The probability that a randomly selected carton has a puncture or a smashed corner is 0.076, or 7.6%.
What is probability?
Probability is a measure of the likelihood of an event occurring. It is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 means the event is impossible and 1 means the event is certain to happen.
To find the probability that a randomly selected carton has a puncture or a smashed corner, we can use the formula:
P(puncture or smashed corner) = P(puncture) + P(smashed corner) - P(puncture and smashed corner)
where P(puncture) is the probability of a carton having a puncture, P(smashed corner) is the probability of a carton having a smashed corner, and P(puncture and smashed corner) is the probability of a carton having both a puncture and a smashed corner.
Substituting the given probabilities into the formula, we get:
P(puncture or smashed corner) = 0.03 + 0.06 - 0.014
P(puncture or smashed corner) = 0.076
Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected carton has a puncture or a smashed corner is 0.076, or 7.6%.
To learn more about probability from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ1
what is the 4th term/number of (a+b)^9, pascal’s triangle?
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this will help you Thanks
2. Which sequence of transformations takes the graph of y = k(x) to the graph of
y=-k(x + 1)?
A. Translate 1 to the right, reflect over the x-axis, then scale vertically by a factor of 1/2
B. Translate 1 to the left, scale vertically by 1/2 , then reflect over the y-axis.
C. Translate left by 1/2, then translate up 1.
D. Scale vertically by 1/2, reflect over the x-axis, then translate up 1.
The correct answer is option B. Translate 1 to the left, scale vertically by 1/2, then reflect over the y-axis.
What does term "transformation of a graph" means?The process of modifying the shape, location, or features of a graph is often referred to as graph transformation. Graphs are visual representations of mathematical functions or data point connections, often represented on a coordinate plane.
Translations, reflections, rotations, dilations, and other changes to the look of a graph are examples of graph transformations.
For the given problem, Transformation to get the desired result can be carried out as:
Translate '1' to the left: The transformation "x + 1" in "-k(x + 1)" shifts the graph horizontally to the left by 1 unit.Scale vertically by '1/2' : The 1/2 factor in "-k(x + 1)" vertically scales the graph, compressing it vertically.Reflect over the y-axis: The minus sign before "k" in "-k(x + 1)" reflects the graph over the y-axis, flipping it horizontally.Hence, to convert the graph of "y = k(x)" to the graph of "y = -k(x + 1)," the correct sequence of transformations is to translate 1 unit to the left, scale vertically by 1/2, and then reflect across the y-axis, which is option B.
Learn more about Graph Transformation here:
https://brainly.com/question/10059147
#SPJ1
in a(n) , the scale questions are divided into two parts equally and the resulting scores of both parts are correlated against one another.
The main topic is the split-half reliability test used in psychological research to assess the internal consistency of a scale.
How to test the  psychological research?In psychological research, reliability is a crucial aspect of measuring constructs or attributes. One commonly used method for assessing the reliability of a scale is the split-half reliability test.
In this test, the scale questions are divided into two parts equally, and the resulting scores of both parts are correlated against one another.
For example, if a scale had 20 items, the items could be randomly split into two groups of 10 items each.
Scores are then calculated for each group, and the scores are correlated with each other to determine the degree of consistency between the two halves.
The correlation coefficient obtained from this analysis provides an estimate of the internal consistency of the scale.
A high correlation coefficient indicates a high level of internal consistency, indicating that the two halves of the scale are measuring the same construct or attribute.
Conversely, a low correlation coefficient suggests that the two halves of the scale are not measuring the same construct or attribute, and the scale may need to be revised or abandoned.
Overall, the split-half reliability test provides a quick and efficient method for evaluating the reliability of a scale.
However, it is important to note that this method does have some limitations, such as the possibility of unequal difficulty or discrimination of the items in each half of the scale.
Therefore, researchers often use other methods, such as Cronbach's alpha, in conjunction with the split-half reliability test to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the reliability of a scale
Learn more about reliability test
brainly.com/question/27873337
#SPJ11