Answer:
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to
keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.<<< Correctchange the number of voting districts within the state.appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population.Explanation:
Oct. 2021 Edge
Because of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, the courts can require states to keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.
What is the case of Baker v. Carr?The Supreme court ruling here is important because its established the right of federal courts to review redistricting issues.
Hence, the case ensured that courts can require states to keep voting districts the same even if the population changes.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Baker v. Carr
brainly.com/question/1344638
#SPJ2
Private international law governs transactions between corporations and citizens of different countries?
True or False? Will mark brainless
Answer:
This is false. Corporations do not have the same rights is citizens under private internal law.
Private international law does not govern transactions between corporations and citizens of different countries.
What do you mean by law?Law refers to the system of rules that are created and enforced through social institutions to regulate behavior.
Private international law is a body of law that governs when there is a conflict between citizens of different countries.
Therefore, it is a false statement.
Learn more about Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/4133756
#SPJ2
no no no no no nooo no nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Free brainlyest first answer
The three main sources of international law are treaty, custom, and
.
government
general principles of international law
commerce
country allegiance
Answer:
General principles of international law
Answer:
general principles of international law
Explanation:
got it right on exam
Help 8 and 9 ,10 thanks
Answer:
8) no
9) resisting arrest
10) eluding officer
Free brainlyest....................
Answer:
me plsss
Explanation:
While pulling out of her driveway, Bethany becomes distracted by a bee and strikes Melanie, who is riding past on a bicycle. Bethany suffers serious injury as a result of the accident while Melanie is uninjured. Do these facts provide a basis for a valid negligence claim? Why or why not?
Answer:
*****************
Explanation:
************************************************************
On average, how much does it take to incarcerate a prisoner in the U.S. for one year?
$3,000
$5,000
$13,000
$20 nnn
On average in the US, it costs about $20,000 per year for each prisoner.
Answer:
20k per year i got the unit 8 test to
Explanation:
if u have 10 cookies then your friend takes 2 what do you have.
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)
hope this helps, have a great day!!
~Pinky~
Should employed be allowed to monitor their employee's personal communications during non-working hours?
What does the Tenth Amendment say about delegated and reserved powers?
Which of the following would be considered a reasonable accommodation for
an individual with a disability?
A. Providing advancement opportunities
B. Building a new office
C. Installing a ramp
D. Offering a higher wage
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. Providing advancement opportunities
An individual is arrested for stealing mail from a United
States Post Office located in the city of Orlando, Florida.
Which court would have original jurisdiction in this case?
Orlando City Court
Orange County Trial Court
United States District Court
Florida District Court of Appeals
Answer:
United States District Court
Explanation:
I think it would be the United States District Court because this is the US mail we're talking about. If this was like a local UPS, FedEx, or Amazon truck it would probably be something different.
Answer:
I think its United states district court
Explanation:
Critical analyze the significance, jurisdiction and functions of Punjab Mohtasib (Ombudsman) and suggest ways and means by which that office may become instrumental to providing substantial justice to the common man.
Answer:
1) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees:
Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or inquire into any matters which:-
(a) are subjudice before a Court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him or
(b) relate to the external affairs of Pakistan or the relations or dealings of Pakistan with any foreign state or Government; or
(c) relate to, or are connected with, the defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan, or the matters covered by the laws relating to those forces.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), the Ombudsman shall not entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matters relating to the Agency in which he is, or has been, working, in respect of any personal grievance relating to his service therein.
(3) For carrying out the objectives of this Act and, in particular for ascertaining the root causes of corrupt practices and injustice, the Ombudsman may arrange for studies to be made or research to be conducted and may recommend appropriate steps for their eradication.
Functions
The law empowers the Ombudsman Punjab to entertain complaints against any department, commission or office of the Provincial Government or a statutory corporation or other institution established or controlled by the Provincial Government but does not include the High Court and the Courts working under the supervision of High Court and Provincial Assembly and its Secretariat.
Under section 9(1) of the Act the Ombudsman on a complaint of any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly or on a motion of Supreme Court or the High Court or on his own motion (suo moto) can undertake any investigation into any allegation of ‘maladministration’ on the part of any agency or its officers or employees.
The Ombudsman, however, has no jurisdiction to investigate or enquire into matters which are (a) subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction (b) relates to the external relations of Pakistan or connected with defence of Pakistan or Military, Naval and Air Force of Pakistan or the matters covered by the laws relating to these Forces. The Ombudsman also cannot entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matter relating to the agency in which the public servant has been or is working in respect of any personal grievance or relating to his service therein.
Powers
Ombudsman has the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the code of civil procedure for summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person; compelling the production of documents; receiving evidence on affidavits and issuing commission for examination of witnesses. The Ombudsman is vested with the powers to enter and search any premises and inspect any article, books of account and other documents; impound and seal such article. The Ombudsman has the same powers, mutatis mutandis, as the High Court has to punish any person for its contempt.
How does educaiton affect wages?
If your objective is to secure order, authoritarian governments actually work best.
True
False
im trying not to fail answer this to get points XD ,
Answer:
?????
Questions???
Explanation:
What is the question?
Explain and summarize the process the police must follow when it comes to providing a person their Miranda Warnings.
summarize the most important factors establishing and ending the "Hands Off Doctrine" I need help
Answer:
Establishing factor is fear of violations and ending factor is prisoner's right movement.
Explanation:
The most important factors that is responsible for establishing the "Hands Off Doctrine" are fear of violations and to avoid collision between arms of government. Courts feared that separation of powers and federalism would be violated if courts intervened in the work of institutions related to the state. The hands-off doctrine ended of two factors i.e. the prisoner's right movement and activism of federal judges. The hands-off doctrine formally ended with two decisions taken by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s.
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!
(AP3X)
Which body of the federal government has members who are elected from a
state to six-year terms?
A. The Supreme Court
B. The Senate
C. The House of Representatives
D. The executive office
Answer:
Senate
Explanation: