Both the women’s suffrage and civil rights movements spanned decades and involved thousands. Why do you think so many Americans joined these movements? What do you think the right to vote meant to them?

Ibn Battuta's travels in the fourteenth century were significant in providing evidence for the unifying influence of Islam. The correct option is A.

During his extensive travels, he encountered people of diverse cultures, languages, and beliefs, yet found that their shared faith in Islam provided a common ground for interaction and exchange.

This is particularly evident in his accounts of his travels to various Muslim societies, such as in the Middle East and Southeast Asia, where he was able to integrate into local communities and find acceptance among fellow Muslims.

His accounts also highlight the spread of Islamic culture, ideas, and practices across different regions, as well as the role of Islamic institutions, such as mosques and madrasas, in promoting education and scholarship.

Overall, Ibn Battuta's travels demonstrate the significance of Islam in shaping and connecting the diverse societies he encountered, and its role as a unifying force in the medieval world.

The correct option is A.

To learn more about evidence click on,

https://brainly.com/question/28699625

#SPJ4

The examples of onomatopoeia in the passage are "thunder boomed," and "rain pounded". These words create auditory imagery for the reader, helping them to imagine the loud and intense storm that the characters are experiencing.

Is a figure of speech in which words are used to imitate or suggest the sounds that are associated with the objects or actions they refer to. In other words, it's a word that phonetically imitates the sound of the thing it describes. Examples of onomatopoeic words include "buzz," "clang," "sizzle," "murmur," "hiss," "crunch," "splash," and "thud."

Therefore, the use of onomatopoeia can add vividness, rhythm, and humor to language, and can help to create a more engaging sensory experience for the reader or listener.

Find out more about onomatopoeia at:

https://brainly.com/question/405575

#SPJ1

Auschwitz was network of concentration and extermination camps established by Nazi Germany in occupied Poland during World War II.

Extermination refers to the deliberate and systematic killing of a particular group, species, or population, often with the intention of completely eradicating it. This can include acts such as genocide, where a specific ethnic or religious group is targeted for elimination, or the extermination of a particular species, often due to human activities such as deforestation or hunting. The term can also be used to describe the intentional killing of pests, such as insects or rodents, in order to control their populations. Extermination is a controversial and often morally charged concept, with many arguing that it is never justified to intentionally wipe out an entire group or species.

To learn more about extermination, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3855932

#SPJ1

Answer:

They provided protection when an atomic bomb exploded

Explanation:

The debris can cause eye damage,maybe that's why.I'm not sure really

The course of action that was taken is that :  It launched an invasion of Iraq to topple dictator Saddam Hussein.

The reasons behind the US decision to topple Saddam Hussein, the former President of Iraq, are complex and multifaceted. There were several stated reasons, including:

WMDs: The US claimed that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and that he was a threat to global security. However, after the invasion, no evidence of WMDs was found.

Terrorism: The US also claimed that Saddam Hussein had links to terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda, and that he supported and sponsored terrorism.

Human Rights: The US and its allies accused Saddam Hussein of committing human rights abuses against his own people, including mass killings, torture, and other atrocities.

Read more on invasion of Iraq herehttps://brainly.com/question/12483188

#SPJ1

Answer:

Gauls

Explanation:

The generalization that can be made about the relationship between national wealth and literacy is that option C.  higher national wealth is not always necessary in order to have high literacy rates. accurately reflects this generalization. While there is a correlation between national wealth and literacy rates, it is not a strict causation.

Several factors contribute to literacy rates, including government investment in education, educational infrastructure, cultural attitudes towards education, and access to quality schooling. While wealthier countries often have the means to invest more in education, it does not guarantee high literacy rates. Conversely, some countries with lower national wealth have achieved remarkable literacy rates through focused efforts on education and literacy programs.

Regarding Option D, it is incorrect to assume that men always receive better education than women in countries with high national wealth. Gender disparities in education exist across various countries, irrespective of their wealth. However, countries with higher national wealth often have better resources and opportunities to address and reduce such disparities.

In summary, while there is a positive correlation between national wealth and literacy rates, it is important to recognize that higher national wealth is not the sole determinant of high literacy rates, and gender disparities in education exist independently of a country's wealth. Therefore the correct option is C

Know more about national wealth  here:

https://brainly.com/question/14056816

#SPJ11

The most commonly cited example of Congress exerting too much power over states' rights is the regulation of interstate commerce.

The correct option is D.

This power is granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the ability to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."

This power has been used to pass a wide variety of laws, such as the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Civil Rights Act, that have been seen as overreaching and infringing on the power of the states. By regulating interstate commerce, Congress has been able to pass laws that may conflict with the laws of individual states, thus limiting the autonomy of the states in certain areas.

The correct option is D.

To know more about Congress , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4736734

#SPJ4

Europeans had limited knowledge of East Asian civilizations prior to the publication of the Travels of Marco Polo.


Prior to the publication of the Travels of Marco Polo in the 13th century, Europeans had limited knowledge of East Asian civilizations. Some European traders and missionaries had made contact with East Asian cultures, but their knowledge was limited to what they observed in their travels. There was also some knowledge of China that had been passed down through classical texts such as those of the ancient Greek geographer Ptolemy.The publication of the Travels of Marco Polo, however, provided Europeans with a much more detailed and accurate picture of East Asian cultures. Marco Polo was a Venetian merchant who spent over 20 years in China and other parts of East Asia, and his descriptions of the region were the most comprehensive and accurate that had been seen in Europe at the time. His accounts of the wealth and sophistication of the East Asian cultures he encountered helped to shape European perceptions of the region for centuries to come.

Learn more about East Asian civilization here:

https://brainly.com/question/6416366

#SPJ11

Answer: Hi! Read the explanation below:

Brainliest?

Explanation:

The Founders of the United States did indeed want to establish a government based on the consent of the governed, but they were wary of direct democracy, which they saw as prone to the tyranny of the majority. To address this paradox, they designed a system of representative democracy that limited the power of the majority through a complex system of checks and balances.

The US government is divided into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches - each with its own set of powers and responsibilities. The legislative branch, made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives, is responsible for making laws. The executive branch, headed by the President, is responsible for enforcing laws, while the judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court, is responsible for interpreting laws and determining their constitutionality.

The Founders also designed the Constitution to limit the power of the federal government and protect the rights of individuals and states. They established a system of federalism, where powers are divided between the federal government and the states, and created a Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms such as freedom of speech and religion.

However, unintended consequences have resulted from these institutional design choices. One consequence is the gridlock and inefficiency that can occur when the branches of government are unable to cooperate and compromise. Another consequence is the tension that can arise between the federal government and the states, as each seeks to assert its own power and authority.

Furthermore, some argue that the design of the US government perpetuates inequalities and perpetuates the influence of the wealthy and powerful. For example, the Electoral College system can result in a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote, as happened in the 2000 and 2016 elections. Additionally, some argue that the Supreme Court, with its unelected justices, wields too much power and is unaccountable to the people.

Overall, while the institutional design choices made by the Founders have helped to establish a stable and enduring democratic system, they have also led to unintended consequences and ongoing debates about the fairness and effectiveness of the US government.

Answer:

Hm

Explanation:

In December 1802, it is likely that England seems like it will be the first to explore the Louisiana Territory, given its naval power and history of exploration. If this were to happen, it would have significant implications for the claims of ownership of the Louisiana Territory, as England could potentially stake its own claim to the territory and challenge the United States' right to it.

Thomas Jefferson, who was the President of the United States at the time, would likely have been concerned about this prospect. Jefferson was a strong proponent of westward expansion and the acquisition of the Louisiana Territory, and he had recently negotiated the Louisiana Purchase with France in 1803. If England were to explore the territory and assert its own claims to it, it could potentially threaten the territorial ambitions of the United States and undermine the gains made through the Louisiana Purchase. As such, Jefferson would likely have viewed any English exploration of the Louisiana Territory as a direct challenge to American interests in the region.

C. Justice Marshall's perspective on the government of the United States best describes how it has not always upheld the Constitution's ideals.

Marshall was guided by a firm belief in the supremacy of the national government over state legislatures and a strong commitment to the power of the judiciary. The Federalist political program was very much in line with his judicial vision. A transcending figure in American lawful history, John Marshall filled in as boss equity of the US High Court for over thirty years, during which time he helped increment the power and glory of the Government court framework.

Equity Thurgood Marshall's perspective on the US government is that it was imperfect all along and required a few corrections, a nationwide conflict, and earth shattering social change to achieve the arrangement of established government and regard for individual opportunities and common liberties are major today.

To learn more about Marshall visit :

https://brainly.com/question/1962198

#SPJ1

Answer:

World War I had a significant impact on the women of the United States in two main ways: it opened up new opportunities for women in the workforce, and it contributed to the growth of the women's suffrage movement.

Overall, World War I had a significant impact on the women of the United States, opening up new opportunities for women in the workforce and contributing to the growth of the women's suffrage movement. These changes had lasting effects on women's economic and political opportunities, and helped to pave the way for greater gender equality in the decades that followed.

In the 1930s, the Japanese Empire used war as a tool to advance their imperialistic goals and expand their influence in Asia. The Japanese government believed in the idea of "Asia for the Asians," and sought to establish a sphere of influence in East Asia to counter the domination of the Western powers.

Answer:

Emancipation would redefine the Civil War, turning it from a struggle to preserve the Union to one focused on ending slavery

Explanation:

Lyndon B. Johnson was the U.S. President who escalated American involvement in the Vietnam War, and General William Westmoreland was the commander of U.S. forces during the conflict.

John McCain was a Navy pilot who served in the Vietnam War. Military service of John McCain, From Navy Brat to POW. He was a distinguished, if occasionally careless, fighter pilot who made nearly twenty bombing sorties in Vietnam before being shot down, taken prisoner, and subjected to torture. John Sidney McCain III, an American Navy lieutenant and future senator, in the early 1960s. On August 29, 1936, John Sidney McCain III was born at Coco Solo, close to Colón, in the Panama Canal Zone. His father and grandpa both served in the navy and were U.S. Naval Academy graduates. These two great individuals formed and impacted John III's whole naval career.

To know more about lieutenant refer :
brainly.com/question/30273043

#SPJ11

Answer:

hm

Explanation:

Resistance has been a powerful tool for people and groups to fight for and uphold the ideals of freedom, equality, and democracy. Here are a few examples:

1. The Civil Rights Movement: African Americans and their allies in the United States used nonviolent resistance, civil disobedience, and other tactics to fight against segregation, discrimination, and voter suppression. The movement led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which significantly expanded the freedoms and rights of African Americans.

2. Women's Suffrage: Women fought for their right to vote and be treated equally to men through resistance tactics such as picketing, hunger strikes, and civil disobedience. The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution, which granted women the right to vote, was ratified in 1920.

3. LGBTQ+ Rights: Members of the LGBTQ+ community have used resistance tactics such as protests, direct action, and legal challenges to fight against discrimination and advocate for equality. These efforts have led to significant gains in recent decades, including the legalization of same-sex marriage in many countries.

4. Environmentalism: Environmental activists have used resistance tactics such as protests, sit-ins, and civil disobedience to advocate for conservation, sustainability, and climate justice. These efforts have led to the creation of environmental regulations and protections, and increased awareness of the need for action to address climate change.

In each of these examples, resistance has been used as a means to challenge existing power structures and push for change, leading to progress toward greater freedom, equality, and democracy.

Instances of united resistance to challenge oppressive governments, asserting the right to freedom, equality and democracy, have been present since the beginning of recorded history.

Throughout human history, oppressed populations have used a diverse range of tactics to resist their oppressors. These have ranged from peaceful protests and conversations to civil disobedience and armed revolt.'

Throughout history, resistance has been one of the most powerful tools utilized by groups striving for freedom, equality and democracy.

Examples of resistance include peaceful protest and civil disobedience, legal challenges, strikes and boycotts, and direct action. By engaging in collective acts of resistance, individuals can stand up for their rights and demand justice.

Additionally, resistance can be used to resist oppressive systems, particularly those that perpetuate inequality and injustice—by challenging oppressive laws, challenging unjust policies, and engaging in street protests and other forms of activism. Ultimately, through resistance, people can exercise their rights to freedom and justice, and fight for a fairer and more democratic society.

To know more about democracy, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30466950

#SPJ2

Glass was probably first used by the ancient Mesopotamian culture.

The ancient culture that first used glass was most likely the Mesopotamians around 3500 BCE. They used it primarily for jewelry and decorations, and later for practical items such as containers and lenses. The ancient Egyptians also used glass for decorative purposes, but it was the Mesopotamians who were the first to develop the technique of glassblowing around 100 BCE.

They later used glass for practical items such as containers and lenses. While the ancient Egyptians also used glass for decorative purposes, it was the Mesopotamians who developed the technique of glassblowing around 100 BCE, which revolutionized the production of glass items and allowed for more complex designs and shapes to be created. The art of glassblowing then spread throughout the Roman Empire and eventually to other parts of the world, contributing to the development of glassmaking as we know it today.

To learn more about Mesopotamian visit;

brainly.com/question/26116131

#SPJ11

For a successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that a state actor violated their federally protected rights.

To successfully bring a 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit, you must meet two key requirements:

1. The alleged violation must involve a person acting "under color of state law." This means that the defendant must be a state actor or someone working on behalf of a government entity, such as a police officer or a public school official.

2. The alleged conduct must have violated the plaintiff's rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution or federal laws. In other words, there must be a clear violation of the plaintiff's civil rights as protected by federal law or the U.S. Constitution.

In summary, for a successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that a state actor violated their federally protected rights.

To learn more about 42 U.S.C Section 1983 here: brainly.com/question/31166953

#SPJ11

A successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit requires the plaintiff to demonstrate (1) a violation of their constitutional or federal rights by a defendant acting under color of state law, and (2) a direct causal connection between the defendant's actions and the harm experienced.

A successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit has two main requirements. First, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant, acting under "color of state law," violated their constitutional or federal rights. This means that the defendant, usually a state or local government official or employee, exercised their authority in a way that infringed upon the plaintiff's federally protected rights.

Second, the plaintiff must show a direct causal link between the defendant's actions and the alleged violation. In other words, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant's conduct was the primary cause of the harm suffered. Establishing this causation is essential to successfully pursuing a Section 1983 lawsuit.

For more such questions on lawsuit, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29485327

#SPJ11

Answer: the constitution begins with the preamble

Explanation: "We the People of the United States"

the best matches are as follows:

federal government could not pay debts --> federal government can tax the people

states fear a strong central government --> three branches of government are created

states have different needs and interest --> states learn to compromise for a common goal

people disagree on how much power states should have --> political parties are formed

The correct answer is D. Class in ancient Greece for free men was determined by one's citizenship, business/trade, and whether they had the full right to vote.

Citizenship is the status of a person recognized under the custom or law of a state or a nation, as a member of the state or nation, with rights and duties. It entails a set of rights, such as the right to vote, the right to receive state protection and the right to participate in the affairs of the state. It also includes the duties of citizens to respect the laws, defend the country, pay taxes and uphold the nation's values and traditions.

The four divisions of men in ancient Greece were the nobles, the secondary class, the middle class, and the foreigners. Nobles were those who had a hereditary right to participate in the public life of their city-state. The secondary class consisted of independent farmers and small landowners. The middle class was comprised of merchants, craftsmen, and tradesmen. Lastly, the foreigners were non-citizens who lived in the country without the full right to vote.

To learn more about citizenship
https://brainly.com/question/25990409
#SPJ1

Complete Question:
1. PART A: Which of the following statements best describes the social structure of free male citizens in ancient Greece?

A Life for men in ancient Greece was divided into two categories: free and enslaved—class did not matter as much as this.

B There were three divisions of free men in ancient Greece: the nobles, the secondary landowning class, and the middle business class.

C There were four divisions of men in ancient Greece: the nobles, the secondary class, the middle class, and the foreigners.

D Class in ancient Greece for free men was determined by one's citizenship, business/trade, and whether they had the full right to vote.

"The Isolationist Policies of the United States in the Interwar Period: Examining Congress' Rejection of the League of Nations, Kellogg-Briand Pact, Neutrality Acts, and the America First Committee."  is an apt title for this research paper.

A foreign policy stance known as isolationism emphasizes a country's independence and lack of participation in international events, especially in military alliances and conflicts. Following the destruction of World War I, many Americans in the interwar era thought that the United States should concentrate on home matters and stay out of foreign conflicts.

Isolationist views were prevalent in the US during this time, as seen by the Neutrality Acts of 1936–1937, the Kellogg–Briand Pact of 1928, and the rejection of American inclusion in the League of Nations. After World War I, the League of Nations was established to foster international cooperation and avert future conflicts; however, the United States Congress refused to join the group out of worry over losing authority over foreign policy choices.

To learn more about Isolationist Policies, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/30126137

#SPJ4

The strike tactic used by General Motors employees in 1937 is known as the sit-down strike, which involves workers occupying their workplace to protest and demand better working conditions, higher wages, or other grievances.

This tactic proved to be successful in securing workers' rights, and it inspired other groups to follow suit.In 1939, a group of young black men in Alexandria, Virginia, organized a sit-in strike at the segregated Alexandria Library to protest against racial segregation and discrimination. The strike lasted for several months and gained national attention, leading to changes in the library's policies and the desegregation of public libraries in Alexandria.This sit-in strike in Alexandria was one of the earliest examples of the civil rights movement in the United States, and it demonstrated the power of peaceful protests and civil disobedience in effecting change. The tactics used by these young men were later adopted by other civil rights activists, including the famous sit-ins at Woolworth's lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina, in 1960.

Learn more about employees here:

https://brainly.com/question/21847040

#SPJ11

Mazzini argued that Lombardy should be allowed to achieve personal independence from Austria because it had the common bonds necessary for a nation-state, such as common language, common traditions and shared ancestors.

He argued that the people of Lombardy should not be kept from freely associating with each other because of foreign domination. He believed the people of Lombardy should struggle for country and liberty, and be allowed to enjoy their own personal independence.

Mazzini's argument for independence for Lombardy was based on the idea that the region had the bonds necessary to be an autonomous nation-state, and that it should not be kept from enjoying its own personal independence by foreign domination.

To know more about Mazzini , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7365706

#SPJ4

Answer:

acquire the land occupied by Indian tribes and move the Indians west.

Explanation:

The Crédit Mobilier scandal option b is correct of 1872-1873 destroyed the careers of several Gilded Age politicians.

Jay Gould and James Fisk's attempt to control the gold market by taking advantage of Grant's connections was one of a number of political scandals that rocked the Grant administration. In the political scandal of 1872, bribes were paid to US congressmen in order to obtain permission to build the Transcontinental Railroad.

A construction and financing business involved in the construction of the Union Pacific Railroad (1865–69) engaged in illicit contract manipulation known as the "Crédit Mobilier Scandal," which made the corporation famous as a symbol of post–Civil War corruption.

To know more about Crédit Mobilier scandal  visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/3872181

#SPJ1