Answer:
Since there are two side to this both the religious side and scientific people believe different things depending on your religion it would be different since different religions believe different things so for example Christians would believe God created Adam and Eve and then things went from there whereas scientist would believe Modern humans originated in Africa within the past 200,000 years and evolved from their most likely recent common ancestor, Homo erectus, which means 'upright man' in Latin. Homo erectus is an extinct species of human that lived between 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago.
Explanation:
Who believed power should not be concentrated in the hands of an individual? A. Jean-Jacques Rousseau B. John Locke C. Baron de Montesquieu D. Cotton Mather
Answer:
C. Baron de Montesquieu
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Judaism,like christianity and islam traces its roots to
Answer:
Abraham
Explanation:
He plays a part in the founding/beginning of all of these religions.
Hope this helps!
Do you think the consequences of imperialism/colonialism are more positive or negative?
Answer:
It depends on what you have been taught, but I would personally say negative because of the diseases that destroyed Native Americans and the rise of slavery.
On the flip side, if you're thinking of positive, it did help exchange new ideas and goods (the Columbian Exchange) between the worlds. It also allowed a safe haven for those persecuted (like the Protestants) and allowed countries to dump their inmates onto the new land.
Which of the following was one of the factors that led to the decline of the Islamic empires?
A. Too much spent on new technology
B. Too much dpent on grand buildings
C. Declines in military spending
D. Religious infighting
Answer:
Religious infighting was one of the factors that led to the decline of the Islamic empires.
Explanation:
PF
Answer:
D. religious infighting
Explanation:
took the test and got it correct! hope this helps! have a good day!
Read these two passages, which were written by leaders in India and South Africa fighting to overthrow repressive governments, and then answer the questions. (10 points) Passage 1: Excerpted from Indian Home Rule, by Mohandas Gandhi Passive resistance, that is, soul-force, is matchless. It is superior to the force of arms. How, then, can it be considered only a weapon of the weak? Physical force men are strangers to the courage that is requisite in a passive resister. Do you believe that a coward can ever disobey a law that he dislikes? Extremists are considered to be advocates of brute-force. Why do they, then, talk about obeying laws? I do not blame them. They can say nothing else. When they succeed in driving out the English, and they themselves become governors, they will want you and me to obey their laws. And that is a fitting thing for their constitution. But a passive resister will say he will not obey a law that is against his conscience, even though he may be blown to pieces at the mouth of a cannon. What do you think? Wherein is courage required—in blowing others to pieces from behind a cannon or with a smiling face to approach a cannon and be blown to pieces? Who is the true warrior—he who keeps death always as a bosom-friend or he who controls the death of others? Believe me that a man devoid of courage and manhood can never be a passive resister. This, however, I will admit: that even a man, weak in body, is capable of offering this resistance. One man can offer it just as well as millions. Both men and women can indulge in it. It does not require the training of an army; it needs no Jiu-jitsu. Control over the mind is alone necessary, and, when that is attained, man is free like the king of the forest, and his very glance withers the enemy. Passive resistance is an all-sided sword; it can be used anyhow; it blesses him who uses it and him against whom it is used. Without drawing a drop of blood, it produces far-reaching results. It never rusts, and cannot be stolen. Competition between passive resisters does not exhaust. The sword of passive resistance does not require a scabbard. It is strange indeed that you should consider such a weapon to be a weapon merely of the weak.2 Passage 2: Nelson Mandela Some of the things so far told to the Court are true and some are untrue. I do not, however, deny that I planned sabotage. I did not plan it in a spirit of recklessness, nor because I have any love of violence. I planned it as a result of a calm and sober assessment of the political situation that had arisen after many years of tyranny, exploitation, and oppression of my people by the Whites. . . . . . . We first broke the law in a way which avoided any recourse to violence; when this form was legislated against, and then the Government resorted to a show of force to crush opposition to its policies, only then did we decide to answer violence with violence. . . . I, and some colleagues, came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable, it would be unrealistic and wrong for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non-violence at a time when the Government met our peaceful demands with force. This conclusion was not easily arrived at. It was only when all else had failed, when all channels of peaceful protest had been barred to us, that the decision was made to embark on violent forms of political struggle . . . I can only say that I felt morally obliged to do what I did. . . . . . . Above all, we want equal political rights, because without them our disabilities will be permanent. I know this sounds revolutionary to the whites in this country, because the majority of voters will be Africans. This makes the white man fear democracy. But this fear cannot be allowed to stand in the way of the only solution which will guarantee racial harmony and freedom for all. It is not true that the enfranchisement of all will result in racial domination. Political division, based on colour, is entirely artificial and, when it disappears, so will the domination of one colour group by another. The ANC has spent half a century fighting against racialism. When it triumphs it will not change that policy.3 Questions Describe any bias found in each source. If you feel that a particular source does not contain bias, explain why. Describe the context surrounding each source. If you are unable to determine the context, explain how you would find it. Describe each source's level of reliability. If you are unsure about a source's reliability, explain how you would determine it. Explain the extent to which each source is corroborated by the other. If one source does not seem to be corroborated by the other, explain how you might find a source that would corroborate it.
Answer:
1. There is small amount of bias in the first passage. The author seems to favor passive resistance over people who use brute force, or extremists. He says the people who use brute force over being a passive resistor “devoid of courage and manhood.” To some, that could be very offensive. In the second passage their doesn’t appear to be any bias, if so, it is virtually undetectable. Nelson seems to know both sides of the story and speaks in a way that all people can get behind. He is obviously knowledgeable about what he’s speaking on.
2.Gandhi talks about the English at one point and that makes me think that they are trying to add their “two cents” to what India already has. In the second source, I think Nelson is speaking on the government and police systems being corrupt and them abusing their power. He said he decided to meet violence with violence, which means something was happening before he decided to get involved. If I was unable to determine the context, I personally might search what article, book, etc. the excerpt comes from to get a better understanding. With the second passage, it doesn’t come from a specific source that is listed so I might search words or phrases that are used to see where they come from.
3.Due to the fact that there is bias present in the first source, I would say that while it is still reliable, it might not be the first source I use to get evidence. The fact that it was written by Ghandi is a small redeeming factor. The second source, I would definitely use. It is a firsthand statement by Nelson Mandela, and he is very honest about the events that unfolded. To determine a sources reliability, I would first check the accuracy of the information with what I already know. I would also check where the source comes from and who wrote it as well as the type of source it is. Lastly, I would check for bias.
4. They both talk and address the government and the powers that are corrupt at different points in the passages. The main difference between the two is that in the 1st passage, the standpoint is more the difference in the people that are fighting back against the oppressors, while in the 2nd passage the standpoint is of a person fighting back that knows they could’ve did it differently and the events that took place didn’t have to happen. They both confirm that repressive governments need to be handled and that it is the publics job to call them out and step in when necessary. For me personally, to find a source that would corroborate another one, I would search for the overall theme or message of the source I already have. Then based on what comes up find a short passage that I can use.
Ok, that was a lot. Could i maybe get brainliest?
Explanation:
Why did Lyman Beecher believe that alcohol was so dangerous to society?
Beecher believes that alcohol is to blame for a ramification of issues. He believed that alcohol changed into dangerous to individuals who drank it. It renders them mentally incompetent. He also believed that alcohol became accountable for societal issues which include homelessness.
What are the problems with alcohol?Through the years, excessive alcohol use can result in the improvement of chronic illnesses and other critical problems including excessive blood strain, heart ailment, stroke, liver disease, and digestive issues. Cancer of the breast, mouth, throat, esophagus, voice box, liver, colon, and rectum.
Learn more about Cancer here: https://brainly.com/question/23116124
#SPJ2
Religious tensions in India after World War II led to which outcome?
A. The rise of secular communist leaders in the Indian National
Congress
B. The formation of a Hindu state in India and a Muslim state in
Pakistan
O C. The establishment of the British Raj on the Indian subcontinent
D. The spread of nonviolent resistance to colonialism throughout
India
Answer:
Option A the rise of secular communist in the Indian national congress because congress mounted pressure on British government to give all the authority to Indian national congress
Explanation:
I hope this will help you :)
3. What does Geraldine Ferraro suggest about how Reagan's approach to the Middle East has been problematic?
Answer and Explanation:
Regan’s approach towards the Middle East was a major dismal. His relation to Middle-East took him to the light if not to the limelight.
Geraldine Ferraro suggested that his approach toward middle-east is not more than a problem. Reagan’s administration helped the Freedom Fighters who were anti-communist. Moreover, Reagan’s administration sold weapons to Iran. Moreover, it used that money to support or fund the Contras during the Iran-Contra affair.
He was an anti-communist, and to assert American power; he rolled the Soviet Union by authorizing the US to make the Strategic Defense Initiative against Soviet Missiles.
To overthrow the power of the Soviet Union, his administration helped the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. Moreover, he replaced the Marxist government.
How is communism different than socialism?
Answer:
An early distinction between communism and socialism was that the latter aimed to only socialise production while the former aimed to socialise both production and consumption
How does this paragraph develop the characters in the dialogue
Answer:
which paragraph? please be specific :)
Explanation:
Which best describes the United Fruit Company in the early 1900s?
A. It worked to lower prices.
B. It was broken apart by government.
C. It created a monopoly.
D. It worked to improve conditions for workers.
Answer:
C. It created a monopoly.
Explanation:
The United Fruit Company held most of the banana production in Central America.
How did the invention of the Cotten gin affect slave labor in the United States plato
Answer:
The invention of the cotton gin made it easier and faster to separate cotton from any debris. Now, with the work being done faster, it increased the demand for slaves.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
I think Affected slave labour in the USA because it raised the production of cotton to a higher rate. I could be wrong.
Explanation:
The terrorist groups in Italy and Peru both wanted to
gain personal freedom.
separate from the country.
unite various ethnic groups.
overthrow the existing government.
Answer:
the answer is (D
Explanation:
i took the quiz
The terrorist groups in Italy and Peru both wanted to overthrow the existing government. Hence, option D is appropriate.
What is the meaning of Terrorists?The use of deliberate violence and fear to further political or ideological goals is referred to as terrorism in its broadest sense. In this usage, the phrase primarily refers to intentional harm done to noncombatants during times of peace or during armed conflict.
the deliberate use of illegal violence or the threat of illegal violence to sow fear in governments or societies in order to force or frighten them into pursuing goals that are typically political, religious, or ideological.
The illegal use of force or violence against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing a government or its people to promote specific political or social goals is referred to as terrorism. Domestic and foreign terrorism is typically recognized as distinct categories by law enforcement.
Learn more about the Terrorists here:
https://brainly.com/question/15203676
#SPJ5
What was considered a characteristic of a “true woman” in the nineteenth century and how it differs from modern social perception
Answer:
In the nineteenth century, the characteristics that made the average woman very different from those that we see today in western society.
Thus, at that time, women played a secondary role in society. She was a figure with little social, political and economic weight, due to the limitations she suffered in the patriarchal context of the society of the 1800s, where man was the only one who made the relevant decisions for her family and at the social level. Therefore, the figure of the woman was limited to the upbringing of her children and the care of the home, being a model of behavior that woman who fulfilled these functions efficiently.
Instead, today, thanks to the feminist struggle and international progressivism that have led to a greater perception of rights by minorities, women occupy a level of equality with men in every way. Thus, today women occupy hierarchical jobs, have the same civil and political rights as men, and even intersperse domestic responsibilities with them. In addition, many women have reached positions of power that were previously dominated only by men, as is the case, for example, of Angela Merkel in Germany.
HELP ME!! What was the main problem with the Constitution after ratification?
Answer: I’m guessing Popular Sovereignty, Federal Power, state power
Explanation:
Is American politics today significantly different from those from the gilded age
Answer:
Answered below
Explanation:
The gilded age politics was characterized by intense competition between the democrats and the republicans who were the two major parties, with minor parties coming and going.
The gilded age politics was not significantly different from the politics today.
There was high voter turnout and elections were close. There was a lot of lobbying and businessmen supported politicians who would make favourable decisions for them. Both democrats and republicans favoured business interests.
Republicans called for high tariffs while democrats wanted free trade. Religious lines were sharply drawn in politics. The Protestant church supported the democrats while the Catholic church and Lutheran church supported the republicans.
Which of the following is an enumerated power of the national government?
A) regulating guns near schools
B) Creation of a national bank
C) Marriage and divorce
D) conducting foreign policy
Answer:
D) Conducting foreign policy
Explanation:
Delegated (sometimes called enumerated or expressed) powers are specifically granted to the federal government in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. This includes the power to coin money, to regulate commerce, to declare war, to raise and maintain armed forces, and to establish a Post Office.
What was the outcome of most European revolts of the 1830s?
Answer:
Explanation: These movements took place in three main countries: France, Belgium, and Poland. The general spirit was the desire of people to be independent and free from domination. At that time, the majority of European countries were ruled by monarchies. This movement was the first step of the bigger revolutions, that happened later in Europe, in 1848.
Further explanation
The first actions began in France between July 27 and 29, 1830. It was a revolt of the Parisians against King Charles X who did not accept to leave a little power to the people. For three days, the revolutionaries fought in the streets of Paris against the French soldiers and forced the king to flee. A new king was finally chosen, the Duke of Orleans, who established a more democratic monarchy.
Inspired by the French, the Belgians revolted from August 25, 1930. They won a better victory than their neighbors in France because they managed to free themselves from the control of the King of the Netherlands, William I, and declared their independence on October 4, 1830.
The last revolution during 1830 was the Polish. At that time, Poland was under the control of Russia, and the war lasted for almost one year. It ended in September 1831 with the defeat of the Polish who failed to gain their independence.
Hope this helps :D
Answer: They resulted in little or no change. They led to larger revolutions. They resulted in sweeping reform.
Explanation:
Which line from Beowulf
describes the heroic character
of Beowulf?
Answer:
Wulfgar's words make Beowulf seem greater of a hero by stating that he is of noble birth, and that he is well-known. Beowulf says that he has come to kill Grendel.
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPED U DIDNT GIVE ANY OPTIONS SO THIS IS BEST I CAN GIVE U <3
Enter important economic, political, and social developments in the South. Be sure to note how and why slavery changed over time.
Answer:
The Southern states were depended on the slavery system in culturally, socially, and economically.
Explanation:
The South economy based on plantation and slaves needed as labourers in cotton and other plantations. The Southern economy based on farming as the soil was favourable for growing crops like tobacco, cotton, and rice.
The Southern states depended on the labours to toil in the fields of cotton plantations. For plantation owners, slavery became the backbone of the economy of the South. Slaves worked as domestic servants in white colonists household as well as in plantations. The efficiency and productiveness in the South made most plantation owners economically dependent on slaves.
Slavery changed over time because it was as an evil practice by the Northerners in America. Slavery remained legal in the South, while it continued as illegal in the North. Slavery lasted until 1865 when the South lost the Civil War.
List Things about The 3 branches of government
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Answer:
Hope that helps :D
Explanation:
The Federal Government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative , executive , and judicial , whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively.
The Legislative Branch to make the laws. Congress is made up of two houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives.
The Executive Branch to enforce the laws.
The Judicial Branch to interpret the laws.
Who does the Cuban Son represent in his music? a. to the governors C. to africans b. to the humble classes d. to the bourgeoisie
Answer:c is the answer
Explanation:
1. What imports does Canada receive from the United States? 2. What has been the effect of NAFTA on Canadian business? 3. What effect has Canadian trade had on Washington State? 4. How does the Washington State aircraft industry benefit from trade relations with Canada? Do you think open trade with Canada has a positive or negative effect on the United States? Why or why not?
Answer:
1. What imports does Canada receive from the United States?
Canada mostly imports fuels, machinery, vechicles, and plastics.
2. What has been the effect of NAFTA on Canadian business?
The effect of NAFTA on Canadian businesses has been mostly positive. Canada's businesses have been able to access the large markets of the United States and Mexico, and have attracted investments from these two countries.
3. What effect has Canadian trade had on Washington State?
Canada is the main import partner of Washington State. 31% of imports in the state come from Canada.
Canada is the second export partner of Washington State, after China. Around 20% of exports of Washington State go to Canada.
4. How does the Washington State aircraft industry benefit from trade relations with Canada?
The main export of Washington State being aircraft goods (mainly Boeing but also other companies), and Canada being the second export partner of the state, the aircraft industry in the state benefits from trade relations with Canada simply by having a sizeable market in the vicinity, with a high income population, where to export the goods produced by this industry.
Do you think open trade with Canada has a positive or negative effect on the United States?
Open trade with Canada has a positive effect on the United States. International trade is economically benefitial to all countries because it allows each country to specialize in what it does best.
This is known in economics as comparative advantage and leads to more economic efficiency.
On week–ends [my neighbor’s] Rolls—Royce became an omnibus, bearing parties to and from the city between nine in the morning and long past midnight . . . . And on Mondays eight servants, including an extra gardener,
The correct answer is the following.
There is no question here. It is only a description, but there is no question at all. However, we can comment on the following.
The description refers to the passage of the story "The Great Gatsby," written by American writer F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1925. This novel has been publicly acclaimed as one of the best books written in American modern times to the degree that a movie was filmed due to the success of the book.
The description in the book goes on with parts of the text like this: "Every Friday five crates of oranges and lemons arrived from a fruiterer in New York — every Monday these same oranges and lemons left his back door in a pyramid of pulpless halves. There was a machine in the kitchen which could extract the juice of two hundred oranges in half an hour if a little button was pressed two hundred times by a butler’s thumb."
The setting and the descriptions of the author are very important to create an impact on the story and maintain the interest of the reader.
Answer:
It was a time of excess and parties, especially among the rich.
Explanation: Edgenity
This
group
received more power
and more revenue in the 1970s
under the presidency of Richard
Nixon.
Answer:
(C) federal governments
Answer: B-state government’s
Explanation:just answered question
1-Why do you think the british at first approved of the setting up of a national political organisation,but later disapproved?(4)
Answer:
Because this gave a colony much freedom, which would have more strength to generate a rebellion and organize separatist and independent independence movements.
Explanation:
I believe that you are talking about England's colonialist policy in Indian territory.
As Indians sought greater participation in the formulation of national policies, England allowed a national political organization to be created where members would be Indians. The problem is that this gave a certain autonomy and freedom in India, which could seek the power to launch separatist movements that sought independence from the country and the breaking of subordination to the English crown. This made England regret allowing this organization to be created.
Determine which statements accurately describe the changing colonial world of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
a. Saharan and sub-Saharan Africa were sparsely populated.
b. The Kingdom of Kongo was central to the Portuguese slave trade.
c. Brazil's indigenous population was replaced by an African population
Answer:
The kingdom of Kongo was central of the Portuguese slave trade.
Explanation:
this is true because Africans who became slaves were sent to brazil.
The Kingdom of Kongo was central to the Portuguese slave trade, to describe the changing colonial world of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Thus, option B is correct.
What is colonial?A time in a nation's existence when that nation was under the control of colonial power. In this system, there were several colonies whose people were immigrants, and they came into foreign land to live and settle.
The kingdom was wealthy due to the surrounding traffic with slaves and metals alongside the Congo River. The advent of Portuguese merchants in the 15th and 16th century CE increased human trafficking in the area.
The market Congo on in the king of the kingdom of Congo there was a boost when the Portuguese came into arrival and booster does the economy was and high peak. Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about colonial, here:
https://brainly.com/question/20147075
#SPJ2
In December 1950, poor rural African Americans asked for school buses for their children, but their request was denied. They asked that their children be allowed to attend white schools. What Supreme Court case gave the county a legal basis for denying the right of African Americans to attend white schools?
Which of the following best completes the table?
Cotton with a lower price than domestic cotton
Cotton that is domestically taxed
Cotton infested with boll weevils
Cotton grown in a hostile country
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Cotton with a lower price than domestic cotton
The following that best completes the table is Cotton grown in a hostile country. The correct option is a.
Cotton grown in a hostile country is cotton produced in a country that is politically or economically hostile to the country referred to in the table. Trade relations and diplomatic connections between the two nations may be strained in such instances, resulting in limitations, tariffs, or other trade obstacles imposed on cotton imports.
Cotton grown in a hostile country may have a lower price than local cotton as a result of these trade obstacles. The restrictions and additional expenses involved with importing cotton from a hostile country can make it less appealing to domestic purchasers, resulting in decreased demand and a lower price.
Thus, the correct option is a.
Learn more about cotton, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23397467
#SPJ6
The Canterbury Tales was a popular book of the period because it
The Canterbury Tales was a popular book of the period because it contained many different stories.