is 12% a reasonable estimate of the proportion of all americans who eat chocolate frequently? why or why not?

Step-by-step explanation:

vf = vo + at      vo = 0 in this case  ( you dropped it from 'at rest')

4 f/s = 32 t

t = 1/8 s

df = do + vot + 1/2 at^2                  df = final position = 0 ft (on the ground)

0 = do  + 0   + 1/2 (-32)(1/8)^2

   solve for do = 1/4 foot

Answer:

below

Step-by-step explanation:

58.

(72 + 75 + 68 + 70 + 73 + 72 + 76 + 72 + 69 + 72 ) divided by 10 = 71.9

59.

order- 68, 69, 70, 72 , 72, 72, 72, 73, 75, 76

median = (72 + 72) divided by 2 = 72

61.

I dont know what MAD means

this is all I could do rn

Using simple interest we know the Total value of annual health coverage is $9000.

Borrowers must pay lenders simple interest as a fee in exchange for a loan.

Compound interest is excluded from the calculation and just the original principal is used.

Simple interest applies to all loans, not just specific ones.

Additionally, it refers to the kind of interest that banks give their customers on their savings accounts.

So, complete yearly health coverage calculation

Let x be the total annual healthcare budget.

Ruth contributes 18% of the entire cost of healthcare, or $67.50 for two weeks. (ie 15 days)

So, total paid for one month = 67.5 x 2 = 135

The total amount paid for the entire year is 135 x 12 = 1620.

She foots 18% of the overall annual health care costs, as was already established.

Then,

18% x = 1620

18 x / 100 = 1620

x = (1620 x 100) / 18

= $9000

Therefore, using simple interest we know the Total value of annual health coverage is $9000.

Know more about simple interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ1

Correct question:

Ruth contributes 18% of the total cost of her individual health care. This is a $67.50 deduction from each of her biweekly paychecks. What is the total value of her individual coverage for the year?

Step-by-step explanation:

24 times, as there are no orange marbles in the set.

so, every pull will produce a marble that is not orange with 100% certainty.

in general, we have 12 marbles.

let's change the problem description into picking a marbles that is not blue.

we have 6 blue marbles.

the chance to pick a blue marble is therefore 6/12 = 1/2.

and the probability to not pick a blue marbles is 1 - 1/2 = 1/2.

so, in 24 pulls, we expect 24× 1/2 = 12 times to get a marble that is not blue.

or change it to "not green" marbles.

5 green marbles.

the probability to pick a green marble is 5/12.

the probabilty to not pick a green marble = 1 - 5/12 = 7/12.

in 24 pulls we expect 24 × 7/12 = 14 times to get a marble that is not green.

it change it to "not purple" marbles.

1 purple marble.

the probability to pick a purple marble is 1/12.

the probabilty to not pick a purple marble = 1 - 1/12 = 11/12.

in 24 pulls we expect 24 × 11/12 = 22 times to get a marble that is not purple.

Answer:

To find the average rate of change of the function f(x) = 1.5x² over the interval [10, 11], we need to calculate the change in f(x) over the interval, and divide by the change in x.

The change in f(x) over the interval [10, 11] is:

f(11) - f(10) = (1.511^2) - (1.510^2) = 165 - 150 = 15

The change in x over the interval [10, 11] is:

11 - 10 = 1

Therefore, the average rate of change of the function over the interval [10, 11] is:

(15/1) = 15

This means that for every 1 cm increase in diameter (i.e., for every 1 unit increase in x), the number of calories in the pancake increases by an average of 15 calories per cm of diameter.

Therefore, the answer is (A) 150 calories per cm of diameter.

Answer: 14%

Step-by-step explanation:

Our formula is i=prt but we're trying to find the rate (r) so we'll rearrange it to become r=i/pt.

i = $245

p = $7000

t = 3/12= 0.25 years

[tex]r=\frac{245}{(7000)(0.25)} \\r = 0.14[/tex]

Answer:

-23. In my explanation I will include in my picture how this will look in your final answer

Step-by-step explanation:

So to solve this, I first set x + 3 = 0. This means that x = -3, which we will use soon. Now, here's how you would work out this problem. It would be confusing if I explained over text, so I included a picture of my work.

You would first set up your problem like it is in the picture. Then, bring 2 down. Next, multiply 2 by -3 (for future problems, you would multiply the number you brought down by whatever number is on the side). -3 × 2 = -6, so you would put that under 3 (as shown in the picture). Now, add 3 and -6 (which = -3). Repeat this step each time.

I hope this made sense! Please let me know if you have any questions.

If the area of the base is 19. 6 ft^2 and the height of the pyramid is 11. 6 ft, the volume of the pyramid is approximately 79.1 cubic feet.

The formula for the volume of a pyramid is given by:

V = (1/3) × base area × height

In this case, we are given that the pyramid has a square base, so the base area is simply the area of a square with side length s:

base area = s^2 = 19.6 ft^2

We are also given the height of the pyramid:

height = 11.6 ft

Substituting these values into the formula for the volume of a pyramid, we get:

V = (1/3) × base area × height

= (1/3) × 19.6 ft^2 × 11.6 ft

≈ 79.1 ft^3 (rounded to the nearest tenth)

To learn more about volume click on,

https://brainly.com/question/23861754

#SPJ4

If p is a prime number and a is a positive integer, then pa has (a+1) distinct positive divisors.

A prime number is a positive integer greater than 1, which is divisible only by 1 and itself. Divisors are the numbers that evenly divide a given number.

For a prime number p raised to the power of a (p^a), the number of distinct positive divisors can be found using the following formula:

Number of divisors = (a + 1)

This is because each power of p from 0 to a can divide p^a without any remainder, giving us a total of a + 1 distinct divisors. These divisors are:

1, p, p^2, p^3, ..., p^(a-1), p^a

For example, if p = 2 (a prime number) and a = 3 (a positive integer), then the number of distinct positive divisors for 2^3 (which is 8) would be:

Number of divisors = (3 + 1) = 4

The divisors for 2^3 (8) are 1, 2, 4, and 8.

Learn more about Prime numbers here: brainly.com/question/30358834

#SPJ11

The expression that represents the total amount that Julian paid at the register in terms of x is 0.84x.

What is Percentage?

Percentage is a way of expressing a proportion or fraction as a quantity out of 100. The word "percent" means "per hundred," so percentages are often denoted by the symbol %, which represents one part in a hundred.

The first step is to find the discounted price after the 20% discount. This can be found by multiplying the original price by (1 - 0.2), which represents a 20% reduction.

Discounted price = x - 0.2x = 0.8x

Next, a 4% tax is added to the discounted price. This can be found by multiplying the discounted price by (1 + 0.04), which represents a 4% increase.

Total amount paid = (0.8x) * (1 + 0.04) = 0.84x

Therefore, the expression that represents the total amount that Julian paid at the register in terms of x is 0.84x.

To learn more about Percentage visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

The dimensions of the poster be so that the least amount of poster is used are A = 6L + 4W + 412.

Let the length and width of the printable area of the poster be L and W, respectively. Then, the total dimensions of the poster can be expressed as L + 2(2) and W + 2(1), since there are 2-inch margins at the top and bottom, and 1-inch margins on the left and right.

We know that the area of the printable area of the poster is 392 square inches. Therefore, we can write the equation: LW = 392

We want to minimize the total area of the poster, which is given by:

A = (L + 2(2))(W + 2(1)) = (L + 4)(W + 2)

Expanding this expression, we get:

A = LW + 2L + 4W + 8

Substituting the equation for LW, we get:

A = 392 + 2L + 4W + 8

Simplifying, we get:

A = 2L + 4W + 400

To minimize this expression, we can take the partial derivatives with respect to L and W and set them equal to zero:

[tex]∂A/∂L = 2 = 0 => L = 0[/tex]

[tex]

∂A/∂W = 4 = 0 => W = -100[/tex]

These values do not make sense in the context of the problem. Therefore, we can conclude that the dimensions of the poster that minimize the amount of poster used cannot be found using this method.

Instead, we can use the fact that the printable area of the poster has a fixed area of 392 square inches, and that the margins have fixed dimensions. We can express the area of the poster as:

A = (L + 4)(W + 2) = LW + 4L + 2W + 8

Substituting the equation for LW, we get:

A = 392 + 4L + 2W + 8

Simplifying, we get:

A = 4L + 2W + 400

To minimize this expression, we can again take the partial derivatives with respect to L and W and set them equal to zero:

[tex]∂A/∂L = 4 = 0 => L = 0[/tex]

[tex]∂A/∂W = 2 = 0 => W = -200[/tex]

These values do not make sense in the context of the problem. Therefore, we can conclude that the dimensions of the poster that minimize the amount of poster used cannot be found using this method either.

We can try a different approach. We can use the fact that the printable area of the poster has a fixed area of 392 square inches, and that the total area of the poster is given by:

A = (L + 4)(W + 2) + 2(L + 4) + 2(W + 2)

Expanding this expression, we get:

A = LW + 6L + 4W + 20

Substituting the equation for LW, we get:

A = 392 + 6L + 4W + 20

Simplifying, we get: A = 6L + 4W + 412

To minimize this expression, we can take the partial derivatives with respect to L and W and set them equal to zero:

[tex]∂A/∂L = 6 = 0 => L = -2/3[/tex]

[tex]∂A/∂W = 4 = 0 => W = -3/2[/tex]

Learn more about dimensions here:

https://brainly.com/question/29581656

#SPJ4

We the best reason behind why we call National halothane study is an observational study rather than an experiment is: " In order to be an experiment, the treatments (choice of anesthetic) would have to be randomly assigned." So, option( b) is right one.

We have data from the National Halothane Study that correlates with important research into the safety of anesthetics used in surgery. The above shows the death rate and aesthetic. There is a relationship between the anesthetic used and the death of the patient. The data was collected after that the anesthesia was administered is started. In the observational study, interesting observer in the subjects & any treatment that the subjects recive are beyond the council of the investigators. Here the motion of anaesthesia is anesthetics used her determined by the doctors and the investigators are simply observing. So, it is an observational study due to because in order to be an experiment, the treatments (choice of anesthetic) would have to be randomly assigned. Instead, a patient's anesthetic is selected by his or her doctor(s).

For more information about observational study, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/14393640

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The National Halothane Study was a major investigation of the safety of anesthetics used in surgery. Records of over 850,000 operations performed in 34 major hospitals showed the following death rates for four common anesthetics:27 Anesthetic A Death rate B CD 1.7% 1.7% 3.4% 1.9% There is a clear association between the anesthetic used and the death rate of patients. Anesthetic C appears dangerous.

a) in order to be an experiment, the subjects would have to be randomly selected from the population. however, these are hospital patients who all have some disease or condition and have not been randomly selected from the population, which includes both healthy and sick people.

b) in order to be an experiment, the treatments (choice of anesthetic) would have to be randomly assigned. instead, a patient's anesthetic is selected by his or her doctor(s).

c) there is not enough information to say for sure, but it is safer to assume that it is only an observational study, so that we are not overconfident about the results.

d) actually, it is an experiment and not an observational study.

The probability that the sample mean would differ from the population mean by greater than 3 millimetres is 0.0033 + 0.0033 = 0.0066, rounded to four decimal places.

We are given that the population mean diameter of the steel bolts manufactured by Thompson and Thompson is μ = 137 millimeters and the variance is = 49.

We need to find the probability that the sample mean would differ from the population mean by greater than 3 millimeters.

The standard deviation of the sample means is given by the formula:

[tex]\sigma_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\sigma}{{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we have:

[tex]\sigma \bar{x}=\frac{\sqrt{49}}{\sqrt{48}}=1.118[/tex]

To find the probability that the sample mean would differ from the population mean by greater than 3 millimeters,

we need to calculate the z-score:

[tex]z=\frac{(\bar{x}-\mu)}{ \sigma _{\bar{x}}}[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we have:

[tex]z=\frac{\bar{x}-137}{1.118}[/tex]

We want to find the probability that |z| > 3/1.118 = 2.683.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find that the probability of z > 2.683 is 0.0033.

Since this is a two-tailed test, the probability of z < -2.683 is also 0.0033.

For more questions on standard normal distribution table

https://brainly.com/question/1846009

#SPJ11

The pair of required complementary angles are 26.2° and 63.8° respectively.

Two angles are said to be supplementary angles because they combine to generate a linear angle when their sum is 180 degrees.

When two angles add up to 90 degrees, however, they are said to be complimentary angles and together they make a right angle.

If the total of two angles is 90o (ninety degrees), then the angles are complementary.

A 30-angle and a 60-angle, for instance, are two complementary angles.

So, to find the 2 angles which are complementary:

x + x + 37.6 = 90

Now, solve it as follows:

x + x + 37.6 = 90

2x = 90 - 37.6

2x = 52.4

x = 52.4/2

x = 26.2

Now, x = 26.2 and the second angle x + 37.6 is = 26.2 + 37.6 = 63.8°.

Therefore, the pair of required complementary angles are 26.2° and 63.8° respectively.

Know more about complementary angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/16281260

#SPJ1

Answer:

The given function is k(t) = cos(2πt/3).

The general form of a cosine function is A*cos(Bx - C) + D, where:

Comparing this form to the given function, we can see that:

Therefore, the amplitude of k(t) is 1, the period of k(t) is 3, the phase shift of k(t) is 0, and the vertical shift of k(t) is 0.

Applying the right triangle altitude theorem and the leg rule, we have:

5. x = 6; y ≈ 6.7; z ≈ 13.4       6. x = 32; y ≈ 35.8; z ≈ 17.9

The right triangle altitude theorem states that the altitude drawn on the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the geometric mean of the two line segments into which the altitude divides the hypotenuse.

5. To find x, apply the right triangle altitude theorem, which is:

x = √(3*12)

x = √36

x = 6

Using the leg rule, we can find y and z. It is expressed as:

hypotenuse/leg = leg/part

Therefore, substitute and find y:

(3 + 12) / y = y / 3

Cross multiply:

y² = 15 * 3

y = √45

y ≈ 6.7

Find z using the leg rule:

15/z = z/12

z² = 180

z = √180

z ≈ 13.4

6. Use the same theorem and leg rule as done in question 5:

Find x:

16 = √(8 * x)

16² = 8x

256 = 8x

x = 256/8

x = 32

Find y using the leg rule:

(8 + 32) / y = y/32

y² = 40 * 32

y = √1,280

y ≈ 35.8

Find z:

40/z = z/8

z² = 40 * 8

z = √320

z ≈ 17.9

Learn more about the right triangle altitude theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/31068781

#SPJ1

Answer:

Using similar triangles, we can set up a proportion:

(tree height)/(tree shadow) = (building height)/(building shadow)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

8/4 = 24/x

Solving for x, we get:

x = (24 x 4)/8 = 12 feet

Therefore, the length of the building's shadow is B. 12 feet.

The inference is that,  Incorrect because of a failure to distinguish between incidence and prevalence.

What is inference drawn from statistics?

Utilising data analysis to determine characteristics of a probability distribution at play, statistical inference is the process. Through the use of estimation and hypothesis testing, inferential statistical analysis infers characteristics of a population. It is presumed that a bigger population than the observed data set was sampled for this data collection.

What distinguishes random assignment from random sampling inferences?

As a method of choosing participants for your study's sample, random selection or random sampling can be used. The sample can be divided into control and experimental groups using random assignment, however.

Learn more about inference

brainly.com/question/29774121

#SPJ1

The complete question is -

At the initial examination in the Framingham study, coronary heart disease was found in 5 per 1,000 men aged 30yrs to 44yrs and in 5 per 1,000 women aged 30yrs to 44yrs. The inference that in this age group men and women have an equal risk of developing coronary heart disease is Selected Answer: A. Correct Answers: A. Correct B. Incorrect because of a failure to distinguish between incidence and prevalence C. Incorrect because a proportionate ratio is used when a rate is required to support the inference D. Incorrect because of failure to recognize a possible cohort phenomenon E. Incorrect because there is no control or comparison group.

the sine function that meets the given conditions is:
[tex]y(t) = 3 \times sin ((2\pi / 1200) \times t) + 2[/tex]

Function with the given characteristics.

The terms and their definitions we need to consider:
Amplitude:

The maximum displacement from the midline (in this case, 3)
Midline:

The horizontal line that passes through the center of the wave (y = 2)
Period:

The length of one complete cycle of the wave (1200)
Now, let's write the sine function:
[tex]y(t) = A \times sin (B \times t) + C[/tex]
Where:
y(t) is the sine function with respect to time (t)
A is the amplitude (3)
B is the frequency (to be determined)
C is the midline (2)
First, we need to find the frequency (B).

The period and frequency are related by the following formula:
[tex]Period = 2\pi / B[/tex]
In this case, the period is 1200:
[tex]1200 = 2\pi / B[/tex]
Now, solve for B:
[tex]B = 2\pi / 1200[/tex]
Now, we can plug in the amplitude (A), frequency (B), and midline (C) into our sine function:
[tex]y(t) = 3 \times sin((2\pi / 1200) \times t) + 2[/tex]

For similar questions on Function

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

Triangle PQR's perimeter is **60 inches**.

The lengths of a triangle's sides added together form its perimeter.

The Pythagorean theorem asserts that in a right-angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse's length (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides 1. A Pythagorean triplet is a group of three positive integers that satisfies this condition.

Triangle PQR has sides PQ = 15 inches, QR = 20 inches, and PR = 25 inches.

A triangle's perimeter is equal to the sum of its sides. Triangle PQR's perimeter is 15 + 20 + 25= **60 inches**.  as a result.

To know more about perimeter of triangle visit:

brainly.com/question/29507476

#SPJ1

A reasonable prediction for the number of times a sixth or seventh grader will be chosen is 24 out of the 40 games.

What is reasonable prediction?

A reasonable prediction is a prediction made with a reasonable degree of accuracy or likelihood, based on available information and knowledge. It is based on facts, past events, and logical assumptions, and is not based on conjecture or guesswork. Reasonable predictions can be made about future events, trends, and outcomes, and can be used to inform decisions, plans, and strategies.

The total number of sixth and seventh graders on the team is:

10 sixth graders + 14 seventh graders = 24 students

The total number of students on the team is:

10 sixth graders + 14 seventh graders + 16 eighth graders = 40 students

To find the expected number of times a sixth or seventh grader will be chosen in the coin toss, we can use the proportion of sixth and seventh graders to the total number of students:

(expected number of times) = (proportion of sixth and seventh graders) * (total number of coin tosses)

(expected number of times) = (24/40) * 40

(expected number of times) = 24

Therefore, a reasonable prediction for the number of times a sixth or seventh grader will be chosen is  24.

To learn more about reasonable prediction

brainly.com/question/31255693

#SPJ1

Subway ridership data can reveal useful patterns through calculations with multiple operators, informing decisions about infrastructure and scheduling to better serve riders' needs.

The subway ridership dataset can reveal a wealth of information through calculations with multiple operators. One such calculation is the average increase or decrease in ridership during specific time intervals. By comparing ridership during peak and off-peak hours or weekdays versus weekends, it is possible to determine when the subway system is busiest and when it is underutilized.

Another useful calculation is the average percentage change in ridership between different stations or subway lines. This can help identify the most popular stations or lines and can inform decisions about where to allocate resources and infrastructure improvements.

Additionally, it is possible to explore the correlation between ridership and other factors such as weather, events, or holidays. By analyzing how ridership fluctuates in response to external factors, transportation planners can adjust schedules and routes to better serve the needs of riders.

Calculations with multiple operators can also reveal patterns in ridership based on time of year or day of the week. By analyzing the average change in ridership on different days or months, transportation planners can make informed decisions about scheduling and staffing.

Finally, regression analysis can be used to identify the overall trend in ridership over time. By examining long-term ridership trends, transportation planners can identify areas for improvement and plan for future infrastructure projects to better meet the needs of subway riders.

Learn more about Calculation

brainly.com/question/30151794

#SPJ11

The total areas of each composite shape are:

1) 121 in²

2) 150m²

3) 14.03 ft²

4) 538.36 cm²

1) Formula for area of a rectangle is:

Area = Length * width

Thus:

Area of composite shape = (9 * 8) + (7 * 7)

= 121 in²

2) Formula for area of rectangle is:

Area = Length * width

Area = 12 * 5 = 60 m²

Area of triangle = ¹/₂ * base * height

Area = ¹/₂ * 12 * 15

Area = 90 m²

Area of composite shape = 60 + 90 = 150m²

3) Area of triangle = ¹/₂ * 3 * 7 = 10.5 ft²

Area of semi circle = ¹/₂ * πr²

= ¹/₂ * π * 1.5²

= 3.53 ft²

Total composite area = 10.5 ft² + 3.53 ft²

Total composite area = 14.03 ft²

4) Total composite area = (¹/₂ * π * 7.5²) + (30 * 15)

= 538.36 cm²

Read more about Area of composite figure at: https://brainly.com/question/10254615

#SPJ1

Assuming a two-tailed test with 9 degrees of freedom (10 stores minus 1), the p-value for a t-value of 2.3 is approximately 0.040.

In order to calculate the p-value, we need to know the specific test being used and the significance level of the test. Let's assume that the test is a two-tailed t-test with a significance level of 0.05.

Since the test statistic is 2.3, we need to find the probability of getting a t-value of 2.3 or greater (in absolute value) under the null hypothesis. We can use a t-distribution table or a statistical software to find the corresponding p-value.

Assuming a two-tailed test with 9 degrees of freedom (10 stores minus 1), the p-value for a t-value of 2.3 is approximately 0.040. Therefore, if the significance level of the test is 0.05, we would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the ratings given by the three reviewers.

To know more about statistic here

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ4

The chance/

probability

is

16/33

, or roughly 0.485 that 1 and 2 are in the

same set.

Let's say we divide the range of numbers from

1 to 15

into two sets, each containing seven and eight numbers, respectively. Finding the likelihood that the numbers 1 and 2 are included in the same

set

is our goal.

We can determine the

total number

of ways to divide the numbers into the two sets of

7

and

8

in order to begin solving this issue. Calculating this yields the result 6435 using a formula.

The number of ways in which the pairs 1 and 2 can be found in the same set must then be determined. Considering that there are

seven numbers

in the set, we must select six more from the remaining thirteen to complete the set, presuming that one is among the seven .There are

1716

ways to do this. The number of methods remains the same, 1716, even if we suppose that 2 is among the set of 7 numbers.

Hence, there are

3432

different ways to combine the numbers 1 and 2 into one set. The chance is 16/33, or roughly 0.485, when we divide this number by the total number of possible

divisions

of the numbers.

Learn more about

probability:

https://brainly.com/question/14210034

#SPJ4

The greatest number of 27-inch pieces that she can cut from three pieces of ribbon is found to be 19. So, option B is the correct answer choice.

Each yard is equal to 36 inches, so 5 yards are equal to 180 inches. Therefore, each piece of ribbon is 180 inches long.

To find out how many 27-inch pieces Lucia can cut from each piece of ribbon, we divide 180 by 27.

180/27 = 6.67

Since Lucia can only cut whole pieces, she can cut 6 pieces of ribbon from each piece of ribbon.

Therefore, she can cut a total of 6 x 3 = 18 pieces of ribbon from the three separate pieces of ribbon.

Learn more about Division :

https://brainly.com/question/19871608

#SPJ4

Answer: C 70%

Step-by-step explanation:

First you need to add up how many students are participating in the study. 4+6+12+8+4=34. There are 24 people who own more than 5 video games. This means that it is 24/34. This equals about 70%

194 member voted against the bill whereas 241 members voted in favour of the bill.

A bill usually refers to a piece of paper money, such as a dollar bill or a euro bill.

To solve this problem, we can use algebra. Let's call the number of members who voted against the bill "x". Then, the number of members who voted in favor of the bill would be "x + 47" (since there were 47 more members voting in favor than against).

We know that the total number of members who voted (either for or against) was 435. So, we can write an equation:

x + (x + 47) = 435

Simplifying this equation, we get:

2x + 47 = 435

Subtracting 47 from both sides:

2x = 388

Dividing both sides by 2:

x = 194

So, 194 members voted against the bill, and the number of members who voted in favor would be:

x + 47 = 194 + 47 = 241

Therefore, 241 members voted in favor of the bill.

Learn more about equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1