In a certain year, the probability that a person in the United States would declare personal bankruptcy was 0.005. The probability that a person in the United States would declare personal bankruptcy and had recently experienced a "big three" event (loss of job, medical problem, or divorce or separation) was 0.004. What was the probability that a person had recently experienced one of the "big three" events, given that she had declared personal bankruptcy? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

I apologize, but I am having difficulty understanding your question. Can you please provide more information or clarify the terms and calculations you are requesting. Here's a step-by-step explanation to find a formula for the balance after each month:

1. Start with the initial balance on your MasterCard: $6,000.
2. Each month, you make a minimum payment (let's call it 'P') of the balance.
3. After making the payment, the remaining balance will be Balance - Payment = 6000 - P.
4. Assuming no additional charges and an interest rate (let's call it 'i'), we can calculate the new balance after interest is added.
5. New balance = (Remaining balance) * (1 + i) = (6000 - P) * (1 + i).
6. To find the balance after each month, replace 'n' in the formulation with the number of months that passed.

The formula for the balance after 'n' months would be: (6000 - P) * (1 + i)^n.

Please note that you will need to know the minimum payment percentage ('P') and the interest rate ('i') to calculate the exact balance.

Learn more about percentages here:- brainly.com/question/29306119.

#SPJ11

The volume of the given solid enclosed by the paraboloids y = x2 + z2andy = 72 − x2 − z2 is 10368 cubic units.

Using a triple integral, we will integrate over the region of the xz-plane that is enclosed by the paraboloids.

The limits of integration for x and z can be found by solving the two equations for x^2 + z^2:

$x^2 + z^2 = y = x^2 + z^2 + 72 - x^2 - z^2$

$x^2 + z^2 = 36$

Therefore, the limits of integration for x and z are from -6 to 6.

The limits of integration for y are from the equation of the lower paraboloid $y = x^2 + z^2$ to the equation of the upper paraboloid $y = 72 - x^2 - z^2$.

Therefore, the limits of integration for y are from $x^2 + z^2$ to $72 - x^2 - z^2$.

The triple integral for the volume of the solid is:

$\iiint_V dV = \int_{-6}^{6} \int_{-6}^{6} \int_{x^2+z^2}^{72-x^2-z^2} dy dz dx$

Integrating with respect to y:

$\int_{x^2+z^2}^{72-x^2-z^2} dy = 72 - 2(x^2 + z^2)$

Substituting this into the triple integral gives:

$\iiint_V dV = \int_{-6}^{6} \int_{-6}^{6} (72 - 2(x^2 + z^2)) dz dx$

Integrate with respect to z:

$\int_{-6}^{6} (72 - 2(x^2 + z^2)) dz = 72(12) - 4x^2(6) = 864 - 24x^2$

Integrate with respect to x:

$\int_{-6}^{6} (864 - 24x^2) dx = 2(864)(6) - 2\int_{0}^{6} (24x^2) dx = 10368$

Therefore, the volume of the solid enclosed by the paraboloids $y = x^2 + z^2$ and $y = 72 - x^2 - z^2$ is 10368 cubic units.

Know more about paraboloids here:

https://brainly.com/question/30766647

#SPJ11

The critical numbers in increasing order, we have:

x = 0, 4/9, 4

At x = 0, the function has a local minimum.

At x = 4/9, the function has a local maximum.

At x = 4, the function has neither a local maximum nor minimum.

To find the critical numbers of the function f(x) = [tex]x^8(x - 4)^7[/tex]:

We need to take the derivative of the function and set it equal to zero.

f'(x) = [tex]8x^7(x - 4)^7 + 7x^8(x - 4)^6(-1)[/tex]
Setting f'(x) = 0 and solving for x, we get:

x = 0 or x = 4/9

To describe the behavior of f at these critical numbers:

At x = 0, the function has a local minimum.

This is because the derivative changes sign from negative to positive at this point, indicating a change from decreasing to increasing behavior.

At x = 4/9, the function has a local maximum.

This is because the derivative changes sign from positive to negative at this point, indicating a change from increasing to decreasing behavior.

At x = 4, the function has neither a local maximum nor minimum.

This is because the derivative is zero at this point, but does not change sign. Instead, the behavior of the function changes from decreasing to increasing to decreasing again as we move from left to right around x = 4.

Listing the critical numbers in increasing order, we have:

x = 0, 4/9, 4

To know more about Critical Numbers:

https://brainly.com/question/30000833

#SPJ11

[tex]\frac{6 x^{2} - 7 x - 5}{x - 2}=6 x + 5+\frac{5}{x - 2}[/tex] and long division is explained below.

Step 1:

Divide the leading term of the dividend by the leading term of the divisor: [tex]6x^2/x=6x[/tex].

Write down the calculated result in the upper part of the table.

Multiply it by the divisor: 6x(x−2)=6x²−12x.

Subtract the dividend from the obtained result: (6x²−7x−5)−(6x²−12x)=5x−5.

Step 2

Divide the leading term of the obtained remainder by the leading term of the divisor: 5x/x=5.

Write down the calculated result in the upper part of the table.

Multiply it by the divisor: 5(x−2)=5x−10.

Subtract the remainder from the obtained result: (5x−5)−(5x−10)=5.

[tex]\frac{6 x^{2} - 7 x - 5}{x - 2}=6 x + 5+\frac{5}{x - 2}[/tex]

Learn more about long division here:

https://brainly.com/question/28824872

#SPJ1

The correct answer is Prediction intervals make sense since they account for both the vulnerability in evaluating the mean and the inconstancy of personal perceptions.

A confidence interval is an estimate of the range of values ​​over which the true population mean is likely to fall within the specified confidence level.

It is based on the sample mean and sample size and assumes that the variability of observations is constant across the range of predictor variables.

A prediction interval, on the other hand, is an estimate of the range of values ​​to which a single observation is likely at a given confidence level.

This accounts for both the uncertainty in estimating the mean and the variability of individual observations.

It is therefore wider than a confidence interval that only accounts for the uncertainty in estimating the mean.

Therefore, it makes sense that the prediction interval for y is wider than the confidence interval.  

learn more about confidence interval

brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

The mean, median, mode and range of the data set after you perform the given operation on each data value include the following: C. Mean: 13.8, Median: 14, Mode: 14, Range 15.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the mean for this set of data can be calculated by using the following formula:

Mean = [F(x)]/n

For the total number of data, we have;

Total, F(x) = 9 + 7 + 12 + 13 + 9 + 3

Total, F(x) = 53

Mean = 53/6

Mean = 8.8.

By adding 5 to the mean, we have the following:

Mean = 8.8 + 5 = 13.8

Mode = 9 + 5 = 14

Median = (9 + 9)/2 + 5 = 14.

Range = (13 - 3) + 5 = 15

Read more on mean here: brainly.com/question/9550536

#SPJ1

The converted number is 4248, which matches the result obtained using division-remainder method or subtraction.

To convert 310410 to base 9, we can use division-remainder method.

Step 1: Divide 3104 by 9. The quotient is 344 and the remainder is 8. Write down the remainder (8) as the rightmost digit of the converted number.

Step 2: Divide 344 by 9. The quotient is 38 and the remainder is 2. Write down the remainder (2) to the left of the previous remainder.

Step 3: Divide 38 by 9. The quotient is 4 and the remainder is 2. Write down the remainder (2) to the left of the previous remainder.

Step 4: Divide 4 by 9. The quotient is 0 and the remainder is 4. Write down the remainder (4) to the left of the previous remainder.

Therefore, the converted number is 4248.

Alternatively, we could also use subtraction method as follows:

Step 1: Find the largest power of 9 that is less than or equal to 3104. This is 9^3 = 729.

Step 2: Divide 3104 by 729. The quotient is 4 and the remainder is 368. Write down the quotient (4) as the leftmost digit of the converted number.

Step 3: Find the largest power of 9 that is less than or equal to 368. This is 9^2 = 81.

Step 4: Divide 368 by 81. The quotient is 4 and the remainder is 64. Write down the quotient (4) to the right of the previous digit.

Step 5: Find the largest power of 9 that is less than or equal to 64. This is 9^1 = 9.

Step 6: Divide 64 by 9. The quotient is 7 and the remainder is 1. Write down the quotient (7) to the right of the previous digit.

Step 7: The remainder is 1, which is the final digit of the converted number.

Therefore, the converted number is 4248, which matches the result obtained using division-remainder method.

Learn more about subtraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/20113814

#SPJ11

Therefore, the vertex form of the equation is y = -2(x - 3)² - 3.

To change the standard form of a quadratic equation to vertex form, we need to complete the square.

First, we factor out the leading coefficient -2 from the quadratic terms:

y = -2(x² - 6x) - 21

Next, we need to add and subtract a constant term inside the parenthesis to make the quadratic term a perfect square trinomial:

y = -2(x² - 6x + 9 - 9) - 21

y = -2((x - 3)² - 9) - 21

y = -2(x - 3)² + 18 - 21

y = -2(x - 3)² - 3

To know more about vector,

https://brainly.com/question/30202103

#SPJ11

If |r(t)| = 1 for all t, then r(t) lies on the surface of a unit sphere centered at the origin. The magnitude of the tangent vector r'(t) represents the speed of motion along this surface at time t.

Since r(t) lies on the surface of the unit sphere, it follows that r(t) is a constant distance away from the origin, namely 1. Therefore, any motion along this surface must conserve the distance of the point to the origin, meaning that the magnitude of the tangent vector r'(t) is constant.

In other words, we have:

|r(t)| = 1 -> r(t) dot r(t) = 1

Differentiating both sides with respect to t, we obtain:

2r(t) dot r'(t) = 0

Taking the magnitude of both sides, we get:

2|r(t)||r'(t)|cos(θ) = 0

where θ is the angle between r(t) and r'(t).

Since |r(t)| = 1 for all t, we have cos(θ) != 0, which implies that |r'(t)| must be constant in order to satisfy the equation. Therefore, we can conclude that if |r(t)| = 1 for all t, then |r'(t)| is a constant.

To know more about vector,

https://brainly.com/question/10740302

#SPJ11

Answer:

(-3,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

left 1 = (-5,3)

right 2 = (-3,3)

Answer:

-3,3

Step-by-step explanation:

The requried cost of the item is $2392, and the sale tax is 4.5% of the cost of the item.

As given in the question,
Total spent = $2500
Total sale's tax paid = $108
Sale's tax % = 108/[2500-108]×100%
Sale's tax % = 4.5%

The cost of the item is given as:

= $2500 - $108
= $2392

Thus, the requried cost of the item is $2392, and the sale tax is 4.5% of the cost of the item.

Learn more about sales tax here:

https://brainly.com/question/29442509

#SPJ1

The question seems to be incomplete,
The question must be,
What is the sale tax for a purchase of $2,500 and what is the cost of an item with a sales tax of $108?

The points of intersection of the line and of the circle are given as follows:

(0.94, -4.06) and (17.06, 12.06).

The equations are given as follows:

Replacing y = x - 5 into the equation of the circle, we obtain the x-coordinates of the points of intersection, as follows:

(x - 5)² + (x - 5 + 1)² = 25

(x - 5)² + (x - 4)² = 25

x² - 10x + 25 + x² - 8x + 16 = 25

x² - 18x + 16 = 0.

The coefficients of the quadratic equation are given as follows:

a = 1, b = -18, c = 16.

Using a calculator, the solutions are:

x = 0.94 and x = 17.06.

Hence the y-coordinates are:

Hence the points are:

(0.94, -4.06) and (17.06, 12.06).

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

Based on the given scenario, the appropriate conclusion is option 5) "We did not find enough evidence to say a significant difference exists between the true average fuel economy today and 22.74 MPG." This conclusion is drawn from the fact that the p-value of 0.6901 is greater than the 5% level of significance, which means that we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we cannot conclude that the true average fuel economy today is significantly different from 22.74 MPG. It is important to note that a random sample of data was used in this hypothesis test to draw a conclusion about the population.
To answer this question, let's look at the given information and the 5% level of significance:

1. You have a null hypothesis (H) that states the average fuel economy today is equal to 22.74 MPG.
2. The alternative hypothesis (ui) states that the average fuel economy today is not equal to 22.74 MPG.
3. You performed a hypothesis test on a random sample of data and found a p-value of 0.6901.
4. You are asked to conclude at the 5% level of significance, which means you would reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.05.

Since the observed p-value (0.6901) is greater than the 5% level of significance (0.05), you fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means there is not enough evidence to say a significant difference exists between the true average fuel economy today and 22.74 MPG.

So, the appropriate conclusion is:

5) We did not find enough evidence to say a significant difference exists between the true average fuel economy today and 22.74 MPG.

Learn more random samples here:- brainly.com/question/31523301

#SPJ11

The quotient of the polynomials is 6x^2 - 2x + 5 with a remainder of -50.

To find the quotient of the polynomials  ÷ (2x + 5), you can use polynomial long division as follows:

       6x^2 - 2x + 5

 -----------------------

2x + 5 | 12x^3 + 26x^2 + 25

- (12x^3 + 30x^2)

---------------

-4x^2 + 25

- (-4x^2 - 10x)

--------------

35x + 25

- (35x + 75)

-------------

-50

Therefore, the quotient of the polynomials is 6x^2 - 2x + 5 with a remainder of -50.

Chord [a straight line segment that joins two points on the circumference of a circle]

Tangent [a straight line that touches a circle or sphere at a single point]

Secant [a straight line that intersects a circle at two points]

Diameter [a straight line passing through the center of a circle and connecting two points on the circumference]

In geometry, there are several terms related to circles, such as chord, tangent, secant, and diameter. Here are their definitions:

Chord: A chord is a line segment connecting any two points on the circumference of a circle. It is the longest segment that can be drawn inside a circle.

Tangent: A tangent is a line that touches the circumference of a circle at only one point, called the point of tangency. It is perpendicular to the radius at the point of tangency.

Secant: A secant is a line that intersects a circle at two points. It can be a line that passes through the center of the circle, in which case it is the diameter of the circle.

Diameter: The diameter is the longest chord of a circle, and it passes through the center of the circle. It is twice the length of the radius.

Understanding these terms is important in solving problems related to circles and their properties. For example, in finding the length of an arc or the area of a sector, we need to know the chord or diameter of the circle, and the angle or central angle subtended by the arc or sector. In constructing tangents to circles, we need to know the point of tangency and the radius or diameter of the circle.

To learn more about line segment visit: https://brainly.com/question/30072605

#SPJ11

Answer:  B.  5.6 mi

Step-by-step explanation:

The want you to convert 9km to mi

you can multiply by conversion factors to convert

[tex]9km*\frac{1 mi}{1.61 km}[/tex]      >The conversion factor is equivalent measurements.  The

                         >measurement you want to cancel out goes on the bottom.

=5.6 mi

Based on the nutritional facts provided, there are 4.8 grams of unsaturated fat in 240 g of these crisps.

Based on the nutritional facts provided, 2/35 of fat are unsaturated fats.

The percentage of unsaturated fat in 35% of fats is calculated below:

The percentage of unsaturated fat in 35% fats = 2/35 * 35/100

The percentage of unsaturated fat in 35% fats = 2.00%

The mass in grams of unsaturated fat in 240 g of crisps, is calculated below as follows:

mass in grams of unsaturated fat = 2% * 240 g

mass in grams of unsaturated fat = 4.8 g

Learn more about percentages at: https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

Answer:

y=3x-12

Step-by-step explanation:

We can simply apply the formula;

[tex]y = y1 = m(x - x1)[/tex]

When x1 and y1 are points on the line and m is the gradiant

Hence,

[tex]y - ( - 3) = 3(x - 3)[/tex]

[tex]y + 3 = 3x - 9[/tex]

Hence when arranging to yields:

[tex]y = 3x - 12[/tex]

Hopefully this helps!! :)

Please mark as brainliest! :)

The probability that none of the bulbs will fail to flower (i.e. at least one will flower) is 1 - 1/8, or 7/8. Therefore, the probability that at least one tulip bulb will flower is 7/8.

To find the probability that at least one tulip will flower, we can use the complementary probability. The complementary probability is the probability of the opposite event occurring, which in this case is the probability of not all tulips failing to flower.

Given that the probability that all tulips will fail to flower is 1/8, the probability that at least one tulip will flower is:

P(at least one tulip flowers) = 1 - P(all tulips fail to flower) = 1 - 1/8 = 7/8

So, when the three tulip bulbs are planted in the window box, there is a 7/8 probability that at least one will flower.

Learn more about probability  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Logistic Regression is preferred over Linear Regression for classification problems for several reasons.

Firstly, the predicted values in Logistic Regression are much more interpretable as they lie in the range of 0 to 1, which represents the probability of a certain outcome occurring. In contrast, Linear Regression predicts continuous values which are difficult to interpret as probabilities.
Secondly, the sigmoid curve used in Logistic Regression fits the data better than a straight line used in Linear Regression. This is because the sigmoid curve captures the non-linear relationships between the input variables and the output variable, which is often the case in classification problems.
Lastly, Logistic Regression uses maximum likelihood estimation to estimate parameters, whereas Linear Regression minimizes the mean squared error. Maximum likelihood estimation is a more appropriate method for estimating parameters in classification problems as it takes into account the binary nature of the output variable. Linear Regression, on the other hand, does not consider this binary nature and may not produce accurate results in classification problems.

In summary, Logistic Regression is preferred over Linear Regression for classification problems because of its interpretable predicted values, better fit to non-linear relationships, and appropriate method of estimating parameters using maximum likelihood estimation.

We prefer Logistic Regression over Linear Regression for classification problems for the following reasons:

1) Predicted values in Logistic Regression are more interpretable as they lie in the range of 0 to 1, representing probabilities of class membership, while Linear Regression predicts continuous values which may not directly indicate class membership.

2) The sigmoid curve in Logistic Regression fits the data better for classification problems, as it represents a natural threshold between classes, while a straight line from Linear Regression may not provide clear separation between classes.

3) Logistic Regression uses maximum likelihood estimation to estimate parameters, which makes it more suitable for classification problems as it finds the best fit for the probability of class membership. Linear Regression minimizes the mean squared error, which focuses on minimizing the distance between predicted and actual values, but does not directly optimize for class membership probabilities.

Learn more about Linear Regression:

brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ11

The area and circumference of the circle are 16π cm² and 8π cm respectively.

A circle is simply a closed 2-dimensional curved shape with no corners or edges.

The area of a circle is expressed mathematically as;

A = πr²

The circumference of a circle is expressed mathematically as;

C = 2πr

Where r is radius and π is constant pi.

Given the diameter of the circle as 8 cm, we can find the radius by dividing the diameter by 2:

r = 1/2 × diameter

r = 1/2 × 8cm

r = 4cm

Using the radius, we can now calculate the area and circumference of the circle:

Area of circle = πr²

A = π(4 cm)²

A = 16π cm²

Circumference of circle = 2πr

C = 2π(4 cm)

C = 8π cm

Therefore, the circumference of the circle is 8π cm.

Learn more about circles here: https://brainly.com/question/20693416

#SPJ1

a) The null hypothesis is H0: mu = $27.
b) The alternative hypothesis is one-sided, as the analyst wants to know if the mean purchase amount of all transactions is at least $27. So, Ha: mu > $27.

c) To calculate the test statistic, use the formula: (sample mean - null hypothesis mean) / (standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)). Plugging in the given values: (32.84 - 27) / (14.35 / sqrt(25)) = 5.84 / (14.35 / 5) = 5.84 / 2.87 = 2.04. The test statistic is 2.04 (rounded to two decimal places).
d) To find the P-value, look up the test statistic (2.04) in the t-distribution table with 24 degrees of freedom. The P-value for a one-sided test is 0.0264 (rounded to four decimal places).
e) With a significance level of α = 0.005, the P-value is 0.0264, which is greater than α. So, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean purchase amount of all transactions is greater than $27.

Learn more about test statistic here:

https://brainly.com/question/14128303

#SPJ11

The correct set of hypotheses for testing the effect of the bonus plan is:

To test the effect of the new bonus plan on increasing sales at the automobile dealership, the manager can use the following set of hypotheses:

Null Hypothesis: The mean sales rate per salesperson remains the same or less than five automobiles per month (H0: μ ≤ 5)

Alternative Hypothesis: The mean sales rate per salesperson increases with the implementation of the bonus plan (HA: μ > 5)

These hypotheses will help determine if the bonus plan has a significant impact on increasing sales.

To learn more about mean visit;

brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: what would halve of 5 be?

To estimate the mean farm size for the region with 90% confidence, we can use the t-distribution since the population standard deviation is not known and the sample size is small (n = 11).

First, we need to calculate the sample mean and the sample standard deviation:

Sample mean (x) = (67 + 165 + 170 + 296 + 351 + 409 + 486 + 770 + 1092 + 1321 + 2612) / 11 = 643.36

Sample standard deviation (s) = √[Σ(xi - x)² / (n - 1)] = 565.90

Next, we need to find the t-value for a 90% confidence interval with 10 degrees of freedom (n-1=11-1=10). Using a t-distribution table or calculator, the t-value for a 90% confidence interval with 10 degrees of freedom is 1.812.

Finally, we can calculate the confidence interval for the population mean:

Margin of error (E) = t-value * (s / √n) = 1.812 * (565.90 / √11) = 374.23

Lower bound of the confidence interval = x- E = 643.36 - 374.23 = 269.13

Upper bound of the confidence interval = x+ E = 643.36 + 374.23 = 1017.59

Therefore, we can estimate with 90% confidence that the mean farm size in the region is between 269.13 acres and 1017.59 acres. Rounded to two decimal places in ascending order, the interval is (269.13, 1017.59).

Visit here to learn more about standard deviation brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

In this case, you're looking for the critical value of a left-tailed t-test with a significance level (α) of 0.01 and 8 degrees of freedom (df).

A left-tailed test focuses on the lower tail of the distribution, and the rejection region is in the left tail. Since it's a one-tailed test, there's no need to find a critical value for the unused region, so we will enter "NONE" for that.

To find the critical value, you need to consult a t-distribution table or use a calculator or software that provides t-distribution values. Look for the value that corresponds to a 0.01 significance level (α) and 8 degrees of freedom (df).

After checking the t-distribution table or using a calculator, you'll find the critical value to be approximately -2.896. So, for this left-tailed t-test, any t-value less than -2.896 would fall into the rejection region, indicating a significant result.

In summary:
- Critical value (left-tailed): -2.896 (rounded to three decimal places)
- Critical value (unused region): NONE

Learn more about left-tailed test  here:

https://brainly.com/question/17101788

#SPJ11

Answer:

m=8w

Step-by-step explanation:

8 miles times the number of weeks he runs = the total miles he ran

8w = m

We know that we need the total number of miles, so m needs to be isolated on one side of the equation.

We also know that every week, she runs 8 miles.

So we can multiply 8 by w to get our other side.

~~~Harsha~~~

The larger of the two expressions is maxvalue(r, n - k - r, k).

The expression with -1 as the second parameter to maxvalue is maxvalue(n-k-r, -1, k).

To see why this is the case, let's consider the definition of maxvalue(r, a, b). This function returns the maximum value among r, a, and b.

Now, suppose that k < n - r. Then, we have:

n - k - r > n - (n - r) - r = r

This means that n - k - r is greater than r, so maxvalue(r, n - k - r, k) will return either n - k - r or k, whichever is greater.

On the other hand, since -1 is less than any non-negative integer, we have:

-1 < 0 <= r

Therefore, maxvalue(r, -1, k) will return either r or k, whichever is greater.

Since r is non-negative, we have:

maxvalue(r, -1, k) = max(r, -1, k) = max(r, k)

So, the larger of the two expressions is maxvalue(r, n - k - r, k).

To learn more about expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ11

Answer:

Greg borrowed $10 from his friend.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]38.32+12.25+12.75 = 63.32 \\ 63.32 - 60 = 3.32 \\ 3.32 + 6.68 = 10[/tex]

Based on the information you provided, it seems that a simple linear regression model was used to analyze the relationship between the size of a house (in square feet) and its selling price (in 1,000 dollars).

The dependent variable in this model was the price, while the independent variable was the size. The sample size used for this analysis was 8.

The correlation coefficient (r) measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. In this case, the correlation coefficient would indicate how closely the selling price of a house is related to its size. The value of r can range from -1 to 1, with values closer to -1 or 1 indicating a stronger relationship, while values closer to 0 indicate a weaker relationship.

Without knowing the specific value of r, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the strength of the relationship between the size of a house and its selling price. However, in general, it is reasonable to assume that there is a positive correlation between these two variables - that is, as the size of a house increases, its selling price is likely to increase as well.

Learn more about model here:

https://brainly.com/question/28713017

#SPJ11