an automotive manufacturer wants to know the proportion of new car buyers who prefer foreign cars over domestic. in an earlier study, the population proportion was estimated to be 0.31 . how large a sample would be required in order to estimate the fraction of new car buyers who prefer foreign cars at the 95% confidence level with an error of at most 0.03 ? round your answer up to the next integer.

The population mean time on death row is different than 15 years with p value is 0.0002.

To conduct the hypothesis test, we will use a one-sample t-test with the following null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis: The population mean time on death row is equal to 15 years. μ = 15

Alternative hypothesis: The population mean time on death row is different than 15 years. μ ≠ 15

We will use a significance level of 0.05.

First, we need to calculate the t-value:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

t = (17.4 - 15) / (6.3 / √75)

t = 3.667

Next, we need to find the degrees of freedom:

df = n - 1

df = 74

Using an online calculator for the t-distribution, we find that the p-value for a two-tailed test with a t-value of 3.667 and 74 degrees of freedom is less than 0.00015 (or 0.0002 when rounded to 4 decimal places).

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population mean time on death row is different than 15 years.

Learn more about hypothesis at https://brainly.com/question/28044165

#SPJ11

A test for two proportions and the null hypothesis would be the best test statistic to assess the variance in bacon consumption from 2011 to 2016.

The null hypothesis for the test is that the proportion of adults who consumed at least 3 pounds of bacon in 2011 is equivalent to the proportion of adults who consumed at least three pounds of bacon in 2016.

A potential explanation would be that the percentage of adults who ate at least 3 pounds of bacon in 2011 and 2016 differed.

Additionally, the test statistic may be likened to a chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom; hence, it is necessary to compute the test statistic's p-value in order to establish whether the null hypothesis can be ideally rejected or not.

Read more about null hypothesis on:

brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ12

The margin of error can be calculated as half the width of the confidence interval. So, the margin of error is:

(0.257 - 0.183) / 2 = 0.037

Therefore, the answer is (a) 0.037.
The margin of error for this confidence interval can be calculated by finding the difference between the upper bound and the lower bound, and then dividing by 2.

In this case, the confidence interval is (0.183, 0.257).

Margin of error = (0.257 - 0.183) / 2 = 0.074.

So the answer is b. 0.074.

The margin of error is a measure of the precision of an estimate or a statistic, often used in opinion polls and surveys. It represents the amount of sampling error that is expected in the results due to random variation.

In statistical terms, the margin of error is calculated as a range of values around the estimated statistic, within which the true population parameter is likely to fall with a certain degree of confidence. The most common way to express the margin of error is as a plus or minus value, typically represented as a percentage of the sample size.

For example, if a survey of 1,000 people finds that 60% of them support a particular political candidate, with a margin of error of +/- 3%, this means that there is a 95% chance that the true level of support in the population falls between 57% and 63%. In other words, if the survey were to be repeated many times, 95% of the resulting confidence intervals would contain the true level of support.

Visit here to learn more about margin of error brainly.com/question/10501147

#SPJ11

To calculate the probability, we need to divide the number of deaths (12) by the number of visitors (6.2 million) and multiply by 100 to get a percentage.
Probability = (12/6,200,000) x 100 = 0.00019354838


Given that the Grand Canyon has an average of 6.2 million visitors each year and an average of 12 deaths per year, we can calculate the probability of a visitor's death as follows:

Step 1: Convert the annual number of deaths to a decimal.
12 deaths per year / 6,200,000 visitors per year = 0.0000019355 (rounded to 8 decimal places)
To calculate the probability, we need to divide the number of deaths (12) by the number of visitors (6.2 million) and multiply by 100 to get a percentage.

Probability = (12/6,200,000) x 100 = 0.00019354838

Rounded to eight decimal places, the probability is 0.00019355.

So, the probability that a visitor to the Grand Canyon will die while visiting is 0.00019355(rounded to 8 decimal places). This probability is theoretical because it is based on the average number of deaths and visitors over several years.

Learn more about Probability:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The theoretical probability of the spinner not landing on yellow is 5/8, which is approximately 0.625.

The correct option is B.

The spinner has a total of 8 equally likely outcomes, so the theoretical probability of each individual outcome is 1/8.

To find the probability of the spinner not landing on yellow, we need to add up the probabilities of all the non-yellow outcomes.

These are:

Purple (sections 1 and 8): 2/8 = 1/4

Blue (sections 4, 5, and 6): 3/8

Red (section 7): 1/8

So the probability of the spinner not landing on yellow is:

P(not yellow) = P(purple) + P(blue) + P(red)

= 1/4 + 3/8 + 1/8

= 5/8

= 0.625

So the correct option is (B) 0.625.

To learn more about the probability;

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ1

The answer for the equation is B.

150 with a remainder of 2

Based on the given data, we can calculate the sample proportions of adults using social media for each country as follows:

United Kingdom: p1 = 480/(480+320) = 0.6

China: p2 = 215/(215+285) = 0.43

Russia: p3 = 343/(343+357) = 0.49

United States: p4 = 640/(640+360) = 0.64

To test whether the proportion of adults using social media is equal for all four countries, we can use a chi-squared test of independence with the null hypothesis:

H0: P1 = P2 = P3 = P4

And the alternative hypothesis:

Ha: Not all population proportions are equal

We can calculate the expected frequencies for each cell assuming the null hypothesis is true, and use these to calculate the chi-squared test statistic:

Expected frequency for Yes-UK = (480+320) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 400

Expected frequency for No-UK = (320+480) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 400

Expected frequency for Yes-China = (215+285) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 320

Expected frequency for No-China = (285+215) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 320

Expected frequency for Yes-Russia = (343+357) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 350

Expected frequency for No-Russia = (357+343) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 350

Expected frequency for Yes-US = (640+360) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 500

Expected frequency for No-US = (360+640) * (480+215+343+640) / (480+215+343+640+320+285+357+360) = 500

Using these expected frequencies and the observed frequencies, we can calculate the chi-squared test statistic:

chi2 = sum((observed - expected)^2 / expected) = (480-400)^2/400 + (320-400)^2/400 + (215-320)^2/320 + (285-320)^2/320 + (343-350)^2/350 + (357-350)^2/350 + (640-500)^2/500 + (360-500)^2/500 = 33.49

The degrees of freedom for this test are df = (r-1)(c-1) = (2-1)(4-1) = 3, where r is the number of rows (2 for Yes/No) and c is the number of columns (4 for the countries).

We can then use a chi-squared distribution with 3 degrees of freedom to calculate the p-value for the test:

p-value = P(Chi2 > 33.49) = 0.00000031 (using a chi-squared calculator)

Visit here to learn more about frequency brainly.com/question/5102661

#SPJ11

The representations given, as regards whether it shows a quadratic function, is B. No.

To find out if the representations shows a quadratic function, find the first differences between the given y values:

10 - 5 = 5

15 - 10 = 5

20 - 15 = 5

Then, calculate the second differences, using the first differences :

5 - 5 = 0

5 - 5 = 0

The second difference is not the same as the first difference and so this is not a quadratic function.

Find out more on quadratic functions at https://brainly.com/question/29293854

#SPJ1

The integral of the 1-form field x dy over the straight-line path from (2,0) to (0,3) is equal to 3.

To integrate the 1-form field x dy over the straight-line path from (2,0) to (0,3), we need to parametrize the path first.

Let's define a parameterization r(t) = (x(t), y(t)) for t in [0,1] that describes the straight-line path from (2,0) to (0,3).

The equation of the line passing through (2,0) and (0,3) can be written as y = -3/2 x + 3. So we can choose:

x(t) = 2 - 2t

y(t) = 3t

with t in [0,1].

Now we can calculate the differential form evaluated along the path:

x dy = x(t) dy/dt = (2-2t)(3) = 6 - 6t

Finally, we can integrate over the interval [0,1]:

∫(2,0) x dy = ∫(0,1) (6 - 6t) dt = [6t - 3t^2] from 0 to 1 = 3.

Therefore, the integral of the 1-form field x dy over the straight-line path from (2,0) to (0,3) is equal to 3.

To learn more about integrate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

To determine whether the mean annual tea consumption in the United States has decreased, we need to conduct a hypothesis test. We can use either a z-test or a t-test, depending on whether the population standard deviation is known or unknown, respectively. In this case, we are given that the population standard deviation is 2.2 gallons, so we can use a z-test.

Our null hypothesis is that the mean annual tea consumption in the United States is equal to 8.9 gallons. Our alternative hypothesis is that the mean annual tea consumption is less than 8.9 gallons. We want to test if there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Using the sample data provided, we calculate a test statistic of -2.45. This is calculated by taking the difference between the sample mean and the hypothesized population mean, divided by the standard error of the mean (which is the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size).

Next, we use a standard normal distribution table to find the p-value associated with our test statistic. The p-value turns out to be 0.0071.

Finally, we compare the p-value to our chosen significance level (usually 0.05 or 0.01) to determine whether we should reject the null hypothesis. In this case, the p-value is less than 0.05, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to show that the mean annual tea consumption in the United States has decreased.

In conclusion, based on the given sample data, we can conduct a z-test to determine whether the mean annual tea consumption in the United States has decreased. We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis that the mean annual tea consumption has indeed decreased.

Learn more about hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ11

If we use alpha as the criteria or critical value for the maximum probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis, then when the p-value is less than alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected.

If we use alpha as the criteria or critical value for the maximum probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis, then when the p-value is less than alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that there is strong evidence to suggest that the alternative hypothesis is true and that the data set supports this conclusion. Therefore, we can conclude that the null hypothesis is not supported by the data and that we can reject it.
If we use alpha as the criteria or critical value for the maximum probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis, then when the p-value is less than alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected.

learn more about null hypothesis

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The correct definition for a proposition is: a sentence that describes some state of affairs and therefore makes a claim about the world. In this context, a proposition is a statement that asserts something about the world, while an utterance refers to the actual spoken or written expression by a particular speaker on a specific occasion.

A proposition refers to a sentence that describes a particular state of affairs and therefore makes a claim about the world. It is a statement or assertion that can be either true or false. It is different from an utterance, which is the use of a sentence by a particular speaker, on a particular occasion. The proposition is the underlying meaning of the utterance, which can be expressed in different ways depending on the context.

Learn more about proposition here: brainly.com/question/23265650

#SPJ11

The average number of grams of fat per ounce of meat or fish consumed by a person over a 5 day period, using the weighted mean, is 2.72 g/oz.

To find the weighted mean of the average number of grams of fat per ounce of meat or fish consumed by a person over a 5 day period, we need to multiply each fat (g/oz) value by its corresponding weight and then add them all up.

Here's how to do it:

- Fried shrimp: 3 oz x 3.33 g/oz = 9.99 g
- Veal cutlet: 3.33 oz x 3 g/oz = 9.99 g
- Roast beef: 2 oz x 2.5 g/oz = 5 g
- Fried chicken: 2.5 oz x 4.4 g/oz = 11 g
- Canned tuna: 4 oz x 1.75 g/oz = 7 g

Next, add up all the total grams of fat consumed:

9.99 + 9.99 + 5 + 11 + 7 = 42.98 g

Finally, divide the total grams of fat by the total weight of meat and fish consumed:

(3 + 3.33 + 2 + 2.5 + 4) = 15.83 oz

42.98 g ÷ 15.83 oz = 2.72 g/oz

Know more about weighted mean here:

https://brainly.com/question/15904675

#SPJ11

the answer for your question is B

The value of the trigonometric ratio Sin 89 is 0.9998

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Sin 89

The trigonometric ratio can be evaluated using a calculator

Using a calculator, we have the following result

Sin 89 = 0.99984769515

Approximate

Sin 89 = 0.9998

Hence, the solution is 0.9998

Read more about trigonometric ratio at

https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

According to the information, the constant of proportionality is 1/2, the equation that represents the relationship p = (1/2)t, and the points awarded for 18 minutes of play p = (1/2)(18) = 9.

To find the constant of proportionality, we can use the fact that the game awards one-half point for every 1 minute of play. We can set up a proportion:

where,

Simplifying the left side, we get:

Therefore, the constant of proportionality is 1/2.

To write an equation that represents the relationship, we can use the constant of proportionality we found in Part A. Let p be the number of points awarded and t be the amount of time played. Then the equation is:

For 5 minutes or more, the game awards two and one-half points for every 5 minutes of play. Thus, for t ≥ 5, we have:

Thus, the equation that represents the relationship is:

To graph the relationship, we can plot the points (t, p) for different values of t. Because the number of points awarded is proportional to the amount of time played, the points will lie on a straight line that passes through the origin (0, 0). We can plot at least two points to draw the line, such as (1, 1/2) and (5, 2.5).

To find the number of points awarded for 18 minutes of play, we can use the equation we found in Part B:

Substituting t = 18, we get:

Learn more about constant in: https://brainly.com/question/14159361

#SPJ1

Since the distance from a point to point C is 1 and the distance from that same point to point B is 4, the point must be: C. point D.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a number line simply refers to a type of graph with a graduated straight line which comprises both positive and negative numbers that are placed at equal intervals along its length.

This ultimately implies that, a number line primarily increases in numerical value towards the right from zero (0) and decreases in numerical value towards the left from zero (0).

From the number line shown above, we have:

Distance = 4 + (-1)

Distance = 4 - 1

Distance = 3 (point D).

Read more on number line here: brainly.com/question/22515080

#SPJ1

(a) This statement is false. The probability of getting heads or tails on a fair coin is always 50%, regardless of previous outcomes.  

(b) This statement is true. Drawing a face card and drawing a red card from a full deck of playing cards are mutually exclusive events.

(a) The statement is false. The outcome of each coin toss is independent of the previous tosses. Therefore, the chance of getting heads on the next toss is still 50%, regardless of the outcome of the previous eight tosses.

(b) The events of drawing a face card and drawing a red card are not mutually exclusive events. There are 12 face cards in a deck of playing cards, and 6 of them are red (2 jacks, 2 queens, and 2 kings). Therefore, the probability of drawing a face card and a red card from a full deck of playing cards is:

P(face card and red card) = P(face card) x P(red card|face card)
P(face card and red card) = (12/52) x (6/12)
P(face card and red card) = 3/52 or about 5.77%

To learn more about probability visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

This statement is false.

Every real matrix has real eigenvalues or comes in pairs of complex conjugate eigenvalues.

In general, the eigenvalues of a 2x2 matrix A can be found by solving the characteristic equation det(A - lambda*I) = 0, where I is the 2x2 identity matrix and lambda is the eigenvalue. The characteristic equation is a quadratic equation in lambda, and its solutions are the eigenvalues of A.

For a real 2x2 matrix, the coefficients of the characteristic equation are real, and so the solutions to the characteristic equation are either real or complex conjugate pairs. This follows from the fact that complex roots of real polynomials always come in complex conjugate pairs.

Now, suppose that a real 2x2 matrix A has eigenvalues i and 2i. Since these eigenvalues are not real, they must be complex conjugates of each other. That is, 2i is also an eigenvalue of A, and the other eigenvalue must be the complex conjugate of i, which is -i.

However, the characteristic equation of a 2x2 matrix with eigenvalues i and 2i is given by:

det(A - lambda*I) = (a - lambda)(d - lambda) - bc = (a - lambda)(d - lambda) - b*c

where A = [[a,b],[c,d]], and lambda = i or 2i.

If we substitute lambda = i into the above equation, we get:

(a - i)(d - i) - b*c = 0

Expanding this equation, we get:

ad - ai - di + i^2 - bc = 0

Simplifying, we get:

(ad - bc) - i(a + d) = 0

Since the matrix A has real entries, the imaginary part of this equation must be zero, which implies that a + d = 0. But this contradicts the assumption that A has eigenvalues i and 2i, since the sum of the eigenvalues of A is equal to the trace of A, which is a + d. Therefore, there cannot exist a real 2x2 matrix with eigenvalues i and 2i.

VVisit to know more about Matrix:-

brainly.com/question/30218994

#SPJ11

The concept stoichiometry is used here to determine the moles of oxygen produced according to the given chemical reaction. It refers to the quantitative study of reactants and products involved in a reaction.

Stoichiometry is an important concept in chemistry which helps us to use the balanced chemical equation to find out the amounts of reactants and products. Here we make use of molar ratios from the balanced equation.

The balanced equation is:

4Al  +  3O₂     →     2Al₂O₃

So, 1.35 mol O₂ × 4 mol Al / 3 mol O₂

=5.4 /3

=  1.8 mol Al

To know more about Stoichiometry, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29775083

#SPJ1

Answer:

  [tex]\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{ccc}\vphantom{\int\limits_q^B}\dfrac{1}{6}&-\dfrac{1}{6}&\dfrac{1}{3}\\\vphantom{\int\limits_q^B}-\dfrac{11}{6}&\dfrac{3}{2}&-\dfrac{8}{3}\\\vphantom{\int\limits_q^B}5&-3&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the inverse of the given coefficient matrix using the Gauss-Jordan elimination method.

The method starts by forming an augmented matrix with the given matrix on the left, and the identity matrix on the right. Row operations are then performed that cause the matrix on the left to become the identity matrix. The matrix on the right is then the inverse of the original coefficient matrix.

For example, the first row operation is to divide the first row by the upper left coefficient, 9. This makes the first row be [1, 1/3, 1/9, 1/9, 0, 0]. This row is then used to zero the remaining 1st-column terms, by subtracting the values obtained by multiplying this by the first-column coefficients.

In the first attachment, all rows are replaced at each step, so there is not a separate step for making the diagonal term be 1. The "ReplacePart" function is what does the replacement of the designated row.

The second attachment shows a calculator computes the same result.

__

Additional comment

The number of math operations is quite large, so they are not all shown here. Rather, we have shown the result at each step of creating one column of the desired identity matrix in the first three columns.

If the starting matrix is further augmented by the constants on the right side of the matrix equation, the end result will show the solution to the equation(s). The second attachment shows the solution is ...

  (a, b, c) = (-1/3, 2, 5)

The length of the minor arc is equal to 1.109 centimeters.

In this problem we must compute the length of minor arc, in centimeters, based on central angles, in degrees, and length of major arc, in centimeters. The arc length is directly proportional to the measure of the central angle:

s ∝ θ

Where:

9.4 cm / s = 322° / 38°

s = 1.109 cm

The minor arc has a length of 1.109 centimeters.

To learn more on arc lengths: https://brainly.com/question/16403495

#SPJ1

The equation that represents the different amounts of chicken X and steak y that Mr Day can buy with the amount available would be = 3x + 5y = $75

The total amount of money that Mr Day has to spend = $75

The amount of money that chicken (X) is sold = $3

The amount of money that steak(y) is sold = $5

Therefore,the expression that should show the total amount of chicken and steak that Mr Day can get would be = 3x + 5y = $75

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/28038123

#SPJ1

The equation that represents the different amounts of chicken, x, and steak, y, Mr. Day can buy is:

3x + 5y = 75

Where x is the amount of chicken in pounds, and y is the amount of steak in pounds.

To rewrite the equation in slope-intercept form, we need to solve for y:

3x + 5y = 75

5y = -3x + 75

y = (-3/5)x + 15

So the slope of the line is -3/5 and the y-intercept is 15. This means that for every 5 pounds of steak Mr. Day buys, he can buy 3 pounds less of chicken and still stay within his budget. The y-intercept tells us that if Mr. Day doesn't buy any steak, he can buy 15 pounds of chicken.

The range would increase by 1 when the age of 17 is added to the data

Given data ,

The range is the difference between the highest and lowest values in a data set

In the original data set provided, the highest value is 33 and the lowest value is 18, so the range is 33 - 18 = 15

Now , when the age 17 is added , the new lowest value of the data is 17

So , the new range is R = 33 - 17 = 16

Hence , the range of the data has increased by 1

To learn more about domain and range click :

https://brainly.com/question/28135761

#SPJ1

The correct answer is d) No, because 1.12 < 3.84 for chi-square.

To determine whether a chi-square test based on a 2 x 2 table using a level of 0.05 is statistically significant, we need to compare the chi-square statistic (in this case, 1.12) to the critical value of chi-square with 1 degree of freedom and a significance level of 0.05.

For a 2 x 2 table, the degrees of freedom is (number of rows - 1) multiplied by (number of columns - 1), which equals (2-1) x (2-1) = 1.

Looking at a chi-square distribution table with 1 degree of freedom and a significance level of 0.05, we find the critical value of chi-square to be 3.84.

Since the chi-square statistic (1.12) is less than the critical value (3.84), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the results are not statistically significant.

Therefore, correct answer is d) No, because 1.12 < 3.84.

Learn more about chi-square here:

https://brainly.com/question/24260686

#SPJ11

Therefore, we do not have sufficient evidence to support the executive's claim that the true proportion of readers who own the particular make of car is different from the reported proportion of 43% at the 0.10 level of significance.

To determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the executive's claim that the percentage of readers who own a particular make of car is different from the reported percentage of 43%, we need to conduct a hypothesis test.

The null hypothesis H0 is that there is no difference between the true proportion of readers who own the particular make of car and the reported proportion of 43%:

H0: p = p0

The alternative hypothesis Ha is that the true proportion of readers who own the particular make of car is different from the reported proportion:

Ha: p ≠ p0

We can use a z-test for proportions to test this hypothesis, since the sample size is sufficiently large and the sampling distribution of the sample proportion can be approximated by a normal distribution.

test statistic is calculated as:

z = (x/n - p0) / √(p0*(1-p0)/n)

Substituting the values from the problem statement, we get:

z = (0.38 - 0.43) / √(0.43*(1-0.43)/200)

= -1.51

At the 0.10 level of significance, the critical values for a two-tailed test are ±1.64. Since our calculated z-value of -1.51 is not in the rejection region, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about hypothesis,

https://brainly.com/question/11560606

#SPJ11

For any vectors u and v in V₃ and any scalar k,

(ku) v. is equal to (ku) v.

Let's consider,

k = 2, u = 2i and v = 3i.

k(u v) = (ku) v.

L. H. S. = R. H. S.

k(u v) ........(1)

(ku) v.........(2)

Plugging the values of k, u and v in equation 1.

2 (2i × 3i) = 2×6i² = 12.

Now, plugging the values of k, u and v in equation 2.

(ku) v. = (2 × 2i) × 3i = 4i ×3i = 12i² = 12.

Therefore, for any vectors u and v in V₃ and any scalar k,

k(u v)= (ku) v.

Learn more about vector here:

https://brainly.com/question/31672164

#SPJ12

The population of tigers 20 years ago was 106,000 tigers.

Let's say that 20 years ago the population was P, if we reduce this number by 97%, then we will get:

P' = P*(1 - 97%/100%)

P' = P*(1 - 0.97)

P' = P*0.03

We know that the population now is 3200, then P' = 3200

3200 = P*0.03

Solving this equation for P we will get:

P = 3200/0.03 = 106,666.666....

Rounding it to the nearest thousand we get:

P = 106,000

Learn more about populations at.

https://brainly.com/question/29885712

#SPJ1

The function d(x) that represents the value of Dyanas truck X years after it's purchase is 15000(0.9)^x

Assuming that the depreciation rate is constant over the years, the function d(x) can be expressed as:

d(x) = 15000(1-0.1)^x

Where x is the number of years since the purchase of the truck.

This can be we can simplified further as: d(x) = 15000(0.9)^x

Learn more about function at https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1