Write the equation of the line fully simplified slope-intercept form.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you have any questions about the way I solved it, don't hesitate to ask me in the comments below ;)

Answer:

The answer is C on Edge

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

= −14/5

Step-by-step explanation:

= − 14/5 cause that's what I think it is also I solved it and this is what I got

Answer: It could be, just add two dots at the smiley face, BOOM! The function of Facial muscles in humans.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x= 16 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

the angles can be a little hard to remember but just know that the angles that are outside of the transversal are exterior angles and if they are on the opposite sides of the line that passes through the parallel lines then they're alternate exterior angles and those angles that are inside are interior angles and if they are on the opposite sides of the line passing through the parallel then they are alternate interior angles .

Given:

Jan and Julie started their ride at 09:30 and finished at 15:15.

Stopped for a drink = 20 minutes

Lunch = 45 minute

Rest = 10 minutes

To find:

Time they are riding on their bikes (excluding stops).

Solution:

Jan and Julie started their ride at 09:30 and finished at 15:15.

So, total time of ride including stops is 5 hours 45 minutes or we can say 345 minutes calculated as

[tex]30+60+60+60+60+60+15=345\text{ minutes}[/tex]

We need subtract Drink, lunch and rest time from the total time to get the Time they are riding on their bikes (excluding stops) is

[tex]345-20-45-10=270 \text{ minutes}[/tex]

Therefore, the total time they are riding on their bikes (excluding stops) is 270 minutes.

===================================================

Explanation:

The given visual line has a slope of -1/4. We can see this by starting at (0,2) and we do two things

a) move down 1

b) move over to the right 4

This leads to slope = rise/run = -1/4

Once we find the slope of the original line, we take the opposite reciprocal. This is also called the negative reciprocal. So we'll take the reciprocal of -1/4 to get -4/1 or just -4. Then we flip from negative to positive.

In short we flip the fraction and the sign. That has us go from -1/4 to 4.

The original slope is -1/4. The perpendicular slope is 4.

Side note: multiplying any two perpendicular slopes leads to -1. Neither line can be vertical.

--------------------------

So we found the slope of the perpendicular line to be m = 4.

We don't know which point the perpendicular line goes through, so theoretically we have infinitely many equations to pick from. They are all in the form y = 4x+b. Note how I replaced m in y = mx+b with 4.

So our answer will be in the form y = 4x+b. Choices A through C don't fit the description. Only choice D does. So choice D is the answer.

With y = 4x+4, the slope is 4 and the y intercept is 4.

Answer:

1 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

your fee would be $10.60

Step-by-step explanation:

You would do 6*0.35 which gives you an answer of 2.1 then you would add 8.5 to give you your answer of 10.6

In this situation, Meg will need to find the whole because she already has the part and the percentage.

In mathematics, a whole represents the total number of items that are analyzed, in this case, the total number of dogs.  

The part refers to a number that is usually lower than the whole and describes specific characteristics. For example, in a classroom of 30 kids, 20 like to play basketball. Then 20 is the part.

The percentage is the number followed by the symbol % and represents the relationship between the part and the whole. In this case, the percentage of boxers is related to the number of total dogs.

Based on this, Meg already has the percentage (50%), and the part (16), therefore, she needs to find the whole or the total number of dogs, in this case, 32.

Learn more about percentage in: https://brainly.com/question/7624715

She needs the find the whole

Answer:

rational since all decimals that terminate are rational here is a sheet to help

6.825 is rational number.

A rational number is a number that is of the form p/q where p and q are integers and q is not equal to 0. The set of rational numbers is denoted by Q.

Given number: 6.825

Now, we know Terminating decimals like 0.35, 0.7116, 0.9768, etc., are rational numbers.

So, we can see that 6.825 is terminating decimal.

Learn more about rational and irrational number here:

https://brainly.com/question/24398433

#SPJ2

Answer:

I cant read all of that. Im sure others ant either.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i cant read it for some reason, can you type it?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

table C

Step-by-step explanation:

you can just check the given coordinates:

(-1,0) (0,1) (1,2) (2,3)

which corresponds to the values in table C

Answer:

168

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]q\ge \frac{5}{3}\\\\q\geq 1\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]6-3q\leq 1\\\\\mathrm{Subtract\:}6\mathrm{\:from\:both\:sides}\\\\6-3q-6\le \:1-6\\\\Simplify\\\\-3q\le \:-5\\\\\mathrm{Multiply\:both\:sides\:by\:-1\:\left(reverse\:the\:inequality\right)}\\\\\left(-3q\right)\left(-1\right)\ge \left(-5\right)\left(-1\right)\\\\Simplify\\\\3q\ge \:5\\\\\mathrm{Divide\:both\:sides\:by\:}3\\\\\frac{3q}{3}\ge \frac{5}{3}\\\\Simplify\\\\q\ge \frac{5}{3}\\\\q\geq 1\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's look at the first parallel lines (the ones with one arrow).

Because both these lines are parallel, we can say that (3x + 2) and (4x - 18) are equal due to the alternate interior angles theorem.

So we have to make both of these expression equal to each other, and then solve:

3x + 2 = 4x - 18

-x = - 20

x = 20            < --- this is your answer

Hope this helps!

The Answer is 3

All you need to do is multiply 7 and 1 then divide.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Expression

Solving

-11 is smaller than -8 and therefore is on the left from -11 by 3 spaces

Correct choice is:

Answer:

Answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation: If you see all the answers, C. has no negative sign included into it, so its not C, and its not A or B because they move to the RIGHT side. Therefore, D is your answer.

Answer:

false

Step-by-step explanation:

thats not fair for the other team

Answer:

y = -3x + 12/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Add -x to both sides

x + 2/3 + -x = 4 + -x

2/3y = -x + 4

Step 2: Divide both sides by 2/3

2/3y ÷ 2/3 = -x + 4 ÷ 2/3

y = -3x + 12/2

Answer: The answer is $50.60

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Multiply 2.4 * 4 =$9.60

2. Multiply 4.1*10 = $48

3. Add $9.60+$48= $50.60

Answer:

C. y ≤ −3x + 2 . Not sure, but I'm kind of confident in my answer.

Answer:

please ask proper question or repost it

Answer:

6.83333333333 (repeated)

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3 x 20.5= 6.83333333333...

Answer:

It would be C. The hexagon.

Answer:It would be C because you have 3 sides for the triangle than 4 sides for the rectangle, 5 sides for the pentagon, and 6 sides for the hexagon

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the reciprocal of one is [tex]\frac{1}{1}[/tex] it doesn't really make a difference it's still 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Two uniformly charged, infinite, nonconducting planes are parallel to a yz plane and positioned at x = -50 cm and x = +50 cm. The charge densities on the planes are -50 nC/m² and +25 nC/m², respectively. What is the magnitude of the potential difference between the origin and the point on the x axis at x = +80 cm? (Hint:Use Gauss’ law.)

Answer:

ΔV = 2520 V

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

Charge density 1; σ1 = -50 nC/m² = -50 × 10^(-9) nC/m²

Charge density 2; σ2 = +25 nC/m² = +25 × 10^(-9) nC/m²

Now, formula for electric field strength is;

E = -(½ε)(|σ1| ± |σ2|)

ε is vacuum permittivity with a constant value as 8.85 × 10^(−12) C²/N.m²

|σ1| and |σ2| means we are taking the absolute values and would therefore not use the negative sign attached to them.

Now, in between x = 0 cm(0 m) and 50 cm (0.5 m), electric field generated by both charge densities would be in the same direction and thus;

E_in = -(½ε)(|σ1| + |σ2|)

E_in = -(½ × 8.85 × 10^(−12)) × [(50 × 10^(-9)) + (25 × 10^(-9))]

E_in = -4200 V/m

In contrast, when x ≥ 50 cm (0.5 m), electric field generated by both charge densities would be in opposite directions and thus;

E_out = -(½ε)(|σ1| - |σ2|)

E_out = -(½ × 8.85 × 10^(−12)) × [(50 × 10^(-9)) - (25 × 10^(-9))]

E_out = 1400 V/m

The magnitude of the potential difference from the origin to x = 80 cm(0.8 m) is calculated as attached;

From the attachment, we see that;

ΔV = 2520 V