find the missing length?

Answer:

Just the fraction parts: 11/8 or 1 3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

1 5/8 + 1 6/8 = 3 3/8

Hopefully this helps :3 sorry if wrong :( Plz mark brainiest if correct :D Your bootiful/handsome! Have a great day luv <3

-Bee~

Answer:

The resulting matrix will be 11 * 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Matrices 11 * 6 multiplied by 6 * 7

Required

The dimension of the resulting matrix

When a matrix a * b is multiplies by a matrix b * c, the resulting matrix will be: a * c

In this case:

[tex]a * b = > 11 * 6[/tex]

[tex]b * c => 6 * 7[/tex]

So, the resulting matrix will be:

[tex]a * c => 11 * 7[/tex]

Answer:

I think the answer of this question is,

Step-by-step explanation:

The 20th term may be 1048576

Answer:

it goes 0 then 1/4 in the first notch 1/2 in the second notch 3/4 in the third notch then the number 1 on the fourth

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope that helps.

Answer:

Yes, that's correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2961.63

Step-by-step explanation:

First, convert R as a percent to r as a decimal

r = R/100

r = 2.12/100

r = 0.0212 rate per year,

Then solve the equation for A

A = P(1 + r/n)nt

A = 2,500.00(1 + 0.0212/12)(12)(8)

A = 2,500.00(1 + 0.001766667)(96)

A = $2,961.63

Summary:

The total amount accrued, principal plus interest, with compound interest on a principal of $2,500.00 at a rate of 2.12% per year compounded 12 times per year over 8 years is $2,961.63.

Answer:

I=$424

Step-by-step explanation:

I=PRT

I=2500×8×0.0212

I=$424

Answer:

i think the answer is c but im soo sorry if im wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

So, your answer would be 226.08 cubic meters of dirt.

Step-by-step explanation:

:D

Answer:

The values of g(x): 2,8,2. So now what would the answer be then

Step-by-step explanation: h'(1)=f''(g(1))g'(1)=6f'(2)=6*5=30

mary is the 4th childs nam,e

Answer:

45.5

Step-by-step explanation: NUN

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the depreciation rate is x per year, then we have:

Exponential function for this case is:

Value of the car after 3 years:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The pink figure has dimensions:

The blue figure has dimensions:

The scale factor is the ratio of corresponding sides:

The area's scale factor is

The area of the reduced figure is:

note. It was answered based on the additional information given in the comments (though 41 mm should be 42 mm)

26mm² is area of complex figure.

Answer:

solution:in rectangle

length[l]=6mm

breadth [b]=4mm

area of rectangle=l×b=6×4=20mm²

again in triangle

height[h]=6/2=3mm

base[b]=4mm

area of triangle =1/2 b×h=1/2×3×4=6mm²

total area of composite figure=20mm²+6mm²

=26mm²

The population of deer at time t=3 years is approximately 4128 deer.

An exponential function is a mathematical function of the form [tex]f(x) = a^x[/tex], where a is a positive constant called the base, and x is the input variable. The exponent x represents the power to which the base a is raised.

The rate of growth of the deer population is given by the function [tex]R(t) = 2000e^{(0.231t)}[/tex], where t is the time in years since t=0.

To find the population at time t=3, we need to evaluate R(3) using the given function:

[tex]R(3) = 2000e^{(0.231\times 3)[/tex]

[tex]R(3) = 2000e^{0.693}[/tex]

R(3) ≈ 4127.72

Therefore, the population of deer at time t=3 years is approximately 4128 deer.

To know more about an exponential function follow

https://brainly.com/question/30135888

#SPJ2

Answer:

Positive 233

Step-by-step explanation:

7300-3280-2620-1167(14000/12)=233.

Answer:

$400

Step-by-step explanation:

The future value of the investment increase will be $6,028.98.

The interest that is calculated using both the principal and the interest that has accrued during the previous period is called compound interest. It differs from simple interest in that the principal is not taken into account when determining the interest for the subsequent period with simple interest. Compound interest is commonly abbreviated C.I. in mathematics.

Given:

P = $3000

R = 7%

T = 10 years

r = R/100

r = 7/100

r = 0.07 rate per year,

Then solve the equation for A

A = P[tex](1 + r/n)^{nt[/tex]

A = 3,000.00[tex](1 + 0.07/12)^{(12)(10)[/tex]

A = 3,000.00[tex](1 + 0.0058333333333333)^{(120)[/tex]

A = $6,028.98

Hence, the future value will be $6,028.98.

Learn more about Compound Interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ2

Answer:

(-4,5)

Step-by-step explanation:

90 degree rotation = (-y,x)

Answer:

[tex]Rate = -2h-1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]f(x) = -2x^2 + 3x - 7[/tex]

[tex]Interval: [1,1+h][/tex]

Required

The average rate of change

This is calculated as:

[tex]Rate = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a}[/tex]

Where:

[tex][a,b] = [1,1+h][/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]Rate = \frac{f(1+h) - f(1)}{1+h - 1}[/tex]

[tex]Rate = \frac{f(1+h) - f(1)}{h}[/tex]

Calculate f(1+h) and f(1)

[tex]f(x) = -2x^2 + 3x - 7[/tex]

[tex]f(1) = -2 * 1^2 + 3 * 1 - 7 = -6[/tex]

[tex]f(1+h) = -2 * (1+h)^2 + 3 * (1+h) - 7[/tex]

Evaluate squares and open bracket

[tex]f(1+h) = -2 * (1+h+h+h^2) + 3+3h - 7[/tex]

[tex]f(1+h) = -2-2h-2h-2h^2 + 3+3h - 7[/tex]

[tex]f(1+h) = -2-4h-2h^2 + 3+3h - 7[/tex]

Collect like terms

[tex]f(1+h) = -2h^2-4h +3h-2+ 3 - 7[/tex]

[tex]f(1+h) = -2h^2-h-6[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]Rate = \frac{f(1+h) - f(1)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]Rate = \frac{-2h^2-h-6 - -6}{h}[/tex]

[tex]Rate = \frac{-2h^2-h-6 +6}{h}[/tex]

[tex]Rate = \frac{-2h^2-h}{h}[/tex]

Factorize the numerator

[tex]Rate = \frac{h(-2h-1)}{h}[/tex]

Divide

[tex]Rate = -2h-1[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x+ y = 0  

and

-2x + 5y + 2 = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

given line

3x+5y+2=0

5x+3y-2=0

solution

when two line bisect each other then line equation of bisector is express as

  1

and here

A1 = 3

B1  = 5

C1 = 2

and

A2 = 5

B2  = 3

C2 = -2

so now put value in equation 1 we get

solve it we get

-2x + 5y + 2 = 0   1

and

3x+5y+2 = - ( 5x+3y-2 )

solve it we get

8x + 8y = 0

x + y = 0  2

Answer: D -12x +12y -2 =0

Step-by-step explanation:

Edge 2021

Answer:

It's geometric and common difference is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

15/5=3

45/15=3

Answer:

its geometric and the common ratio is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of a figure dependents from the value of "π"

So, it can be 1374.45 ft³ or 1375 ft³

✏--------------

[tex]Given:- \\\\R_15~ft\\\\R_2=2\\\\v=88[/tex]

[tex]\frac{R_1}{R_2} =\frac{5}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(R_1)^3}{(R_2)^3} =\frac{v_1}{v_2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{5^3}{2^3} =\frac{v_1}{88}[/tex]

[tex]8v_1=11,000[/tex]

[tex]v_1=1375ft^3[/tex]

hope it helps...

have a great day!!

Answer: 4.338

Step-by-step explanation: Calculator

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

When you shift up or down, the function gets added to or subtracted from the expression on the right of the y value.  Put in simpler language, for this question, the equation becomes.

g(x) = f(x) + 13

And the solution is

g(x) = ln(x) - 1 + 13

g(x) = ln(x) + 12

Answer:

2 3/5 :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

26/5

Step-by-step explanation:

an=a1+(n-1)d

d is common difference

so,

2/5- (-2)=12/5

putting values in above formula

 =-2+(4-1)(12/5)

=-2+3(12/5)

=-2+(36/5)

=26/5

Answer:

Ok 9-8=1 times 2 = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x^3−5x+3x^2−15

Step-by-step explanation:

Common math

Answer:

E

Step-by-step explanation:

AP Classroom says so.

The data doesn't provide convincing statistical evidence for considered proportion comparison. We deduce that: Option E: There is not convincing statistical evidence

There are two hypotheses. First one is called null hypothesis and it is chosen such that it predicts nullity or no change in a thing. It is usually the hypothesis against which we do the test. The hypothesis which we put against null hypothesis is alternate hypothesis.

Null hypothesis is the one which researchers try to disprove.

Suppose we have:

Then, we get:

[tex]Z = \dfrac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p}_1 )(\dfrac{1}{n_1} + \dfrac{1}{n_2}) }}[/tex]

If the level of significance = [tex]\alpha[/tex]critical value of Z is: [tex]Z_{\alpha/2}[/tex], and if [tex]Z > Z_{\alpha/2}[/tex]null hypothesis, else if [tex]Z_{\alpha/2} > Z[/tex] then we cannot reject it.

For this case, we want to know if  the data provides convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month of taking cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month of not taking cinnamon.

Thus, we get our hypotheses as:

Null hypotheses: They don't provide convincing evidence (and thus, cinnamon had no improvement on the proportion), and thus:

[tex]H_0: \hat{p}_1 \leq \hat{p}_2[/tex]

Alternate hypothesis: Data provides convincing evidence (that the use of cinnamon made increment in considered proportion), and thus:

[tex]H_a: \hat{p}_1 > \hat{p}_2[/tex]

The test is single tailed.

For this case, we have:

Thus, we get:

[tex]Z = \dfrac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p}_1 )(\dfrac{1}{n_1} + \dfrac{1}{n_2}) }} =\dfrac{0.35 - 0.25}{\sqrt{0.3(0.7 )(\dfrac{1}{40} + \dfrac{1}{40}) }} \approx 0.976[/tex]

At 0.01 level of significance ([tex]\alpha = 0.01 = 1\%[/tex]), we get the critical value of Z from z-tables as:

[tex]Z_{\alpha/2} = 2.576[/tex]

Since [tex]Z_{\alpha/2} > Z[/tex] , we cannot reject the null hypothesis, and thus, deduce that there is not convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01

At 0.05 level of significance ([tex]\alpha = 0.05 = 5\%[/tex]), we get the critical value of Z from z-tables as:

[tex]Z_{\alpha/2} = 1.96[/tex]

Since [tex]Z_{\alpha/2} > Z[/tex] , we cannot reject the null hypothesis, and thus, deduce that there is not convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05

At 0.10 level of significance ([tex]\alpha = 0.10 = 10\%[/tex]), we get the critical value of Z from z-tables as:

[tex]Z_{\alpha/2} = 1.645[/tex]

Since [tex]Z_{\alpha/2} > Z[/tex] , we cannot reject the null hypothesis, and thus, deduce that there is not convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10

Remember that the conclusions can be made even if they were volunteers since that doesn't make it wrong as volunteers are randomly coming out people from real population.

Thus, we deduce that: Option E: There is not convincing statistical evidence

Learn more about two proportions z-test here:

https://brainly.com/question/4757147