In the first story, why did Alexander pour the water on the ground?
Alexander poured the water on the ground because he believed that everyone should experience thirst on an equal basis.
What prompted Alexander in the first story to pour the water on the ground?To show that he was willing to experience the same hardships as his soldiers because there wasn't enough water for them to drink, he threw his helmet's full of water into the battle.Alexander wanted to show his soldiers that he was willing to suffer with them, so he performed the water-sprinkling act as a significant part of his performance.He did not appear to be more superior simply because he was the only one of his troops who could consume water.He dropped the water on the floor to show his unit that he will not drink water until they do.Learn more about Alexander: https://brainly.com/question/1833055
#SPJ9
The photo was taken during world war ii. this photo shows american soldiers marching up a hill from a beach. on the beach are more soldiers and vehicles. near the shore are various landing craft, and larger ships can be seen further offshore. how does the photo reveal evidence that it was taken during operation overlord? it shows army uniforms. it shows tanks and other weapons. it shows rows of troops. it shows ships along the coastline.
The answer is The photo reveals evidence that it was taken during Operation Overlord, it was the landing craft area.
During World War II, the British and Americans mass-produced landing crafts and modified them throughout the war to perform a wide range of tasks.The beach was the landing craft area, where the small naval vessels used primarily to transport and tactically deploy soldiers, equipment, vehicles, and supplies from ship to shore for offensive military operations during the war.However, The Japanese armed forces first introduced the development and use of specialized craft for tactical deployment.Thus, this design was replicated by the British and Americans during the world war. It incorporated into sixty different types of landing craft and landing ships for the war.What constitutes a war?An armed conflict develops if there is hostilities between States, lengthy armed conflict between government forces and organized armed groups, or between organized armed organizations. When one State gives armed force against another State.
What distinguishes a war from other conflicts?Only when it is carried out by an authorized government can a war be considered just. Even causes cannot be served by actions conducted by persons or groups that do not represent an authority recognized by whatever the society and those outside the society to be legitimate.
To know more about War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ1
Answer:
It shows ships along the coastline.
Explanation:
4/D
How did the new imperialism of the 19th century differ from earlier efforts?
A imperial powers tolerated more independence among colonies
B imperial powers engaged in less trade with colonies
C imperial powers exerted greater political control over colonies
D imperial powers made less effort to spread Christianity to colonies
The correct option is C. The new imperialism of the 19th century differ from earlier efforts was imperial powers exerted greater political control over colonies.
Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means of control over other nations or territories. This can be achieved through direct rule, where the imperial power governs the colony directly, or indirect rule, where the imperial power uses local leaders to govern the colony.
Imperialism can have economic, political, and social motivations. Economic motivations include access to resources, markets, and cheap labor. Political motivations include expanding the influence and power of the imperial country. Social motivations can include a belief in cultural superiority and a desire to spread the imperial country's way of life.
To learn more about Imperialism visit here:
brainly.com/question/1225474
#SPJ4
Why was it amost impossible for jews to scape from germany??
America uses numerous methods to resolve conflict over disputed areas. How did they resolve the dispute over Texas? What other methods are there and when were they used?
Answer:
The dispute over Texas was resolved through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, which ended the Mexican-American War. Mexico recognized Texas as part of the United States and ceded territories that are now part of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma to the US.
Other methods that the US has used to resolve disputes over disputed areas include negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and litigation.
Negotiations involve direct talks between the parties involved to reach a mutually agreeable solution. Mediation involves a neutral third party who facilitates discussions between the parties to assist in reaching a resolution. Arbitration involves a third party who makes a ruling on the dispute after listening to evidence from both sides. Litigation involves taking legal action in a court of law.
These methods have been used in various disputes over time. For example, negotiations and mediation were used in the Camp David Accords of 1978 between Israel and Egypt over the Sinai Peninsula. Arbitration was used in the dispute over the island of Palmas between the Netherlands and the US in 1928. Litigation was used in the case of Nicaragua vs. United States in the International Court of Justice in 1986.
To whom could we compare the daring charioteers of Circus Maximus
The daring charioteers of Circus Maximus may be as compared to modern-day race vehicle drivers who compete in high-velocity races together with formula One or NASCAR.
Just like the charioteers, present day race vehicle drivers push themselves and their vehicles to the restriction, navigating complicated tracks and taking risks with the intention to win.
Both sets of athletes require incredible reflexes, physical patience, and mental attention to prevail. moreover, each charioteers and race vehicle drivers often have a passionate fan base that follows them from race to race, including to the excitement and depth of the game. usual, the talent, bravery, and showmanship of the charioteers can be seen as a precursor to the current-day spectacle of motorsports.
Learn more about Circus Maximus:-
https://brainly.com/question/30495236
#SPJ4
8. How would you have felt if ordered not to shoot with an army of thousands of enemy
soldiers rushing at you? What does General James Wolfe's order show us about his
relationship with his troops? Explain.
Answer:
Being ordered not to shoot when faced with an army of thousands of enemy soldiers rushing at you would be a challenging situation for any soldier. On one hand, soldiers are trained to follow orders, and disobeying orders can lead to serious consequences. On the other hand, soldiers also have a natural instinct for self-preservation and may feel a sense of duty to protect their comrades and themselves.
General James Wolfe's order not to shoot in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham during the French and Indian War is often cited as an example of his tactical genius. By ordering his troops not to fire until they saw the whites of the enemy's eyes, he was able to conserve his ammunition and ensure that his soldiers fired accurately at close range. However, this order also put his troops in a precarious position and required them to have the discipline to hold their fire in the face of an enemy charge.
Wolfe's order shows us that he had a high level of trust and respect for his troops. He understood that they were well-trained and disciplined enough to follow his orders, even in a difficult situation. His order also demonstrates his willingness to take calculated risks to achieve victory and his ability to inspire and motivate his troops to overcome challenging circumstances. Overall, Wolfe's order not to shoot highlights the strong relationship he had with his troops based on trust, respect, and a shared commitment to achieving their mission.
Which statement best describes one legacy of the New Deal?
A. Many of the laws and agencies created by the New Deal are now
established parts of the U.S. government.
B. The New Deal expanded the power of the state governments to
aid individuals in a time of need.
C. The New Deal made corporations and charities responsible for
individuals in need, instead of the federal government.
D. All the laws and agencies established by the New Deal have been
disbanded and are not part of the U.S. government.
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. Many of the laws and agencies created by the New Deal are now established parts of the U.S. government.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
What impact does heavy rain in areas of China have on the agriculture?
Millions of people are employed in China's agriculture industry, which produces a diverse range of products including rice, wheat, maize, soybeans, vegetables, fruits, and tea.
The impact of heavy rain on various agriculture are -
1. In southern china rain is important for the good yield of agriculture but if it rains heavily it can lead to water logging due to which there will be no oxygen supply to the roots of crops.
2. In northern china if it rains heavily it can delay the planting and it can also increase the risk of disease in roots such as root rot.
3. The rain can be beneficial to some extent but if it rains heavily then it can damage or destroy the crops and ultimately the livelihood of farmers.
To know more about agriculture in china-
brainly.com/question/28138295
The People Behind the Laws
In this assignment, you will learn more about the people behind the laws that you have learned about in this lesson. You will choose one of the laws that you have read about and research its history. From your research, you will choose one person who was instrumental to the development of the law, and you will further research that person' biography. You will then use the results of your research to write an essay describing the person's major contributions and how his background shaped his Worldview.
To complete this assignment you will:
Research the history of one of the laws described in this lesson.
Identify a major figure in the development of your chosen law.
Research biographical information on your chosen figure. You must use a minimum of three credible references.
Write a 750-word essay describing the major contributions of your chosen figure and how that person's background motivated the person's actions.
To complete your assignment, submit:
Your 750-word biographical essay.
A list of all references used in the assignment.
Question # 1
Long Text (essay)
Choose one person who was instrumental to the development of the law.
Write a 750-word essay describing the major contributions of your chosen figure and how that person's background motivated the person's actions.
In the United States, education is a fundamental right for all children. However, it was not always this way. Discrimination and inequality were widespread in the education system, especially towards minority groups, and there was a need for federal laws to ensure that children's rights and safety were protected in public schools. One of the major figures responsible for the development of these laws was Thurgood Marshall.
Thurgood Marshall was born in 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland. He grew up in a time of extreme racial segregation and discrimination, which would go on to shape his worldview and his lifelong fight for equality. Marshall attended Lincoln University, where he studied law and became interested in civil rights issues. After graduation, he worked as an attorney for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
In the 1940s and 1950s, Marshall became heavily involved in the legal battles surrounding school desegregation. One of his most significant contributions was his role as lead attorney in the landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, which challenged the legality of racial segregation in public schools. Marshall and his team argued that segregation violated the "equal protection" clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Marshall and his team, declaring that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
After the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, Marshall continued to work as a civil rights attorney and became the first African American to serve as a US Supreme Court justice in 1967. During his time on the bench, he was known for his commitment to protecting individual rights and promoting equality.
Marshall's background and personal experiences greatly influenced his work as a civil rights attorney. He understood the struggles that minority groups faced and was passionate about fighting for justice and equality. He once said, "I wish I could say that racism and prejudice were only distant memories. We must dissent from the indifference. We must dissent from the apathy. We must dissent from the fear, the hatred, and the mistrust. We must dissent because America can do better, because America has no choice but to do better."
In conclusion, Thurgood Marshall played a critical role in the development of federal laws that protect the rights and safety of children who attend primary and secondary public schools. His work as a civil rights attorney and his landmark victory in Brown v. Board of Education paved the way for the desegregation of public schools and the guarantee of equal education opportunities for all children. Marshall's background and personal experiences motivated him to fight for justice and equality, and his legacy continues to inspire those who advocate for civil rights today.
References:
"Thurgood Marshall." Biography.com, A&E Networks Television, 6 Feb. 2020, https://www.biography.com/law-figure/thurgood-marshall.
"Thurgood Marshall." Oyez, https://www.oyez.org/justices/thurgood_marshall.
"Thurgood Marshall." National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, https://www.nps.gov/people/thurgood-marshall.htm.
1. Analyze two passages about the Atlantic slave trade and then answer the questions.
Passage 1: Olaudah Equiano
This passage is from the autobiography of Olaudah Equiano, an African man sold into slavery.
The first object which saluted my eyes when I arrived on the coast was the sea, and a slave ship . . . waiting for its cargo. These filled me with astonishment, which was soon converted into terror. . . . I was immediately handled and tossed up to see if I were sound by some of the crew; and I was now persuaded that I had got into a world of bad spirits, and that they were going to kill me. . . . I was soon put down under the decks, and there I received such a salutation in my nostrils as I had never experienced in my life: so that, with the loathsomeness of the stench, and with my crying together, I became so sick and low that I was not able to eat. . . . I now wished for the last friend, death, to relieve me; but soon, to my grief, two of the white men offered me eatables; and, on my refusing to eat, one of them held me . . . and laid me across I think the windlass, and tied my feet, while the other flogged me severely. . . . But still I feared I should be put to death, the white people looked and acted, as I thought, in so savage a manner; for I had never seen such instances of brutal cruelty; and this is not only shown towards us blacks, but also to some of the whites themselves.
Passage 2: Alexander Falconbridge
This passage is a firsthand account of a British doctor who worked aboard slave ships. He later became an advocate for ending the slave trade.
On being brought aboard the ship, [the men] are immediately fastened together, two and two, by hand-cuffs on their wrists and by irons riveted on their legs. They are then sent down between the decks and placed in an apartment partitioned off for that purpose. The women also are placed in a separate apartment between the decks, but without being ironed. An adjoining room on the same deck is appointed for the boys. Thus they are all placed in different apartments.
Questions:
a. What is one historical argument a historian might make about the Atlantic slave trade based on these sources?
b. What is one similarity and one difference in the way the two sources interpret the events described?
Answer:
a. Based on these sources, a historian might argue that the Atlantic slave trade was a brutal and dehumanizing system that subjected African people to unimaginable suffering and cruelty. The passages describe the initial shock and terror experienced by those who were captured and taken aboard slave ships, as well as the brutal treatment they endured during the voyage.
b. One similarity in the way the two sources interpret the events described is that they both emphasize the inhumane treatment of enslaved people during the Atlantic slave trade. Both Equiano and Falconbridge describe the physical and emotional abuse endured by those who were enslaved, including being chained, confined in cramped spaces, and subjected to beatings.
One difference between the two sources is their perspective on the role of white people in the slave trade. Equiano portrays white people as savage and cruel, while Falconbridge does not explicitly blame any particular group or individual for the system of slavery. Instead, he describes the conditions and treatment of enslaved people in a matter-of-fact way, without assigning blame or moral judgment.
Explanation:
about first world war
As a result of the Protestant Reformation, Pope Paul III called for the Council of Trent to meet in 1545. What was the result of this council?
The Council of Trent played a significant role in shaping the Catholic Church and its doctrines and practices in the centuries that followed.
The Council of Trent, which began in 1545 and ended in 1563, was a major event in the history of the Catholic Church. It was convened by Pope Paul III in response to the Protestant Reformation and aimed to address the theological and ecclesiastical issues that had arisen during that time.
The Council of Trent resulted in a number of important developments in Catholic doctrine and practice. Some of the key outcomes of the council include:
Clarification of Catholic doctrine: The council clarified and reaffirmed many of the key doctrines of the Catholic Church, including the doctrine of the Trinity, the nature of Christ, the role of the sacraments, and the authority of the Pope.
Reaffirmation of the importance of tradition: The council emphasized the importance of tradition in addition to Scripture as a source of authority in the Church.
Changes to the liturgy: The council revised and standardized the Catholic liturgy, including the Mass, and issued guidelines for the training and behavior of priests and bishops.
learn more about Council of Trent here:
https://brainly.com/question/11408674
#SPJ4
5. Does Bryan seem to be content to commit himself to a campaign that would divide
urban and rural voters?
Answer:
Bryan faced a number of disadvantages in seeking the Democratic nomination: he was little-known among Americans who did not follow politics closely, he had no money to pour into his campaign, he lacked public office.
Explanation:
What was the combined total of sick and vacation days a factory worker earned per year during the late 1800's?
A. 10
B. 0
C. 14
D. 21
The combined total of sick and vacation days a factory worker earned per year during the late 1800's was 0.
What is sick leave?
Sick leave is a paid period of time off from work that employees can use to attend to their medical requirements at home without losing pay. Sick leave is distinct from paid holiday time or time off work for personal reasons because it is reserved for medical-related needs. A mental health day and taking time off work to attend a scheduled doctor's visit are both examples of sick leave. Some policies also permit the use of paid sick leave to care for sick family members or to address health and safety issues.
Know more about Sick leave - brainly.com/question/28316816
#SPJ1
What point does the author Jim murphy make on pages 73 to 75 about how war changed the boy soldiers the boys war
Jim Murphy argues that the boys who went to war in World War I experienced a drastic change in their lives, both physical and emotional.
On page 73, Murphy notes that "the war drained boys of their youth," and as they encountered more of the harsh realities of war, their childish nature was replaced with an appreciation of life and a sense of responsibility.
On page 75, Murphy argues that the war not only changed their physical appearance, but also the way they thought and spoke. The boys "came to understand the horrors and courage of war, and developed a language of their own to describe it."
For more question on World War I click on
https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ11
Image of page 73 to 75 is below.
Why did many of the young Chinese intellectuals favor Soviet communism
Many young Chinese intellectuals in early to mid-20th century favored Soviet communism because they saw it as a model for modernization and social progress.
What is communism?Communism is a political and economic ideology that advocates for a classless society in which all property and resources are collectively owned and controlled by the community as a whole. Under communism, wealth and resources are distributed according to the needs of each individual, rather than based on their ability to pay or work. The goal of communism is to eliminate social and economic inequality by creating a system in which everyone has equal access to resources and opportunities. However, communism has been criticized for its implementation in many countries, often resulting in authoritarian regimes that suppress individual rights and freedoms.
To learn more about communism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30309688
#SPJ1
Why do you think the USA referred to the people as 'communist
insurgents'?
Answer:
During the Vietnam War, the US government and military may have used the term "communist insurgents" to make the war seem like a fight against an outside communist threat to the free world rather than a fight by the Vietnamese people for their own freedom. This helped to explain why the US military had to get involved and gave the impression that the US was fighting for democracy and freedom against communism. Also, the word "insurgents" makes it sound like the Vietnamese were fighting against an established government instead of for their own freedom. This makes it harder to understand how complicated the conflict was and why the Vietnamese didn't want to support the US-backed government.
What does Kennedy seek to accomplish by calling himself a Berliner?
Answer:
On July 25, 1961, Kennedy insisted in a presidential address that the U.S. would defend West Berlin, asserting its Four-Power rights, while making it clear that challenging the Soviet presence in Germany was not possible.
Explanation:
history of sonjata the lion king
Answer:
Sundiata Keita, also known as the Lion King, was a real-life king and founder of the Mali Empire in West Africa. His story has been passed down through generations and has become part of the oral tradition of West Africa.
According to legend, Sundiata Keita was born in 1217 in the city of Niani, which is located in what is now modern-day Mali. His father was Maghan Kon Fatta, king of the Mandinka people, and his mother was Sogolon Kedjou, who was said to have been a powerful sorceress.
Sundiata was born with a physical disability that prevented him from walking, but he was said to have possessed great strength and intelligence. When he was a child, his father was killed in battle by a rival king, and Sundiata and his mother were forced to flee to a neighboring kingdom.
As Sundiata grew older, he developed a reputation as a powerful warrior and leader. He eventually returned to Niani and began to unite the various kingdoms and tribes in the region under his leadership. He formed alliances with other powerful leaders, including the sorcerer king Soumaoro Kante, and led a series of successful military campaigns against rival kingdoms.
In 1235, Sundiata led an army of over 10,000 soldiers against the Sosso Kingdom, which was ruled by Soumaoro Kante. In a legendary battle, Sundiata and his army defeated the Sosso army, and Soumaoro Kante was killed. With this victory, Sundiata became the first king of the Mali Empire.
Sundiata is remembered as a great leader who brought peace and prosperity to the people of West Africa. His story has been told and retold for generations and has become an important part of the cultural heritage of the region.
Explanation:
Sundiata Keita, also known as Sunjata or Sundjata, was a legendary king of the ancient West African empire of Mali. His story is told in the epic poem "Sundiata," which has been passed down through oral tradition for centuries.
According to the legend, Sundiata was born in the early 13th century in the city of Niani in what is now Mali. His mother, Sogolon Kedjou, was said to be a hunchback who was ostracized by the other women in the kingdom. However, she was also believed to be a powerful sorceress, and it was said that Sundiata inherited her mystical abilities.
When Sundiata was a child, his father, the king of Mali, was assassinated, and his half-brother took the throne. The new king was cruel and despotic, and he exiled Sundiata and his family to a remote village. Despite his physical disabilities, Sundiata grew into a strong and courageous young man, and he began to gather a following of loyal supporters.
Eventually, Sundiata and his supporters launched a rebellion against the cruel king. They defeated him in a great battle and restored Sundiata to the throne. Sundiata went on to become a great king and a hero to the people of Mali. He expanded the empire's borders, promoted trade and commerce, and was known for his wisdom and fairness.
Today, Sundiata is considered a national hero in Mali, and his story continues to be celebrated in song, dance, and literature. He is also recognized as an important figure in the history of West Africa, and his legacy has inspired generations of Africans to fight for their independence and sovereignty.
Why would watergate create a lack of trust in the government
Answer:
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the early 1970s, and it involved the illegal activities of President Richard Nixon's administration. The scandal included a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex, as well as attempts by the Nixon administration to cover up its involvement in the break-in.
The Watergate scandal eroded public trust in the government for several reasons. First, it demonstrated that the President and his administration were willing to engage in illegal activities to maintain their grip on power. Second, the scandal revealed a pattern of abuse of power by the executive branch, as well as attempts to undermine the integrity of the justice system. Third, the Nixon administration's efforts to cover up the scandal showed a lack of transparency and honesty, which further eroded public trust in the government.
The Watergate scandal had a profound impact on the American public and on the perception of government. It undermined the belief that the government could be trusted to act in the best interests of the people, and it led to a period of increased skepticism and cynicism about politics and government. The scandal ultimately resulted in Nixon's resignation from the presidency, and it served as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked executive power and the importance of transparency and accountability in government.
Why did the relation between King Edward II and Hugh Despenser annoy the English barons and Isabella of France?
Answer:
The English barons and Isabella of France viewed the relationship between King Edward II and Hugh Despenser as problematic for a number of reasons. Hugh Despenser was first and foremost a ruthless and ambitious man who was charged with misusing his position of authority and enriching himself at the expense of the kingdom. Second, the English nobles felt threatened by the close friendship between Edward and Despenser, believing that Despenser would use his influence to undercut their position. Last but not least, Isabella of France, Edward's queen, is said to have been quite dissatisfied with the union and may have viewed Despenser as a competition for her husband's love. Ultimately, the quarrels between Edward, Despenser, and the English lords resulted in a time of political unrest and civil unrest known as the Despenser War.
Wilson's idea of "neutrality" when the Great War broke out was
A. that America was to remain completely impartial in the Great War and not associate with either side.
B. that America could still sell their goods to all countries regardless.
C. that America would only sell to Great Britain.
D. that America would only sell goods to the side we thought was the "good" side.
Answer: A. ; that America was to remain completely impartial in the Great War and not associate with either side.
Explanation: At the start of the Great War, Wilson aimed to implement a policy of impartiality and non-involvement in the conflict between the Allied Powers and the Central Powers. His "neutrality" idea meant that the US would remain neutral and not take sides with any party in the war.
By 1200, Muslim power had reached over the entire plain of northern India, creating a new muslim state known as the _______.
I need help pls
How did New Mexico's government change at the beginning of the Civil War? PLEASE HELP I NEED TO DO MY WORK BUT GOTTA GO TO BED iHELP!
Answer:
At the beginning of the Civil War, New Mexico was a territory of the United States, not yet a state. In 1861, after the Confederate States of America had been established, the territory of New Mexico was in danger of being taken over by Confederate forces. Governor Abraham Rencher requested federal troops to protect the territory, but President James Buchanan refused, leaving the New Mexico government to fend for itself. In response, the New Mexico government formed a volunteer army to defend the territory against Confederate invasion. Later, in 1862, New Mexico was officially recognized as a state of the United States.
how does muslim belief in martyrdom play out in the attacks on 9/11?
The Muslim belief in martyrdom play out in the attacks on 9/11 as they saw themselves as carrying out a holy war (jihad) against the United States and its allies, whom they believed were enemies of Islam.
How does muslim belief in martyrdom play out in the attacks on 9/11?The belief in martyrdom is a complex aspect of Islamic theology that is interpreted differently by different groups of Muslims. While most Muslims believe that martyrdom can be achieved in various ways, including through acts of selfless service, charity, and self-defense, some extremist groups have justified violent acts, including terrorism, as a means of achieving martyrdom.
The attacks on 9/11 were carried out by a group of Islamist extremists who believed in the concept of martyrdom. They saw themselves as carrying out a holy war (jihad) against the United States and its allies, whom they believed were enemies of Islam. They believed that by sacrificing their lives to kill as many people as possible, they would become martyrs and be rewarded with paradise in the afterlife.
Read more on Muslims here:https://brainly.com/question/1214743
#SPJ1
Who designed Hearst Castle?
Orson Welles
Julia Morgan
William Randolph Hearst
Marion Davies
Answer: Julia Morgan
How did the U.S. government prepare the nation for World War II? And what were the socio-economic implications for the nation?
The US government undertook several measures to prepare the nation for World War II, both in terms of military readiness and the mobilization of resources for the war effort. Some of the measures included:
Enacting the Selective Training and Service Act in 1940, which required all men aged 21-36 to register for military service.
Investing in military training and increasing the size of the armed forces.
Encouraging factories and businesses to convert their production lines to produce war supplies and equipment.
Implementing rationing programs to conserve resources such as gasoline, food, and rubber for the war effort.
Promoting patriotic messages and propaganda to boost morale and support for the war effort.
These efforts had significant socio-economic implications for the nation. The war led to a significant increase in government spending and a shift in the economy towards war production. This led to a rise in industrial production and employment, which helped to pull the US out of the Great Depression. However, there were also some negative impacts, such as inflation, shortages, and rationing of essential goods, which affected many Americans. Additionally, the war had a profound impact on society, leading to changes in gender roles, racial attitudes, and the social fabric of the nation. Overall, the US government's preparations for World War II had significant implications for the nation, both during the war and in the postwar period.
Explanation:
The constitutional principles of limited government and popular sovereignty apply to
Answer:
Explanation:
The constitutional principles of limited government and popular sovereignty apply to the federal government alone
Which Nazi action is referred to as the Holocaust?
the bombing of major European cities
the arson attack on the German Reichstag
the systematic elimination of European Jews
the signing of a nonaggression pact with Russia
Answer:
the systematic elimination of European Jews
Explanation: