alerts from the national terrorism advisory system apply only to the united states and its possessions.

Answer:

exadration

Explanation:

that's all there is to it

Answer:

2. Union membership and activities fell sharply in the face of economic prosperity, a lack of leadership within the movement,

3. The main piece of progress that was made toward world peace in the 1920s was the League of Nations, which was founded in 1920 as a response to the evils of World War I. It ultimately failed to prevent another world war, however.

4. Mining companies, railroads and farms weren't doing well.

Explanation:

Answer:

okokokokokokoo

ExplanationIn philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

A world where there is nothing is just an empty shell, you might reply; but the shell itself exists, is something. And even if there were no matter, arguably space could still exist, so could time; and these are not nothing.

Answer:

The Inca civilization built stone-paved roads over mountains.

Manifest destiny: A widely held belief in the 19th century United States that its settlers were given the divine right to expand across the continent.

Answer:

Hewo There!!!

___________________________

According to official records, five people died while constructing the Empire State Building. One was struck by a truck, another fell down an elevator shaft, a third was killed by explosives, a fourth struck by a hoist and the fifth fell from scaffolding.

___________________________

“You can get a thousand no's from people, and only one "yes" from God.”

― Tyler Perry

___________________________

Think of life as a mytery because well it sort of is! You don't know what may happen may be good or bad but be a little curious and get ready for whatever comes your way!! ~Ashlynn

The type of censorship that Lenin and Communist Party use in Russia is known as Selective censorship because they control certain aspect of the sphere.

Basically, a censorship refers to the prohibition of any books, films, news, because they are seen as obscene, politically unacceptable, threat  by the authorities or leaders.

In conclusion, the type of censorship that Lenin and Communist Party use in Russia is known as Selective censorship because they control certain aspect of the sphere.

Read more about censorship

brainly.com/question/1762718

Answer:

A. that the panic caused trade between the states to come to a halt

Answer:

i think their cool !

Explanation:

Answer:

i think there amazing  (lol i am one )

Explanation:

were bosses were chill till u  make us mad  were honestly really nice pepole

The best is for your letter to include evidence to oppose Schenck's arrest, and not to include your name.

Charles Schneck was arrested in 1919 for printing thousands of fliers that encouraged men not to approve the World War I draft and therefore join was as Schneck considered this was against people's rights.

The government considered Schneck's actions a crime because it oppose the Espionage Act of 1917 that states people could not interfere with military recruitment.

Based on this context, if you want to express your disagreement with Shneck's arrest it is important you:

Learn more about World War I in: https://brainly.com/question/925121

Answer:

1. AMUN-RA: The Hidden One

2. MUT: The Mother Goddess

3. OSIRIS: The King of the Living

4. ANUBIS: The Divine Embalmer

5. RA: God of the Sun and Radiance

6. HORUS: God of Vengeance

7. THOTH: God of Knowledge and Wisdom

8. HATHOR: Goddess of Motherhood

9. SEKHMET: Goddess of War and Healing

10. GEB: God of Earth

Explanation:

Your anwers is on there

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

A recipe calls for 2/3 cup of sugar for every 1/2 teaspoon of vanilla.what is the unit rate of cups per teaspoon.

Explanation:

right ??

Answer:

School is an organization that provides instruction such as an institution for the teaching of children.

The first American schools in the thirteen original colonies opened in the 17th century. Boston Latin School was founded in 1635 and is both the first public school and oldest existing school in the United States.

The modern school system was brought to India, including the English language, originally by Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay in the 1830s. The curriculum was confined to “modern” subjects such as science and mathematics, and subjects like metaphysics and philosophy were considered unnecessary.

Answer:

An organization that provides instruction: such as. a : an institution for the teaching of children. b : college, university.

The full form of SCHOOL are as follows: Sincerity Capacity Honesty Orderliness Obedience Learning. Scholars Come Here Over and Out for Learning. ... Several Common Hours Of Our Learning -lifes.

Jonathan P. Berkey was commonly known for his book, The Formation of Islam. Berkey's argument was that Islam did not appear as a fully-formed faith, but developed through conversation and study with other religions.

Through thorough study of the religious scene in the Near Eas, he was able to know Islam's first century.

He was able to trace the start of new forms of Islam in the middle period as a result of thorough study of other religion.

Learn more about Islam from

https://brainly.com/question/25843660

Answer:

The reforms included the development of a new secular school system, the reorganization of the army based on the Prussian conscript system, the creation of provincial representative assemblies, and the introduction of new codes of commercial and criminal law, which were largely modeled after those of France.

Answer:

Working hard at getting a good education has long been seen as the right thing to do, because education is the key to success.

Explanation:

Answer:

What do you need help with there is no picture or anything

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Thanks for points...

May God bless u dear...

Answer:

The Allies had a lower casualty rate than the Central Powers.

Explanation:

i got 100 good luck

The Allies had a lower casualty rate than the Central Powers which conclusion can be drawn from these data about casualties in World War I. The correct option is C.

The German army lost more than two million soldiers, making it the force with the most casualties. The largest number of civilian deaths occurred in Turkey, mostly as a result of the mass killing of Assyrians, Greeks, and Armenians.

There had never been a war with as many victims as the First World War. On the battlefields, thousands of troops were being buried by their fellow soldiers in private or collective cemeteries. They were frequently interred in the spot where they died in battle, in a cemetery nearby, or both.

About 5.7 million men were lost by the Entente Powers commonly known as the Allies, compared to 4 million by the Central Powers. These data on military fatalities cover deaths from combat as well as deaths from accidents, illness, and deaths while serving as a prisoner of war.

Thus, the ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about WW1 here:

https://brainly.com/question/14387086

#SPJ6

Based on historical perspective, President Hoover hoped to gain people's votes by claiming that people would be returned to their normal lives.

This is because President Herbert Hoover was the President of the United States when the Great Depression occurred between 1929 to 1933.

However, while he was President, he did little or nothing to solve the issue of the Great Depression.

When the second term election came, he tried to convince people to vote for him by boasting and claiming that people would return to their normal lives.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "People's vote."

Learn more about President Herbert Hoover here: https://brainly.com/question/3214442

Answer:

Hoover believed that Roosevelt was offering people a plan that was both impossible and far too expensive even if it were possible. He also believed that it would abandon the principles that the American system was based on. He had never supported direct aid to people, and he didn't want American voters to support Roosevelt's plan to do this.

Explanation:

Edmentum

Answer:

Napoleon reformed the French educational system, developed a civil code (the Napoleonic Code), and negotiated the Concordat of 1801. He also initiated the Napoleonic Wars

Explanation:

Answer: Financial Assistance

Explanation:

It relatedto the issues of the Great Depression.