Answer:
While they are sometimes used interchangeably, they are different: ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Morals refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong. ... The legal duty involves a corresponding right.
Explanation:
Hi! :)
I am not exactly sure what you mean by what moral and ethical laws you are talking about, but Ill try my best to break it down. Morals are your (or an individual person) own guiding inner compass on right and wrong. In 6th grade, you know stealing is wrong, so you are not going to do it. That is an example of your morals. That is also an example of a moral law, stealing is illegal. These are things that are guidlines for the whole community. Someone doesn't need to be moral to be ethical. There may be someone who has no moral compass but follows ethics to be in good standing with society. On the other hand, someone can violate ethics all the time because they believe something is morally good. Ethical behavior includes honesty, integrity, fairness and a variety of other positive traits. Those who have others' interests in mind when they make decisions are displaying ethical behavior. In the workplace, there might be a standard for ethics set throughout the company.The examples for ethical but illegal are generally lawmakers deciding to impose their own moral judgments in the law to prohibit some act when there is actually no identifiable public good being diminished by that act. That is the best I can explain, message me if you need something else!
Read the passage from the Bhagavad Gita.
That person who is equal to an enemy as well as a friend, also in honor or dishonor, impartial in cold, heat, happiness, and distress, exempt from attachment . . . satisfied with whatever comes on its own accord, not attached to domestic life . . . such a one is very dear to Me.
–Bhagavad Gita
Which statement best describes how the passage presents information?
The passage is describing the sequence needed to be happy.
The passage is comparing the two types of people in the world.
The passage is explaining the actions that cause someone to please the gods.
The passage is showing two contrasting ways that people can view the world.
WILL MARK BRAINLEIST
Answer:
Based off of the quoted words from Bhagavad Gita, I would say that the passage is describing the sequence needed to be happy. Im probably not right but I tried. (btw i tried to find the passage but i couldn't)
Explanation:
Sorry if its wrong. yw if its right
The best description of the statement is that the passage is explaining the actions that cause someone to please the gods. The correct option is (C).
What do you mean by the Bhagavad Gita?Bhagavad-Gita, a story that appears in the epic Hindu literature written in Sanskrit known as the Mahabharata.
It is structured in the form of a discussion between Prince Arjuna and Krishna, an avatar (incarnation) of the divinity Vishnu, and it takes up chapters 23 to 40 of Book VI of the Mahabharata.
Such a person is very dear to Me because they are equal to both friends and enemies, balanced in both heat and cold, happiness and misery, fame and infamy, free from all tainting associations, silent and content with anything, unconcerned with where they live, fixed in knowledge, and actively involved in devotional service.
Therefore, the best description of the statement is that the passage is explaining the actions that cause someone to please the gods.
To know more about the Bhagavad Gita, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11365062
#SPJ2