, deontological ethics, and virtue ethics) are at the heart of normative ethics debates. It is critical, however, for public relations professionals to grasp how to use these notions in their day-to-day work. Morality and ethics are both vaguely concerned with discriminating between "good and bad" or "right and wrong." Many individuals consider morality to be a personal and normative concept, whereas ethics refers to the "good and evil" norms established by a society or social situation.
- Robertonbrainly
In your own words, define development. Relate your difinition to that of any authority.
A power of attorney should be used with great caution and only in exceptional circumstances because a. An attorney must be licensed to practice law in the state of authority. B. The power to be exercised defines the duty to be obeyed. C. It grants extensive authority to an agent. D. Failure to comply with the equal dignity rule makes a contract voidable
Generally, the power of attorney is expected to be used with great caution and only in exceptional circumstances because its grants extensive authority to an agent.
What is power of attorney?This power is inferred in a a written document that confers express authority to agent and is usually notarized.
Hence, it is expected to be used with great caution and only in exceptional circumstances because its grants extensive authority to an agent.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about power of attorney
brainly.com/question/20397360
Which part of a supreme court decision presents the argument
Answer:
The part that presents the argument in opposition to the courts ruling is dissent.
Explanation:
Dissenting view refers to the judges' disagreement with public opinion. They also call it the report of a minority. There are different kinds of Dissenting opinions.
What do you mean by dissenting opinion?Dissenting opinions often occur when there is a consensus of part of the case.
A dissenting (or opposing) opinion is a legal opinion in certain legal cases written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the public opinion of the court that results in its decision.
Thus, Dissenting view part of a supreme court decision presents the argument.
To learn more about dissenting opinion:
https://brainly.com/question/11651416
#SPJ4
A subpoena duces tecum is different from an ordinary subpoena in that a subpoena duces tecum
Answer:
It can only be given to an expert to require a personal appearance before a court.
PowerPoint on investigation on a crime scene.
should include:
✓ Team Members and roles
✓ Type of search patterns used
✓ Evidence collection, recording, and preservation
✓No reference, 8 slides
Answer:
Explanation:
Complete the presentation and extra work themselves; in the future, the individual will have to remember to send everything or risk doing the extra work themselves.
Explanation:
Not only this helps in increasing accountability in the individual but it would also help in influencing the behavior of the individual in the future. He would be more responsible for delegating the tasks as he would learn from his mistakes. This would go a long way in developing a competent and responsible workforce which would help in increasing the effecency of the company.