Precedent law is based on previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances, providing a foundation for legal consistency and predictability.
Precedent law, also known as case law or common law, is a legal system where judicial decisions from higher courts serve as binding or persuasive authority for future cases with similar circumstances. Under this system, judges are expected to follow the legal principles established in previous cases and apply them to the current case at hand.
Precedent law is essential in providing consistency, predictability, and stability in legal interpretations and outcomes. It allows for the development of legal principles and standards over time as courts build upon and refine previous decisions. Precedents play a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape, as they serve as a guide for judges and lawyers in determining the appropriate legal reasoning and outcome in new cases. Hence, precedent law is based on the previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances, providing a foundation for legal interpretations and outcomes.
Learn more about Precedent law here:
https://brainly.com/question/25440253
#SPJ11
a contract that conveys the right to quiet enjoyment and use of property but does not convey title is a
A contract that conveys the right to quiet enjoyment and use of property but does not convey title is a lease.
What is a lease?
A lease is an agreement between a landlord and a tenant to rent a property. It conveys the tenant the right to exclusive use of the property for a limited period of time, in exchange for rent payments. A lease does not convey the title to the property to the tenant, but it gives the tenant a right to enjoy and use the property without interference from the landlord.
Learn more about a lease:
https://brainly.com/question/28385017
#SPJ11
2. A remedial course for reexamination must include how many hours of clinical experience
O None
O 60
96
180
A remedial course for reexamination must include 180 hours of clinical experience. So, the correct answer is 180.
The question states that a remedial course for reexamination requires a specific number of hours of clinical experience. In this case, the correct answer is 180 hours. This means that students who are retaking the examination must complete 180 hours of clinical practice as part of their remedial course.
Clinical experience is an essential component of many educational programs, especially those in fields such as healthcare, medicine, and nursing. It provides students with hands-on practical training and allows them to apply their knowledge in real-world settings under the guidance of experienced professionals. By completing the required number of clinical hours, students can gain valuable skills and competencies necessary for their future careers.It is important to note that the specific number of required clinical hours may vary depending on the educational institution, program, or regulatory requirements.
Therefore, it is always advisable for students to consult their academic advisors or refer to the official guidelines to determine the exact number of hours required for their specific remedial course.
for more questions on remedial course
https://brainly.com/question/29088953
#SPJ8
parties to a contract can limit or exclude consequential damages, provided the limitation is not unconscionable.
Yes, parties to a contract can indeed limit or exclude consequential damages, as long as the limitation is not considered unconscionable.
Consequential damages are a type of damages that arise as a result of the consequences, or secondary effects, of a breach of contract. These damages are typically indirect and not directly caused by the breach itself, but rather by the impact of the breach on the non-breaching party.
In contractual agreements, it is common for parties to include clauses that limit or exclude consequential damages. By doing so, they seek to define the extent of their liability and protect themselves from potential extensive or unforeseen damages resulting from a breach of contract.
However, there are limitations to this ability. Contract law imposes a requirement of reasonableness, fairness, and good faith in the terms of the contract. If a limitation or exclusion of consequential damages is deemed to be unconscionable, meaning it is excessively one-sided or unfairly favors one party over the other, it may be unenforceable.
The determination of whether a limitation or exclusion of consequential damages is unconscionable will depend on the specific circumstances, the nature of the contract, and the applicable laws of the jurisdiction. Courts will consider factors such as the parties' relative bargaining power, the clarity of the contractual terms, and whether the limitation or exclusion was made known and understood by the parties at the time of contract formation.
Learn more about contractual agreements here:
https://brainly.com/question/31080037
#SPJ11
parties to a contract can limit or exclude consequential damages, provided the limitation is not unconscionable. Yes or No.