Name of Stock Symbol High Low Close
105.19 103.25 103.38
145.18 143.28 144.05
Stock A
Stock B
A
B
Last year, an investor purchased 120 shares of stock A at $90 per share and 35 shares of stock B at $145 per share. What is the difference in
overall loss or gain between selling at the current day's high price or low price?
O The difference in overall gain is $299.30.
O The difference in overall loss is $299.30.
The difference in overall gain is $293.90.
O The difference in overall loss is $293.90.

The point (0, 4) is not a solution of the given system of equations.

The given system of equations,

-x + 4y = 16 [Equation 1]

3x - 4y = -19 [Equation 2]

We have to find the solution of the system of equations.

From [Equation 1],

4y = x + 16 [Equation 3]

From [Equation 2],

3x + 19 = 4y [Equation 4]

From [Equation 3] and [Equation 4],

x + 16 = 3x + 19

2x = -3

x = -3/2

So x = 0 is not possible.

Hence (0, 4) is not a solution.

Learn more about Solutions of Equations here :

https://brainly.com/question/545403

#SPJ1

To review Assessment 0.25 of 1 Point Part 2 of 4, we need to use the accompanying data table and perform three tasks. First, we need to draw a normal probability plot. Second, we need to determine the linear correlation between the observed values and the expected rooms. Third, we need to determine the critical value in the table of critical values of the correlation coefficient to assess the normality of the data.

To draw a normal probability plot, we need to plot the data points against their expected normal scores. This plot will help us determine if the data is normally distributed.

To determine the linear correlation between the observed values and the expected rooms, we need to calculate the correlation coefficient (r). This will tell us how strong the linear relationship is between the two variables. A value of r between -1 and 1 indicates the direction and strength of the relationship.

To determine the critical value in the table of critical values of the correlation coefficient, we need to use a significance level and the degrees of freedom. This will help us assess the normality of the data by comparing the calculated r-value to the critical value.

In summary, Assessment 0.25 of 1 Point Part 2 of 4 requires us to perform a normal probability plot, determine the linear correlation coefficient, and find the critical value to assess the normality of the data. These terms are all important in understanding how to analyze and interpret data.
Here's a step-by-step explanation using the terms you mentioned:

1. Assessment: Analyze the given data table and identify the observed values and the expected values.

2. Normal Probability Plot: Create a normal probability plot using the observed values. To do this, arrange the observed values in ascending order, calculate their respective percentiles, and plot them against the expected values based on a standard normal distribution.

3. Linear Correlation: Determine the linear correlation between the observed values and expected values by calculating the correlation coefficient (r). You can use statistical software or a calculator to find the value of r.

4. Normality: To assess the normality of the data, we need to compare the calculated correlation coefficient (r) with the critical value from the table of critical values for the correlation coefficient.

5. Critical Value: Look up the critical value in the table of critical values for the correlation coefficient, considering the sample size and desired level of significance (usually 0.05 or 0.01).

6. Assess Normality: If the calculated correlation coefficient (r) is greater than or equal to the critical value, we can conclude that the data follows a normal distribution (normality is assumed). If the correlation coefficient (r) is less than the critical value, we cannot assume normality, and the data might not follow a normal distribution.

Remember to always check the sample size and level of significance when comparing the correlation coefficient with the critical value for an accurate assessment of normality.

Learn more about Normality here:- brainly.com/question/31491231

#SPJ11

Conditional probability is calculated by multiplying the probability of the preceding event by the updated probability of the succeeding, or conditional, event.

True. The notation P(a | b) represents the conditional probability of event a given that event b has occurred. It is read as "the probability of a given b."

learn about conditional probability,

https://brainly.com/question/10567654

#SPJ11

Answer:

80 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

80 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the relationship

distance = rate × time, hence

rate = distance/time = 24/3  = 8 mph

distance travelled in 10 hours at this rate

distance = 8 × 10 = 80 miles

The equations of the graph from the figure are y = 4 and y = -2

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

On the graph, we can see that

We have two horizontal lines that pass through the points y = 4 and y = -2

This means that the equations represented on the graph are y = 4 and y = -2

So, we can conclude that none of the options are true from the options

Read more about functions at

https://brainly.com/question/27915724

#SPJ1

The probability of randomly selecting a red marble from the jar is 1/4 or 0.25 (25%).

The probability of randomly selecting a red marble from the jar can be calculated by dividing the number of red marbles by the total number of marbles in the jar. In this case, there are 10 red marbles and 30 blue marbles, so the total number of marbles is 40. Therefore, the probability of selecting a red marble is 10/40 or simplified to 1/4. This means that there is a 25% chance of selecting a red marble from the jar at random. The answer to your second question is 10/30, 10/40, 1/10, and 1/40 are all potential answer choices, but the correct answer is 1/4.

A jar contains 10 red marbles and 30 blue marbles, making a total of 40 marbles in the jar. To find the probability of randomly selecting a red marble from the jar, you need to divide the number of red marbles by the total number of marbles.

The probability of selecting a red marble is:

(10 red marbles) / (40 total marbles) = 10/40

Simplify the fraction by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 10:

10/40 = 1/4

So, the probability of randomly selecting a red marble from the jar is 1/4 or 0.25 (25%).

Learn more about probability at: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

If exposure to an earlier assessment affects behavior when a participant is assessed a second time, the researcher might suspect that testing effects are the cause.

When a participant's behavior is affected by exposure to an earlier assessment during a second assessment, this is called testing effects. Testing effects are a type of response bias that can occur in research studies where participants are tested multiple times. This phenomenon can lead to changes in the way participants respond to a test, such as increased familiarity with the test items or increased confidence in their ability to perform well.

Testing effects can be particularly problematic in longitudinal studies where participants are assessed repeatedly over time. If testing effects are not accounted for, they can lead to inaccurate conclusions about the true effect of the intervention or treatment being studied.

To minimize testing effects, researchers may use various strategies such as counterbalancing the order of tests, using different versions of the test, or using longer intervals between assessments. These strategies aim to reduce the potential for participants to remember specific test items or become overly familiar with the testing procedure.

To learn more about Testing effects visit: https://brainly.com/question/6791607

#SPJ11

Answer:

50

Step-by-step explanation:

23+13+14=50

so probaillity is a 50%

The area of the table top would be 28.275 square ft

The area of the table top is calculated by

The area using the inner diameter is now subtracted from the area solved using the outer diameter and the result is the diameter of the table

area of the whole circle using the outer diameter

For a semicircle, area = 1/2 pi r^2

where r = 11 ft / 2 = 5.5 ft

area = 1/2 pi 5.5^2

area = 47.517 square ft

area of the whole circle using the inner diameter

where r = (11 ft - 2(2) ft) / 2 = 3..5 ft

area = 1/2 pi 3.5^2

area = 19.242 square ft

Area of the table

= 47.517 square ft - 19.242 square ft

= 28.275 square ft

Learn more about area of semicircle at

https://brainly.com/question/15822332

#SPJ1

Answer: 20

Step-by-step explanation:

With 2 secants, it's the inside of the secant times the whole secant for one line = same on other side but for other secant

EF(EF+GF)=ED(ED+CD)       EF=18; GF=3+CD; ED=19; CD=CD

18(18+3+CD)=19(19+CD)    substitute and simplify and distribute

18(21+CD)=361+19CD

378+18CD=361+19CD

CD=17

GF=3+CD      substitute

=3+17

=20

Mr. Miller should clarify the difference between length and width and how they relate to the dimensions of a rectangular prism. He could use visual aids or examples to help his students understand the concept better.

Mr. Miller should:

1. Explain to his students that the terms length, width, and height in the formula for the volume of rectangular prisms can represent any of the three dimensions, as long as they are consistent throughout the calculation.
2. Remind his students that the volume of a rectangular prism can be calculated by multiplying its three dimensions (length, width, and height) together, regardless of the order.
3. Encourage his students to focus on understanding the concept of volume and how it relates to the dimensions of rectangular prisms, rather than getting caught up in the specific labels of the dimensions.

Learn more about length here:

https://brainly.com/question/9842733

#SPJ11

Answer:$68.40

Step-by-step explanation:

The solutions for each one are:

1) Two real

2) Two complex

3) One real.

For a quadratic of the form:

ax² + bx + c = 0

The discriminant is:

D = b² - 4ac

if D > 0, there are two real solutions.

if D=  0 there is one real solution.

if D < 0 the solutions are complex.

The first quadratic equation is:

2x² + 4x + 3 = 0

The discriminant is:

D = 4² - 4*2*3

  = 16 - 24 = -8

So this equation has no real solutions.

The second is:

3x² - 5x + 1 = 0

The discriminant is:

D = (-5)² - 4*3*1

  = 25 - 12 = 13

Two real solutions.

The last one is:

x² + 4x + 4  =0

We have:

D = 4² - 4*4*1

  = 16 - 16  =0

One real solution.

Learn more about quadratic equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

Using the empirical rule, we can estimate that 68% of the boys having height between 65 and 69 inches.

Since the heights of the student body are normally distributed, we can use the empirical rule to estimate the percentage of boys who are between 65 and 69 inches tall.

The empirical rule states that for a normal distribution:

Approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean.

Approximately 95% of the data falls within two standard deviations of the mean.

Approximately 99.7% of the data falls within three standard deviations of the mean.

Since the mean height is 67 inches and the standard deviation is 2 inches, we can use this information to estimate the percentage of boys who are between 65 and 69 inches tall:

65 inches is 1 standard deviation below the mean (since 67 - 2 = 65).

69 inches is 1 standard deviation above the mean (since 67 + 2 = 69).

Therefore, using the empirical rule, we can estimate that 68% of the boys are between 65 and 69 inches tall.

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/30218856

#SPJ1

Using the relative frequency approach, we can define the probability of any specific outcome as the ratio of times it occurs over the long run.

the probability of an event occurring is the number of times the event occurs divided by the total number of trials or observations. This approach assumes that the long-term relative frequency of an event is equal to its probability, and it is a fundamental principle of probability theory. The more trials or observations we have, the closer the relative frequency of an event will be to its true probability.

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The teacher could use a hypothesis test for a population mean in the following situation:

The teacher wants to determine if computer-based instruction has a statistically significant effect on the average test scores of students in the class. The teacher can collect a sample of test scores from students who received computer-based instruction and a sample of test scores from students who did not receive computer-based instruction. Then, the teacher can use a hypothesis test for the population mean to compare the mean test scores of the two groups and determine if the difference is statistically significant.

To know more about hypothesis test,

https://brainly.com/question/30588452

#SPJ11

Complete question:

teacher is experimenting with computer-based instruction In which situation could the teacher use a hypothesis test for a ifference in two population means?

O The teacher uses a combination of treditional methods and computer based instruction She asks students # they lked computer based instruction better She wants to determine if the maorty prete the computer-based instruction

O She gives each student a pretest Then she teaches a lesson using a computer program Afterwards, she gives each student a postest The teacher wants to see f the difference in scores willshow an improvement 。

She ran om y d des the class into t goups One gup ecerves computer based instruction The other group recen es tradit na n rete wit t copters Ahe rst eten een student ha to solve a single problem. The teachers wants to compare the proportion of each group who can solve the problem 。She gives each student a pretest he then randomly dvides the class mto two groups.

Ο e group receves compte based i struct . The other go p eceves tradtind rst cto with t computers After instruction each student takes a post test. The teacher compares the improvement in scores (post test minus pretest) in the two groups

Therefore, using linear approximation, we estimate that [tex](8.06)^{(2/3)}[/tex] is approximately 2.8327.

Linear approximation, also known as the tangent line approximation, is a method used to estimate the value of a function at a particular point by approximating it with a linear function. This method is based on the fact that the tangent line to a curve at a point is a good approximation to the curve near that point.

Let's use linear approximation to estimate (8.06)^(2/3) at x = 8, which is a nice round number close to 8.06.

First, we need to find the formula for the linear approximation. We have:

[tex]f(x) = x^{(2/3)}[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = (2/3)x^{(-1/3)}[/tex]

At x = 8, we have:

[tex]f(8) = 8^{(2/3) }[/tex]

= 2.8284

[tex]f'(8) = (2/3)*8^{(-1/3) }[/tex]

= 0.2974

The linear approximation is:

L(x) = f(8) + f'(8)(x - 8)

Plugging in x = 8.06, we get:

L(8.06) = f(8) + f'(8)(8.06 - 8)

= 2.8284 + 0.2974(0.06)

= 2.8327

To know more about differential equation,

https://brainly.com/question/14620493

#SPJ11

Sure! Let X be a continuous random variable with PDF (probability density function) 2x, where x is greater than or equal to 0.

This means that the probability of X taking on any particular value is given by the area under the PDF curve for that value. Since the area under a PDF curve represents the probability of X taking on a value within a particular interval, we can say that the probability of X taking on any interval [a,b] is given by the integral of 2x from a to b.

Additionally, since the PDF is a probability density, the total area under the curve must be equal to 1, which means that the integral of 2x from 0 to infinity must equal 1.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The matching of the accounting terms will be:

It should be noted that in accountancy, depreciation is a term that refers to two aspects of the same concept: first, the actual decrease of fair value of an asset, such as the decrease in value of factory equipment each year.

Learn more about depreciation on

https://brainly.com/question/1203926

#SPJ1

Thus, there are 208 positive integers less than 1000 that are divisible by exactly one of 7 and 11. The rules used to find the number of positive integers less than 1000 that are divisible by exactly one of 7 and 11 are:

a. The principle of inclusion-exclusion for sets: This rule is used to count the number of integers that are divisible by both 7 and 11, and subtract them from the total number of integers that are divisible by either 7 or 11. This gives us the number of integers that are divisible by exactly one of 7 and 11.

b. The division rule: This rule is used to find the number of integers that are divisible by a certain number within a given range. For example, we can use the division rule to find the number of integers less than 1000 that are divisible by 7.

c. The product rule: This rule is used to find the number of ways two or more events can occur together. In this case, we can use the product rule to find the number of integers that are divisible by both 7 and 11.

d. The sum rule: This rule is used to find the total number of ways two or more events can occur separately. In this case, we can use the sum rule to find the total number of integers that are divisible by either 7 or 11.

By using these rules, we can find the number of positive integers less than 1000 that are divisible by exactly one of 7 and 11.

Learn more about integers here:

https://brainly.com/question/15276410

#SPJ11

Answer: To determine how many more of the shortest paper chains Rico has than the longest paper chains, you need to know how many paper chains he has of each length. Once you know that, you can subtract the number of longest paper chains from the number of shortest paper chains to find the difference.

For example, if Rico has:

- 10 paper chains that are 3 inches long

- 8 paper chains that are 5 inches long

- 6 paper chains that are 7 inches long

Then the shortest paper chains are the ones that are 3 inches long, and the longest paper chains are the ones that are 7 inches long. To find the difference, you can subtract the number of longest paper chains (6) from the number of shortest paper chains (10):

10 - 6 = 4

Therefore, Rico has 4 more of the shortest paper chains than the longest paper chains.

Step-by-step explanation:

To use Holt's method with smoothing constants of 0.3 for alpha and 0.6 for gamma, we first need to calculate the initial values for the level and slope.

Let L0 be the initial level and B0 be the initial slope. We can estimate these using the following equations:

L0 = y1

B0 = y2 - y1

where y1 and y2 are the first two observed values in the time series.

Once we have the initial values, we can use the following recursive equations to calculate the level and slope at each time period t:

Lt = alpha * yt + (1 - alpha) * (Lt-1 + Bt-1)
Bt = gamma * (Lt - Lt-1) + (1 - gamma) * Bt-1

where yt is the observed value at time t.

Using these equations and the given smoothing constants, we can find the equation of the forecast line as:

Ft+1 = Lt + Bt

and the mean squared error (MSE) as:

MSE = (1 / n) * sum((yt - Ft)^2)

where n is the number of observed values.

To learn more about alpha : brainly.com/question/29425402

#SPJ11

In the scenario where exactly half the time the element x is not in the list and if x is in the list it is equally likely to be in any position.

The average-case performance of the linear search algorithm would be O(n/2), where n is the size of the list.
This is because in the worst case scenario, the algorithm would have to search through the entire list to find the element x, which would take n operations. However, since half the time x is not in the list, the algorithm would only need to search through half the list, on average. Therefore, the average-case performance would be O(n/2).

To analyze the average-case performance of the linear search algorithm, given that exactly half the time the element x is not in the list and if x is in the list it is equally likely to be in any position, please follow these steps:
1. Consider the two scenarios: element x is in the list and element x is not in the list.
2. For the case when x is in the list, as it is equally likely to be in any position, the average number of comparisons required would be (n+1)/2, where n is the total number of elements in the list.
3. For the case when x is not in the list, the linear search algorithm will go through all the elements in the list and make n comparisons before determining that x is not present.
4. To calculate the average-case performance, take into account the probabilities of each scenario. As the element x is not in the list exactly half the time, the probabilities are 0.5 for each scenario.
5. The average-case performance would be the weighted average of the comparisons in both scenarios: 0.5*((n+1)/2) + 0.5*n.
So, the average-case performance of the linear search algorithm in this situation is given by the expression: 0.5*((n+1)/2) + 0.5*n.

Visit here to learn more about algorithm:

brainly.com/question/22984934

#SPJ11

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

because if is tripled the size of original

The independent variable in a relationship between two variables is the variable that is used to predict or explain the variation in the other variable.

It is the variable that is manipulated or controlled by the researcher. For example, if we are investigating the relationship between temperature and ice cream sales, temperature would be the independent variable, as we would expect changes in temperature to predict changes in ice cream sales.

On a scatter diagram, the independent variable is typically represented on the horizontal axis (x-axis) and the dependent variable is typically represented on the vertical axis (y-axis). This is because the independent variable is typically plotted along the horizontal axis, with its values placed at regular intervals, and the dependent variable is then plotted along the vertical axis, with its values plotted based on their relationship to the corresponding independent variable values.

To know more about variable,

https://brainly.com/question/2466865

#SPJ11

A bank teller serves customers standing in the queue one by one. Suppose that the service time [tex]X_i[/tex] for customer i has mean [tex]E(X_i)[/tex]= 2 minutes and variance [tex]Var(X_i)[/tex] = 1. Assuming that the different bank customers are independent.

(a) P (90 < Y < 110) = P(Z < Z2) - P(Z < Z1).

(b) P(y > 2.3) = 0.3.

(a) To find the probability P(90 < Y < 110), we first need to determine the mean and variance of Y, the total service time for 50 customers. Since the service times are independent, we can calculate the mean and variance for Y as follows:
Mean of Y, E(Y) = Sum of E[tex](X_i)[/tex] for all 50 customers = 50 * E[tex](X_i)[/tex] = 50 * 2 = 100 minutes.
Variance of Y, Var(Y) = Sum of Var[tex](X_i)[/tex] for all 50 customers (due to independence) = 50 * [tex]Var(X_i)[/tex] = 50 * 1 = 50.
Now, we need to find the standard deviation of Y:
Standard Deviation of Y, σ(Y) = [tex]\sqrt{(Var(Y))}[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{(50)}[/tex].
Next, we need to standardize the given interval (90 < Y < 110) using the mean and standard deviation of Y:
Z1 = (90 - E(Y)) / σ(Y) = (90 - 100) / [tex]\sqrt{(50)}[/tex]
Z2 = (110 - E(Y)) / σ(Y) = (110 - 100) / [tex]\sqrt{(50)}[/tex]
Now, we can use a standard normal table or calculator to find the probabilities corresponding to Z1 and Z2, and then compute P(90 < Y < 110) as follows:
P(90 < Y < 110) = P(Z1 < Z < Z2) = P(Z < Z2) - P(Z < Z1).
(b) For P(Y > 2.3), we need to find the corresponding Z-score:
Z3 = (2.3 - E[tex](X_i)[/tex]) / [tex]\sqrt{(Var(X_i))}[/tex] = (2.3 - 2) / [tex]\sqrt{(1)}[/tex] = 0.3
Now, we can use a standard normal table or calculator to find P(Z > Z3) which is equal to P(Y > 2.3).

To learn more about standard deviation, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Using mathematical operators, the value of x in the equations are -1/3, (2.39 or 0.71) and no solution respectively.

To determine the value of x in the equations, we need to use mathematical functions or operators;

1. 8 + 9x(x + 4) = (3x - 2)(3x + 2)

Open the brackets

8 + 9x² + 36x = 9x² + 6x - 6x - 4

Collect like terms

8 + 9x² + 36x - 9x² + 4 = 0

8 + 4 + 36x = 0

12 + 36x = 0

36x = -12

x = -12/36

x = -1/3

2. 2x(2x - 2) - 17 = (5x + 2x)(2x - 5)

Open the brackets;

4x² - 4x - 17 = 10x² - 25x + 4x² - 10x

collect like terms

14x² - 35x - 4x² - 4x + 17 = 0

10x² - 31x + 17 = 0

solving the quadratic equation;

x = 2.39 or x = 0.71

3. (2x + 1)(4x² - 2x + 1) = 4x(2x² - 5)

Open brackets;

8x³ - 4x² + 2x + 4x² - 2x + 1 = 8x³ - 20x

collect like terms

8x³ + 1 - 8x³ + 20 = 0

21 = 0

The equation has no solution

Learn more on mathematical operations here;

https://brainly.com/question/4721701

#SPJ1

Answer:

20% off means that the new price of the skirt will be 80% of the original price:

$30(100%  – 20%) = $30(80%)

Converting the percent to a decimal gives:

$30(0.8) = $24.00

There is an additional 15% off the sale price of $24.00, so the final price is 85% of the sale price:

$24(100%  – 15%) = $24(85%)

Again converting the percent to a decimal gives:

$24(0.85) = $20.40

Step-by-step explanation:

20% off means that the new price of the skirt will be 80% of the original price:

$30(100%  – 20%) = $30(80%)

Converting the percent to a decimal gives:

$30(0.8) = $24.00

There is an additional 15% off the sale price of $24.00, so the final price is 85% of the sale price:

$24(100%  – 15%) = $24(85%)

Again converting the percent to a decimal gives:

$24(0.85) = $20.40

a)he margin error for a 95% confidence interval to estimate the population proportion is 0.0506., b) the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion is approximately (0.337, 0.423).

a) To find the margin error for a 95% confidence interval to estimate the population proportion, we need to use the following formula:

Margin error = z * sqrt(p * (1 - p) / n)

where z is the z-score for the desired confidence level (in this case, 95% confidence level), p is the sample proportion (given as 0.38), and n is the sample size (not given).

To find the sample size, we can use the formula:

n = (z^2 * p * (1 - p)) / (margin error)^2

where z and p are the same as above, and margin error is given as the value we want to find.

Using a z-score of 1.96 for a 95% confidence level, we can plug in the values and solve for the margin error:

Margin error = 1.96 * sqrt(0.38 * (1 - 0.38) / n)

Now we need to find n by solving the second formula:

n = (1.96^2 * 0.38 * (1 - 0.38)) / (margin error)^2

Plugging in the values for margin error and solving for n, we get:

n = 547.896

Rounding up to the nearest integer, we get a sample size of n = 548.

Plugging in this value for n, we can solve for the margin error:

Margin error = 1.96 * sqrt(0.38 * (1 - 0.38) / 548) = 0.0506

Therefore, the margin error for a 95% confidence interval to estimate the population proportion is 0.0506.

b) To find the confidence interval for a 95% confidence level, we can use the formula:

Confidence interval = sample proportion +/- margin error

where sample proportion is the given value of p (0.38), and margin error is the value we just calculated (0.0506).

Plugging in the values, we get:

Confidence interval = 0.38 +/- 0.0506

Simplifying, we get:

Confidence interval = (0.3294, 0.4306)

Therefore, the confidence interval for a 95% confidence level is (0.3294, 0.4306). This means that we can be 95% confident that the true population proportion falls within this range.
Hello! I'd be happy to help with your question.

a) To find the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval when estimating the population proportion, you'll need the following formula:

Margin of error = z * √(p * (1 - p) / n)

Where:
z = 1.96 (for a 95% confidence interval)
p = 0.38 (given proportion)
n = 500 (sample size)

Now, let's plug in the values and calculate the margin of error:

Margin of error = 1.96 * √(0.38 * (1 - 0.38) / 500)
Margin of error = 1.96 * √(0.38 * 0.62 / 500)
Margin of error = 1.96 * √(0.0004768)
Margin of error ≈ 0.043

So, the margin of error for the 95% confidence interval is approximately 0.043 or 4.3%.

b) To find the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion, use the following formula:

Confidence interval = p ± margin of error

Using the proportion (p) and margin of error calculated in part a:

Confidence interval = 0.38 ± 0.043

Lower limit = 0.38 - 0.043 = 0.337
Upper limit = 0.38 + 0.043 = 0.423

So, the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion is approximately (0.337, 0.423).

Learn more about confidence interval at: brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The probability of a healthy adult having a body temperature greater than 97.60°F is approximately 91%.

To find the probability of a healthy adult having a body temperature greater than 97.60°F, we can use the Z-score formula to standardize the temperature value. The Z-score formula is:
Z = (X - μ) / σ

Where X is the value we are interested in (97.60°F), μ is the mean (98.60°F), and σ is the standard deviation (0.73°F).
Z = (97.60 - 98.60) / 0.73 = -1.37
Now, we can use the Z-score to find the probability. A Z-score of -1.37 corresponds to a percentile of approximately 0.0853, which means there is an 8.53% chance that an adult will have a body temperature lower than 97.60°F. Since we are interested in the probability of a temperature greater than 97.60°F, we need to subtract this value from 1:
1 - 0.0853 = 0.9147
As a whole number percentage, this would be 91%.

Learn more about Z-score formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/9751714

#SPJ11