Answer:
The question is incomplete, so I looked for a similar one:
Copy Center sells laser printers and supplies. Watson Copy Center started the year with 90 containers of ink (average cost of $ 8.50 each, FIFO cost of $ 8.90 each, LIFO cost of $ 7.80each). During the year, Watson Copy Center purchased 720 containers of ink at $ 10.30 and sold 600 units for $ 19.75 each. Watson Copy Center paid operating expenses throughout the year, a total of $ 5000. Watson Copy Center's income statement-excluding the effects of income tax under each of theaverage-cost, FIFO, and LIFO inventory costing methods--is given.
Total sales revenue = 600 x $19.75 = $11,850
COGS under weighted average = {[(90 x $8.50) + (720 x $10.30)] / 810} x 600 = $6,060
COGS under FIFO = (90 x $8.90) + (510 x $10.30) = $6,054
COGS under LIFO = 600 x $10.30 = $6,180
Copy Center
Income Statement for the year 202x
(using weighted average)
Sales revenue $11,850
COGS ($6,060)
Gross profit $5,790
Operating expenses ($5,000)
Net income $790
Copy Center
Income Statement for the year 202x
(using FIFO)
Sales revenue $11,850
COGS ($6,054)
Gross profit $5,796
Operating expenses ($5,000)
Net income $796
Copy Center
Income Statement for the year 202x
(using LIFO)
Sales revenue $11,850
COGS ($6,180)
Gross profit $5,670
Operating expenses ($5,000)
Net income $670
On 1/1/27, Frankfort Company sold 100 components at $700 each. All sales were cash sales. Estimated total cost servicing the components was $1,300 each year of the three-year-warranty. Frankfort spent $1,400 servicing the components in 2027. This is considered an assurance-type warranty. Using the Expense Warranty approach, what is the 12/31/27 Warranty Liability
Answer:
the 12/31/27 Warranty Liability is $2,500
Explanation:
An assurance type warranty gives a customer assurance that the Good or Service will function or work as intended.
There is no option on the customer to take the warranty or not. Therefore, an assurance type warranty is not a separate performance obligation for revenue recognition.
Assurance type warranties are accounted for in terms of IAS 37 : Provisions.
Entries that Frankfort Company will have made Using the Expense Warranty approach will be :
Date : 1/1/27
Debit : Warranty Expense $1,300
Credit : Warranty Provision $1,300
Providing for amount it will cost the entity in 2027
Date : 12/31/27
1st increase the provision
Debit : Warranty Expense $100
Credit : Warranty Provision $100
then utilize the provision
Debit : Warranty Provision $1,400
Credit : Cash $1,400
When warranty claim is subsequently received
Conclusion :
Warranty liability remaining = $3,900 - ($1,300 + $100)
= $2,500
I know that Stephen has a lot of money. His parents drive Mercedes. His dogs wear cashmere sweaters, and he paid cash for his Hummer. The conclusion of the argument is ____________
Answer: I know that Stephen has a lot of money.
Explanation:
The whole point of the reasoning behind this thought by the speaker was to prove that Stephen had a lot of money.
This is why the speaker explained why they believed that Stephen had a lot of money. They talked about the car his parents drove, the cashmere sweaters his dogs wear and his use of cash to pay for his Hummer all to come to the conclusion that Stephen has a lot of money.
The regular selling price for the product is $80. The annual quantity of units produced and sold is 40,000 units (the costs above relate to the 40,000 units production level). The company has excess capacity and regular sales will not be affected by this special order. There was no beginning inventory. What would be the effect on operating income of accepting a special order for 1,000 units at a sale price of $40 per product
Answer:
The correct option is d. Increase by $19,500.
Explanation:
Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:
Pluto Incorporated provided the following information regarding its single product:
Direct materials used = $240,000
Direct labor incurred = $420,000
Variable manufacturing overhead = $160,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead = $100,000
Variable selling and administrative expenses = $60,000
Fixed selling and administrative expenses = $20,000
The regular selling price for the product is $80. The annual quantity of units produced and sold is 40,000 units (the costs above relate to the 40,000 units production level). The company has excess capacity and regular sales will not be affected by this special order. There was no beginning inventory.
What would be the effect on operating income of accepting a special order for 1,000 units at a sale price of $40 per product? Note: The special order units would not require any variable selling and administrative expenses.
a. Decrease by $19,500
b. Decrease by $18,000
c. Increase by $18,000
d. Increase by $19,500
The explanation of the answer is now provided as follows:
We first calculate the expected total relevant cost of the special order as follows:
Direct materials cost per unit = Direct materials used / Annual units = $240,000 / 40,000 = $6.00
Direct labor cost per unit = Direct labor incurred / Annual units = $420,000 / 40,000 = $10.50
Variable manufacturing overhead per unit = Variable manufacturing overhead / Annual units = $160,000 / 40,000 = $4.00
Expected special order total relevant cost = (Direct materials cost per unit + Direct labor cost per unit + Variable manufacturing overhead per unit) * Special order units = ($6.00 + $10.50 + $4.00) * 1,000 = $20.50 * 1,000 = $20,500
Expected revenue from the special order = Special order units * Special order selling price per unit = 1,000 * $40 = $40,000
Expected profit from the special order = Expected revenue from the special order - Expected special order total relevant cost = $40,000 - $20,500 = $19,500
Since the expected profit from the special order is $19,500, it therefore implies that accepting it would increase operating income by $19,500.
Therefore, the correct option is d. Increase by $19,500.