Help with both questions

Answer: Florence was a city-state with its own system of governance before it became a city in Italy today.

Since the Renaissance, the world has undergone significant changes, particularly with regard to technology, social structure and cultural ethos. The Renaissance, primarily characterized by a revival in art, culture, and classical knowledge, contrasts notably with the modern era marked with technology, human rights, gender equality, and democratic principles.

Without specifying the location, it's difficult to provide a precise comparison between the 'Renaissance' period and the present day. However, broadly speaking, there have been significant changes in many aspects of society since the Renaissance, which spanned the 14th to the 17th century.

The Renaissance was a period of 'rebirth' in art, culture, and thought, marked by a renewed interest in the classical knowledge of Greece and Rome. It saw developments in areas such as literature, architecture, science, and politics, which significantly reshaped European culture.

Today, the modern world is far more advanced. For instance, from a technological standpoint, the proliferation of computers and internet technology has transformed our lives enormously. Socially and culturally too, we've progressed greatly, with universal human rights, gender equality, and democratic principles being much more prevalent.

https://brainly.com/question/32379086

#SPJ12

The mass movement was motivated by a desire to avoid racial violence and pursue economic and educational opportunities.

The Great Migration is typically divided into two parts that correspond to the United States' involvement and effects in both World Wars. Migration has played an important role in African history. The human species most likely began spreading across the earth between 2 and 2.5 million years ago, both within and outside of Africa.

Population movements in Africa during the pro-colonial era were mostly related to the prevailing sociopolitical and ecological conditions, particularly internecine violence, natural calamities, and the hunt for arable land or colonization.

Learn more about immigration here:

https://brainly.com/question/17141328

Answer:

Because he was a person who had wide interests and was expert in several areas.

Explanation:

D) The factor that led to the rise of the Kingdom of Kush was that the Kush traded more with their neighbors.

The Kush expanded their business with their neighbors, which added to the foundation of the Realm of Kush. This empowered the Realm of Kush to wealth and assets, permitting them to construct a strong power and broaden their domain.

The Realm of Kush was unmistakably positioned in the Nile Waterway Valley, making it an exchanging and business center among Egypt and Sub-Saharan Africa. The Kush exchanged rich items acquired from adjoining networks, like gold, and iron, which developed their economy and support their situation in the locale. While different components expressed may have added to the rise of the Realm of Kush.

Learn more about Kingdom of Kush at

https://brainly.com/question/18371701

#SPJ4

Answer:

The excerpt suggests that the event changed Americans' minds about the Vietnam War because it exposed the reality of the war and the government's lies to the public, leading to widespread disillusionment and anti-war sentiment.

Explanation:

D) Torana is the decorative gateway through which visitors enter the Great Stupa.

The torana is adorned with intricate carvings and sculptures of animals, deities, and other figures from Buddhist mythology. Once inside, visitors can meditate by circumambulating or walking around the stupa in a clockwise direction, following the path of the sun. This practice is believed to accumulate merit and bring good luck. The stupa itself is a sacred structure in Buddhism and represents the Buddha's enlightened mind. The harmika is a square structure on top of the stupa that symbolizes the Buddha's throne, while the yasti is a pole that extends from the harmika and represents the axis mundi, or the world axis connecting the heavens and earth.

Learn more about Buddhist mythology here:

https://brainly.com/question/30518883

#SPJ11

Topic sentence: The interest group that represents my point of view on taxing the sugar content of beverages is the American Heart Association.

Reasons for my position:

Overall, I believe that the American Heart Association represents my point of view on taxing the sugar content of beverages because they have a strong track record of advocating for policies that promote public health and healthy lifestyle choices. Taxation of sugary drinks is a necessary step in reducing consumption and improving public health outcomes.

Learn more about American Heart Association here:

https://brainly.com/question/17074119

#SPJ1

One major impediment to historical research is the lack of available sources or the destruction of historical records due to wars, natural disasters, or intentional actions such as censorship or book burning.

This can make it difficult or impossible to piece together a comprehensive understanding of past events, people, and cultures. Another impediment is the biases and limitations of the sources that do exist, as they may be written from a particular perspective or may not accurately reflect the viewpoints and experiences of marginalized groups or individuals. Additionally, the interpretation of historical evidence can also be subjective and influenced by the cultural and social context of the researcher.

Learn more about interpretation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30932003

#SPJ11

In 1982, John Hinckley Jr. was found innocent by reason of insanity for the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan.

In 1982, John Hinckley Jr. was found innocent by reason of insanity for the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan. Hinckley had shot Reagan and three other individuals outside a Washington D.C. hotel, in an attempt to impress actress Jodie Foster. The trial was highly publicized and controversial, as some argued that Hinckley was aware of his actions and should have been held fully accountable. However, after extensive psychiatric evaluations, it was determined that Hinckley suffered from severe mental illness and could not fully comprehend the consequences of his actions. He was subsequently placed in a mental institution for several years before being released in 2016. The Hinckley case sparked a nationwide conversation about the intersection of mental health and the criminal justice system, and led to changes in how the legal system approaches cases involving insanity pleas. Overall, the Hinckley case remains a significant moment in American history and a reminder of the complexities of the legal system and the challenges of balancing justice with compassion.

Learn more about President here

https://brainly.com/question/924435

#SPJ11

c. Division in class,race and region with Spanish Americans. The Spanish American Revolutions were more difficult than the American Revolution because of the divisions in class, race, and region within the colonies.

The Spanish colonies were made up of a variety of different social classes, including different ethnicities and races, which had been divided by the Spanish monarchy for centuries.

This created a situation where the different social classes had conflicting interests, making it difficult for them to unite towards a common goal. Furthermore, the regions within the colonies had different histories, customs, and beliefs, making it difficult to create a unified movement.

This division in class, race, and region ultimately meant that the Spanish American Revolutions took longer and were more difficult than the American Revolution.

Know more about American Revolution here

https://brainly.com/question/27833385#

#SPJ11

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is considered a left-wing political party. The National Post is considered right-wing because it supports conservative parties and politicians. CNN is considered left-leaning because it reports on issues that matter to liberal viewers. Fox News is considered far right because it promotes conservative views and policies.

1. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) promotes issues of diversity, multiculturalism and social justice. CBC is considered a left-wing political party. CBC has been accused of neglecting conservative views and criticizing Canada's conservative political parties. CBC promotes multiculturalism, diversity, social justice issues.

2. The National Post is considered right-wing because it supports conservative views and policies. The paper is known for supporting conservative parties and politicians and its editors have criticized liberal policies and agendas. The National Post has published content supporting conservative political parties and policies in the past.

3. CNN is considered left-leaning because it reports on issues important to liberal viewers, such as social justice, climate change, and LGBTQ rights. The news channel is known for featuring liberal commentators and pundits. It has been criticized for being overly critical of conservative politicians and policies.

4. Fox News is considered far-right because it promotes conservative views and policies. News channels are known to have far right-wing commentators and pundits who promote conspiracy theories and spread misinformation on their news channels. Fox News is more conservative than conservative political parties.

5. The New York Times is considered to be left-leaning because it supports liberal policies. The paper is committed to journalistic integrity and a balanced approach to news. It supports progressive political candidates and has criticized conservative policies and agendas, but it should be noted that the paper is still committed to its journalistic integrity.

learn more about CNN: https://brainly.com/question/14104529

#SPJ1

The Sedition Act made it a wrongdoing for American residents to "print, utter, or distribute any misleading, shameful, and pernicious composition" about the public authority.

The objectives of arraignment under the Sedition Act were American residents who went against the conflict exertion, including peaceful objector, agitators, and communists. Infringement of the Sedition Act could prompt as much as 20 years in jail and a fine of $10,000.

Sedition Act preliminaries, alongside the Senate's utilization of its disdain powers to smother disagree, set off a firestorm of analysis against the Federalists and added to their loss in the appointment of 1800, after which the demonstrations were canceled or permitted to terminate.

Learn more about Sedition Act, from:

brainly.com/question/29775367

#SPJ1

The Great Depression of the 1930s was  said to be one of the foremost annihilating financial emergencies in American history, taking off millions of Americans without employments, homes, or trust.

In reaction to this emergency, President Franklin D. Roosevelt propelled the Unused Bargain, a arrangement of programs and arrangements pointed at giving help, recuperation, and change.

After some thought, I immovably accept that the  New Deal  is one that is given help to Americans amid the Great Depression. One of the most reasons for this can be that the Unused Bargain made employments and diminished unemployment.

Learn more about The New Deal from

https://brainly.com/question/936437

#SPJ1

The objective of the Carlsbad Decrees was to suppress political opposition and liberal ideas in the German Confederation.

The Carlsbad Decrees, issued by the German Confederation in 1819, aimed to suppress liberal and nationalist ideas in the wake of the Napoleonic Wars. The decrees sought to strengthen the power of the conservative rulers in Germany by imposing strict press censorship, university inspections, and banning student organizations. The objective was to suppress any form of opposition to the conservative order and to prevent the spread of liberal and nationalist ideas, which were perceived as a threat to the established order.

Learn more about Germany here:

https://brainly.com/question/1061130

#SPJ11

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 established a process for creating new states in the Northwest Territory. In terms of slavery, the ordinance prohibited the practice in the region. Article VI stated, "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."

As for Native Americans, the ordinance recognized their rights and established that their land would not be taken without their consent. It stated, "The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent." However, the ordinance did not fully protect Native American rights as the United States government often disregarded these provisions in its expansionist policies.

Learn More about slavery here :-

https://brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ11

The policy that was used by an imperialist country using direct rule in an African colony was to assign European leaders to all positions of authority in the colony. Hence, Option D is correct.

A policy of assimilation in the 19th century in West Africa was part of British colonial policy. The grand plan of the Africans was to assimilate the colonies into European civilization and culture.

With the help of the policy, a western class of black Englishmen was created. To achieve this goal, European leaders were assigned to all the positions of authority in the colony.

Hence, Option D is correct.

Learn more about African colony from here:

brainly.com/question/17073335

#SPJ4

Full Question ;

An imperialist country using direct rule in an African colony would most likely

enact which policy?

A. Giving up economic and military control over the colony

B. Offering equal treatment to all colonial citizens regardless of

ethnicity

C. Allowing colonized people to maintain most of their cultural

traditions

D. Assigning European leaders to all positions of authority in the

colony

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

The Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas were all ancient civilizations that existed in the Americas, particularly in Central and South America. Despite being in proximity to each other, these civilizations were distinct and had unique cultural and religious beliefs.

The Mayan civilization existed from around 1000 BC to AD 1697 , while the Aztecs were prominent from AD 1325 to 1521. The Inca civilization arose later, from AD 1438 to 1532. All three civilizations displayed remarkable achievements in various fields such as agriculture, art, astronomy, mathematics, and writing.

The Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas all had polytheistic religions, and religion played a significant role in their lives. Mayans believed in various gods and incorporated their worship into their daily activities. The Aztecs believed in a pantheon of gods and goddesses, with the sun god Huitzilopochtli being one of the most important deities. The Incas worshiped the sun god Inti and believed that their leaders were descended from him.

Despite their similarities, there were also significant differences in the Mayan, Aztec, and Inca cultures. For example, Mayan society comprised city-states, while the Aztecs were organized into an empire, and the Incas were a confederation of regions. The Mayans had a writing system, while the Aztecs used pictorial writing, and the Incas relied on a system of knotted cords called quipus.

Additionally, the Mayan and Aztec civilizations saw human sacrifice as an important part of their religion while the Incas did not practice human sacrifice. The Mayans placed a significant emphasis on astronomy, while the Incas were skilled in building roads and other infrastructure.

Overall, the Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas were all unique and remarkable civilizations that made significant contributions to the development of the Americas. Though there were similarities in their regions, culture, and beliefs, they all had their differences, which made them distinct from each other.

Explanation:

Answer:

use this to help guide you

Explanation:

The ancient civilizations of the Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas were three of the most advanced and influential cultures in the Americas. Although these civilizations existed in different time periods and geographical locations, they share several similarities in terms of their beliefs and cultural practices.

One of the most striking similarities among these civilizations is their religious beliefs. All three cultures had a polytheistic belief system, with multiple gods and goddesses representing different aspects of nature and human experience. In addition, these civilizations practiced human sacrifice as a way to appease their gods and ensure the continued prosperity of their communities.

Despite these similarities, there were also significant differences between the three cultures. The Mayans, for example, were known for their advances in mathematics and astronomy, as well as their impressive architectural feats such as the pyramids and ball courts. The Aztecs, on the other hand, were known for their military prowess and their sophisticated social hierarchy, which included a powerful emperor and a well-organized bureaucracy. The Incas, meanwhile, were renowned for their mastery of engineering and agriculture, as well as their vast empire that spanned much of South America.

In conclusion, while the Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas shared many similarities in their religious beliefs, each civilization also had its own unique cultural practices and achievements. Their contributions to the fields of mathematics, astronomy, architecture, military strategy, and engineering continue to inspire and amaze people around the world.

Answer:

Martin Luther believed that good works and indulgences were not necessary for salvation, but rather it was faith in Jesus Christ as the savior that was essential.

Explanation:

Vietnam War was a noble cause because:

The battle waged against the proliferation of communism was deemed imperative. Supporters strongly contended that as an obligation, the United States needed to hinder the global propagation of such ideology for it proved deleterious.

Hence, they maintained that the individuals in Vietnam should not suffer under the dictatorial influence of the communist regime ruling from North Vietnam.

Find out more on the Vietnam war at https://brainly.com/question/27126318

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, was a significant event in the history of the United States and had a profound impact on the American people's perception of their involvement in the war.

Prior to the attack, the American public was largely divided over whether the United States should enter World War II. Some believed that the country should remain neutral, while others advocated for intervention on the side of the Allies. However, the attack on Pearl Harbor united the country in a common cause, and support for American involvement in the war surged.

The attack led to a wave of patriotism and a sense of national unity among Americans. President Franklin D. Roosevelt addressed Congress the day after the attack, calling it "a date which will live in infamy," and requested a declaration of war against Japan. Congress approved the declaration of war, and the United States formally entered World War II.

The bombing of Pearl Harbor also led to a shift in American attitudes towards the war. Prior to the attack, many Americans viewed the conflict as a distant, foreign affair that did not directly affect them. However, the attack brought the war home to the United States and made it clear that the country could not remain neutral or uninvolved. The American people recognized the need to support the war effort and do their part to help their country and their allies achieve victory.

In conclusion, the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor changed Americans' perception of how they should be involved in the war. It united the country, increased support for American involvement in the war, and brought the war home to Americans, leading to a shift in attitudes towards the conflict.

Explanation:

In South Africa, citizens and businesses are allowed to make decisions in a free market economy.

This means that they have the freedom to make choices regarding their economic activities, such as what goods and services to produce, how much to produce, and at what price to sell them.

The government provides a legal framework and regulations to ensure fair competition and to protect consumers and the environment.

In addition, the government may intervene in the market to correct market failures or to promote certain social or economic objectives, such as reducing unemployment or promoting sustainable development.

Overall, South Africa's economic system is a mixed economy, with elements of both capitalism and socialism, and with a significant role for the government in promoting social and economic development.

Learn more about economy here:

https://brainly.com/question/30131108

#SPJ1

The Republican argument does not blame the New Deal for the Depression

The Republican argument does not fault the New Deal for the Great Depression, as it was the brainchild of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat, in response to the said phenomenon.

Nevertheless, negative feedback expressing that government intervention and regulation enacted by the New Deal extended the length of the Depression, thus halting any possible prompt recovery has surfaced.

Read more on New deal here:https://brainly.com/question/936437

#SPJ1

Answer:

Maybe Garth brooks

Explanation:

Answer:

In the light of other Scriptures, interpret Joshua 11:20.

The book of Joshua in the Bible tells the story of the Israelites’ victory over Canaan and their settlement in the Promised Land. In chapter 11, Joshua and the Israelites defeat the armies and capture cities of several Canaanite kings. However, one of the verses raised questions among biblical scholars and readers. Joshua 11:20 states, “For it was the Lord’s doing to harden their hearts that they should come against Israel in battle, in order that they should be devoted to destruction and should receive no mercy but be destroyed, just as the Lord commanded Moses.”

This verse seems to imply that God purposely caused the Canaanite kings to resist the Israelites so that they would be destroyed. This raises questions about God’s character and his actions towards people who do not follow him. However, it has a different meaning and purpose when compared to other Scriptures.

One important principle to consider when interpreting the Bible is the context of the passage. In this case, readers must understand the historical and cultural context in which the book of Joshua was written. The conquest of Canaan was a unique event in the history of the Israelites. It was intended to fulfill God’s promise to Abraham and his descendants. God promised to give the land of Canaan to the Israelites, and the conquest would help achieve this goal. However, it would judge the Canaanites for their wickedness and idolatry (Deuteronomy 9:5).

Based on other Scriptures, God promotes justice and mercy and desires all people to repent and be saved (2 Peter 3:9). He is not happy about the death of the wicked but desires them to repent and live (Ezekiel 33:11). Therefore, we can conclude that God did not harden the hearts of the Canaanite kings to destroy them but rather to judge them for their sin.

Another important principle used to interpret Scripture is comparison with other passages addressing the same topic or theme. In this case, readers could examine other verses speaking about God’s sovereignty and his use of evil for his purposes. For example, in the book of Romans, Paul writes that God works purposely to favor those who love him and are called according to his purpose (Romans 8:28). This includes even the evil actions of people since God can use them to bring about his will.

[Get instant answers, essays, and research papers through proffrank01 at g m ail.com. Score maximum points easily]

In conclusion God did not harden the hearts of the Canaanite kings in order to destroy them. Instead, he intends to judge them for their sin. This is based on the view of Joshua 11:20 based on other Scriptures. The victory over Canaan was a unique event in the history of the Israelites. It was intended to fulfill God’s promise to Abraham and his descendants. Humans can trust in God’s sovereignty and his ability to use even evil actions for his purposes.

Explanation:

The book of Joshua is imperative in understanding God's plan for Israel, depicting their entry into Canaan. The Biblical events, including the possibility of the sun and moon standing still, and the significance of Joshua 11:20, can be seen as part of a wider divine scheme.

The book of Joshua is crucial in understanding God's plan for Israel as it depicts the entry of Israel into the land of Canaan, fulfilling God's promise to Abraham. The conquest and division of the land under Joshua's leadership signify the fulfillment of God's plan. God's redemptive plan is also apparent throughout the first six books of the Bible, from Genesis through Joshua. Here, we see God's relentless pursuit to restore humanity and His chosen people back to Himself, despite their failures and disobedience.

The event Joshua 10:13 where the sun and moon stand still under Joshua’s request has been a topic of discussion among scholars. Some interpret it literally, while others view it as a poetic description of a significant day.

In the light of other scriptures, Joshua 11:20 has been interpreted to mean that the hardening of the hearts of these kings was to fulfil God’s will for the land to be utterly destroyed, again showing His sovereign control over events.

https://brainly.com/question/32927196

#SPJ11

The author suggests that young people in Germany are willing to embrace Hitler's methods of ruthlessness and violence because they are impatient for change and contemptuous of the slow and moderate methods of the republic.Option (A)

They believed that the slow and moderate methods of the republic were ineffective in bringing about the changes they desired, and they were looking for more drastic measures to achieve their goals.

Additionally, they were motivated by a sense of idealism and a longing for a resurgent Germany, which they believed could only be achieved through strong and forceful leadership. Their contempt for the republican government also contributed to their willingness to embrace Hitler's vision and methods.

Learn more about Hitler's methods

https://brainly.com/question/26058658

#SPJ4

Full Question: Among the hundreds of thousands who make up the audiences at Hitler's or Goebbels' meetings, and who seem to an outsider to be carried away by a kind of mass hysteria, there are many who are motivated by real idealism, who long to give themselves unreservedly to the great vision of a resurgent Germany. Being young they are of course contemptuous of the slow and moderate methods of the republic; they are for action, quick, arrogant, ruthless.

According to the author, why are the young people of Germany so willing to embrace Hitler's methods of ruthlessness and violence?

a. They are outsiders to democracy.

b. They respect republican government.

c. They are visionaries.

d. They are impatient for change.

American military leader: General Mark A. Milley

American political leader: President Kamala Harris

General Mark A. Milley, having been born on June 18, 1958, is among the senior officers of the United States Army who have served in several leadership roles.

He held the position of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff-one of the highest-ranking military positions within the U.S Armed Forces after taking up the post on October 1, 2019.

General Milley's profile is impressive; a Princeton University alumnus from 1980 commissioned as an officer in the Infantry gradually making him onto leadership positions through a distinguished and celebrated decade spanning over four decades.

Learn more about General Mark A. Milley at

https://brainly.com/question/30107133

#SPJ1

Answer:

The sale of indulgences by the Catholic Church was objected to by many people because it was seen as a corrupt practice that allowed individuals to buy their way out of sin and punishment, undermining the idea of repentance and forgiveness. This practice also contributed to the growing resentment towards the Catholic Church and played a significant role in the Protestant Reformation.

Explanation:

Charles Schneck was detained in 1919 for printing a large number of flyers urging men not to sign up for the World War I draught and refrain from enlisting because he believed that doing so violated their constitutional rights.

The government saw Schneck's acts as illegal since they were in opposition to the 1917 Espionage Act, which forbade anybody from interfering with military recruitment. This background makes it crucial that, if you want to express your opposition to Shneck's detention.

you Clearly state your opposition to Schneck's arrest. Include supporting details in your letter to demonstrate why this behaviour is illegal. Avoid using your name to protect yourself from criticism from those who disagree. A car and a few street signs being vandalised is a serious offence. It is a hooliganism-related act. The harm seems severe and unwarranted. It is done with the intention of doing harm. Never should it be tolerated. The teenagers need to be severely disciplined.

Complete question:

What would you say in your letter?

Now imagine you are the editor of the paper that receives a letter like this. If you print it, you might be arrested, too. Your family and friends may have to answer questions by the police. What would you do?

Respond to a student who chose to do the opposite. Try to talk them into doing what you would do World war 1?

To know more about World war I visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25845729

#SPJ4

Parenting styles can be divided into four categories, which vary along two dimensions: responsiveness and demandingness (Baumrind, 1975; Maccoby & Martin, 1983).

Responsiveness refers to the degree to which parents are sensitive to their child's needs and provide emotional support, while demandingness involves the expectations and rules set by parents for their child's behavior.

1. Authoritative parenting: High in responsiveness and demandingness. Parents are warm and nurturing while also setting clear boundaries and expectations. They encourage communication and promote independence in their children.

2. Authoritarian parenting: Low in responsiveness and high in demandingness. Parents have strict rules and expectations, but may not be as emotionally supportive or communicative with their children.

3. Permissive parenting: High in responsiveness and low in demandingness. Parents are loving and nurturing, but may not set firm boundaries or have high expectations for their children's behavior.

4. Neglectful parenting: Low responsiveness and demandingness. Parents may not be emotionally involved with their children or have clear expectations for their behavior, which can result in children feeling uncared for and unsupported.

Understanding these parenting styles helps us appreciate the different ways parents interact with their children and the potential impact of these styles on a child's development and well-being.

Learn more about parenting styles:

https://brainly.com/question/4263476

#SPJ11