I need help plz ❤️️️

Answer:

plzz show me the diagram otherwise I can't help you sorry!!!!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

28+22 is 50

Answer:

12+28=50

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

bet power of 7

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm help you 2 cubed plus b times 4

Answer:

G

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer: it's 1200

Step-by-step explanation: please give me brainliest

400x3=1200

60x20=1200

Answer:

x=12, y=9, z=7, w=3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The population of California is [tex]3.3216 * 10^{7}[/tex] more than the population of Wyoming.

Alternatively, the population of California is [tex]6.64 * 10^{1}[/tex] times the population of Wyoming.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first part is to take the numbers out of the scientific notation. The estimated population of California is 38,800,000, and the population of Wyoming is 584,000.

Not that we've done that, let's start with the first part of the problem.

"The population of California is __________ more than the population of Wyoming."

This is a statement of subtraction, because it's not asking how many TIMES more. So, we subtract Wyoming's population from California's population.

[tex]38,800,000 - 584,000 = 38,216,000.[/tex]

Putting that number into scientific notation is easy: move the decimal to the place in the number where there will only be one number in front of the decimal: 3.3216. How many number slots until you have only one number in front of the decimal? 7. So, we know that the power of 10 is going to be 7. So, the first part of the question answers to:

[tex]3.8216 * 10^{7} .[/tex]

Now for the second part.

"Alternatively, the population of California is _________ times the population of Wyoming."

This is a problem of division. The question is asking us to divide California's population by Wyoming's population.

[tex]\frac{38,800,000}{584,000} = 0.664383562 * 10^{2} .[/tex]

We need to have one number in front of the decimal point, so we move it behind the first 6, giving us 6.64. Because we did this, we need to bump the exponent from 2 to 1, leaving us with:

[tex]6.64 * 10^{1}.[/tex]

So, the answer to the question is:

1. [tex]3.8216 * 10^{7}.[/tex]

2. [tex]6.64 * 10^{1}.[/tex]

Hope this helped you, and I hope you get a perfect score!! :)

Answer:

The population of California is ( 3.8216 x 10⁶ ) more than the population of Wyoming.

Alternatively, the population of California is ( 6.64 x 10¹ ) times the population of Wyoming.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm pretty sure this is what the other person was trying to say it was just very confusing.

Anyway I got this right on my mastery test.

so thx for the points

Answer:

9/25 or .36

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

61

Step-by-step explanation:

90 divided by 36 is 2.5 add 10 to the 90 then multiply 10 by 2.5 you get 25 then add 25 to 36 witch gives u 61.  90/36=2.5x10=25+36=61

/ is for division. Hope it helps.

Answer:

y= -5/2X

.....................

Answer:

43

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that ABC and CBD need to add up to 90 so we have

47+CBD=90

CBD=43

Answer:43Step-by-step explanation: if angle ABD is 90 degrees, and abc+cbd=ABD then ABD-ABC=CBD 90-47=CBD which is 43

Answer:

1/5 of a box of candy

Step-by-step explanation:

Because John has 4 boxes of candy, he needs to divide this by his 20 classmates. So we have 4/20, which reduces to 1/5. So each classmate would get 1/5 of a box of candy (assuming that Josh himself does not get any candy).

Answer:

(7+5.5)m + 5.5(2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Equation;

7m + 5.5(2+m)

Find:

Equivalent way

Computation:

7m + 5.5(2+m)

7m + 11 + 5.5 m

12.5m + 11

Or

(7+5.5)m + 5.5(2)

Answer:

huh????

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

cool. i like cookies.

Answer:

0.0769

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

210

Step-by-step explanation:

35x3x2=210

Answer:

mhm

Step-by-step explanation:

that is right

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope it's helpful!

Answer:

(-6, -3) (-3,-3) (-3,-6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiple all of the vertices by 1.5.

(-6, -3) (-3,-3) (-3,-6)

Hope I helped!

[enlargment will still be a triangle]

Answer:

can you take a better pick

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]f(x) = \left \{ {{39.99; 0 \le x \le 450} \atop {0.45x - 162.51; \ x>450}} \right.[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Charges: $39.99 for first 450 minutes

Charges: $0.45 for additional minutes

(a): What is x

x represents the total minutes

(b): What is f(x)

f(x) represents the total monthly cellular charges

(c): The piecewise function

For the first 450 minutes, the function is:

[tex]f(x) = 39.99;\ 0 \le x \le 450[/tex]

For additional minutes.

In (a), the total minutes is x.

So, we have:

Total Charges = Charges for first 450 minutes + Charges for additional minutes * (Minutes after 450 minutes)

[tex]Total\ Charges = 39.99 + 0.45 * (x - 450)[/tex]

[tex]f(x) = 39.99 + 0.45 * (x - 450)[/tex]

Open bracket

[tex]f(x) = 39.99 + 0.45x - 0.45 * 450[/tex]

[tex]f(x) = 39.99 + 0.45x - 202.5[/tex]

Collect Like Terms

[tex]f(x) = 0.45x+39.99 - 202.5[/tex]

[tex]f(x) = 0.45x-162.51[/tex]

The range of the above function is: x > 450.

So, the piecewise function is:

[tex]f(x) = \left \{ {{39.99; 0 \le x \le 450} \atop {0.45x - 162.51; \ x>450}} \right.[/tex]

Answer:

Diana's score is better.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Diana case :

Score = 92

Mean score , μ = 71

Standard deviation σ = 15

So,

P( x ≥ 92 ) = 1 - P( x ≤ 92 )

                = 1 - P(z ≤ [tex]\frac{x - u}{\sigma}[/tex] )

                = 1 - P( z ≤ [tex]\frac{92 - 71 }{15}[/tex] )

                = 1 - P( z ≤ 1.4 )

                = 1 - 0.9192

                = 0.0808 = 8.08 %

⇒P( x ≥ 92 ) = 8.08%

∴ we get

Diana score is > 91.92% other students in the class.

In Micheal case :

Score = 688

Mean score , μ = 493

Standard deviation σ = 150

So,

P( x ≥ 688 ) = 1 - P( x ≤ 688 )

                = 1 - P(z ≤ [tex]\frac{x - u}{\sigma}[/tex] )

                = 1 - P( z ≤ [tex]\frac{688 - 493 }{150}[/tex] )

                = 1 - P( z ≤ 1.3 )

                = 1 - 0.9032

                = 0.0968 = 9.68 %

⇒P( x ≥ 688 ) = 9.68%

∴ we get

Micheal score is > 90.32% other students in the class.

From both scores , we can conclude that

Diana's score is better.

Answer:

C.8/1125 is the answer......