Answer:
C) Revise the articles of Confederation
Explanation:
Abigail Adams (1744–1818) projected that the Massachusetts revolt of 1786 led by Daniel Shays (ca. 1741–1825) "will prove to be sallutary to the state at large," even though it was driven by "ignorant, wrestless desperates, without conscience or representatives." Many in the United States claimed that a powerful central government was required to deter these territorial uprisings against established rule. In this scene, Shays and Job Shattuck (1736–1819), both Revolutionary Army veterans and leaders of the 1786 rebellion, are featured. Afterward, Madison and Washington consider Confederation.
Most US adults have social ties with a large number of people, including friends, family, co-workers, and other acquaintances. It is nearly impossible for most people to reliably list all the people they know, but using a mathematical model, social analysts estimate that, on average, a US adult has social ties with people.1 A survey of randomly selected US adults who are cell phone users finds that the average number of social ties for the cell phone users in the sample was with a standard deviation of . Does the sample provide evidence that the average number of social ties for a cell phone user is significantly different from , the hypothesized number for all US adults?
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Most US adults have social ties with a large number of people, including friends, family, co-workers, and other acquaintances. It is nearly impossible for most people to reliably list all the people they know, but using a mathematical model, social analysts estimate that, on average, a US adult has social ties with 634 people.1 A survey of 1700 randomly selected US adults who are cell phone users finds that the average number of social ties for the cell phone users in the sample was 664 with a standard deviation of 778. Does the sample provide evidence that the average number of social ties for a cell phone user is significantly different from 634, the hypothesized number for all US adults?
Answer:
The sample does not provide evidence that the average number of social ties for a cell phone user is significantly different from 634.
Explanation:
First, it is necessary to find out if the average number of social connections for a cell phone user is significantly different from 634 people. For this, we will consider:
H₀: The average number of social connections for a cell phone user is 634 people. For this we will use μ = 634.
Hₐ: The average number of social connections for a cell phone user is different from 634 people. For this we will use μ ≠ 634.
After these considerations we will adopt the following information:
n = 1700
'X = 664
SD = 778
We can see that the size of the sample is very large and as the population is unknown, we will use the concepts of the central limit theorem and adopt the average sample distribution in the same way as the normal distribution. For this reason, a single mean z test will be appropriate in this case.
After understanding the information, we can calculate the test value. For this it will be necessary to use the formula:
z= ('x-μ)/(SD/√n)
z =(664-663)/(778/√1700) = 1.59
When finding this value, you must take into account whether the p-value of the test is less than the significance level.
The p-value for the two-tailed test is found by the formula:
p - value = 2 * P (Z> 1.59)
p - Value = 2 [1-P (Z> 1.59)
p- value = 2 * (1-0.944) = 0.112
The p-test reveals a very high value in relation to the level of significance and shows that the null hypothesis must be rejected. Based on this, we can say that we have no factor that proves that the average number of social connections for a cell phone user is different from 634 people.
Verify Identities:
sec²a=1/1-sin²a
Answer: see proof below
Explanation:
[tex]sec^2\alpha=\dfrac{1}{1-\sin^2 \alpha}[/tex]
LHS → RHS
[tex]sec^2\alpha\qquad \text{Given}\\\\\dfrac{1}{cos^2\alpha}\qquad \text{sec is reciprocal of cos}\\\\\\\dfrac{1}{1-sin^2\alpha}\qquad \text{Identity}:cos^2\alpha + sin^2\alpha = 1\\\\\\\dfrac{1}{1-sin^2\alpha}=\dfrac{1}{1-sin^2\alpha}\quad \checkmark[/tex]