Answer:
City rule
I answered after a long time
hope you have a great day.
How does the fact that the court cannot set an agenda complement its reactionary nature?
Answer:Bobby no way this is you hahah
Explanation:
Which of the following are exceptions to the "Fruit of the
poisonous tree doctrine? Choose all that apply.
A)Best effort
B)Genuine mistake
C)Independent source
D) Inevitable discovery
Answer:
C.
Explanation: I took the test and once I put C, and submitted it. I got it right
Which one of the following is a doctrine
created by the courts to deter police from
intentionally violating a suspects
Constitutional Rights in order to obtain
evidence against that person?
A)Fourth Amendment
B)Fifth Amendment
C)Exclusionary Rule
D)Sixth Amendment
Answer:
Fourth Amendment
Explanation:
Protects from unlawful search and seizures
What is a legally enforceable contract where an agent or owner of a property gives the exclusive right of possession for a specific amount of time in exchange for money?
Answer:
A lease agreement.
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, etc.
A lease agreement is a legally enforceable contract where an agent or owner of a property gives the exclusive right of possession for a specific amount of time in exchange for money.
Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
Which amendment was passed as a means of ensuring that newly freed slaves received all the rights and privileges of citizenship?
A) The Fourth Amendment
B) The fourteenth Amendment
C) The thirteenth Amendment
D) The twenty-sixth amendment
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper articles based on the torts discussed in this lesson: strict liability, products liability, misrepresentation of a product, and public and private nuisance. In the article you write, include some points about the defenses and remedies available for each tort. This exercise should be at least two to three paragraphs per tort (about 800 words in length total).
Answer:
Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.
Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.
This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.
Overview of Public Nuisance Law
In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.
Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]
Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases
Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]
The democrats currently possess less than a 2/3 majority in congress?
True or false
Answer:
truee
Explanation:
hope i helped you :)
What is legal precedent ?
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. What issue did they bring to the court?
3. Who is the defendant?
4. What was their defense?
5. Who won the case?
estate of Melvin w Ballantyne, Deceased.(T.C.M. (CCH)2002-160(2003)
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
at holy angel university in pampanga councilor marjorie oftentimes treats her clients ordinarily she has been hearing the same old problems of her students for 10 years that she automatically nods to everything she hears without even really listening to her clients
Which organization is primarily responsible for controlled substance and narcotics enforcement at the
federal level?
Please really need help on this please
do individuals make rational decisions when considering committing a crime?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
An individual chooses to commit crime if he can gain more from crime than not committing the crime. This gain from crime is not limited to monetary gains. Criminals may gain a lot from guilty pleasure and excitement from breaking the law, inflicting violence, and consuming illicit drugs. But even when accounting for all the monetary and non-monetary gains from crime, it seems like crime usually does not “pay”(Future learn).
Hence, an individual may choose to commit crime if the immediate rewards of the crime seem to outweigh the long time consequences of the crime. This is a rational decision. Finally, criminals make rational decisions because most of them usually consider the net gain of crime to outweigh the net loss of crime.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
describe the main aspect of the U.S. political system.
Who owns the alcoholic beverages of a private club?
What core value is common to all U.S. Military services? *
A) Integrity
B) Courage
C) Honor
D) Loyalty
The ___ has one supreme power over and above all other power in the state A) common law.
B) Civil law.
C) Constitution.
D) legislation
NS)
Pressure group includes all except ....... (a)Nigerian Medical Association (b)Nigerian
Union of Teachers (©)Nigerian union of Journalist (d)Nigerian Police force
Answer: (d)Nigerian Police force
Explanation:
Pressure group simply refers to an organization that influences the government to take action with regards to a particular issue. Pressure groups can include ethnic associations or trade unions.
The pressure groups serve as an important link between the government and the people that are being governed. From the options given, pressure group includes Nigerian Medical Association, Nigerian
Union of Teachers and the Nigerian union of Journalist.
It should be noted that the Nigerian Police Force isn't a pressure group.
how can you say that a police officer has a good character ?
Explanation:
Physical fitness.
Critical thinking.
Problem-solving skills.
Communication skills.
Interpersonal skills.
Strong moral character.
D
When selecting ammunition you must choose the correct cartridge or shotshell for your firearm. What else should you consider?
What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
A. Criminal law
B. Administrative law
c. Procedural law
D. Civil law
Answer: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!!
Explanation:
Under which circumstances would you consider filing an amicus brief in an appeals case?
Answer:
An amicus curiae brief in support of a petitioner or appellant shall be filed within 30 days after the case is placed on the docket or a response is called for by the Court, whichever is later, and that time will not be extended.
what is section 398 ipc
Explanation:
Section 398 in The Indian Penal Code. 398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon. —If, at the time of attempting to commit robbery or dacoity, the offender is armed with any deadly weapon, the imprisonment with which such offender shall be punished shall not be less than seven years.
What did Justice Ginsburg mean when she described the Supreme Court as “reactionary?”
Due to the strong enforcement of traditional gender roles in the US at the time, women were historically discouraged from pursuing higher education. She intended the change to benefit some people.
Who was Ruth Bader Ginsburg ?Ruth Bader Ginsburg was one of just 9 women accepted into Harvard Law School when she was younger. To put things into perspective, Harvard at that time welcomed about 500 new students yearly.
It was very difficult to get high paid jobs at the time, even for highly educated women. The majority of businesses simply hire women for secretarial positions without giving them the option to advance to managerial positions.
However, Ruth Bader Ginsburg eventually rose to the position of supreme court justice.
Learn more about Justice Ginsburg here
https://brainly.com/question/19556210
# SPJ 3
ILL NAME U AS BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
Affirmative action is most often criticized for
A)
being reverse discrimination.
B)
refusing to help Native Americans.
C)
being of little help to minorities.
D)
ignoring past discrimination against women.
What is a judicial review?
A The authority of the Supreme Court to declare laws or actions unconstitutional
B
The authority of a court to sentence a defendant.
C) The authority of a court to hear an appeal from a lower court.
Answer:
...A.) the authority of the supreme court to declare to laws or actions unconstitutional.
: Put the following events in chronological order.
a. Britain & its
b. Declaration of
c. French and Indian
colonies are in
Independence
War
debt after the 7
years war
e. Boston Tea Party f. Tea Act
g. Taxation without
representation
h. Britain imposes
taxes
Answer:
um let me see i hope i can help
Explanation:
c
a
b
e
h
g
most teen courts have a/an_______as the decision maker.
Answer:
D. Adult Judge
Explanation:
A survey conducted by the American Youth Policy Forum(AYPF) in 2004 revealed that Youth courts used an estimate of;
1. 40% of the adult judge model
2. 26% of the peer jury model
2. 17% of the youth judge model
3. 9% of a combination of models
4. 8% of the youth tribunal
We can thus infer that most teen courts use the adult judge as the decision maker.
When juveniles commit offences their cases can be held in a court presided over by peers who are in the same age bracket with them. A youth judge presides over the case most times. A panel or jury made up of other youth judges sometimes numbering up to six deliberate over the matter and make a decision that would be announced to the court. Restorative justice is applied most of the time.
The sentencing administered by the teen court might include sending the offender to a rehabilitation center so that the main factor that caused his or her misbehavior can be corrected.
Answer:
D. Adult Judge
Explanation:
an Adult Judge as the decision-maker.
What is the term used to describe an instance when two-thirds of congressional memebers Vote against a presidential veto?
A) Gridlock
B) Overdrive
C) An override
D) A filibuster
Answer:
C
Explanation:
An overdrive thats the name
When does the government have the right to search your property without a warrant?
A) When you give your consent for a search
B) When there is a search happening nearby
C) When you’ve already been through a trail
D) When you are standing in a public place
Answer:
A
Explanation:
When you give a consent for a search
Answer:
When you give your consent for a search
Explanation: