Answer:
here you go
Explanation:
5 elements and properties:
Boron- The chemical properties of boron are more similar to carbon and silicon than elements of its own group, although boron is more electron deficient. Boron has a high affinity for oxygen-forming borates, and reacts with water at temperatures above 100 °C to form boric acid and other boron compounds.
Carbon- As a member of group 14 on the periodic table, it is nonmetallic and tetravalent—making four electrons available to form covalent chemical bonds. The most common isotope of carbon has 6 protons and 6 neutrons, and has an atomic mass of 12.0107 amu. Its ground state electron configuration is 1s22s22p2.
Nitrogen- Nitrogen gas (chemical symbol N) is generally inert, nonmetallic, colorless, odorless and tasteless. Its atomic number is 7, and it has an atomic weight of 14.0067. Nitrogen has a density of 1.251 grams/liter at 0 C and a specific gravity of 0.96737, making it slightly lighter than air.
Oxygen- is the air you breath
Nickel- Nickel is a hard silver white metal, which forms cubic crystals. It is malleable, ductile, and has superior strength and corrosion resistance. The metal is a fair conductor of heat and electricity and exhibits magnetic properties below 345°C
5 compounds and properties:
Water - Formula: H2O = Hydrogen2 + Oxygen. ...
Hydrogen Peroxide - Formula: H2O2 = Hydrogen2 + Oxygen2 ...
Salt - Formula: NaCl = Sodium + Chlorine. ...
Baking Soda - Formula: NaHCO3 = Sodium + Hydrogen + Carbon + Oxygen3
Octane - Formula: C8H18 = Carbon8 + Hydrogen18
hope this helps
"Henry mixed salt and water together in a cup until he observed a clear solution. He measured the mass of the solution. Then he placed the cup outside for several sunny days during the summer. After a week, he observed that only solid salt remained in the cup and the mass had decreased. Henry concluded that a physical and chemical change occurred in this investigation."
Which statements correctly defend or dispute his conclusion?
A.)He is correct. Dissolving salt in water is a physical change, but evaporating the water is a chemical change. Formation of a solid is evidence that a chemical change occurred.
B.)He is correct. Evaporation is a physical change, but dissolving salt in water is a chemical change. The change in mass is evidence that a chemical change occurred.
C.)He is incorrect. Dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both physical changes. The reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a physical change, so it could not be a chemical change.
D.)He is incorrect. Dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both chemical changes. The reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a chemical change, so it could not be a physical change.
Answer:
C.)He is incorrect. Dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both physical changes. The reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a physical change, so it could not be a chemical change.
Explanation:
From the analogy of the problem presented, we can see that Henry is grossly incorrect. His conclusion from the process of the experiment he carried out is completely wrong.
Physical changes are changes that alters the physical properties of matter particularly the form and state.
Chemical changes leads to the formation of a new kind of matter.
We can see that since the salt was obtained back after evaporation, no change has occurred to it.
Therefore, evaporation in itself is a physical change process.
Answer:
c on ed
Explanation:
____ power is generated from the heat released when uranium atoms split in a process known as fission.