Please help
Text: but more important by far is the abundant testimony about Conrad’s savage’s which we could gather if we were so inclined from other sources and which might lead us to think that these people must have had other occupations besides merging into the evil forest or materializing out of it simply to plague Marlowe and his dispirited band.For as it happened ,soon after Conrad had written his book an event of far greater consequences was taking place in the art world of Europe. This is how Frank Willet ,a British art historian describes it:

Gauguin has gone to Tahiti the most extravagant individual act of turning to a non-European culture in the decades immediately before and after 1900, when Europeans artists were avid for new artistic experiences, but it was only about 1904-5 that African art began to make its distinctive impact. one piece is still identifiable; it is a mask that has been given to Maurice Vlaminck in 1905. He records that Derain was “speechless” and “stunned” when he saw it, bought it from Vlaminck and it showed it to Picasso and Matisse,who were also greatly affected by it.Ambroise Vollard then borrowed it and had it cast in bronze...Th revolution of twentieth century art under way! The mask in question was made by other savages living just north of Conrad’s River Congo.They have a name too: the fang people,and are without a doubt among the worlds greatest masters of the sculptured form.The event Frank Willet is referring to marked the beginning of cubism and the infusion of new life into European art that had run completely out of strength.
The point of all of this is to suggest Conrad’s picture of the people’s of the Congo seems grossly inadequate even at the height of their subjection to the ravages of King Leopolds International Association for the Civilazation of Central America.

QUESTIONS:
What claim does Achebe make in this passage?
A: Conrad’s depiction of Africans Is not accurate
B: Willets depiction of African culture is fair
C: Conrad and Willet both dehumanize Africans

What type of evidence does Achebe use to support this claim?
A: anecdotal
B: textual
C: historical

How does the evidence support the claim?
A: it contrasts Conrad’s limited viewpoint
B: it’s supports Conrad‘s perspective
C: it’s denies claims that Conrad is racist

The claim that Achebe make in this passage is that "Conrad’s depiction of Africans Is not accurate" (Option A)

When a writer or a speaker makes an assertion or a statement of position, they are said to have made a claim.

The type of evidence that  Achebe use to support this claim is: "Historical Evidence" (Option C).

Historical Evidence refers to evidence that stems from an event that has happened in the past.

The evidence supports Achebe's claim in that it contrasts Conrad’s limited viewpoint with that of Willet.

Learn more about claims at;

https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1

Answer:

A,C,A

Explanation:

10 POINTS What do readers learn about Mr. White in
the first paragraph of the story? How might this
be related to the theme?

If you can answer all please do or just one you have to look them up or u probably know some

Who will show you the answer ? change the voice ​

Help please and thank you so much! this is due today!

Which statements about the excerpt are objective?
Check all that apply.

The rivalry between Yatman and Lindsay was petty
and ridiculous

Both Yatman and Lindsay rode the same 20-mile
course many times.

Lindsay completed an 800-mile marathon in 91
hours. 48 minutes.

Yatman held the Long Island women's century
record prior to Lindsay

It is clear that Lindsay was the stronger cyclist
between the two women.

25 points!!!!!!In the early years of human history, people traded goods with one another. This tradition continues in today's world. Many of the goods used every day were acquired as a result of trade. Today, trade remains very important to economic survival. For this project, you will be asked to make comparisons between trading practices in early empires and trading practices today. OBJECTIVES Think about similarities and differences in trading practices over time. Write a short essay. VOCABULARY tradebuying, selling, or bartering of goods and services​

Make this sentence more descriptive.

Jaylen hit a home run.

do you know how to write an essay

Which of the following sentences is punctuated correctly?
A. Can you see that shark. It's huge!
B. Did you hear that!
C. Can you help me lift this rock off my foot.
D. What can you say about Paul?

what is the main idea of once upon a time by nadine Gordimer?

how physical violence a good example of how protest might degenerate ? How does this reflect kings views

The purpose of fasting on Wednesdays is specifically to encourage the eating of fish, to support the fishing industry. People therefore respond differently. Some households uphold the old religious fasts during Advent and Lent, as if they are still observing the religious law; others ignore Advent but observe the Lenten fast. Still others ignore Wednesdays and just fast on Fridays and Saturdays. Why does the author use third-person point of view in this excerpt?

Which sentence is a complex sentence?

What elements of a novel should you review to generate questions for a collaborative discussion

Mrs. Sommers plans a judicious use of the
money.
A. wise
B. extravagant
C. careless
D detailed

Procedural writing would be useful for explaining
1. why bears hibernate in the winter.
2. where bald eagles build their nests.
3. how a new library will help students.
4. how to play a game of Frisbee golf.

HELP I NEED TO DO THIS REALLY BAD!!!!!Unit 1 Performance Task: Analyzing Telling Details
Instructions: Carefully read the short story, "Powder," by Tobias Wolff.
The two main characters are a father and son. Since the son is the narrator, his
thoughts are often expressed directly. On the other hand, figuring out what the father is
thinking requires paying close attention to the telling details the author includes.
Write a well-written paragraph in which you analyze how the author uses telling details
to provide the reader with insight into the father's thoughts and character.

What is the topic of this passage?
What is the author's purpose for writing this passage?
Madagascar is an island lying about 1,000 miles south of
Socotra. The people are Saracens who worship Mahomet.
They have four sheikhs--that is to say, four elders-who
exercise authority over the whole island. ... It is said to
measure about 4,000 miles in circumference. The people
live by trade and industry.
-"The Middle East,"
Marco Polo

Which statement shows bias

which best described the mood of the haiku?

A. Anxious and Irritated
B. Carefree and Optimistic
C. Remorseful and Lonely
D. Wistful and Meditative​

starting conversation each other to f&f​

Which statement best states a theme in “Gumption”?
The feeling of powerlessness can inspire acts of bravery.
People must think of others before thinking of themselves.
Hard work and perseverance will pay off over time.
People are often rewarded by society for doing what is right.

I suck at writing just give me like two sentances. Edgar Allen Poe the raven
Summarize how the speaker views the raven over the course of the poem. Cite evidence in
you answer

View Passage
Read the passage on the left to answer the following questions:
ent
29) The author's use of formal language in the passage affects the purpose
of the text by
A)
creating agencies to monitor the spread of Avian Flu.
r International
hard to support
an influenza,
birds. The
or GAINS, will
Lyze laboratory
anges in the
n, including a
cease Control
B)
encouraging Dr. Dobriansky to push for a global
response.
C)
emphasizing the specific important nature of the
information
D)
persuading the Wildlife Conservation Society to
protect migratory birds.
ciety, GAINS will

I'll give brainleist! Which sentence uses correct subject-verb agreement? Select one:
1 The shelves at the library is full of good books.
2 The color of her eyes are a beautiful blue-green.
3 Many vehicles on the road emits large amounts of pollution.
4 Several varieties of flowers grow in the garden.​

Read the excerpt and then answer the question that follows. "I offered to lie down that he might the more conveniently reach my ear, but he chose rather to let me hold him in my hand during our conversation. What is the BEST explanation for this description? A)The narrator is a giant compared to his very small guest. B)The narrator is pretending to defer to the guest's weaker political power. C)The narrator is feeling ill but makes time to listen to his guest. D)The narrator respects the guest's significant political stature.

HOW A BILL BECOMES A LAW
by USHistory.org2016

Creating new laws is what the United States Congress is all about. However, many people criticize Congress for its inefficiency and the length of time that it takes for laws to be passed and enacted. For example, members of the 112th Congress (2011-2012) introduced 6,845 bills, but only 758 were passed. That’s 5%!

The process of creating laws is long and difficult, but our nation’s founders intentionally set it up that way. Our founders didn’t want a process where just a few people would have the power to quickly be able to make all the laws. Instead, they created many hurdles so that many people would have to agree on a law before it could be passed.

Before a bill becomes a law it must pass both chambers of Congress and be signed into law by the president. It may begin its journey at any time, but it must be passed during the same Congressional session of its proposal (a period of one year).

The two chambers of the United States Congress are called the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House has 435 members, and states with larger populations get a larger share of the representatives. States with relatively few people, like Vermont and Wyoming, each get only 1 representative, but Texas gets 36 representatives and California gets 53. The Senate is different. Each state — no matter how big or small it is — gets 2 Senators.

For any bill to pass the House or the Senate, a few very important things must happen. First, the bill must pass through the relevant committee. For example, if there is a bill on farm subsidies,1 the bill is sent to the Agriculture Committee. In this committee, members can recommend changes, and the details of the bill can be edited. Once edits are finished, members of that committee vote to determine whether or not to send the bill to the floor for a vote. Roughly 90% of bills never actually make it out of their committee.

If a majority of members support the bill in committee, then it is moved to the floor where there is a debate and a vote. Since the House has many more members, the debates are timed and members usually have just a few minutes to speak in favor of or in opposition to the bill. The Senate is different and much more complicated; Senators can debate an issue for a far longer amount of time. For example, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was debated for 60 days since some Senators didn’t believe that bill should become a law. After the debates end, a vote is held, and majority rules.

If a bill passes both the House and the Senate with a majority vote, the bill is then sent to a conference committee. A conference committee is formed to merge two versions of a bill — one from the House and one from the Senate — when the two houses cannot easily agree on revisions. The members of the conference committee must come up with a compromise. The revised bill then must go back to the floors of each house and be passed by both houses before it can be sent to the president.

If the president agrees with the bill, he or she can sign it, and then it becomes a law. If the president disagrees with the bill, he or she can veto it. At that point, Congress can override the president’s veto if two-thirds of the members in the House and Senate vote to overturn the veto.

As you can see, it is very hard to pass laws in America, but this can also help protect us from leaders who have bad ideas. Winston Churchill, the former Prime Minister of Great Britain once said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” When he said this, he may have been thinking about America’s government!

1. What is the central idea of this text
A. Bills become laws once Congress has reviewed them.
B. Bills become laws after approval by either house or Senate
C. Bills become laws only after receiving several reviews and approvals.
D. Bills often do not become laws because they receive a presidential veto


2. What is the meaning of "share" as it is used in paragraph 4?
A. Portion
B. Quality
C. Space
D. Variety

Please help me I have Gifted Common lit and I'm also Dyslexic, it gets really hard reading words and I often skip words causing me to fail. Thankyou! :)

how does the main idea and key details work together

Read this excerpt from "Birdfoot's Grampa."
But, leathery hands full
of wet brown life,
knee deep in the sumrler
roadside grass,
he just smiled and said
they have places to go to
too.
Why does the author use the words "wet brown life" in this excerpt?
to show that the grass is still alive and growing
to indicate that the mud is all over everything
to signify how wet the night has become
O to point out that the toads are living things

4. Which words in the first eight lines of "To Sleep" create a sympathetic tone?
embalmer and enshaded
benign and charities
follow.
fingers and eyes
0
midnight and hymn
O