Find the equation of the line.
Use exact numbers.

Answer:

Pretty sure the answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

The measure of the diagonal of given rectangular bulletin board is 6x+0.3 meters.

Given that, MN=4x-0.1 meters and NK=2x+0.4 meters.

Here, diagonal = MK=MN+NK

= 4x-0.1+2x+0.4

= 6x+0.3

Therefore, the measure of the diagonal of given rectangular bulletin board is 6x+0.3 meters.

Learn more about a rectangle here:

brainly.com/question/10046743.

#SPJ1

No, there are x values which map to more than 1 y-value.

Given that Matthew examines the relation as shown in the below.

{(4, -11), (3,1), (0,1), (2,6), (3, -1)}

We need to check whether the relation is a function or not,

So, we know that,

A relation can map inputs to multiple outputs. It is a function when it maps each input to exactly one output. The set of all functions is a subset of the set of all relations.

If any x values are repeated, and the corresponding y values are different, then we have a relation and not a function.

Here we can see that the y values are repeated, so it is not a function.

Learn more about functions click;

https://brainly.com/question/31062578

#SPJ1

Answer:

Number of TAILS outcomes = 100 - 58 = 42

Experimental probability of TAILS = Number of TAILS outcomes / Total number of outcomes = 42/100 = 0.42

The theoretical probability of getting HEADS or TAILS is 0.5 each, assuming the penny is fair.

The experimental probability of HEADS is 58/100 = 0.58, which is close to the theoretical probability of 0.5. This suggests that Aaron's experiment is consistent with the theoretical probability. Similarly, the experimental probability of TAILS is 0.42, which is also close to the theoretical probability of 0.5. This further supports the idea that the penny is fair.

Siama and Wills used different methods to find the differences between (5x + 6x) and (2x - 1) but they both arrived at the same answer.

I prefer Wills method because it is easier and less complicated.

Wills method:

(5x + 6x) - (2x - 1)

Subtract both 2x and -1

5x + 6x - 2x - - 1

5x + 4x + 1

In conclusion, Wills method is preferred when both methods are compared.

Read more on difference of numbers:

https://brainly.com/question/17301989

#SPJ1

The value of x from given parallel lines is 2.

In the given figure, three lines are parallel and two lines are passing through.

When three or more parallel lines are cut by two transversals, the line segments formed are proportional.

That is, 2x/x = (x+4)/(4x-5)

2/1 = (x+4)/(4x-5)

2(4x-5)=1(x+4)

8x-10=x+4

8x-x=4+10

7x=14

x=2

Therefore, the value of x from given parallel lines is 2.

To learn more about parallel lines visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16701300.

#SPJ1

The value of variables a and b are,

a = - 4,

b = - 2

WE have to given that;

Function is,

⇒ f (x) = x³ - 12x² + 48x - 62

Now, We can simplify for change the function in the form of

f (x) = (x + a)³ + b as;

⇒ f (x) = x³ - 12x² + 48x - 62

⇒ f (x) = x³ - 12x² + 48x - 62 - 2 + 2

⇒ f (x) = (x - 4)³ + 2

Hence, We get;

By comparing we get;

a = - 4,

b = - 2

Thus, The value of variables a and b are,

a = - 4,

b = - 2

Learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

The number of additional copies you could ship by ordering 128 instead of 127 copies is 0 copies.

We have,

To determine the number of additional copies you could ship if you ordered 128 copies instead of 127 copies, we need to compare the costs of ordering each quantity using the given function C(n).

For n = 127:

C(127) = $6.91 x 127 = $878.57

For n = 128:

C(128) = $5.16 x 128 = $660.48

By subtracting the cost of ordering 127 copies from the cost of ordering 128 copies, we can determine the cost difference:

Cost difference = C(128) - C(127)

= $660.48 - $878.57

= -$218.09

Since the cost difference is negative, it means that ordering 128 copies is cheaper than ordering 127 copies.

However, the question asks for the number of additional copies, so we need to consider the whole number of copies.

Rounding down to the nearest whole copy, the number of additional copies you could ship by ordering 128 instead of 127 copies is 0 copies.

Thus,

The number of additional copies you could ship by ordering 128 instead of 127 copies is 0 copies.

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ1

The difference between 1/5 and 2/10 is that they are different representations of the same value.

The ratio is a comparison of two quantities while proportional reasoning involves finding an equivalent ratio.

"Fifth" can refer to the ordinal number of a position or the unit fraction 1/5.

The diagram can be used to illustrate fraction concepts.

1/5 is simple, but 2/10 can be reduced to 1/5 by dividing both numbers by 2. They are both 0.2 or 20%. 1/5 and 2/10 are different fractions with different purposes.

Use 1/5 for 5 parts and 1/5 (simplified from 2/10) for 10 parts. 1/5 and 2/10 = 0.2, ratio reasoning emphasizes ratios between quantities. A 2:3 boys-to-girls ratio compares the constant ratio between changing quantities.

Proportional reasoning maintains constant ratios between quantities, while ratio reasoning uses fractions or ratios to compare relationships. For instance, if distance doubles, so does speed.

Step 3/5: "Fifth" is the ordinal number for the object five places away in a sequence. See diagram. The fifth circle is 1/5 of a whole in unit fraction sequence. Imagine a rectangle divided into five equal parts, each shaded to show 1/5. Shaded part = 1/5 of whole.

To show 25/7 with area model, make 7x25 rectangle and split into 7 equal parts. 25/7 per part.

1.2 The set model:

To represent 25/7, divide 25 objects into 7 equal sets, resulting in 3 objects per set with 1 left over. This represents the fraction of 25/7.

1.3 The length model:

To show 25/7 on a length model, draw a line of 25 units and divide it into seven equal parts. Each part represents 1/7 or 25/7.

Step 5/5

Let's assume the width of the rectangular piece of paper as x cm. Then the length of the paper would be:

Now we know that the perimeter of the rectangle is given by the formula:

So, for this rectangle:

54 = 2(5x + x)

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

54 = 2(6x)

27 = 6x

x = 4.5 cm

Therefore, the width of the paper is 4.5 cm and the length is 5 times the width which is 22.5 cm.

The difference between 1/5 and 2/10 is that they are different representations of the same value.

The ratio is a comparison of two quantities while proportional reasoning involves finding an equivalent ratio.

"Fifth" can refer to the ordinal number of a position or the unit fraction 1/5.

The diagram can be used to illustrate fraction concepts.

Read more about ratios here:

https://brainly.com/question/13513438

#SPJ1

Answer:

2ab(b + 4 - 3a)

Step-by-step explanation:

a^2b + 2ab^2 + 8ab - 7a^2b

= 2ab^2 + 8ab + a^2b - 7a^2b

= 2ab^2 + 8ab - 6a^2b

= 2(ab^2 + 4ab - 3a^2b)

= 2a(b^2 + 4b - 3ab)

= 2ab(b + 4 - 3a)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know the postulate used to declare the triangles similar, and the corresponding similarity statement.

The side length ratios of the larger triangle are ...

  45 : 63 : 90 = 5 : 7 : 10 . . . . . divide by 9

For the smaller triangle, they are ...

  25 : 35 : 50 = 5 : 7 : 10 . . . . . divide by 5

The ratios of the three side lengths are the same, so the triangles are similar by the SSS postulate.

One triangle is designated as ∆KLM. In terms of (reduced) ratio units, the sides in order are ...

  KL = 10, LM = 7, MK = 5

The corresponding sides in the smaller triangle are ...

  UT = 10, TS = 7, SU = 5

This means the similarity statement must be written as ...

  ∆KLM ~ ∆UTS . . . . . . matches the last choice

__

Additional comment

It is generally helpful to list the sides in some recognizable order (here, longest to shortest) so that the correspondence is clear.

<95141404393>

The solutions are,

a) the statistical procedure you should use to answer this question is  normal approximation.

b) p = 0.1034 is the probability of correctly predicting exactly 20 cards in a series of 100 trials.

c) 0.1238 is the probability of correctly predicting more than 16 cards in a series of 64 trials.

Here, we have,

a)

X - the number of success

following the binomial distribution with p = 1/5

or when np > 5 ,nq > 5

we can use normal approximation

mean = np

sd =sqrt(npq)

b)

here n = 100

P(X = k) = 100Ck * (1/5)^k *(1-1/5)^(100-k)

P(X = 20) = 100C20 (1/5)^20* (4/5)^80

by normal approximation

μ = 20 and σ = 4 For X = 20,

P(19.5 < X< 20.5)

P ( −0.13<Z<0.13 )=0.1034

and p = 0.1034.

c)

P(X > 16)

mean = np = 64/5 = 12.8

sd = sqrt(npq) = sqrt(12.8*.8)= 3.2

P(X > 16)

=P(Z > (16.5 - 12.8)/3.2)

= P(Z> 1.1562)

= 0.1238

To learn more on probability click:

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ1

This question is incomplete, here is the complete question:

A test developed to measure ESP involves using Zener cards. Each card shows one of five equally likely symbols (square, circle, star, cross, wavy lines) and the person being tested has to predict the shape on each card before it is selected. Answer questions a-c below to find each of the probabilities requested for a person who has no ESP and is just guessing. a. Determine the statistical procedure you should use to answer this question and explain why. b. What is the probability of correctly predicting exactly 20 cards in a series of 100 trials? c. What is the probability of correctly predicting more than 16 cards in a series of 64 trials?

Answer:

certain

Step-by-step explanation:

The question says "strawberry OR cherry chew", which means if you have only 17 strawberry and 3 cherry chews, the answer is certain, as you will always pull out one of those options.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

3√5/√11 = 2.02

3√55/11 = 2.02

so,

3√5/√11 = 3√55/11

Answer:

x = 93

Step-by-step explanation:

the adjacent angle to x ( on the right side) and 48° are alternate angles and are congruent.

the 3 angles lying on line m sum to 180° , that is

39 + x + 48 = 180

x + 87 = 180 ( subtract 87 from both sides )

x = 93

The words that has to be kept in the blank space to prove the similarity are (a, 0), (0, a) and scale factor.

Here we have to choose the words to finish the explanation of how to plan a coordinate proof to show that all isosceles right triangles are similar.

Isosceles right triangles are the right triangles which has the two legs of same length.

For that first consider an isosceles right triangle with legs having length "a".

Then if we place the triangle with one of the vertices at origin, then since the length of the legs is "a", the other vertices will be at (a, 0) and (0, a).

If we place another triangle similarly with length of legs "b", then we have to prove that they are similar.

For them to be similar, there must exist a scale factor that maps one triangle on to the other.

Hence the spaces are (a, 0), (0, a) and scale factor.

Learn more about Similarity here :

https://brainly.com/question/29731302

#SPJ1

Answer: $275

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]log_{4}2x = 5 \\2x = 4^5\\2x = 2^{10}\\x = \frac{2^{10}}{2}\\ x = 2^9\\x = 512[/tex]

Mistake is in step - 3 .

Given statement solution:- The fewer people in the 18-25 year age group result is negative, it indicates that the 18-25 year age group has more people with some form of technology career than all other age groups combined. None of the options provided (a, b, c, d) are correct.

To find the number of fewer people in the 18-25 year age group with some form of technology career compared to all other age groups combined, we need to sum up the technology career numbers for all age groups except the 18-25 year age group and then subtract it from the number for the 18-25 year age group.

Sum of technology career numbers for age groups other than 18-25 years:

(41+ yrs) + (36-40 yrs) + (26-35 yrs) = 24312 + 3.215 + 2.709 = 24318.924

Number of fewer people in the 18-25 year age group compared to all other age groups combined:

1673 - 24318.924 = -22645.924

Since the fewer people in the 18-25 year age group result  is negative, it indicates that the 18-25 year age group has more people with some form of technology career than all other age groups combined. Therefore, none of the options provided (a, b, c, d) are correct.

For such more questions on Negative Difference in Careers

https://brainly.com/question/16794903

#SPJ11

The area of the escribed circle is: 201.06 cm²

The formula for the area of a circle is:

A = πr²

where:

A is area

r is radius

From the given diagram, we see that, the side length of the square is 16 cm. Now, we also see that the side length of the square serves as the diameter of the circle and as such:

Radius of circle: r = 16/2 = 8 cm

Thus:

A = π(8²)

A = 201.06 cm²

Read more about Area of Circle at: https://brainly.com/question/14068861

#SPJ1

The expected value of the winnings from the game is $3.24.

To find the expected value of the winnings, we multiply each possible payout by its corresponding probability and sum them up.

Expected Value = (2 x 0.64) + (4 x 0.18) + (6 x 0.12) + (8 x 0.04) + (10 x 0.02)

Expected Value = 1.28 + 0.72 + 0.72 + 0.32 + 0.20

Expected Value = 3.24

Therefore, the expected value of the winnings from the game is $3.24.

Learn more about expected value here:

https://brainly.com/question/31753821

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:express the 15% as a fraction divided by 100.Multiply the result by $9000.

The result is $ 1350

Subtract the result from new price of the car.$9000-$1350

=$7650

Answer: the present age of son is 15 years, and the present age of father is 45 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the age of son be 'x' and that of his father be 'y'.

So according to the question, the 1st equation that can be formed will be:

y = 3(x) ->(1)

[as father's age is 3 times the age of son]

Now after 5 years:

Age of son = (x+5)

Age of father = (y+5)

So according to the question, the 2nd equation that can be formed will be:

(y+5) = 2.5×(x+5) ->(2)

[as father is now two and half times old as his son]

Substituting the value of equation (1) in (2), we get:

(3x+5) = 2.5×(x+5)

=> 3x + 5 = 2.5x + 12.5

=> 3x - 2.5x = 12.5 - 5

=> 0.5x = 7.5

=> x = 7.5/0.5 = 15

Thus, the present age of son is 15 years.

Note : we can calculate the age of father by putting the value of x in equation (1) or (2):

y = 3(x) = 3 × 15 = 45 (putting x in equation 1)

Thus, the present age of father is 45 years.

Answer:

begin equation begin cases x = 1y = 5 end cases end equation. Rearrange like terms to the same side of the equation

Step-by-step explanation:

begin equation begin cases x = 1y = 5 end cases end equation. Rearrange like terms to the same side of the equation

The height d as shown in the right angled triangle is 4.95.

Height is the vertical distance between two points.

To calculate the height d as shown in the right angled triangle, we use the formula below

Formula:

From the diagram in the question,

Given:

Substitute these values into equation 1

Learn more about height here: https://brainly.com/question/23144757

#SPJ1

Answer: -5/4

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum possible volume for a piece of carry-on luggage is given as follows:

2772 cubic inches.

The volume of a rectangular prism, with dimensions length, width and height, is given by the multiplication of these dimensions, according to the equation presented as follows:

Volume = length x width x height.

The dimensions for this problem are given as follows:

22 inches, 14 inches and 9 inches.

Hence the volume is given as follows:

22 x 14 x 9 = 2772 cubic inches.

More can be learned about the volume of a rectangular prism at brainly.com/question/22070273

#SPJ1

The Probability of Boris' character casting a spell is 8/15, based on the given odds in favor of 8/7.

The probability of Boris' character casting a spell, we can use the odds in favor of casting a spell. The odds in favor are given as 8/7.

Odds in favor of an event are calculated as the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes to the number of unfavorable outcomes. In this case, the favorable outcomes are the instances where Boris' character casts a spell, and the unfavorable outcomes are the instances where his character does not cast a spell.

Let's represent the probability of casting a spell as P(casting spell). We can use the formula for odds in favor to find the probability:

Odds in favor = Favorable outcomes / Unfavorable outcomes

8/7 = Favorable outcomes / Unfavorable outcomes

To solve for the probability, we need to convert the odds into a fraction. We can do this by considering the odds as a ratio of favorable outcomes to the total number of outcomes.

The odds can be written as:

8/(8+7) = Favorable outcomes / (Favorable outcomes + Unfavorable outcomes)

8/(8+7) = Favorable outcomes / Total outcomes

8/15 = Favorable outcomes / Total outcomes

Since the total outcomes represent all possible outcomes, the denominator represents the total number of outcomes, which includes both the favorable and unfavorable outcomes.

Therefore, the probability of Boris' character casting a spell is 8/15.

In summary, the probability of Boris' character casting a spell is 8/15, based on the given odds in favor of 8/7.

To know more about Probability .

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ8

The correct solution is,

D. Mean = 50.4,

Variance = 27.2,

Standard deviation = 5.2.

Now, Formula for the mean, variance, and standard deviation of the given values,

Mean (μ) = (Σx) / n

Variance (σ) = (Σ(x-μ)) / n

Standard deviation (σ) = sqrt(σ)

where: Σx = sum of the values

Σ(x-μ)² = sum of the squared differences between each value and the mean

n = number of values

Substituting the given values into these formulas, we get:

Mean (μ) = (50 + 46 + 53 + 51 + 52) / 5

Mean (μ) ≈ 50.4

Variance (σ) = [(14 - 50.4)² + (50 - 50.4)² + (-0.4 - 50.4)² + ... + (2.6 - 50.4)] / 13

Variance (σ) ≈ 27.2

Standard deviation (σ) = √(27.2)

Standard deviation (σ) ≈ 5.2

Therefore, the correct answer is,

D. Mean = 50.4,

Variance = 27.2,

Standard deviation = 5.2.

Learn more about the standard deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ1