Answer:
to treat unfairly by using someone's work or ideas and giving them very little in return
Explanation:
B) is the definition of the word collusion, and C) is the opposite of the word exploit.
Did the population of Texas increase or decrease after the Civil War?
Answer:
For nine years following the Civil War, Texas was in turmoil, as its people attempted to solve political, social, and economic problems produced by the war. Emancipation changed the labor system, and the end of slavery forced a redefinition of the relationship between Blacks and Whites.
Explanation:
I think it decreased
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects citizens from the deprivation of property without the due process of law and requires just compensation for property taken for public use, is a key tenet of which of the following selections?
Select one:
A. economic freedom
B. right of first refusal
C. political freedom
D. retributive justice
Answer:
A
Explanation:
According to the reading, how did Japanese leaders define what it meant to be a modern nation?
Answer:
Having a modern military and being an industrialized power. To summarize it was like they wanted to copy the U.S. in terms of economic success and military power.
Explanation:
I don't know what the reading said but this is what I got.
When American colonists protested the idea of taxation without representation, what Enlightenment idea were they
demonstrating?
Answer:
RIGHT life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Explanation:
Answer:
RIGHT life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Explanation:
What primary argument is Wilberforce making for the abolition of the slave trade in this passage?
Answer:
The slave trade is evil
Explanation:
good luck on the rest!
12. A concurrent power is A reserved for the federal government only. B. reserved for the state governments only. C. shared by both federal and state governments. D. voted on by the Congress before enactment.
Answer:
reserved by the state government only
Which of these decreased during the Second Industrial Revolution?
Answer:
It was characterized by the build out of railroads, large-scale iron and steel production, widespread use of machinery in manufacturing, greatly increased use of steam power, use of petroleum and the beginning of electrification. However, during the second industrial revolution access to raw materials has decreased.
Explanation:
Help me, please!
Which argument was most likely used by Southern States in opposition to tariff acts?
The tariffs benefit farmers not industries in the North.
These acts protect industry in the North at the expense of the South.
Slavery in the South is weakened by tariffs on factories.
The government does not regulate tariff acts.
Answer: These acts protect industry in the North at the expense of the South.
Explanation: The south didn't want to pay the tax because it made their products expensive.
Answer:
These acts protect industry in the North at the expense of the South.
Explanation:
The tariffs that the Southern States had didn't benefit them at all compared to what it did in the North.
Hope this helps :)
Ancient Egypt: Geography and Trade:Question 3
One natural resource in perpetually short supply in Egypt was wood. Which region did they
trade with to obtain needed cedar?
Select one:
o
Sicily
O
France
o
Spain
Lebanon
Answer:
Lebanon
Explanation:
France, and Spain weren't kingdoms but mostly tribes who didn't even know Egypt existed. The Lebanese/ Phoenicia traded with Egypt, and supplied them with Cedar Wood, which was used to created ships and other structures that need wood.
Answer:
Lebanon
Explanation:
What is thisssssssss
Answer: It's a monitor.
Explanation: I believe the answer's that the united states wanted to dominate other cultures. Also, I can't see the whole question, so I'm trying to help you the best I can.
tramsform fault how might a geologist measure the distance of Earth moving along a fault line like this
Answer:
transform fault, in geology and oceanography, a type of fault in which two tectonic ... a transform fault may occur in the portion of a fracture zone that exists ... the offset crests, the movement across the transform fault was instead to the right. ... of high temperature and pressure that make them behave like ductile materials.
In what direction are the Papal States from England?
Answer:
So the Papal States are in Italy and England is in the UK. So its safe to say that they are South East of England.
Why did the Japanese cut terraces into the sides of mountains?
Is the Atlantic Ocean east or west?
Is the Pacific Ocean east or west?
PLEASE DON'T GIVE ME AN ANSWER FROM THE INTERNET CAUSE I ALREADY SEARCH BUT I WAS CONFUSED. THEY DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION. YES OR NO THAT'S ALL NEED. I DON'T NEED U TO TELL ME IT'S CONNECTED TO THIS PART JUTS A SIMPLE ANSWER. ONLY ANSWER IF U KNOW.
Answer:
If the US is your reference point, the Atlantic is east an Pacific west. Other way around if you're in Eurasia.hopefully you guys can see it fine, i made a mistake on the last question (pls help, in a rush)
Answer:
Because Europe is a huge peninsula, most land in Europe lies within 300 Miles of a seacoast. This further encouraged trade and the growth of economy.
Explanation:
how does buck feel about owners like Francols, the scotch mall carrier, and Hal anything they use the club?
Answer:
happy
Explanation:
The time period in which FDR had Congress pass an enormous amount of New Deal legislation at the beginning of his presidency is referred to as the:
A. Hundred Days
B. New Year
C. Twenty-Four Hours
D. Six Months
Answer:
A. Hundred Days
Explanation:
The idea of a president's first Hundred Days being extremely important originated with President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal Program in 1933. The programs passed in his first 100 days established a new precedent of judging a presidency based on its first hundred days in office.
we make time or time makes us
Answer:
time make us ..........................
Answer:
Good question though..
Describe mthe significance of the areas acquired to the United States
Answer:
The US of America was made on July 4, 1776, with the Affirmation of Freedom of 13 English settlements in North America. The association was formalized in the Articles of Confederation, which came into power on Walk 1, 1781.
List adjectives that describe the emotions of
the cartoon.
Answer:
Blue sad unhappy lonely etc
Explanation:
^^
Need Help ASAP
Write a extended paragraph answering the Compelling Question: Was U.S. Involvement in WW2 Inevitable?
Answer:
Although in retrospect U.S. entry into World War II seems inevitable, in 1941 it was still the subject of great debate. Isolationism was a great political force, and many influential individuals were determined that U.S. aid policy stop short of war. World War II was inevitable for a multitude of reasons. The foremost reason was the existence of three respective, powerful aggressor states (Germany, Italy, and Japan) with imperial and ideological ambitions that would not hesitate to use force to achieve their goals.
Explanation:
1. Why were guns looked at differently by the founding fathers?
Answer:
In 1791, common guns included muskets and flintlock pistols. According to the Washington Post, a "Typical Revolutionary-era musket" had a one-round magazine capacity, and it could fire around three effective rounds per minute – in the hands of the most skilled wielder.
Explanation:
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Yes
help due in ten min and im tired
Does anyone want to make a sentence with the word Basin in it???????
Definition: An area of land that is drained by rivers and its tributaries (small scale)
Answer:
The watershed was basined.
Explanation:
if basic means an area of land that is drained by rivers. Then watershed works because a watershed is an area that was drained form a body of water live rivers lakes ect.
Why would the United States worry about the Japan's extent of control?
Answer:
they zonin
Explanation:
what did European countries ignore as they created new political boundaries?
Restoration is easy, if one only has the power and the will; creation is not easy, even if one has both. Restoration is reversion to the known, the certain; creation is a venture into the unknown and the uncertain, and is highly conducive to divergencies of thought, to division in the ranks; while an army of restoration knows precisely what it wishes to do, namely, to set up again the old landmarks—and that, too, as speedily as possible—to bring back the good old times, to renew the broken connection with the past. Whether we like it or not, ours is the more difficult task. If the five Great Powers of 1919 were anxious to restore the map of 1914, they could not do it; whereas the five Great Powers of 1814 found it easy to reverse the cartographical innovations of Napoleon Bonaparte. The work of Lenin and Trotzky will not be so easily undone. Fortunately for the peace of his spirit, Napoleon does not know that. Napoleon, Lenin, and Trotzky—an incongruous trio of actors on the Russian stage! Napoleon, a Frenchman, bent upon conquering Russia, was the direct means of heightening the influence and increasing the territory of Russia, as all the world saw in 1815. Lenin and Trotzky, Russians, have not only coöperated zealously in destroying the prestige of their country: they have consented and contributed, to the best of their ability, to the colossal dismemberment of Russia and its utter impotence. Russia has become merely a geographical expression, the combined achievement of German militarism and Russian Socialism. There is not Russia. What was once Russia is a disorganized aggregation of local governments, presenting, among other things, a wild tangle of territorial problems—and territorial problems resembling those of primeval chaos, with most landmarks entirely obliterated. The one outstanding landmark in contemporary Russia is that set up on March 3, 1918—the treaty of Brest-Litovsk. That treaty has never been recognized by any of the victorious Allies; nevertheless, it dogs them night and day in the time of triumph, embittering peace, if not preventing it, darkening counsel, and putting a strain upon friendship. The treaty of Brest-Litovsk may be repudiated by the conferees of Paris; it may be dead as far as Germany, its chief author, is concerned; but it is far from being a negligible factor in the history of the present. On the contrary, it, and the things it represents and embodies in its fell phrases, are bound to exercise a profound and disturbing influence upon the future. Where does one find anything in Germany parallel to this inner transformation? The history of Germany during the last forty years, during the last ten years, has shown the contrary phenomenon: a growing and not a decreasing harmony between the governors and the governed. If one wishes to test this statement, let him compare the stand taken by the only so-called opposition party in the war of 1870 and the war of our own day. In the former, the Socialists, who were few in number, were opposed to militarism, to aggrandizement, to the declaration of war, and to the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine, and their leaders, Bebel and Liebknecht, paid for their opposition by being thrown into prison. The Socialists of to-day, vastly more numerous and with far greater powers of opposition, have compromised with militarism, have warmly approved annexations by voting for the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, and have on every and all occasions, in the year of our Lord 1918, joined in the general clamor that Alsace-Lorraine must never be surrendered. It would seem to be the business of an opposition to oppose. Should there emerge from the Assembly of Weimar a German democracy, that democracy will be the expression of German psychology. German psychology caused the war and kept it going. The ruling classes would never have risked the war, had they not known the temper and the nature of the German people. Nothing has yet occurred to show that the great masses of the people differed in 1914 from their rulers, either in their conceptions of the nature and the duty of the state, in their moral indifferentism, or in their arrogance and conceit. The defeat Germany has sustained may abate somewhat her contempt of other nations. It is not likely to diminish her hatred of them. It is far more likely to intensify that hatred. Men do not love their enemies any the more because their enemies have compelled them to bite the dust. What we know about the Germans does not lead up to believe, either that they have changed in essentials, or that they are changing, or that they are likely to change and to give the world the spectacle of the miracle of a new psychology. The majority of the members of the National Assembly of Weimar were members of the Reichstag, and belonged to parties that enthusiastically supported the policies of the Empire.
Explanation: Facts
What was one effect of the Hartford convention?
Answer:
In the first unqualified defeat of a British naval squadron in history, U.S. Captain Oliver Hazard Perry leads a fleet of nine American ships to victory over a squadron of six British warships at the Battle of Lake Erie during the War of 1812.
Answer:
Explanation:
William Henry Harrison pursued and defeated British forces retreating into Canada.
In a totalitarian dictatorship the people are allowed to make decisions and vote on laws. True or False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
A dictatorship means that there is only 1 person on top. If there is a vote on something, it is absolutely meaningless. The only thing that matters is the person at the top. Just about as false as it can be.
5 sam houston only facts
3 facts both men have in common
5 lamar only facts
By most accounts, Sam Houston and Texas were both born on the same date: March 2. (There is a little disagreement among historians on when the Texas Declaration of Independence was ratified by all signers.) And despite what you might have read, according to Houston biographer James L. Haley, “What’s not true is that Houston made them wait until his birthday to sign the declaration. If he’d thought about it, he probably would’ve. ”Be that as it may, what better time to share a few lesser known anecdotes and insights into perhaps the most eccentric, headstrong, and wonderful leaders this great state has ever known? Houston loved to make statements with his attire Often it was retro. When it came time to hand over the reins of Texas to his arch-nemesis, president-elect Mirabeau B. Lamar, Houston decked himself out in vintage threads in an effort to mimic Gilbert Stuart’s portrait of President George Washington. According to Haley: “Houston arrived dressed like George Washington, in a suit of federal knee-breeches and his hair tied in a queue. According to one observer, the departing president “dressed himself so much like Stuart’s portrait…with powdered hair and elegant fitting garments, that he really looked more like the picture than ever Washington did himself.” Decked out in this vintage gear, and perhaps with a gourd or two of rye whiskey aboard, Houston proceeded to give an passive aggressive three- or four-hour farewell address, as the eager Lamar seethed, simmered, and finally boiled over. By the time Houston left the stage, Lamar was so infuriated, his secretary had to read his speech for him. Then there was the time Houston reached even farther back in time, commissioning a portrait of himself as Roman hero Gaius Marius. And like those hipsters you see at festivals rocking Native American headdresses, Houston loved to deck himself out, sometimes even appearing at official government meetings in full Cherokee attire, much to the disgust of lames like then-secretary of war John C. Calhoun. Unlike the modern hipsters whose trail he blazed, Houston earned that right. He lived amongst the Cherokee on multiple occasions, had been adopted into the tribe, and fought (with little success, in the end) to preserve their rights. You could say he had a pass, unlike those cultural-appropriating kids at Coachella. And while with the Cherokee, Houston picked up the habit of whittling, make him a craftsy artisan. One last note on his fashion sense. When modern hipsters wear neckties, they tend to be ridiculous. The same went for Houston.
Wikimedia Commons
Francis Scott Key represented him in court. And then there was the time that Francis Scott Key, yes, that Baltimore attorney who wrote the lyrics to the national anthem, ineffectually represented Houston in a very important case. Houston had beat, caned, and called Ohio congressman William Stanbery a “darned rascal” on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, an incident that arose after Stanbery had publicly claimed that during his term as Tennessee governor, Houston had swindled his beloved Cherokee Indians. Hauled before Congress to answer for his alleged crime, Houston delivered his own closing argument, reportedly because Key was “indisposed” (read: hungover) at the trial. (Some reports have it that Houston was equally “indisposed,” but better able to marshal his thoughts from the defense bar.) Though Houston was quite persuasive in protection of his own honor—one woman in the gallery said “I had rather be Sam Houston in a dungeon than William Stanbery on a throne”—he was convicted, though he never paid a dime nor served a day behind bars for his offense. He hightailed it for Texas before the law could lay a finger on him. He had a huge fear of ticks. Houston was famously a drinker, at least for the first half of his life before his marriage to Margaret Lea. Haley, author of 2004’s Sam Houston, pointed out his favorite boozy Houston tale to Texas Monthly, which involved Houston, wine, and ticks. At the time, the divorced Houston was courting Anna Raguet of what is now the Lufkin/Nacogdoches area. She would spurn his advances, thanks in no small part to antics like the following, as related in Haley’s book:
“[Of] Houston’s many sojourns in Nacogdoches, this was to be the most stressful, because with everything else going wrong, he still had to be on his best behavior in his losing campaign for the affections of Anna Raguet. This particular stay, therefore, is most likely the one during which Houston accompanied several lawyer friends on a hunting excursion of several days on Neal Martin’s property outside of town. While the other men were in pursuit of the panting deer, Houston, attended by his bodyservant, also named Sam, stayed behind at Martin’s cabin, drinking, or as the bodyservant put it, the president “looked upon the wine when it was red.” This got to annoy his companions, who determined upon an appropriate revenge:
What was the failed revolution against the Weimar Republic in 1923 known
as?
The Putsch
By November 1923, Hitler and his associates had concocted a plot to seize power of the Bavarian state government (and thereby launch a larger revolution against the Weimar Republic) by kidnapping Gustav von Kahr (1862-1934), the state commissioner of Bavaria, and two other conservative politicians.
(If you can please give me brainiest)
why was the name Quebec chosen
Answer:
The name “Quebec” comes from the Algonquin word for “narrow passage” or “strait”. It was first used to describe the narrowing of the St. Lawrence River near what is now the City of Québec. Quebec has had several names throughout its history: Canada, New France, Lower Canada and Canada East.
Explanation: