How did racial laws and discrimination affect the military during the war?
A. Minorities were not given benefits like other soldiers
B. Black soldiers were kept separated from white soldiers
C. The military put aside all discrimination during the war
D. Back Americans were not allowed to join the military

Answer:

Option B is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a series of events in August 1964 that involved the alleged attacks on two American naval destroyers, USS Maddox and USS Turner Joy, by North Vietnamese patrol boats in the Gulf of Tonkin. As a result, the US Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized the use of military force by US armed forces in Vietnam.

In 1917, the U.S. Congress enacted the first extensively restrictive immigration law. The uncertainty generated over national security throughout World War I made it possible for Congress to skip this legislation, and it included various essential provisions that paved the way for the 1924 Act.

All travelers entering the United States from all other countries want a passport upon arrival (regardless of their country of citizenship). Permanent residents and overseas nationals may additionally additionally want a U.S. visa. You must practice for a visa before you begin your trip.

The regulation repealed the final of the current measures to cut out Asian immigration, disbursed every Asian country a minimal quota of a hundred visas every year, and eliminated laws stopping Asians from turning into naturalized American citizens.

Learn more about immigration in the United States here:

Social reform aimed at improving various aspects of society, while the women's movement specifically focused on advancing the rights and opportunities of women.

Social reform encompassed a broad range of issues, such as labor conditions, education, housing, and public health. Its aim was to address the social problems created by industrialization and urbanization and improve the well-being of all members of society, regardless of gender.

On the other hand, the women's movement was a specific movement focused on advancing the rights and opportunities of women. Women's rights activists sought to secure legal and political rights for women, such as the right to vote, access to education and employment, and reproductive rights.

Read more about reform

brainly.com/question/3332629

#SPJ1

President Theodore Roosevelt took action to keep his promise to Upton Sinclair by supporting and advocating for the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act in 1906.

These acts aimed to regulate the food and drug industries and improve the safety and quality of food products for consumers. Upton Sinclair's book "The Jungle" had exposed the unsanitary and dangerous conditions in the meatpacking industry, which prompted public outrage and led to the passage of these acts.

What is Meat Inspection?

Meat inspection is a regulatory process carried out by government agencies to ensure that meat products are safe and suitable for human consumption. It involves a series of inspections and tests to verify that the meat and its processing facilities meet the safety and quality standards set by the regulatory authorities. The inspections may cover various aspects of the meat production process, such as animal health and welfare, food handling and storage, equipment and facility sanitation, and labeling and packaging. Meat inspection is an important public health measure that helps to prevent the spread of foodborne illnesses and protect consumers from unsafe or contaminated meat products.

To know more about Drug Act, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19485509

#SPJ1

Answer:

President Obama proposed improving legal immigration processes, strengthening border security, deporting people convicted of a felony, expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, and creating the Deferred Action for Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program. DACA and DAPA were the most controversial elements of the president's plan with Republican critics, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Sen. Mike Lee (Utah), saying that the programs were a form of amnesty.[8] President Obama responded to these criticisms, saying, "I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. Amnesty is the immigration system we have today – millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time."[7]

Texas and the 25 states that brought a lawsuit against the Obama administration argued that President Obama did not have the authority to implement DAPA because it was essentially a new law. The brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Texas and the states argued that "DAPA is a crucial change in the Nation’s immigration law and policy—and that is precisely why it could be created only by Congress, rather than unilaterally imposed by the Executive.

The Obama administration argued that the president's actions were legal because Congress had given the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the ability to administer and enforce immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The DHS secretary had the authority to decide whom to deport and whom to grant deferred action to under the INA, and "Congress has repeatedly recognized" this ability in other legislation. The United States government argued that the ruling of the appeals court, which stated that DAPA could not be implemented, "will allow States to frustrate the federal government’s enforcement of the Nation’s immigration laws. It will force millions of people—who are not removal priorities under criteria the court conceded are valid, and who are parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents—to continue to work off the books, without the option of lawful employment to provide for their families.

Answer:

Churchill thought that France's army was a strong fortress against potential Nazi aggression against other European countries at the time. One of the most amazing military campaigns in history was the defeat of this formidable army in just six weeks in 1940.

Explanation:

German communications were excellent, and even the smallest field units had radios, enabling them to move and respond more quickly than the Allies. It was also important that the German air and ground forces worked closely together to produce the most destructive firepower possible.

Cuba turns away a ship carrying 937 Jewish immigrants who were fleeing Nazi Germany. On May 27, 1939, Havana, Cuba, turns away a boat carrying 937 Jewish immigrants who were fleeing Nazi persecution. The country only accepts 28 immigrants.

To learn more about immigration paper, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/17141328

Answer:

L'impérialisme peut être défini comme une politique d'expansion territoriale et d'influence politique et économique sur d'autres nations et peuples. Cette politique a été motivée par différents arguments, notamment économiques, humains, stratégiques et moraux. Certains ont justifié l'impérialisme en affirmant qu'il était rentable, que la domination était la nature humaine, que cela garantissait la sécurité régionale ou que c'était une façon de propager une religion. Cependant, d'autres ont critiqué cette politique en affirmant que c'était une forme de domination et d'exploitation qui nuisait aux peuples soumis. Ils ont également souligné les effets négatifs sur la culture et la société des nations dominées. En fin de compte, l'impérialisme peut être considéré comme une politique et une condition à la fois positives et négatives, en fonction des motivations, des méthodes et des conséquences. Dans cet essai, je vais soutenir que l'impérialisme est généralement une politique négative en raison des conséquences néfastes pour les peuples dominés, mais que dans certains cas, il peut être considéré comme positif, par exemple lorsque les peuples dominés bénéficient d'une modernisation bénéfique, d'une meilleure gouvernance et de protections accrues contre les conflits. Pour illustrer mon point de vue, je vais examiner plusieurs exemples d'impérialisme dans l'histoire, tels que le colonialisme européen en Afrique, l'impérialisme japonais en Asie et l'expansion américaine dans les Caraïbes et en Amérique latine.

Explanation:

They needed to find a means to pay off that debt, so they asked their colonists to do it instead. Even though it violated Englishmen's rights, a variety of taxes were implemented throughout the colonies.

How did the British try to control trade?

England established laws, statutes, tariffs, and levies all with the purpose of monopolising commerce and exerting control over the American colonies in order to perpetuate mercantilism.

Britain had spent enormous sums throughout the Seven Years' War, both on its own troops and on aid to its allies. In that little period, the British national debt had quadrupled, and further taxes had been imposed to pay it.

The colonists of America organised a protest in response to the actions of Parliament. A network of covert organizations called the Sons of Liberty was established across the colonies with the intention of scaring the tax collectors for Parliament.

Learn more about taxes on trade:

https://brainly.com/question/1548195

#SPJ1

While Confederate soldiers marched by, Barbara Frietchie flew a Union flag.

According to Barbara Fritchie's tale, as Confederate troops advanced into Union territory and drew near a particular town, the men there took down the Union flags that were flying out of concern for retaliation.

Barbara Fritchie would have none of that, so she: went outside and flew the Union flag; rebuked General "Stonewall" Jackson for trying to convince her to take it down by reminding him that it was the flag of the United States and that he must respect it; and went back inside and lowered the Union flag. She requested that no soldier take the flag down, and General Jackson complied.

To learn more about Barbara Fritchie, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/2720323

Major disasters have the potential to disrupt economies far beyond the local damage to infrastructure, as businesses around the world can find their supply chains and markets hit in the aftermath. There’s hardly a business or consumer who doesn’t rely to some extent on goods and services from other parts of the world – and all parts of the world have different levels of natural disaster risk.

Answer:

Kamala Harris

VICE PRESIDENT

Antony Blinken

SECRETARY OF STATE

Janet Yellen

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

Lloyd Austin

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

Merrick Garland

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Deb Haaland

SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

Tom Vilsack

SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

Gina Raimondo

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE

Xavier Becerra

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Marcia Fudge

SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Pete Buttigieg

SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION

Jennifer Granholm

SECRETARY OF ENERGY

Dr. Miguel Cardona

SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

Denis McDonough

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Alejandro Mayorkas

SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Michael Regan

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Avril Haines

DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

Katherine Tai

UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

Linda Thomas-Greenfield

UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Dr. Cecilia Rouse

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS

Isabel Guzman

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Shalanda Young

DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Dr. Arati Prabhakar

DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY

Jeff Zients

CHIEF OF STAFF

Explanation:

My source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet/

Answer:

Explanation:

Commodity money

Gold was serving as commodity money. Money that derives its worth from the commodity from which it is made is known as commodity money. Thus, option A is correct.

Objects with intrinsic worth or use, as well as their value when used to purchase products, make up commodity money. This contrasts with fiat money, which derives its value from having been established as money by government regulation, and representational money, which has no intrinsic worth but instead represents something valuable like gold or silver, in which it can be exchanged.

Gold, silver, copper, salt, peppercorns, tea, ornamented belts, shells, alcohol, cigarettes, silk, candies, nails, cocoa beans, cowries, and barley are a few examples of commodities that have been used as means of exchange.

Learn more about commodity money here:

https://brainly.com/question/30268213

#SPJ5

Answer: very true jesus how much there is. its crazy

Explanation:

So essentially the question is: How can the state government go against the federal government?

The given information leaves no area for the passage but I can mildly infer what you mean.

To start:

So, constitutionally speaking, the States have more rights than the federal government.

We didn’t start out with a country which was then divided up into states.

Instead, we started out with states that all agreed to have a Federal Government that was given limited powers by those states. The states reserved the right of veto over many things the Federal Government might do. In fact, when the Confederation of Southern States decided to secede from the Union before the Civil War, they were prevented from doing so not because seceeding was unconstitutional (it wasn’t), but because the Federal Government went to war with the Southern States under president Abraham Lincoln and re-captured those lands with the same expansionist mindset that was used to take away the land of Native Americans in the Westward growth of this country. That Civil War resulted in more American deaths than WWI and WWII combined.

It is the nature of government to assume a necessity and right of top-down absolute control over everything and everyone of it’s subjects. The US Constitution was set up to prevent that, but most people who enter government are soon infatuated and addicted to power and our constitution has been chipped away at ever since. It is not so much that the written text of the constitution has been changed legally and voted on, but that a combination of lawmakers and judges throughout history have simply ignored the Constitution.

Thanks.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yo, the Santa Fe Trail was a trade route back in the day, connectin' Mexico with Missouri, man. So the answer is D. Missouri, bro!

Answer: D.Missouri

Explanation:

Missouri is where it started and Mexico is where it ended.

The War of 1812 was a war between the United States and Great Britain, which lasted from 1812 to 1815. Despite some early American successes, such as victory at the Battle of Lake Erie, the war was generally inconclusive and ended in a draw. In 1814, both sides agreed to a peace treaty called the Treaty of Ghent, which restored relations between the two countries to the way they were before the war. One of the long-term effects of the war was that it strengthened the feeling of national unity in the United States and led to further territorial expansion in the West.

Answer:

Racism had a significant impact on both Germany and South Africa in the past, but the nature and scope of racism differed in both countries.

In Germany, during the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler, millions of Jews, Romas, homosexuals, disabled people, and others were targeted and systematically murdered in what became known as the Holocaust. This was a result of Nazi ideology that deemed certain groups of people as inferior and unworthy of life. The Holocaust is considered one of the most significant tragedies in human history and serves as a reminder of the devastating consequences of racism, discrimination, and prejudice.

In South Africa, apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation that was implemented by the white minority government in the mid-20th century. It resulted in widespread discrimination, inequality, and human rights abuses against non-white South Africans, particularly Black people. Non-white people were denied many basic rights, such as access to education, housing, and employment. The apartheid system was ultimately dismantled in the early 1990s, following years of protests, sanctions, and international pressure.

Both Germany and South Africa have since made efforts to acknowledge and address their respective histories of racism, including through education, remembrance, and policies aimed at promoting equality and combating discrimination.

Answer:

One of the qualities of detection dogs is that they are able to identify individual scents, even when the scents are combined or masked by other odors. They also have the ability to detect odors when they are tightly sealed or deeply hidden.

Drug dogs are drugs, so, they obviously lead to addiction.

Harris was the first Supreme Court case to challenge the dog's reliability, backed by data that asserts that on average, up to 80% of a dog's alerts are wrong. Twenty-four U.S. States, the federal government, and two U.S. territories filed briefs in support of Florida as amici curiae.

In my opinion, yes. The Court hears Cases when Lower Courts Disregard past Supreme Court decisions: If a lower court blatantly disregards a past Supreme Court decision, the court may hear the case to correct the lower court, or alternatively, simply overrule the case without comment.

Answer: hope it helps

Explanation:

In her younger years she was sick much of the time, and as a result, was a small child. Her parents eventually separated and her mother took her and her brother and moved to Pine Level, a town adjacent to Montgomery, Alabama. There Rosa spent the rest of her childhood on her grandparents' farm.

Answer:

because she needed to care for her dying grandmother and, shortly thereafter, her chronically ill mother.

Explanation:

Answer:

a mutually beneficial relationship providing each with access to key ports and valuable goods

Explanation:

i hope this helps :)

Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the incapability to use one's personal grasp besides another's guidance.

This nonage is self-imposed if its motive lies no longer in lack of perception but in indecision and lack of braveness to use one's personal idea except another's guidance.

Kant defines enlightenment as “man's release from his self-imposed tutelage”. ¹ He elucidates the meaning of tutelage as “man's inability to make use of his appreciation without route from another”.

, he contended that the Enlightenment marked a new way of thinking and eloquently affirmed the Enlightenment's self assurance in and dedication to reason. Enlightenment is man's leaving his self-caused immaturity.

Learn more about Enlightenment here:

The decision by President Carter to boycott the 1980 Moscow Olympics is controversial and complex, with arguments on both sides.

On the positive side:

• It showed moral support for the U.S. boycott of the Olympics in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Some saw it as a principled stand against Soviet aggression.

• It may have irritated the Soviet Union and weakened their prestige on the world stage by having a conspicuous absence of U.S. athletes at the games.

• It boosted patriotism and national pride in the U.S. for standing up to the Soviets.

However, there are also criticisms and downsides to consider:

• It likely did little to actually influence the Soviet presence or policies in Afghanistan. The boycott did not force the Soviets to withdraw.

• It denied U.S. athletes the chance to compete on the world stage and possibly win medals. This disappointed many American athletes and sports fans.

• It damaged relations with U.S. allies who did not support the boycott, creating diplomatic tensions.

• It gave the impression that the U.S. was capitulating to Soviet demands by compromising Olympic participation over foreign policy concerns.

• There is little evidence the boycott put meaningful economic or political pressure on the Soviet system. The Soviets seemed largely dismissive of it.

So in summary, while the boycott boosted morale at home, it likely had little practical impact on Soviet actions or policies. It made a statement but did not substantially change realities on the ground. The decision remains polarizing, with reasonable positions on both sides regarding its effectiveness and consequences. Ultimately, its positive or negative impact depends a lot on one's perspective.

FEMA or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was created in 1979 to help prepare for and respond to the disasters in the United States.

Disasters refer to events that cause significant harm and disruption to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment. They can be natural, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, or human-made, such as industrial accidents, terrorist attacks, and civil unrest. Disasters can result in the loss of lives, displacement of people, damage to property and infrastructure, disruption of essential services, and the spread of diseases. They can have long-term economic, social, and environmental consequences. Disasters can be mitigated through preparedness measures such as risk assessments, emergency planning, and public education. Effective response and recovery efforts involve coordination and collaboration between government agencies, civil society organizations, and communities to restore normalcy and build resilience.

To learn more about disasters, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28991652

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The battle began on April 16 when the Soviets attacked along the Oder River near Berlin. They quickly defeated the German forces outside Berlin and advanced on the city. By April 20th the Soviets began bombing Berlin. They worked their way around the city and had it completely surrounded in a few days.

A. The women are pointing and C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury. These are the evidences from image that  supports the fact that this image is of a trial.

Hence, options A. and C. are the right choice.

A judicial hearing to decide the outcome of a specific case is known as a trial. For example-Should your cousin be detained for taking her neighbor's dog, she may face a Trial.

A trial is when parties to a disagreement gather together to submit information as evidence in a formal setting, often a court, before a judge, jury, or another authority tasked by law with finding a fact, in an effort to resolve their conflict.

To know more about Trial visit:

https://brainly.com/question/249570

#SPJ1

The complete question is-

What evidence supports the fact that this image is of a trial? Check all of the boxes that apply. ( The image is added below)

A. The women are pointing.

B. The women are wearing white hats.

C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury.

Answer:

Explanation:

The global battle known as World War I lasted from 1914 until 1918. The reasons of the conflict were intricate and numerous, although they may generally be linked to a variety of interrelated issues, such as the establishment of European alliances, imperialism, nationalism, and militarism.

The development of European alliances was one of the major factors that led to World War I. Several European nations made alliances with one another in the years preceding the war in an effort to bolster their positions in the event of conflict. The Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy and the Triple Entente between Great Britain, France, and Russia were the most significant of these partnerships.

The buildup to World War I was also significantly influenced by imperialism.Several European nations had imperial aspirations and tried to enlarge their spheres of influence and dominion. As a result, there was fierce rivalry for resources and lands, especially in Africa and Asia. Conflicts and rivalry between European nations were frequently caused by the battle for colonies and markets.

In the years leading up to the conflict, nationalism also played a part. Several European nations saw the rise of nationalist groups as people fought to defend their national identities and interests. This increased hostilities between various national groups, especially in areas like the Balkans where they coexisted in precarious balance.

And last, militarism was a significant contributor to World War I.Each European state that wanted to keep its position of power and reputation made significant investments in its military forces. As a result, there was a competition to develop the most advanced military technologies and capabilities among various nations. The militarization of Europe increased the likelihood of violence and made it more challenging to settle disputes peacefully.

Together, these elements produced a very unstable environment in Europe that ultimately sparked the start of World War I. The trigger event that started the war was the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in June 1914, although the underlying factors had been accumulating for a long time.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

The economic miracle generally refers to period of rapid economic growth that occurred in the post-World War II Japan, and is therefore answer C.

Economic growth is typically measured by the increase in gross domestic product (GDP) of a country, which is the total value of all goods and services produced within the country's borders. Economic growth is important because it can lead to improvements in standards of living, higher levels of employment, and increased government revenue. However, economic growth can also have negative consequences, such as environmental degradation, inequality, and social unrest. The drivers of economic growth include factors such as technological innovation, investment, trade, education and training, infrastructure development, and sound macroeconomic policies.

To learn more about economic growth, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8043063

#SPJ1

Answer: They broke tools.

Explanation: Don't worry this answer is correct, I answered this question on khan Academy :).