Answer:
D. Adult Judge
Explanation:
A survey conducted by the American Youth Policy Forum(AYPF) in 2004 revealed that Youth courts used an estimate of;
1. 40% of the adult judge model
2. 26% of the peer jury model
2. 17% of the youth judge model
3. 9% of a combination of models
4. 8% of the youth tribunal
We can thus infer that most teen courts use the adult judge as the decision maker.
When juveniles commit offences their cases can be held in a court presided over by peers who are in the same age bracket with them. A youth judge presides over the case most times. A panel or jury made up of other youth judges sometimes numbering up to six deliberate over the matter and make a decision that would be announced to the court. Restorative justice is applied most of the time.
The sentencing administered by the teen court might include sending the offender to a rehabilitation center so that the main factor that caused his or her misbehavior can be corrected.
Answer:
D. Adult Judge
Explanation:
an Adult Judge as the decision-maker.
What is a legally enforceable contract where an agent or owner of a property gives the exclusive right of possession for a specific amount of time in exchange for money?
Answer:
A lease agreement.
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, etc.
A lease agreement is a legally enforceable contract where an agent or owner of a property gives the exclusive right of possession for a specific amount of time in exchange for money.
Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
When selecting ammunition you must choose the correct cartridge or shotshell for your firearm. What else should you consider?
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. What issue did they bring to the court?
3. Who is the defendant?
4. What was their defense?
5. Who won the case?
estate of Melvin w Ballantyne, Deceased.(T.C.M. (CCH)2002-160(2003)
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
1. What if you were on a committee whose mission is to change the structure of your local police department? What type of organization would you recommend? How would it improve the crime situation?
2. What if police officers on community policing details reported directly to a committee comprised of residents from the community? What benefits might this provide? How would it affect the moral of the police? Would this improve crime fighting?
3. What if all current and future police officers were required to earn a bachelor’s degree in order to keep their jobs? Could this improve their effectiveness? Explain your perspective.
Answer:
There are as many definitions of empire as there have been empires, but some pretty familiar elements appear in most of them. It starts with working on our “control issues”.
Principle that only parties to the contract can take action against each other is called ………………………………. of contract.
Answer:
Privity is a doctrine of contract law that says contracts are only binding on the parties to a contract and that no third party can enforce the contract or be sued under it.
Explanation:
:)
how can you say that a police officer has a good character ?
Explanation:
Physical fitness.
Critical thinking.
Problem-solving skills.
Communication skills.
Interpersonal skills.
Strong moral character.
D
What core value is common to all U.S. Military services? *
A) Integrity
B) Courage
C) Honor
D) Loyalty
: Put the following events in chronological order.
a. Britain & its
b. Declaration of
c. French and Indian
colonies are in
Independence
War
debt after the 7
years war
e. Boston Tea Party f. Tea Act
g. Taxation without
representation
h. Britain imposes
taxes
Answer:
um let me see i hope i can help
Explanation:
c
a
b
e
h
g
should law makers have a moral agenda?
Answer:
Law should only reflect moral values if a person can harm others. ... This is regarded as a liberal approach between law and morality, in otherwords the state should not make any laws against an individual unless it will cause harm to another.
Select the best description of an act of protest or civil disobedience that is protected under the First Amendment.
a demonstration on private property where litter is used to deface a place of business
a demonstration on public property where litter is used to deface a public monument
a silent vigil at an intersection where an African American teenager was killed by gunfire
smashing the windows of a store alleged to practice discriminatory hiring
Answer:
Explanation:
Any defacement or window smashing or anything which does harm to a person and harm to property is not protected by the 1st Amendment.
The only answer that is acceptable is C. No one or nothing is being harmed. The rights granted by the first amendment are enforced.
God help America if that ever changes.
What is a judicial review?
A The authority of the Supreme Court to declare laws or actions unconstitutional
B
The authority of a court to sentence a defendant.
C) The authority of a court to hear an appeal from a lower court.
Answer:
...A.) the authority of the supreme court to declare to laws or actions unconstitutional.
Which organization is primarily responsible for controlled substance and narcotics enforcement at the
federal level?
The democrats currently possess less than a 2/3 majority in congress?
True or false
Answer:
truee
Explanation:
hope i helped you :)
Which of the following are exceptions to the "Fruit of the
poisonous tree doctrine? Choose all that apply.
A)Best effort
B)Genuine mistake
C)Independent source
D) Inevitable discovery
Answer:
C.
Explanation: I took the test and once I put C, and submitted it. I got it right
What inventions did south america have before the europeans came to south america
Which amendment was passed as a means of ensuring that newly freed slaves received all the rights and privileges of citizenship?
A) The Fourth Amendment
B) The fourteenth Amendment
C) The thirteenth Amendment
D) The twenty-sixth amendment
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper articles based on the torts discussed in this lesson: strict liability, products liability, misrepresentation of a product, and public and private nuisance. In the article you write, include some points about the defenses and remedies available for each tort. This exercise should be at least two to three paragraphs per tort (about 800 words in length total).
Answer:
Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.
Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.
This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.
Overview of Public Nuisance Law
In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.
Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]
Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases
Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]
What did Justice Ginsburg mean when she described the Supreme Court as “reactionary?”
Due to the strong enforcement of traditional gender roles in the US at the time, women were historically discouraged from pursuing higher education. She intended the change to benefit some people.
Who was Ruth Bader Ginsburg ?Ruth Bader Ginsburg was one of just 9 women accepted into Harvard Law School when she was younger. To put things into perspective, Harvard at that time welcomed about 500 new students yearly.
It was very difficult to get high paid jobs at the time, even for highly educated women. The majority of businesses simply hire women for secretarial positions without giving them the option to advance to managerial positions.
However, Ruth Bader Ginsburg eventually rose to the position of supreme court justice.
Learn more about Justice Ginsburg here
https://brainly.com/question/19556210
# SPJ 3
ILL NAME U AS BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
Affirmative action is most often criticized for
A)
being reverse discrimination.
B)
refusing to help Native Americans.
C)
being of little help to minorities.
D)
ignoring past discrimination against women.
Which responsibility of citizens in a democracy do the media best support?
A Making informed decisions when voting
8. Serving onjuries
Paying taxes
Running for local office
Answer:
A. Making informed decisions when voting.
Explanation:
This question as well as the answer choices are oddly worded. However, the media is responsible for informing the public. While they are often biased and sometimes inaccurately representing the state of affairs, they inform the public nonetheless. Serving on juries and paying taxes don't really have anything to do with the media's duties. You could say running for local office, but the media is truly just an information source. While they may support someone running for office, they may also oppose and bash them. Therefore, they are most qualified to aid in the public making informed decisions when they vote.
NAME - ___________________________________________ HOUR - _______
Directions: Watch the video to complete the worksheet. Questions go in order. [Season 5, Episode 15]
1) Explain three details about the victim and/or crime scene.
1 - _________________________________________________________________________________
2 - _________________________________________________________________________________
3 - _________________________________________________________________________________
2) What was the cause of death in this case? _____________________________________________________
3) Why was the victim’s watch such an important clue in this case? __________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
4) What was the tattoo on the victim’s hand? ____________________________________________________
5) What shocking details did police learn when they mistakenly went to the wrong house in their investigation?
___________________________________________________________________________________
6) How were cell phone records helpful in this case? ______________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
7) What evidence was found in the suspect’s wife’s possession? (two details)
1 - _________________________________________________________________________________
2 - _________________________________________________________________________________
8) What new evidence was matched to wounds on the victim’s body? _________________________________
9) What were two pieces of evidence found in the suspect’s boat?
1 - _________________________________________________________________________________
2 - _________________________________________________________________________________
10) What was the real name of the prime suspect? ________________________________________________
11) What was believed to be the motive in this case? ______________________________________________
12) What was one key mistake the killer made? __________________________________________________
13) What conviction and sentence did the killer receive? ___________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________FORENSIC FILES VIDEO - FOLLOW-UP WRITING
DESCRIPTION
Explain three pieces of evidence that helped close this case.
_________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
PROBLEM & SOLUTION
Explain one problem that forensic experts faced in this case and how it was solved.
_________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Answer:
dang you really think im writing all that
When does the government have the right to search your property without a warrant?
A) When you give your consent for a search
B) When there is a search happening nearby
C) When you’ve already been through a trail
D) When you are standing in a public place
Answer:
A
Explanation:
When you give a consent for a search
Answer:
When you give your consent for a search
Explanation:
Asia is suffering from _____ amnesia after being involved in a serious car accident. She cannot remember anything from her past and has difficulty remembering events she's personally experienced.
Asia is suffering from retrograde amnesia after being involved in a serious car accident. She cannot remember anything from her past and has difficulty remembering events she's personally experienced.
Waht is experienced?
The term experienced refer to learn the things and the knowledge. The experience are the necessary to the human life. The experience are the help in the future challenges. The experience are the built-in the human nature are the day to day. The experienced is to learn bad and the good things.
Asia is the suffering of the diseases, the main causes of the accident. The disease's name is retrograde amnesia. The car accident is the main reason for the not remember the memory. There was the difficulty remembering past details, and she was the personally experienced.
As a result, the retrograde amnesia is the diseases to suffering from the car accident.
Learn more about on experience, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1639543
#SPJ2
The ___ has one supreme power over and above all other power in the state A) common law.
B) Civil law.
C) Constitution.
D) legislation
What is the historical background of privatisation?
Answer:
The first mass privatization of state property occurred in Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1937: "It is a fact that the government of the National Socialist Party sold off public ownership in several state-owned firms in the middle of the 1930s.
Explanation:
what is section 398 ipc
Explanation:
Section 398 in The Indian Penal Code. 398. Attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapon. —If, at the time of attempting to commit robbery or dacoity, the offender is armed with any deadly weapon, the imprisonment with which such offender shall be punished shall not be less than seven years.
Under which circumstances would you consider filing an amicus brief in an appeals case?
Answer:
An amicus curiae brief in support of a petitioner or appellant shall be filed within 30 days after the case is placed on the docket or a response is called for by the Court, whichever is later, and that time will not be extended.
do individuals make rational decisions when considering committing a crime?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
An individual chooses to commit crime if he can gain more from crime than not committing the crime. This gain from crime is not limited to monetary gains. Criminals may gain a lot from guilty pleasure and excitement from breaking the law, inflicting violence, and consuming illicit drugs. But even when accounting for all the monetary and non-monetary gains from crime, it seems like crime usually does not “pay”(Future learn).
Hence, an individual may choose to commit crime if the immediate rewards of the crime seem to outweigh the long time consequences of the crime. This is a rational decision. Finally, criminals make rational decisions because most of them usually consider the net gain of crime to outweigh the net loss of crime.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
discuss the requirements of police operation ?