The pedestrian may be held liable for negligence, and the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian.
What is the basis for the pedestrian's potential liability and the girl's claim against them?In this scenario, the pedestrian may be considered negligent for angrily throwing the ball into the street, creating a hazardous situation. Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. By throwing the ball into the street, the pedestrian potentially breached their duty of care towards others on the sidewalk, including the eight-year-old girl.
As a result of the pedestrian's negligent act, the girl suffered serious injuries when she ran out into the street to retrieve the ball and was hit by a car. The pedestrian's action directly contributed to the chain of events leading to the girl's injuries.
Therefore, the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence, seeking compensation for her injuries, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the accident.
Learn more about: negligence
brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
An agency is part of the _______________ branch of government and has the power to ____________.
a. executive branch; create and implement laws
b. legislative branch; create and adjudicate laws
c. legislative branch; create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws
d. executive; create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws
An agency is part of the ______legislative branch_________ branch of government and has the power to ___create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws_________. The correct answer is: option (C) legislative branch; create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws.
adjudicate laws" is not a common phrase or term. However, it is possible to understand it in a general sense as the process of interpreting and applying laws in order to resolve legal disputes or determine their validity. Adjudication typically involves the following steps:
Legal Disputes: Adjudication comes into play when there is a legal dispute between parties. This could involve civil matters, criminal offenses, or administrative issues.
Court Proceedings: The dispute is brought before a court or a judicial body where the parties present their arguments, evidence, and legal reasoning. This can include witness testimonies, expert opinions, and relevant documents.
Interpretation of Laws: The judge or adjudicator analyzes the applicable laws, statutes, regulations, and precedents relevant to the case. They interpret and apply these legal provisions to the facts and arguments presented.
Legal Reasoning: The judge engages in legal reasoning to analyze the facts, arguments, and legal principles in order to arrive at a fair and just decisions.
learn more about adjudicate laws here :
https://brainly.com/question/30501031
#SPJ11
_____ law is based on the previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances.
Precedent law is based on previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances, providing a foundation for legal consistency and predictability.
Precedent law, also known as case law or common law, is a legal system where judicial decisions from higher courts serve as binding or persuasive authority for future cases with similar circumstances. Under this system, judges are expected to follow the legal principles established in previous cases and apply them to the current case at hand.
Precedent law is essential in providing consistency, predictability, and stability in legal interpretations and outcomes. It allows for the development of legal principles and standards over time as courts build upon and refine previous decisions. Precedents play a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape, as they serve as a guide for judges and lawyers in determining the appropriate legal reasoning and outcome in new cases. Hence, precedent law is based on the previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances, providing a foundation for legal interpretations and outcomes.
Learn more about Precedent law here:
https://brainly.com/question/25440253
#SPJ11
a new partner who is admitted to the partnership is liable for the existing debts and obligations (antecedent debts) of the partnership only to the extent of their capital contribution
When a new partner is admitted to a partnership, they become liable for the existing debts and obligations (antecedent debts) of the partnership only to the extent of their capital contribution.
What this means is that the new partner is only responsible for the debts and obligations of the partnership up to the amount that they have contributed as capital. If the partnership owes more than that amount, the other partners are still liable for the remainder of the debt.
Basically, a partner is not responsible for any debts that were incurred before they joined the partnership. However, if they contribute to the partnership's capital, they become liable for any debts that are incurred after they become a partner. This is because they have invested in the partnership and stand to benefit from its success.
To illustrate this concept with an example: let's say that a partnership has three partners, A, B, and C. The partnership owes $100,000 in antecedent debts. The partners have each contributed $50,000 to the partnership as capital. If a new partner, D, is admitted to the partnership and contributes $25,000 as capital, they are only liable for up to $25,000 of the antecedent debts. The existing partners, A, B, and C, are still liable for the remaining $75,000 of antecedent debts.
Learn more about partnership:
https://brainly.com/question/15913927
#SPJ11
Critically evaluate the considerations taken by the courts in determining the application for postponement of possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor.
The courts consider several factors when determining an application for postponement of a possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor. Here is a step-by-step evaluation of these considerations:
1. Lack of concrete evidence: When the mortgagor fails to provide concrete evidence to support their application for postponement of possession, the courts may consider this as a factor against granting the request. Concrete evidence could include valid reasons for the delay or evidence of financial hardship.
2. Reason for the postponement: The courts will evaluate the reason provided by the mortgagor for seeking a postponement. If the reason is deemed valid, such as unforeseen circumstances or financial difficulties, the courts may be more inclined to grant the application.
3. Merits of the case: The courts will assess the overall merits of the case, including any defenses raised by the mortgagor. If the mortgagor has a strong legal argument or valid defense, the courts may consider this in favor of postponing the possession order.
4. Balance of interests: The courts will weigh the interests of both parties involved, including the mortgagor and the mortgagee. They will consider factors such as the potential harm to the mortgagor if possession is granted, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of the mortgagee.
5. Good faith efforts: The courts will evaluate whether the mortgagor has made good faith efforts to address the issue and resolve any outstanding obligations. This could include attempts to negotiate with the mortgagee, seek financial assistance, or make partial payments.
In conclusion, when determining an application for postponement of a possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor, the courts critically evaluate factors such as the lack of evidence, the reason for the postponement, the merits of the case, the balance of interests, and the mortgagor's good faith efforts. These considerations help the courts make a fair and informed decision.
Learn more about ' Evidence in Courts' https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ11
parties to a contract can limit or exclude consequential damages, provided the limitation is not unconscionable.
Yes, parties to a contract can indeed limit or exclude consequential damages, as long as the limitation is not considered unconscionable.
Consequential damages are a type of damages that arise as a result of the consequences, or secondary effects, of a breach of contract. These damages are typically indirect and not directly caused by the breach itself, but rather by the impact of the breach on the non-breaching party.
In contractual agreements, it is common for parties to include clauses that limit or exclude consequential damages. By doing so, they seek to define the extent of their liability and protect themselves from potential extensive or unforeseen damages resulting from a breach of contract.
However, there are limitations to this ability. Contract law imposes a requirement of reasonableness, fairness, and good faith in the terms of the contract. If a limitation or exclusion of consequential damages is deemed to be unconscionable, meaning it is excessively one-sided or unfairly favors one party over the other, it may be unenforceable.
The determination of whether a limitation or exclusion of consequential damages is unconscionable will depend on the specific circumstances, the nature of the contract, and the applicable laws of the jurisdiction. Courts will consider factors such as the parties' relative bargaining power, the clarity of the contractual terms, and whether the limitation or exclusion was made known and understood by the parties at the time of contract formation.
Learn more about contractual agreements here:
https://brainly.com/question/31080037
#SPJ11
parties to a contract can limit or exclude consequential damages, provided the limitation is not unconscionable. Yes or No.
2. A remedial course for reexamination must include how many hours of clinical experience
O None
O 60
96
180
A remedial course for reexamination must include 180 hours of clinical experience. So, the correct answer is 180.
The question states that a remedial course for reexamination requires a specific number of hours of clinical experience. In this case, the correct answer is 180 hours. This means that students who are retaking the examination must complete 180 hours of clinical practice as part of their remedial course.
Clinical experience is an essential component of many educational programs, especially those in fields such as healthcare, medicine, and nursing. It provides students with hands-on practical training and allows them to apply their knowledge in real-world settings under the guidance of experienced professionals. By completing the required number of clinical hours, students can gain valuable skills and competencies necessary for their future careers.It is important to note that the specific number of required clinical hours may vary depending on the educational institution, program, or regulatory requirements.
Therefore, it is always advisable for students to consult their academic advisors or refer to the official guidelines to determine the exact number of hours required for their specific remedial course.
for more questions on remedial course
https://brainly.com/question/29088953
#SPJ8
a contract that conveys the right to quiet enjoyment and use of property but does not convey title is a
A contract that conveys the right to quiet enjoyment and use of property but does not convey title is a lease.
What is a lease?
A lease is an agreement between a landlord and a tenant to rent a property. It conveys the tenant the right to exclusive use of the property for a limited period of time, in exchange for rent payments. A lease does not convey the title to the property to the tenant, but it gives the tenant a right to enjoy and use the property without interference from the landlord.
Learn more about a lease:
https://brainly.com/question/28385017
#SPJ11
if the tax law changes to reduce or eliminate the deductibility of state and local taxes, what is the impact on tax free municipal bonds for high tax rate individuals?
If the tax law changes to reduce or eliminate the deductibility of state and local taxes, it will increase the appeal of tax-free municipal bonds for high tax rate individuals.
What are tax-free municipal bonds?
Tax-free municipal bonds are issued by state and local governments to fund public projects. The interest earned on these bonds is not subject to federal income tax and may not be subject to state and local taxes if the investor resides in the state in which the bond was issued.
Tax-free municipal bonds are attractive to high-tax-rate individuals because they offer a higher after-tax yield than taxable bonds. For example, an investor in the top tax bracket (37%) would need to earn a yield of 5.87% on a taxable bond to receive the same after-tax yield as a tax-free municipal bond yielding 3.7%.
Impact on tax-free municipal bonds:
If the tax law changes to reduce or eliminate the deductibility of state and local taxes, it will increase the appeal of tax-free municipal bonds for high tax rate individuals. This is because the tax-free nature of municipal bond interest becomes more valuable as the tax benefits of other investments decrease.
The change in tax law will increase the demand for tax-free municipal bonds, resulting in higher prices and lower yields. This, in turn, will make the bonds more expensive for issuers to sell and will result in fewer projects being funded by municipal bonds.
Learn more about municipal bonds:
https://brainly.com/question/28091744
#SPJ11