Answer:
A. Lech Walesa
C. Nelson Mandela
E. Andrei Sakharov
Explanation:
In his “Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize,” Elie Wiesel referred to the suffering of the people who were represented by Lech Walesa, Nelson Mandela and Andrei Sakharov as important to him as the suffering of the Jews.
In his speech, he said, "Apartheid is, in my view, as abhorrent as anti-Semitism. To me, Andrei Sakharov's isolation is as much of a disgrace as Josef Biegun’s imprisonment. As is the denial of Solidarity and its leader Lech Wałęsa’s right to dissent. And Nelson Mandela’s interminable imprisonment.
There is so much injustice and suffering crying out for "
The three options that mention the people whose suffering is as important to Wiesel in his speech as the suffering of the Jews is:
A. Lech Walesa
C. Nelson Mandela
E. Andrei Sakharov
In 1986, Elie Wiesel was awarded the Nobel Prize. A survivor of the Holocaust, Wiesel spoke of suffering and despair.He explained that his main focus as a Jew and a survivor would always be the suffering of the Jewish people.However, that does not make him blind to the suffering of others. Here, he mentions Lech Walesa, Nelson Mandela, and Andrei Sakharov.Wiesel claims that there is no true peace and freedom when there are other people who live in fear.He says there is no good in remaining silent and neutral. We must pick sides and we must help. Doing nothing helps the criminals, the oppressors, but not the victims.Learn more about the topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/23578493
Plz help it would mean a lot
Answer:
Federal Law
Explanation:
Read this passage from Liesl's brother's diary.
I draw pictures of New York in my diary every night. Every time I think about New York, my legs jitter with excitement. Everything will be so new and different! I practice English with everyone I know, even with my family who still wants to speak to me in German. I'm starting to think in English and can't wait until English is all I speak. People walk around here like they are sad, but I couldn't be happier. I think I've already forgotten my life in Hamburg. Ellis Island, here we come!
In the sixth paragraph of "A Letter from the Atlantic," Liesl reflects on the memories that she shares with Hannah in Hamburg, including eating their "favorite Brötchen" at a corner bakery.
How does Liesl's viewpoint conflict with that of her brother?
Liesl cherishes her life in Hamburg, while her brother has already forgotten it.
Liesl knows she can't replace Hannah, while her brother looks forward to new friends.
Liesl hopes New York will resemble Hamburg, while her brother wants New York to be different.
Liesl plans to create new memories in New York, while her brother already misses Hamburg.
The Answer is C. Liesl hopes New York will resemble Hamburg, while her brother wants New York to be different.
A conflict occurs when there are opposing views between two entities. Since Liesl reflects on his life in Hamburg while her brother seems to have forgotten their life there, there is conflict because;
Liesl cherishes her life in Hamburg, while her brother has already forgotten it.The conflict is seen in the story because the brother cannot wait to get to New York.
This forms every aspect of his thinking whereas his sister can still remember the nice moments that they had in Hamburg.
So, this shows that they have conflicting views about the two destinations.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/4028796
Based on the reading of for Esme with love and squalor identify and describe what specific textual details reveal about a characters perspective and the characters motives
Answer:
Can you specify what text you are looking for?
Explanation:
Can you specify what text you are looking for?
The red line where I marked, how would I cite them alphabetically, in MLA 8th style edition? PLEASE AN ENGLISH MASTER HELP!!!
Answer: They’re already in order
Explanation: The first words are
Inside
Richard
The
whats the rising action in the story wishbone valley
Answer:
The rising action in the story was when the gobbler appeared to Donald and accused him of eating it and breaking his wishbone with his sister. The rising action continues as he leads him towards the wishbone valley to meet the ghosts of the other turkeys.
Explanation:
The rising action in a story refers to the events that build up suspense in the mind of the reader. It builds towards the climax of the story where the main suspense is created and later resolved. When the gobbler appears to Donald and has that conversation where he accused Donald of eating it, the writer was building suspense.
The suspense continues when he leads him on to the Wishbone Valley, and Donald showed some hesitation because of fear.
Which of these is an example of direct characterization?
A-actions or thoughts that reveal what a character is like
B- dialogue between a character and other characters in the story
C- an author’s description of a character’s appearance and personality
Answer: its C.
Explanation:
sentence using the word palpable
Answer:
His pain was almost palpable, and she couldn't help feeling it was too raw for him to fake.
Explanation:
please mark me as brainilest
have a GREAT rest of your day!!
<3
How is Trevor noahs father characterized
Answer:
Noah attributes his father's private nature to his parents' ability to get away with a mixed child during apartheid. Where Patricia was feisty, Robert was reserved. Noah believes he is the confluence of both. Trevor Noah's dad hated racism and homogeneity of any kind.