Find the missing angle measurements. 60° 64 45° 49° 53 56 2 ? 649 71°​

Answer:

There's going to be 3 thirds in one whole sandwich. Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{27^{1/3b}}{9^{1/2a}}[/tex]

We know that 27^(2/3) = 9. So:

= [tex]\frac{27^{1/3b}}{27^{1/3a}}[/tex]

note: 9^(1/2a) = 9^((2/3)(1/2)(a)) = 27^(1/3a)

[tex]= 27^{1/3b-1/3a}=27^{1/3(b-a)} = 27^{1/3(2))} = 9[/tex]

9 is the answer

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a - b = 2

Answer: 16 vegetables

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7 carrots 9 potatoes and 16 all together

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The one with 17

Step-by-step explanation:

Heads/tails=1/2 or 50%

20/36=56%

17/36=47%

20/36=64%

47% is closer to 50%

Answer:

D = 5 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

1 inch = 1 meter                      

5 inch = 5 meter

Whatever you do to one side you do the same to the other.

Answer:

its A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

04:25 is the earliest because it is 4:25 am using 24 hour clock then, 4:30 am, 10:30a.m, 16:05 because 16:05 is the same as 4:05 pm , 4:15 pm, then 22:15 because in 24 hour clock is means 10:15 pm and the latest is 10:45pm

Answer:

Sin A = 3/5

Cos A = 4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

To find trigonometric ratio, recall SOHCAHTOA.

Thus:

Reference angle = <A

Opposite side to <A = 6

Adjacent side = 8

Hypotenuse = AB = √(8² + 6²) = 10 (pythagorean theorem)

Therefore,

✔️Sin A = Opp/Hyp

Sin A = 6/10 = 3/5

✔️Cos A = Adj/Hyp

Cos A = 8/10 = 4/5

Answer:

36.72

Step-by-step explanation:

Take 60% of 61.20. That is the markup.

60% * 61.20 = 60/100 * 61.2 = 3672/100 = 36.72

The markup is 36.72

Answer:

B

the middle one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

54

dcutvihvihvtuutcigciyvihvihvo

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: Lucy is correct because all of the squares are filled, and therefore instead of 1 square filled, 8 are, this is why lucy is correct :)

Answer:

Lucy is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see that the ENTIRE model is shaded ( all eight squares).

So Lucy is correct since she stated that 8 out of 8 (8/8) squares are shaded.

8/8 = 1, so whole.

1/8 would mean that only one out of eight squares is shaded, so Tim is NOT coorrect.

Answer:

Option D (States.......distribution) is the appropriate choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

The superposition principle says that perhaps the sample distribution better reflects the regular distribution.

The latter choices should not affect the situation involved. The reaction, then, is the right one.

Answer:

-0.85, 0.09, 3/20, 0.3, 2/5, 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Turn all the fractions into decimals

2/5 -> .4

3/4 -> .75

3/20 -> .15

Then order them

-.85, 0.09, 0.15, 0.3, 0.4, 0.75

Answer:

29.71

Step-by-step explanation:

Continuous Compounding Formula =  P x e^(r x t)

= 181.25 x e^(0.29710000000000003 x 7) = 1450.37

Answer:

i justr f arted really loud LOL

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the choice below, with slope= app. 1.33!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Range= (0,∞) and (-∞,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

Theres no real process to finding this out you just look at what type of function you have, your graph and your asymptote. We can see that the parts above the asymptote go up and towards ∞ and the part below goes down to -∞ but they can not cross 0

Answer:

(-infinity, -32/81] U (0, positive infintiy).

( use the sideways 8 symbol for infinity).

Step-by-step explanation:

The range is all possible y values in a function.

We can find the inverse of the function to find the range.

[tex]y = \frac{8}{ {x}^{2} - 7x - 8 } [/tex]

Replace x with y

[tex]x = \frac{8}{ {y}^{2} - 7y - 8 } [/tex]

Write the LCD as two binomial,

[tex]x = \frac{8}{(y + 1)(y - 8)} [/tex]

Multiply both sides by both binomial

[tex]x(y + 1)(y - 8) = 8[/tex]

[tex](xy + x)(y - 8) = 8[/tex]

[tex]x {y}^{2} - 8yx + xy - 8x = 8[/tex]

[tex]xy {}^{2} - 8yx + xy = 8 + 8x[/tex]

[tex]y( {x}^{2} - 8x + x) = 8 + 8x[/tex]

[tex] \frac{8 + 8x}{ {x}^{2} - 7x } [/tex]

[tex] {x}^{2} - 7x = 0[/tex]

[tex] {x}^{2} - 7x + 12.25 = 12.25[/tex]

[tex](x - 3.5) {}^{2} = 12.25[/tex]

[tex](x - 3.5) = 3.5[/tex]

[tex]x = 3.5[/tex]

Plug that in to the function to find it range.

We get approximately

[tex] - \frac{35}{81} [/tex]

So this means a point on our function must include -35/81.

The vertical asymptote is 0 so our y cannot be zero but it goes infinitely up so our range is

(-infinity, -32/81]U (0, positive infintiy).

( use the sideways 8 symbol for infinity).

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

59:2,2=26,81

15*26,81:250=1,6086

Answer:

9.42 in.²

Step-by-step explanation:

12 × 25% = 3

12 + 3 = 15

2πr

2 × 6 × 3.14 = 37.68 in.²

2 × 7.5 × 3.14 = 47.1 in.²

47.1 in.² - 37.68 in.²

9.42 in.²

The area of the second circle larger than the area of the first circle will be 63.585 square inches.

It is the close curve of an equidistant point drawn from the center. The radius of a circle is the distance between the center and the circumference.

Let r be the diameter of the circle. Then the area of the circle will be

A = (π/4) d² square units

The width of one circle is 12 inches long. The width of a subsequent circle is 25% longer than the measurement of the primary circle.

The diameter of the second circle is given as,

⇒ 1.25 x 12

⇒ 15 inches

The area of the first circle is given as,

A₁ = (π/4) (12)²

A₁ = 113.04 square inches

The area of the second circle is given as,

A₂ = (π/4) (15)²

A₂ = 176.625 square inches

The area of the second circle larger the area of the first circler is given as,

A = A₂ - A₁

A = 176.625 - 113.04

A = 63.585 square inches

The area of the second circle larger than the area of the first circle will be 63.585 square inches.

More about the area of a circle link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/11952845

#SPJ2

Solution :

The formula for the linearization of a function [tex]$f(x)$[/tex] at a point [tex]$x$[/tex] = a is given as

[tex]$L(x)=f(a)+(x-a)f'(a)$[/tex]

Assuming the time is t and the distance travelled is [tex]$f(t)$[/tex], that makes the speed as [tex]$f'(t)$[/tex].

So substituting them in the linearization formula,

A. At t = 7 minutes

   f(7) = 2.5 km

    f'(7) = 0.5 kpm

  ∴ [tex]$L_7(t)=f(7)+(t-7)f'(7)$[/tex]

             [tex]$=2.5+(t-7)0.5$[/tex]

              [tex]$=2.5+0.5t-3.5$[/tex]

              [tex]$=0.5t-1$[/tex]

B. At t = 18 minutes

      f(18) = 14.8 km

    f'(18) = 0.8 kpm

  ∴ [tex]$L_{18}(t)=f(18)+(t-18)f'(18)$[/tex]

               [tex]$=14.8+(t-18)0.8$[/tex]

              [tex]$=14.8+0.8t-14.4$[/tex]

              [tex]$=0.8t-0.4$[/tex]

C. Substituting the value of t as 14 in both the linearization to determine the position at 14 minutes, we get

[tex]$L_7(14)=0.5(14)-1.0$[/tex]

          = 7 - 1

          = 6 km

[tex]$L_{18}(14)=0.8(14)+0.4$[/tex]

            = 11.2 + 0.4

            = 11.6 km

D. According to the linearization at 7, the distance travelled between the 7 minutes and 14 minutes is = 6 km - 2.5 km

                                           = 3.5 km

And between the 14 minutes and 18 minutes is = 14.8 km - 6 km

                                                                              = 8.8 km

This is an average speed of 0.5 kpm in the first interval and an average speed of 2.2 kpm.

Now, according to the linearization of 18, the distance travelled between the 7 minutes and the 14 minutes is = 11.6 km - 2.5 km

                                                           = 9.1 km

And between 14 minutes and 18 minutes is = 14.8 km - 11.6 km

                                                                       = 3.2 km

This gives an average speed of 1.3 kpm in the first interval and 0.8 kpm in the second interval.

Therefore, the second approximation is the better one since the average speed are closer to the actual readings in the second linearization.  

Answer:

1) H0: μ₁=μ₂ against the claim Ha: μ₁ ≠μ₂

2)The test statistic is

t= x1`-x2`/ Sp √ ( 1/n₁ + 1/n₂)

where

Sp=  s₁² ( n1-1) + s₂²(n2-1) /(n1-1) + (n2-1)

3) D.f= n1+n2-2= 32+28-2= 58

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is that there is no  difference in population means (masterâs degree minus bachelorâs degree)

The claim is that there there is a difference in population means (masterâs degree minus bachelorâs degree)

1) H0: μ₁=μ₂ against the claim Ha: μ₁ ≠μ₂

2)The test statistic is

t= x1`-x2`/ Sp √ ( 1/n₁ + 1/n₂)

where

Sp=  s₁² ( n1-1) + s₂²(n2-1) /(n1-1) + (n2-1)

Putting the values

Sp= 12,250,000( 31)  + 16,000,000(27)/ 31+27

Sp=  379,750,000- 432,000,000/58

Sp= -52,250,000/58

Sp= -900,862.1

Now Putting the values in the t- test

t= x1`-x2`/ Sp √ ( 1/n₁ + 1/n₂)

t= 55,000- 58,000/ -900,862.1 √1/32+ 1/28)

t= -3000/ -233,120.21

t= 0.012868

3) D.f= n1+n2-2= 32+28-2= 58

for 2 tailed test the critical value of t is obtained by

t≥ t∝/2 ( d.f)=t≥ t0.025 (58)= ± 2.0017

4) Since the calculated value of t=  0.012868 does not fall in the critical region t≥ t∝/2 ( d.f)= ± 2.0017 we conclude that H0 is true and accept the null hypothesis.

Answer:

29.03703703

Step-by-step explanation:

7-4 √3 = 5.196152423

(5.196152423 + 0.19245009)^2​

Answer:

D) obtuse

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is D. Obtues