Early attempts to explain various forms of deviant behavior (e.g., crime, delinquency, mental illness) focused on:biological explanations responsibility demonologypsychological explanations.

Under 803(8) public records refer to documents, reports, or data compilations maintained by a government agency or office, including those made by law enforcement, that is kept in the regular course of business.

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence 803(8), public records refer to documents, reports, or data compilations maintained by a government agency or office, including those made by law enforcement, that is kept in the regular course of business. These records are admissible as evidence in court proceedings without requiring the presence of the person who created or prepared them.

Public records can include a wide range of materials, including accident reports, birth and death certificates, marriage licenses, property deeds, and tax records. They can also encompass more specialized documents such as building permits, zoning ordinances, and environmental impact reports. In addition, public records may contain information that is sensitive or confidential, such as criminal records or medical reports. The record must also be kept in the regular course of business and maintained in a manner that ensures its accuracy and reliability.

know more about law enforcement here:

https://brainly.com/question/28173975

#SPJ11

Textualists, such as Justice Scalia, believe in interpreting legal texts, including the Constitution and statutes, based on their plain meaning and the original intent of the authors. Textualists prioritize the language of the text itself over any extrinsic factors, such as legislative history or policy considerations.

In relation to the use of canons or "clear statement" requirements, textualists generally view them as useful tools for interpretation, but only insofar as they help illuminate the plain meaning of the text. Canons are established principles or rules that aid in the consistent interpretation of legal texts. "Clear statement" requirements refer to the idea that certain legal provisions should be explicitly and unambiguously stated in the text to have a specific effect or to change existing law.

Justice Scalia often employed canons of construction in his judicial opinions, but he was selective in their use. He would reject certain canons that he felt were incompatible with a textualist approach, especially if they appeared to prioritize policy considerations over the text's plain meaning. When applying "clear statement" requirements, Justice Scalia emphasized the need for clarity and precision in statutory language to prevent courts from making policy decisions that should be left to the legislature.

In summary, textualists like Justice Scalia consider canons and "clear statement" requirements as helpful interpretative tools, but only to the extent that they align with the primary goal of textualism: to discern the plain meaning of legal texts based on their original intent.

Learn more about Justice here:

https://brainly.com/question/9003956

#SPJ11

Corporations that unintentionally pollute streams and watercourses are generally found guilty of environmental offenses no matter how careful they have been because these offenses are,strict liability offenses.

Strict liability offenses are those in which the defendant can be found guilty even if they had no intention to commit a crime or harm the environment. In cases of pollution of streams and watercourses, it is often difficult to prove intent, and therefore, strict liability is applied.

This means that the corporation can be held responsible for the environmental offense regardless of their level of caution or care taken to prevent the pollution.

This is important because it ensures that corporations are held accountable for their actions and encourages them to take necessary precautions to prevent environmental harm. It also sends a message that protecting the environment is a top priority and that even unintentional harm to the environment will not be tolerated.

For more questions like Liability click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/18484315

#SPJ11

Accounts receivable - money that is owed to your group broken out by financial class and age. Aging report - the classification of accounts by the time elapsed after the date of billing or the due date.

Records of sales - the characterization of records when slipped by after the date of charging or the due date

Maturing report - cash that is owed to your gathering broken out by monetary class (e.g., Confidential Compensation, Government medical care, Blue Safeguard, Business, and so forth) and furthermore by age (e.g., current to 30 days old, 31 to 60 days old, and so on.)

Patient assortments - the demonstration of gathering patient adjusts

Self-pay - the person who is liable for any confidential compensation adjusts

Patient obligation - remaining sum, if any, after protection paid its part.

To learn more about Accounts receivable, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30504927

#SPJ1

According to Rule 804(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, a witness is considered unavailable due to a lack of memory if they are unable to recall the events about which they are being asked to testify.

Here are some additional points that can help clarify the criteria for determining that a witness is unavailable due to a lack of memory:

This inability to remember must be verified by the court, and there should be no evidence that the witness is feigning lack of memory or refusing to answer the question. If a witness is deemed unavailable due to lack of memory, any prior statements made by the witness that are inconsistent with their current testimony may be admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule.

Learn More about Unavailable

https://brainly.com/question/30633268

#SPJ11

The most important factor when a prosecutor considers whether or not to proceed with a prosecution is the strength of the evidence supporting the case. This includes the quality, reliability, and admissibility of the evidence, which helps determine the likelihood of securing a conviction.

There are several factors that a prosecutor may consider when deciding whether or not to proceed with a prosecution, such as the strength of the evidence, the seriousness of the crime, and the likelihood of securing a conviction.

However, the most important factor is typically the strength of the evidence. Prosecutors must ensure that they have sufficient evidence to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt before moving forward with a prosecution.

Without strong evidence, it is unlikely that a conviction can be secured, which could result in a waste of time and resources. Therefore, the strength of the evidence is a crucial factor that prosecutors must carefully consider before deciding whether or not to proceed with a prosecution.

Visit here to learn more about Prosecution:

brainly.com/question/30666972

#SPJ11

True, The Yerkes-Dodson law suggests that there is an optimal level of arousal for peak performance. When arousal levels are too low, motivation and performance may be lacking.

Conversely, when arousal levels are too high, performance may suffer due to stress or anxiety. The relationship between arousal, motivation, and performance is complex and varies depending on the task and individual factors.

In conclusion, the Yerkes-Dodson law is a valuable concept to understand for individuals looking to improve their performance in a variety of domains, from athletics to academics. By understanding how arousal and motivation impact performance, individuals can strive to find the optimal level of arousal to achieve their goals.

This knowledge can help individuals perform better, improve their mental and physical health, and achieve greater success in their personal and professional lives.

To know more about Yerkes-Dodson law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30402294

#SPJ11

Historically, victims occupied a secondary position in the criminal justice process.

While the primary focus was on the offender and the state, victims were often overlooked, with their needs and interests receiving limited attention. This lack of focus on victims was primarily due to the criminal justice system's emphasis on punishment and deterrence, rather than restitution and support for the victims themselves.

Over time, however, the role of victims in the criminal justice process has evolved, and their rights and interests have gained increased recognition. This shift can be attributed to various factors, such as the rise of the victims' rights movement, which advocated for greater involvement of victims in the legal process, and the increasing acknowledgment of the long-term effects of crime on victims.

As a result of these changes, contemporary criminal justice systems now recognize the importance of addressing the needs of victims, such as providing support services, compensation, and opportunities for participation in the legal process. This shift toward a more victim-centered approach has not only led to a greater emphasis on restorative justice but also contributed to the overall effectiveness and legitimacy of the criminal justice system.

Learn more about criminal justice process here: https://brainly.com/question/29525107

#SPJ11

If a citizen is arrested for a crime that they know does not exist, they should remain calm, not resist arrest, and seek legal representation as soon as possible.

It is important to remain calm and not resist arrest, as this can escalate the situation and potentially lead to further charges. Once in custody, the individual should exercise their right to remain silent and ask for an attorney. The attorney can help navigate the legal system and determine the best course of action.

It is also important to document any interactions with law enforcement, including the names and badge numbers of the arresting officers and any witnesses. This can be used as evidence in a potential lawsuit or legal defense. Overall, it is crucial to seek legal representation to protect one's rights and ensure a fair legal process.

For more questions like Crime click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31365862

#SPJ11

A recorded recollection under 803(5) is a hearsay exception that allows a witness to read into evidence a document or memorandum containing a statement made by the witness when the matter was fresh in their memory.

However, they cannot remember the details of the statement sufficiently well to testify fully and accurately without referring to the memorandum.

This exception permits a witness to read into evidence a document or memorandum containing a statement made by the witness when the matter was fresh in their memory, but they cannot remember the details of the statement sufficiently well to testify fully and accurately without referring to the memorandum.

The document must have been made or adopted by the witness at the time when the matter was fresh in their memory and must accurately reflect the witness's knowledge and recollection of the matter. The witness must also lack the present recollection of the matter to be admissible.

For more questions like Recollection click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31563956

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Presently, all states (with the exception of rural counties in Nevada) have chosen to criminalize prostitution.

Presently, all jurisdictions in the United States (with the exception of rural counties in Nevada) have chosen to criminalize prostitution.

This decision reflects a widespread belief that the practice of exchanging sexual services for money or goods poses significant social and public health risks. By criminalizing prostitution, lawmakers aim to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation and abuse, reduce the spread of sexually transmitted infections, and deter criminal activities often associated with the sex trade, such as human trafficking and drug use.

In contrast, rural counties in Nevada have taken a different approach by regulating and taxing prostitution within licensed brothels. This alternative model allows for increased oversight and safety measures, with the goal of mitigating some of the negative consequences associated with the industry.

While the debate over the best way to address prostitution continues, it is important to consider the diverse perspectives and potential outcomes of various policy approaches. Ultimately, the decision to criminalize or regulate prostitution will depend on the specific goals and values of each jurisdiction.

Learn more about jurisdiction here: https://brainly.com/question/26659100

#SPJ11

Various forms of punishments can be traced to the pre-biblical era, such as flogging, exile, and even capital punishment in biblical concept.

The use of punishments as a means of social control and retribution has been present throughout history, with different eras and cultures developing their own methods and justifications for punishment. "Biblicists" are individuals who adhere to the idea of explaining biblical concept using biblical language.

The term "biblicist" is used to describe people who think that one should only express biblical principles using biblical vocabulary. The primary source of religious authority, according to biblicists, is the Bible, and its teachings should be applied literally and without consideration of extraneous factors like tradition or reason. They contend that the Bible should serve as the exclusive source of guidance for Christian belief and practise since it provides all the knowledge required to comprehend God and live a moral life. The term "biblicism" is frequently linked to fundamentalist or conservative Christian traditions that place a high value on strict adherence to biblical teachings and disapprove of more liberal or progressive readings of the Bible.

Learn more about biblical concept here

https://brainly.com/question/31232519

#SPJ11

Research suggests that alcohol policy interventions resulted in only modest reductions in the consumption of alcohol, despite significant increases in the costs of alcohol resulting from the policy.

A low-intensity psychological intervention known as a "brief intervention" is used to help persons with alcohol related problems examine their drinking patterns, identify goals for changing those behaviours, and create a strategy to achieve those goals.

In basic care settings, brief intervention strategies are frequently employed to diagnose or treat alcohol misuse or dependence. A wide spectrum of persons who are having mild to moderate alcohol problems can benefit from brief interventions.

These interventions seek to help people examine and, if required, change their drinking habits in a positive and beneficial way. As a result, it can be said that the stated statement is accurate.

Learn more about alcohol here

https://brainly.com/question/31061878

#SPJ11

In the case of Muscarello, the defendant argued that the term "carry" in a federal firearms statute should be narrowly interpreted to only apply to carrying a firearm on one's person. However, the Court rejected this definition and held that "carry" could also include transporting a firearm in a vehicle.

The Court reasoned that the ordinary meaning of "carry" was broad enough to include both on-person carrying and vehicle transport. Additionally, the legislative history and purpose of the statute supported a broad interpretation of "carry."

Regarding the rule of lenity, the Court held that it did not apply in this case. The rule of lenity is a principle of statutory interpretation that requires courts to resolve ambiguities in criminal statutes in favor of the defendant. However, the Court explained that the rule of lenity only applies when there is a genuine ambiguity in the statute that cannot be resolved by other means, such as the ordinary meaning of the words or the legislative history. Here, the Court found that the term "carry" was not genuinely ambiguous and that a broad interpretation was consistent with the statutory text and purpose.

Therefore, the Court held that the defendant's proposed narrow interpretation of "carry" was rejected and that he could be convicted under the federal firearms statute for transporting a firearm in his vehicle.

Learn more about defendant here:

https://brainly.com/question/30736002

#SPJ11

The situation depicted in the map had the most in common: African American migration patterns during and after the First World War. The correct option is D.

This is because the other options, such as A) Patterns of residential segregation in the antebellum South, B) Sectional conflict between the North and the South during the mid-nineteenth century, and C) Federal attempts to guarantee rights for formerly enslaved people during Reconstruction, do not closely align with the map's depiction.

The African American migration patterns during and after the First World War, also known as the Great Migration, involved a large-scale movement of Black Americans from the rural South to urban areas in the North and West.

This migration led to significant demographic shifts and had lasting impacts on economic, social, and political aspects of American society.

To know more about World War, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1449762#

#SPJ11

Complete question:

The situation depicted in the map had the most in common with which of the following earlier processes?

A Patterns of residential segregation in the antebellum South

B Sectional conflict between the North and the South during the mid-nineteenth century

C Federal attempts to guarantee rights for formerly enslaved people during Reconstruction

D African American migration patterns during and after the First World War

The given statement, the direct write-off method is used for tax purposes but is generally not permitted for financial reporting is True.

The direct write-off method is used for tax purposes but is generally not permitted for financial reporting. This method is used when a debt is deemed to be uncollectible. Under the direct write-off method, the creditor will write off the debt when it has been determined that the debt cannot be collected.

This method is not permitted for financial reporting purposes because it does not follow the matching principle. The matching principle requires that revenues and expenses should be recorded in the same period in which they are incurred.

know more about revenues here

https://brainly.com/question/3508823#

#SPJ11

When judges use previous judicial rulings to guide their decisions, they are employing the doctrine of "stare decisis". This doctrine promotes consistency and predictability in the legal system by ensuring that judges rely on established principles and precedents when making decisions.

When judges use previous judicial rulings to guide their decisions, they are employing the doctrine of stare decisis. Stare decisis is a Latin term that means "to stand by things decided." It is a legal principle that requires judges to follow the decisions of previous courts in similar cases.

This principle is based on the idea that predictability and consistency in judicial decisions are essential for the stability of the legal system.

The doctrine of stare decisis is important because it promotes fairness and equality in the law. It ensures that similar cases are treated in the same way, and it prevents judges from making arbitrary or capricious decisions.

However, stare decisis is not an absolute rule, and judges can depart from precedent in certain circumstances. For example, if a previous decision was clearly wrong or if new facts or legal developments have emerged, a judge may decide to overrule or distinguish a previous case.

It helps maintain stability and fairness in the judicial process, and allows individuals and organizations to have a clearer understanding of the law.

In summary, the doctrine of stare decisis is a fundamental principle of the common law system. It reflects the idea that judges should base their decisions on the decisions of previous courts, while also allowing for flexibility and adaptability in the law.

Visit here to learn more about Doctrine of Stare Decisis:

brainly.com/question/21085371

#SPJ11

Answer:

Electoral malpractice is a serious issue that can undermine the legitimacy of elections and damage public trust in the democratic process. Here are some steps to prevent electoral malpractice:

1. Enforce strict laws: The government should enforce strict laws that prohibit any kind of malpractice during elections, and provide for severe punishment for those who violate them. This can act as a deterrent to people who may be considering such activities.

2. Ensure transparency: Elections should be transparent, and all the procedures and processes should be open to public scrutiny. This can help to prevent any kind of malpractice or fraud.

3. Educate voters: Voters should be educated about their rights and the importance of participating in free and fair elections. They should be aware of the ways in which their votes can be compromised, and how to report any suspicious activity.

4. Use technology: Technology can be used to prevent electoral malpractice, for example, by using biometric verification of voters, electronic voting machines, and online voter registration.

5. Provide adequate security: Adequate security measures should be put in place to ensure the safety of voters, polling stations, and election officials. This can help to prevent any kind of intimidation or violence during the elections.

6. Encourage civil society participation: Civil society organizations, such as election monitoring groups and non-governmental organizations, can play an important role in preventing electoral malpractice by observing the election process and reporting any suspicious activity.

7. Promote political accountability: Political leaders and parties should be held accountable for any malpractice that takes place during the elections. This can be done through legal action, public censure, or other means of accountability.

By implementing these steps, electoral malpractice can be prevented, and the legitimacy of elections can be maintained, thus promoting democracy and public trust in the electoral process.

A statement of personal or family history can be admissible under Rule 804(b)(4) if it concerns the declarant's own birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of personal or family history.

Rule 804(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows the admission of hearsay statements that concern the declarant's own personal or family history, provided that the statement is made by a family member or other knowledgeable source, and is trustworthy.

The statement must be relevant to a fact of consequence in the case and must be more probative than any other evidence that could be obtained through reasonable efforts.

For example, a statement from a grandparent about the identity of a child's biological parent may be admissible under this rule. However, the statement must not be offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but only to establish the existence of the fact.

For more questions like Family history click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/17092502

#SPJ11

Taxpayers who use a home for both personal and rental use generally must allocate expenses associated with the home to the personal use and the rental use is true because taxpayers can only deduct the portion of the expenses related to the rental activity as a rental expense

Expenses related to personal use cannot be deducted. The allocation of expenses is usually based on the amount of time the property is used for personal and rental purposes.

For example, if a taxpayer uses their home as a vacation rental for 50% of the year and as their primary residence for the other 50%, then 50% of the expenses associated with the home can be deducted as rental expenses, while the other 50% of the expenses must be allocated to personal use and cannot be deducted.

Expenses that can be allocated between personal and rental use include mortgage interest, property taxes, utilities, repairs, and maintenance.

However, some expenses such as depreciation, which is the gradual decrease in the value of the property over time, can only be deducted as a rental expense.

It is important for taxpayers to keep accurate records of their expenses and the amount of time their property is used for personal and rental purposes. Failing to properly allocate expenses can result in penalties or additional taxes owed to the IRS.

Taxpayers should consult with a tax professional to ensure they are accurately allocating their expenses and taking advantage of all available deductions.

For more question on "Taxpayers" :

https://brainly.com/question/30544748

#SPJ11

The only form of "Theft" law during the early formation of the common law was called "larceny."

Larceny was the only form of theft law during the early common law period, which lasted from the Middle Ages until the 19th century. It was a narrow offense that only covered the taking of someone else's property with the intent to permanently deprive them of it.

The offense required that the property be taken from the possession of another person without their consent and with the intent to steal it. The early common law did not have a general offense of theft that covered a broad range of conduct, as we have today.

Instead, other offenses, such as embezzlement and fraud, were treated separately. It wasn't until the 20th century that most jurisdictions expanded their theft laws to include a wider range of conduct beyond just larceny.

For more questions like Law click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/6107503

#SPJ11

Governing prisons is a unique and complex task that distinguishes it from administering other public institutions. Four key factors that make prison management different are Security, Rehabilitation, Involuntary nature, and Legal and ethical considerations.

1. Security: Prisons require strict security measures to prevent inmates from escaping and maintain order within the facility. This includes constant surveillance, controlled movement, and maintaining a secure perimeter. This level of security is not typically required in other public institutions.

2. Rehabilitation: Prisons aim to rehabilitate offenders by addressing the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior. This involves offering educational and vocational programs, counseling, and therapy to help inmates reintegrate into society upon release. Other public institutions do not typically have such direct responsibility for the personal development of their clientele.

3. Involuntary nature: Unlike other public institutions where individuals usually participate voluntarily, inmates in prisons are there against their will. This creates a challenging dynamic between the inmates and the prison staff, requiring careful management to maintain control and minimize the risk of unrest.

4. Legal and ethical considerations: Prisons must adhere to strict legal guidelines and uphold ethical standards to protect the rights and well-being of incarcerated individuals. This includes providing adequate living conditions,  and medical care, and ensuring fair treatment. Such concerns may be less prominent or different in other public institutions.

In summary, governing prisons is a complex task that involves managing security, promoting rehabilitation, navigating involuntary relationships, and adhering to legal and ethical standards. These factors set prison management apart from the administration of other public institutions.

Know more about Rehabilitation here:

https://brainly.com/question/19874089

#SPJ11

John Locke believed that humans' natural rights included several fundamental freedoms, including the right to life, liberty, and property.

Here are some additional points for further clarification:

However, he did not include the right to equality among these natural rights.

Learn More About Humans natural

https://brainly.com/question/24064575

#SPJ11

The president formally nominates judges for federal district courts. After nomination, the candidate must first be considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

This committee is responsible for evaluating the candidate's qualifications, including their legal knowledge and experience, as well as their personal character. The committee also interviews the nominee and reviews their record in order to make an informed recommendation to the Senate.

If the committee approves the nomination, the candidate is then voted on by the full Senate, which has the power to approve or reject the candidate. The Senate's decision is the final step in the process, and it is not uncommon for the Senate to reject a president's nominee.

know more about president here

https://brainly.com/question/497462#

#SPJ11

The 1967 President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson, was a landmark effort to comprehensively study and address issues related to crime and the criminal justice system in the United States.

The Commission was tasked with identifying the underlying causes of crime, evaluating the effectiveness of law enforcement and criminal justice institutions, and recommending policies and practices to improve public safety and the administration of justice.

The Commission consisted of 19 members, including legal scholars, law enforcement professionals, and social scientists. After conducting extensive research, the Commission released a report, "The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society," which provided a thorough analysis of the state of crime and criminal justice in the US, and made more than 200 recommendations to reduce crime and improve the effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

Key recommendations from the report included the establishment of a National Crime Commission, increased coordination among federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, and the creation of programs aimed at reducing recidivism through education and vocational training for incarcerated individuals. The report also emphasized the importance of community involvement in crime prevention and the need for improved police-community relations.

The 1967 President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice played a significant role in shaping modern criminal justice policy in the United States, and many of its recommendations have been implemented or adapted over the years, leading to improvements in law enforcement practices and the administration of justice.

Know more about criminal justice system here:

https://brainly.com/question/7207817

#SPJ11

In a winner-take-all system, the candidate with the most votes in a single-member district wins the election and represents the district, without needing a run-off election.

The features of the winner-take-all electoral system in the United States, and you would like me to identify which of the provided options does not apply to this system.

The United States utilizes a winner-take-all electoral system wherein a candidate:

1. Is the sole representative of a single-member district.

2. Wins the election for the district by receiving the most votes.

3. Does not typically face a run-off election.

However, the option that does not apply to the winner-take-all electoral system is:

- Received a proportion of the legislative seats based on his party's votes earned in the election.

In a winner-take-all system, the candidate with the most votes in a single-member district wins the election and represents the district, without needing a run-off election.

The system does not allocate legislative seats proportionally based on the party's votes earned in the election. This feature is more characteristic of a proportional representation electoral system, which is not utilized in the United States for most elections.

To know more about winner-take-all, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29705963#

#SPJ11

Answer:  If an affirmative defense is offered at trial, the party who has the responsibility for "going forward" and introducing evidence concerning the validity of the defense is the defendant

Another term for Due Process which has been used several times in class is Procedural Fairness.

Procedural Fairness refers to the legal principle ensuring that individuals are given a fair and unbiased treatment in the decision-making process, particularly when their rights, property, or liberty are at stake. It guarantees that everyone has an equal opportunity to present their case and have it considered under the same standards, with transparency and impartiality.

In essence, Procedural Fairness emphasizes the importance of following proper procedures in legal proceedings, administrative actions, or any other decision-making process that can impact a person's life. This concept is deeply rooted in the fundamental principles of justice and is often enshrined in legal systems worldwide, including the United States Constitution, through the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

By adhering to the principles of Procedural Fairness, the legal system ensures that everyone receives equal treatment and protection under the law. It helps maintain public trust in the justice system, as it promotes transparency, consistency, and accountability in decision-making processes. In summary, the term "Procedural Fairness" is an essential concept in understanding the principles of Due Process and its significance in promoting justice and equality for all.

Learn more about Due Process here: https://brainly.com/question/29392247

#SPJ11

The federal act that sought to have gun dealers run background checks on prospective buyers is called the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, also known as the Brady Law.

Brady Law was signed into effect in 1993 and requires gun dealers to conduct background checks on individuals purchasing firearms. The law also established a waiting period for handgun purchases and created a national instant criminal background check system.

Up until the NICS system was put into place in 1998, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, also known as the Brady Act or the Brady Bill, was a law passed by the US Congress that required federal background checks on anyone buying a firearm in the country. It also imposed a five-day waiting period before purchases could be made.

Learn more about Brady Law here

https://brainly.com/question/29213856

#SPJ11

An excited utterance, as defined under Rule 803(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, is a statement that pertains to a startling event or condition made while the declarant is in legal proceedings, it is an exception to the hearsay rule, allowing for the admissibility of such statements as evidence, even if the declarant is unavailable to testify in court.

The rationale behind this exception is that the emotional impact of a startling event or condition is likely to produce spontaneous and truthful statements, rather than calculated and potentially dishonest ones. The key factors to consider when determining if a statement qualifies as an excited utterance include the proximity in time to the event or condition, the level of stress or excitement experienced by the declarant, and the nature of the statement itself.

For a statement to be admissible under the excited utterance exception, it must meet the following criteria: (1) a startling event or condition must have occurred, (2) the declarant must have been under the stress or excitement caused by the event or condition at the time of making the statement, and (3) the statement must relate to the event or condition.

In summary, an excited utterance under Rule 803(2) is a statement made during or shortly after a startling event or condition, while the declarant is still under the emotional influence of that event. Such statements are considered more reliable and are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings due to their spontaneous nature.

Know more about Federal Rules of Evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/28592086

#SPJ11