Can someone please help me I’m stuck?

Answer: In this case, both pronouns can be used to complete the sentence as both terms grammatically make sense, however whom is the prefered pronoun.  

Explanation:

The difference between “who” and “whom” is the same as the difference between “I” and “me;” “he” and “him;” “she” and “her;” etc. Who, like other pronouns such as I he, and she, is a subject. So, it is the person performing the action of the verb. On the other hand, whom, acts like me, him, and her in a sentence. It is the object. Therefore, it is the person to/about/for whom the action is being done.

But what does that mean? “Who,” the subjective pronoun, is the doer of an action. For example, “That’s the girl who scored the goal.” It is the subject of “scored” because the girl was doing the scoring. Then, “whom,” as the objective pronoun, receives the action. For instance, “Whom do you like best?” It is the object of “like”.

Who should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence.

Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition.

In this case, both pronouns can be used to complete the sentence as both terms grammatically make sense, however, whom is the preferred pronoun.

Pronouns, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, are "any of a small set of words" that are used in place of nouns or noun phrases as well as whose referents are specified or understood in the context.

In a sentence, pronouns such as "you," "we," or "they" stand in for nouns. Most of the time, we refer to individuals using pronouns without giving it a second thought, yet when we're attempting to be inclusive of people of all gender identities, it's critical to take this into account.

Learn more about the Pronoun here:

https://brainly.com/question/30510319

#SPJ6

Answer:

1. Unlike rats and hamsters, ferrets are members of the mink family, which is closely related to the weasel. Despite their appearance, ferrets are not rodents. And they're adorable, too.

2. Sometimes they go into a deep slumber, known as "dead sleep," that they can't be roused from, and it's hard for them to get out of it. These ferrets don't move no matter how hard you try to shake, squeeze or even hit them in the chest. Inexperienced pet owners panic, believing that their beloved pet has died, only to discover that it has only opened its eyes and carried on as normal.

3. There is a good chance that they will steal your possessions: and you may never get them back. A ferret's nesting tendency makes it prone to stealing and storing stuff. There isn't much you can do to stop this habit, so if you want to avoid losing your keys in the future, you need get familiar with where it likes to hide.

Explanation: .  Almost at the start of the story, in the second paragraph, Richards "hastened" (12) to bring his sad news.  But if Richards had arrived "too late" at the start, Brently Mallard would have arrived at home first, and Mrs. Mallard's life would not have ended an hour later but would simply have  gone on as it had been.  Yet another irony at the end of the story is the diagnosis of the doctors.  They say she died of "heart disease--of joy that kills" (11).  In one sense they are right: Mrs. Mallard has for the last hour experienced a great joy.  But of course the doctors totally misunderstand the joy that kills her.  It is not joy at seeing  her husband alive, but her realization that the great joy she experienced during the last hour is over.

           All of these ironic details add richness to the story, but the central irony resides not in the well-intentioned but ironic actions of Richards, or in the unconsciously ironic words of the doctors, but in Mrs. Mallard's own life.  She "sometimes" (13) loved her husband, but in a way she has been dead, a body subjected to her husband's will.  Now his apparent death brings her new life.  Appropriately this new life comes to her at the season of the year when "the tops of trees [...] were all aquiver with the new spring life" (12). But ironically, her new life will last only an hour.  She is "Free, free, free" (12), but only until her husband walks through the doorway.  She looks forward to "summer days" (13), but she will not see even the end of this spring day.  If her years of marriage were ironic, bringing her a sort of living death instead of joy, her new life is ironic too, not only because it grows out of her moment of grief for her supposedly dead husband, but also because her vision of "a long procession of years" (12) is cut short within an hour on a spring day.

The plot details in "The Story of an Hour" are significant because they reveal Louise Mallard to be a woman who is deeply unhappy in her marriage and who longs for freedom.

Claim: The plot details in "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin play a crucial role in revealing the internal conflict and transformation of the main character, Louise Mallard, as she grapples with her emotions and desires in the face of societal expectations.

Evidence 1: The text states, "She did not stop to ask if it were or were not a monstrous joy that held her. A clear and exalted perception enabled her to dismiss the suggestion as trivial." This detail highlights Louise's initial shock and hesitation upon learning about her husband's death, followed by her inner conflict as she acknowledges her newfound sense of freedom and the "monstrous joy" that accompanies it. This internal struggle reflects the complexities of her emotions and sets the stage for her eventual transformation.

Evidence 2: Additionally, the text describes how Louise "carried herself unwittingly like a goddess of Victory." This detail symbolizes Louise's growing sense of empowerment and liberation as she envisions a life without the constraints of marriage. The contrast between her inner thoughts and the outward appearance she adopts illustrates the tension between societal norms and her personal desires.

The plot details in "The Story of an Hour" are carefully chosen by Kate Chopin to reveal Louise Mallard's true feelings about her marriage. Louise's initial reaction of joy to her husband's death is shocking, but it makes sense when we consider her unhappy marriage. She has been trapped in a loveless and oppressive relationship, and her husband's death represents her freedom from that relationship. Her thoughts about her future as a free woman also reveal her desire for independence. She dreams of spending her afternoons reading and gardening, and she even considers remarrying, but only to a man who will give her the freedom she craves. In the end, Louise's death is not caused by grief. It is caused by the shock of seeing her husband alive and well. This suggests that Louise's happiness at her husband's death was not simply a temporary reaction to grief. It was a deep-seated desire for freedom that could not be sustained in the face of reality.

The plot details in "The Story of an Hour" are a powerful indictment of the restrictive social roles that women were expected to play in the 19th century. Louise Mallard is a woman who is denied her freedom and her independence, and she ultimately pays the price for her desire to be free. Chopin's story is a reminder that the fight for women's rights is still not over.

To learn more about Claim and Evidence, here

https://brainly.com/question/31650777

#SPJ3

[tex] \: \: [/tex]

good day, today I apologize to you because I did not attend our class for 2 days because I was sick. I will make a way to catch up with our lessons, again sorry for not attending our class. Hope you understand it thanks

An appropriate counterargument should be a paragraph that discusses the negative effects of cell phones on children, pre-teens, and adolescents and how this could be amplified by allowing cell phones to be used in the learning environment.

We can arrive at this answer because:

Through questions similar to yours, we can see that Olivia needed to show a counterargument to the argument that the use of cell phones in the classroom could be beneficial, as students could obtain more information.

In this case, a counterargument that combats this would be one that shows the negative effects of cell phone use in the lives of young people.

The answer options are in the figure below.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/1198856

Answer: It makes the be fearful because they don’t want the other person to not like them or think badly of them. they don’t want the person to think they are weird.

Explanation:

Answer:

D. Odd

Explanation:

Odd: different to what is usual or expected; strange.

Answer:

1 future

2 present

3 future

4 past

5 present

Explanation:

Answers:

1. Past tense

2. Present tense

3. Present tense

4. Past tense

5. Present tense

Juror 4 is openly racist and prejudiced juror. However, jurors 7, 10 and 4 also show prejudiced opinions.

We can arrive at this answer because:

"The 12 Angry Men," tells the story of a man who goes to trial accused of killing his father and is evaluated by 12 different jurors.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/1227832

O the first answer I think

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

By this point children form an ideal advertising aim for the fast-food industry, that feeds their solitude with all the range of industrialized products

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

My teacher told me

Answer:

A makes the most since

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Key Points

Explanation:

Answer: Stanton wants to emphasize the historical significance of the women's movement and its potential for revolutionary change.

D. Stanton wants to emphasize the historical significance of the women’s movement and its potential for revolutionary change.

Answer:

Explanation:

henry VIII

The play ends with the birth of queen Elizabeth i is “Henry VIII”.Thus the correct option is B.

Shakespeare wrote 10 plays about historical characters, including Henry VIII. The downfall of the King's close associates is illustrated in Henry VIII along with themes of acceptance and loyalty.

The D of Buckingham and several noblemen are seen discussing in the play's opening scene. As they speak, King Henry and the king of France are violating a peace agreement.

The play is coming to an end with Queen Anne's newborn daughter. According to legend, Elizabeth would rise to greatness and bring prosperity and peace to England. So in this way, the play shows the birth of Queen Elizabeth I.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about Shakespeare, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1127426

#SPJ2

The complete question is Probably

Which play ends with the birth of queen Elizabeth I?

“The Merry Wives of Windsor”

“Henry VIII”

“King John”

“All’s Well That Ends Well”

Answer: As Prospero reminds him in Act I, scene ii, Ariel fell out of favor with Sycorax, and she imprisoned him in a “cloven pine.” Ariel remained stuck in the tree for twelve years, during which time Sycorax died, abandoning Ariel to an eternity of pain.

Explanation: hope this help and mark me brainlest.

Answer:Police in riot gear were called in to quell the disturbances/unrest

Explanation:

hmmmm

Answer:

It's B

Explanation:

Answer:

D. I think

Explanation:

Danforth refuses to postpone the hangings because it would admit some wrongdoing or doubt, a "floundering" on their part and it would also cast doubt on the executions and condemnations of the who have already been hanged.

Danforth  fears the people of Salem will riot if the executions don’t take place. Therefore, the correct option is option D.

Danforth refuses to put off the hangings since doing so would amount to an admission of guilt or uncertainty on their side, a "floundering" in their part, and it would also call into question the convictions and hangings of those who have already taken place. Since many others had previously been put to death, the judge's rejection appeared reasonable. If people who are jailed and have been proven guilty are let to live, it will appear unfair. The communities, relatives, and friends of those who have already been executed will undoubtedly be outraged by such a deed.

Therefore, the correct option is option D.

To learn more about Danforth, here:

brainly.com/question/29388714

#SPJ6

Answer:

A

Explanation:

It is A because the question is what supports the claim that his collection is impressive. A would support that because being able to buy a car with pennies is impressive.

Answer:

After the defeat of Japan in World War II, the United States led the Allies in the occupation and rehabilitation of the Japanese state. Between 1945 and 1952, the U.S. occupying forces, led by General Douglas A. MacArthur, enacted widespread military, political, economic, and social reforms.

Answer:

1. and

2. but

3. since

4. although

5. but

Explanation:

not sure, but from what I've studied

Answer:

1. Bobby and I will return the movie. I want to watch it tonight, whereas he wants to watch it tomorrow.

2. We cleaned the entire house while you were resting. Not only is the floor clean, but so are the curtains and the walls.

3. I will take the gift to her party since you have to work late. We will not eat dinner until you arrive.

4. Keri, Sheri and Teri are triplets, although they do not look alike. Keri is taller than either Sheri or Teri.

5. Neither Shawn nor Julie likes to roller skate. Not only do they fall down a lot, but they also twist their ankles, too.

Answer:

1.helmet

2.risk

3.die

4.

5.

Explanation:

hanapin ko pa Yung dalawa po,wait

hope it helps

#Carry on learning

advance Merry Christmas ⛄⭐❄️

The main focus or purpose for a reader when reading a classic prose should be: B. understanding what is happening in the story.

A prose can be defined as a literary device that refers to speaking or writing that follows a fundamental (basic) grammatical structure, especially with words and phrases that build sentences and paragraphs.

Classic prose is usually used by a writer to take a specific stance on the following elements of style:

Basically, a classic prose is simply a conversation between a writer and a reader, in which the writer presents specific information to the reader.

In this context, the main focus or purpose for a reader who's reading a classic prose should be understanding what is happening in the story written by the writer.

Read more: https://brainly.com/question/1412162

Answer:

Depending on the passage, it means to find fault with someone, or to scold.

Answer:What does the speaker's beloved say about his efforts to write her name

in the sand?

A) She asks him to keep trying so that she can see her name written in

the sand.

B) She says it is pointless because, just as she will die someday, her

name will be wiped out and forgotten.

C) She scolds him for doing such a ridiculous thing.

D) She praises his efforts for immortalizing her name.

Explanation:

Answer:

The appropriate answer would be stress . Stress is your body's method for reacting to any sort of interest or danger.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer to the question is a) He was scared when he got on the plane. A …. View the full answer. Transcribed image text: Which of the following sentences is an example of third-person narrative voice? He was scared when he got on the plane. We love sightseeing in our national parks. I went to the store for some basic items.

Explanation:

The central idea that can be gotten from the passage is that D. Anagnos shows his generosity as he gives his wise advice and his expensive present to Annie.

The central idea simply means the main idea that's in a passage or story. It's what the author wants the readers to know.

From the information given, it can be noted that the summary is that Anagnos shows his generosity as he gives his wise advice and his expensive present to Annie. A garnet ring was given as a gift.

Learn more about central idea on:

https://brainly.com/question/13942462

Answer:

When the escape comenses

Explanation:

Answer:

I'd say when he gets the memory of Christmas.

Explanation:

Answer:

a confrontation between the protagonist and antagonist.

Explanation:

what usually happens during a climaxofastory