Answer:
South African women played a significant role in the struggle for human rights during the 1950s and 1960s. They were involved in various campaigns and protests against the apartheid regime, which systematically violated the human rights of non-white South Africans³.
One of the most notable events was the Women's March to the Union Buildings in Pretoria in 1956. Women throughout the country put their names to petitions and indicated their anger and frustration at having their freedom of movement restricted by the hated official passes. The bravery of these women, who risked official reprisals including arrest, detention and even bannings, is applauded¹.
The ANC Women's League (ANCWL) also played a significant role in ensuring that women's demands were included in the Freedom Charter in 1955. In 1960, when the ANC was banned, the ANCWL was also affected as many leaders went into exile⁴.
Issues that concerned women in the 1950s can be described as 'bread and butter' matters, such as housing, food prices, and permits¹. However, their activism and resistance played a crucial role in bringing global attention to the widespread suffering and indignity faced by non-white South Africans during this period.
Sources:
(1) Violation of Human Rights in South Africa: A Dark Decade (1950-1960). https://mycourses.co.za/violation-of-human-rights-in-south-africa-a-dark-decade-1950-1960/ Accessed 11/04/2023.
(2) History of Women’s Struggle in South Africa. https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/history-womens-struggle-south-africa Accessed 11/04/2023.
(3) Women and the struggle against Apartheid | South African History Online. https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/women-and-struggle-against-apartheid Accessed 11/04/2023.
(4) History of women's rights in South Africa - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_women%27s_rights_in_South_Africa Accessed 11/04/2023.
P.S. Sorry the essay is quite short, as there was not much I could find. Hope this helps!
who were the two sides of the Mexican Revolution after 1913 and what did each side want?
The Conventionistas—including Pancho Villa and Zapata—sought big economic and social reforms. The Constitutionalistas—led by Venustiano Carranza and Álvaro Obregón—wanted to establish a liberal democracy, but were less willing to return land to peasant and indigenous villages.
How does gerrymandering change the relationship between the voter and the elected official
Gerrymandering changes the relationship between the voter and the elected official by allowing the elected official to be less accountable to the voter.
What is elected official?An elected official is a person who holds an elected public office in a government. They are usually elected by the people of a particular jurisdiction, such as a state or a city, to represent their interests and carry out the business of the government. Elected officials may hold a variety of different positions, including president, governor, mayor, county commissioner, legislator, and judge.
Gerrymandering is the practice of manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency to favor one group or party over another. This practice makes it easier for the elected official to win re-election and less likely to be held accountable for their performance. Gerrymandering can also lead to a lack of proportionality in representation, meaning that the votes of certain groups are not accurately reflected in the elected body. This can lead to a feeling of disenfranchisement among voters, as they may feel that their voices are not being heard or represented. Ultimately, gerrymandering can undermine the trust between the voter and the elected official, making it more difficult to build relationships and work together to find solutions to problems.
To learn more about elected official
https://brainly.com/question/860307
#SPJ9
How did the soviets respond to finding majdanek
Answer:
Explanation:
Majdanek was a Nazi concentration camp located in Lublin, Poland, that was discovered by Soviet forces on July 23, 1944. The Soviet response to finding Majdanek was to publicize the atrocities committed there in order to raise awareness of the horrors of the Holocaust and to rally international support for the Allied war effort.
The Soviet government immediately sent a special commission to investigate the camp and to document the crimes committed there. The commission included doctors, historians, and other experts who were tasked with gathering evidence and testimonies from survivors. The evidence collected by the commission was used to create a report that detailed the crimes committed at the camp, which was then published in the Soviet press and distributed internationally.
The Soviet response to the discovery of Majdanek was also aimed at discrediting Nazi propaganda and exposing the lies that the Nazis had used to justify their policies of extermination. Soviet authorities organized tours of the camp for journalists and foreign diplomats, hoping to raise awareness of the Holocaust and to counteract the propaganda being spread by the Nazis.
Overall, the Soviet response to the discovery of Majdanek was a key part of the Allied effort to bring the Holocaust to an end and to hold the Nazis accountable for their crimes. By publicizing the atrocities committed at the camp and exposing the lies of Nazi propaganda, the Soviet government played an important role in building international support for the Allied war effort and in laying the groundwork for the eventual prosecution of Nazi war criminals.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Was the fight against Britain truly a revolution, or was it just a war for autonomy and statehood? Should we call this the American Revolution or the War for Independence? Remember to use historical facts to support your argument.
Answer:
La lutte contre la Grande-Bretagne était sans aucun doute une révolution, car elle a radicalement changé le cours de l'histoire américaine et a transformé la société et la politique américaines. Bien que l'indépendance et l'autonomie aient été les principales motivations de la guerre, les idées révolutionnaires et les changements sociaux qui ont suivi ont été tout aussi importants. La Révolution américaine a été caractérisée par une énorme mobilisation populaire, une remise en question de l'autorité traditionnelle et une lutte pour l'égalité et les droits individuels.En outre, la Révolution américaine a été marquée par une transformation politique majeure, passant d'une monarchie coloniale à une république démocratique. Les colonies ont établi des gouvernements locaux indépendants, adopté des constitutions et formé une confédération qui a finalement abouti à la Constitution des États-Unis. Les fondements de l'État américain moderne ont été posés pendant la Révolution américaine, et cela n'aurait pas été possible sans une véritable révolution.Cependant, certains peuvent soutenir que la guerre d'indépendance était simplement une lutte pour l'autonomie et l'État, et qu'il n'y avait rien de révolutionnaire dans la guerre elle-même. Cette vision ignore cependant le rôle central des idées révolutionnaires et de la mobilisation populaire dans la lutte pour l'indépendance. Les idées de liberté, d'égalité et de droits individuels étaient au cœur de la lutte pour l'indépendance, et ces idées ont continué à avoir un impact important sur la politique américaine longtemps après la fin de la guerre.En conclusion, la Révolution américaine a été bien plus qu'une simple guerre d'indépendance ou une lutte pour l'autonomie et l'État. C'était une véritable révolution qui a transformé la société américaine et jeté les bases de l'État américain moderne. En fin de compte, il est juste de l'appeler la Révolution américaine plutôt que simplement la guerre d'indépendance.
Explanation:
1. Read this excerpt from a political speech. Then complete the chart by identifying some of the most
important characteristics of the speech. (B points)
The greatest probliem facing the United States today is the threat of terrorism.
As members of Congress, we must do everything possible to ensure the safety
of the citizens we represent. That is why I strongly urge my fellow senators to
support this new antiterrorism bill. It will increase funding for vital security
programs and allow law enforcement to more easily access the phone and
Internet records of suspected terrorists. The bill will also make it more difficult
for immigrants to enter this country if they're from areas with significant terrorist
activity. This will help us stop terrorists before they have the chance to attack.
Some organizations claiming to support civil liberties and immigrants' rights
have criticized me for sponsoring this bill, but nobody should listen to anything
they say. They apparently support terrorists having free access to our country! If
you side with Americans and not terrorists, you will vote for my bill.
This political speech addresses the issue of terrorism and presents an antiterrorism bill as solution, highlighting the need for increased funding for security programs, easier access to phone and internet record.
What is terrorism?Terrorism is a violent act that is committed by a group or an individual to achieve political or ideological goals by instilling fear and panic in a population. It involves the use of force or the threat of force to intimidate or coerce a government, organization, or people. The targets of terrorism can be civilians, military personnel, or infrastructure, and the tactics used can range from bombings and shootings to kidnappings and hijackings. Terrorism often has a psychological impact beyond the physical damage caused, as it aims to create a sense of insecurity and uncertainty. Counterterrorism efforts involve a range of measures, including intelligence gathering, law enforcement, military action, and addressing the underlying grievances that may fuel terrorist ideologies.
To learn more about terrorism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14195777
#SPJ1
How did “native-born” Americans react to the wave of immigration that occurred from 1870 to 1920? a. Evangelical Christians, who thought of them as brothers and sisters in the same faith, warmly welcomed them. b. The large majority of Americans were ambivalent towards the phenomena.c. Many feared that the new immigrants, with their new cultures, traditions, and religions, would unalterably change America. d. Most embraced the wave of immigration as validation of American exceptionalism.
Answer:
How did Americans respond to the new immigrants?These attitudes—encouragement, hostility, restriction, and Americanization—were the most common reactions to the arrival of so many immigrants around the turn of the century.
How did Nativists react to the new immigrants?Viewing society as a hierarchy of races, nativists relied on flawed scientific ideas that saw new immigrants as inferior and unassimilable. Organizations like the Immigration Restriction League, founded in Boston by three prominent Harvard alumni in 1894, used such ideas to promote restrictive legislation.
How were new immigrants that came to the United States between 1870 and 1900 different from earlier immigrants?"Old" immigrants came for economic reasons, while "new" immigrants came looking for religious freedom. "Old" immigrants were primarily Catholic, while many "new" immigrants were Jewish or Protestant.
Therefore, I'm pretty sure the answer is A) Evangelical Christians, who thought of them as brothers and sisters in the same faith, warmly welcomed them.
From 1870 to 1920, a significant wave of immigration occurred in America, causing varied reactions from native-born Americans. The most prevalent reaction was fear that these new cultures and traditions would drastically change American society. This was reflected in the rise of Nativist movements and restrictive immigration laws.
Explanation:The period from 1870 to 1920 witnessed a massive wave of immigration to the United States. The reaction of "native-born" Americans to this influx of immigrants was varied but the most accurate depiction of their response can be labeled as option C. Many native-born Americans indeed expressed fear and apprehension that the arrival of groups with diverse cultures, traditions, and religions would significantly change the fabric of American society. While some sectors of society may have been more accepting, the sentiment of fear and resistance was a predominant reaction during this time. This can be seen in the rise of Nativist movements and the enactment of restrictive immigration laws in the years that followed, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Immigration Act of 1924.
Learn more about Immigration Reaction here:https://brainly.com/question/31371252
#SPJ2
Which of the following is a country NOT annexed by the Soviet Union shortly after Germany’s declaration of war?
A. Eastern Poland
B. Sweden
C. Finland
D. Lithuania
Sweden is a country not annexed by the Soviet Union shortly after Germany’s declaration of war.
What is Soviet Union?The Soviet Union was a single-party Marxist-Leninist state that existed from 1922 to 1991. It was governed by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and its capital and largest city was Moscow. It was a union of 15 Soviet Socialist Republics, and its economic and political system was based on the Soviet model of central planning and state ownership of resources. The Soviet Union was a superpower that played a major role in world politics, including the Cold War. It was one of the two superpowers and the world's largest and most powerful nation until its dissolution in 1991. The Soviet Union was characterized by its centrally planned economy, its commitment to the ideology of state socialism and its reliance on the state to provide social services and welfare.
To learn more about Soviet Union
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ1
How did each of the following contribute to changes in Southwest Asia after
World War I?
1. the Ottoman Empire
joining the Central
Powers
The following contribute to changes in Southwest Asia after World War I The Ottoman Empire.
What effect did the Ottoman Empire having joined the Central Powers have?Because it had fought Russia in the past and was wary of further invasion, the Ottoman Empire joined the Central Powers. The Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Russian Empire were divided by the treaty, and Germany was required to take full responsibility for the war's consequences and make massive war reparations.
How did the oil industry's development affect the region of Southwest Asia after World War I?Southwest Asia's reliance on oil led to a significant increase in urbanization in the region. Governments started putting more emphasis on teaching technological skills that would help the economy.
To Know more about Central Powers
https://brainly.com/question/12148749
#SPJ1
How the Integration of whites and Blacks has helped to perpetuate inequality and racism in South Africa
The integration of whites and blacks in South Africa has not necessarily led to elimination of inequality and racism, but rather has sometimes perpetuated it.
What is inequality?Inequality refers to the unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, and power among individuals or groups within a society. It can manifest in different forms such as income and wealth inequality, gender and racial discrimination, unequal access to education, healthcare, and social services. Inequality can have negative impacts on individuals' well-being and can lead to social unrest and instability. In addition, it can limit economic growth and hinder the development of a society as a whole. Addressing inequality requires policies and actions that aim to promote fairness, justice, and equal opportunities for all individuals regardless of their background or social status.
To learn more about inequality, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5947672
#SPJ9
Complete Question:
How has the Integration of whites and Blacks helped to perpetuate inequality and racism in South Africa?
How were mounds important to early American Indians peoples in what is today Georgia?
What kind of evidence has been found to support this conclusion?
Answer:
I don't understand the question
state two problems faced by cities in the United States in the late 1800s?
Answer:
During the 1800s, there was issues such as no piped water, which lasted till 1948, when they fixed the problem. There was also rarely any sanitation, making everything dirty. Other mainstream problems were rapid expansions around industrial cities, making things overpopulated for a city that was supposed to be originally for a small crowd of people.
Explanation:
Hope this helped you.
what factors did senators take into account in voting for or against these nominees? Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett
When voting for or against Supreme Court nominations, senators consider a number of different things, such as the nominee's credentials, judicial philosophy, prior decisions or rulings, and political ideology. Senators paid close attention to the opinions of Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett on matters including abortion, gun rights, and healthcare.
Senators questioned the nominees about how they would interpret the Constitution and the Supreme Court's role during their confirmation hearings. Many Republican senators backed the nominations of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett because they were thought to be conservatively inclined.
Concerns about how the selections would affect matters like reproductive rights and the Affordable Care Act were a top priority for Democratic senators. Some people have expressed worries about the selection procedure, particularly in the instance of Kavanaugh, who was confirmed despite being accused of se xual assault.
learn more about Supreme Court here
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
5 reasons and 5 quotes or why the union soldiers fought.
Union soldiers fought soldiers fought for a variety of reasons, some of which included a sense of duty to their nation, opportunities for adventure, or the chance to start over in new circumstances.
Which three factors contributed to the Union's Civil War victory?The Union's greater personnel, transportation, and industrial capabilities were key factors in its success, as was President Abraham Lincoln's skillful leadership.
Which 5 Civil War battles were the most crucial?Many significant and minor engagements and military actions took place during the United States Civil War, which was fought between 1861 and 1865. The First Battle of Bull Run, the Battle of Shiloh, and the Battle of Antietam were some of the more important ones.
To know more about union soldiers fought visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/26953929
#SPJ1
help with this please
Answer:
B) Establishment of the mandate system.
According to some research, it says supporting free trade, which is a mandate system.
What is Free Trade?Free trade is a trade policy that does not restrict imports or exports. In government, free trade is predominantly advocated by political parties that hold economically liberal positions, while economic nationalist and left-wing political parties generally support protectionism, the opposite of free trade.
which ONE of the three branches is the most powerful and influential today?
Answer: The Legislative Branch
Explanation: The most powerful branch of the United States government not only because of the powers given to them by the Constitution, but also the implied powers that Congress has.
As everyone slowly gets off the train onto the ramp, Mordechai sees his fellow passengers adjust their suits, gather their belongings, and stretch their legs. Mordechai has a lump in his throat because he has heard of the destination of these trains. When he was in the Warsaw ghetto, he heard stories of those on the trains who were killed as soon as they arrived. Mordechai begins to shake, and his breathing becomes labored. Suddenly, he feels the hand of a guard on his shoulder. What will the guard MOST likely do?
A.
Take Mordechai to see a doctor for his panic attack.
B.
Arrest Mordechai and take him away, hands bound.
C.
Shoot Mordechai on the spot because of his anxiousness.
D.
Steer Mordechai quietly away from the platform to be executed elsewhere.
Based on the given information, the guard is most likely to take Mordechai away from the platform quietly, potentially to be executed elsewhere. The fact that Mordechai is experiencing a panic attack and is anxious about the destination of the train suggests that he is likely a Jewish prisoner being transported to a concentration camp or extermination camp during the Holocaust. The guards in charge of transporting prisoners during the Holocaust were often cruel and unsympathetic to the prisoners' suffering, and it is unlikely that they would have taken Mordechai to see a doctor or shown him any compassion. Instead, they would have been more likely to punish or kill him for showing signs of weakness or resistance.
~~~Harsha~~~Which of the following are examples of Discretionary Spending?
A. Social Security, and employee retirement
B. Veterans benefits, and Debt repayment
C. Military spending and a scientific research.
D. Medicare and Medicaid spending
Discretionary expenses include, for example, restaurant meals and entertainment charges.
What is Discretionary Spending?Spending that is officially approved by the President, Congress, and the appropriations committee each year is referred to as discretionary spending. Typically, the discretionary budget is split between funding the administration of other agencies and programmes and allocating more than half to the national defence. The national defense, foreign aid, education, and transportation sectors are a few examples of those supported by discretionary spending. Spending that is required, often known as non-discretionary spending, is exactly that. Your rent or mortgage, food, and car payments may all fall under this category. On the other side, products that are lovely to have but not necessary would fall under discretionary spending.To learn more about Discretionary Spending, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/12602941
Later, when the trials of the Nazis commenced to hold them accountable for crimes such as the death march, most defendants attempted to use the excuse that they were following orders from higher up. If these defendants had their way, who should be the only one held responsible for the death march?
A.
Adolf Hitler
B.
Rudolf Hoess
C.
Heinrich Himmler
D.
Hermann Goering
Option (a), Adolf Hitler should be the sole one held accountable for the death march, according to these defendants.
What is meant by the Death March?1. It's possible that the phrase "death march" was first coined by inmates of concentration camps. It alluded to the torturous, supervised forced marches of prisoners from concentration camps across great distances. 2. During death marches, SS guards brutally treated the prisoners and murdered many of them.
Which death march has the greatest notoriety?In April 1942, at the start of World War II, 76,000 prisoners of war—66,000 Filipinos and 10,000 Americans—were compelled to walk the 66 miles (106 km) of the Bataan Death March in the Philippines.
Learn more about Adolf Hitler: https://brainly.com/question/3905550
#SPJ1
1) What are the drawbacks and advantages of drug dogs?
2)To what extent should a drug dogs history of false positives and false negatives factor into questions concerning the admissibility of evidence?
3) Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision?
Advantages of drug dogs include their ability to detect drugs quickly and accurately, their low cost of use, and their ability to be used in areas where traditional methods of drug detection may not be feasible.
What is cost?Cost is a measure of monetary or non-monetary resources used to produce a good or service. It refers to the money spent on labor, materials, equipment, and other resources in the production of a product or service. It also includes the costs of research and development, marketing, and administrative expenses.
1) Advantages of drug dogs include their ability to detect drugs quickly and accurately, their low cost of use, and their ability to be used in areas where traditional methods of drug detection may not be feasible. Drawbacks include their potential to produce false positives and false negatives, their potential to be trained to detect drugs based on anecdotes and not actual training, and their potential to be used as a form of intimidation rather than actual drug detection.
2) A drug dog's history of false positives and false negatives should be considered when evaluating the admissibility of evidence. A history of false positives or false negatives can indicate that the dog is not trained properly and is not reliable in determining the presence of drugs. A court should consider the accuracy and reliability of such evidence before allowing it to be used in a trial.
3) Yes, the Supreme Court's decision in the Florida v. Harris case was correct in finding that the use of a drug dog in this case was an acceptable form of evidence. The Court noted that the drug dog had a high rate of accuracy, and that the evidence provided by the dog was reliable. The Court also noted that the drug dog's training had been properly documented and that the dog had undergone regular testing to ensure its accuracy and reliability.
To learn more about cost
https://brainly.com/question/29413919
#SPJ1
how did Microsoft innovate and improve GUIs?
GUIs in history
Microsoft further developed GUIs through doing the accompanying: Causing it to have more visual attachment ,Making it more instinctive and Making it more clear.
What is Microsoft's advancement procedure?In a holistic manner, the innovation strategy ought to address processes, culture, and enabling technology. The purpose of Microsoft's Innovation Management Framework is to assist businesses in developing a comprehensive and integrated strategy for supporting and implementing an innovation management strategy.
On April 4, 1975, Bill and Paul Allen established Microsoft to develop and market Essential mediators for the Altair 8800. With MS-DOS, it became the dominant PC operating system in the 1980s, followed by Windows.
What is the GUI?Using visual indicator representations, graphic user interfaces allow users to interact with electronic devices.
To learn more about Microsoft visit :
https://brainly.com/question/27308429
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from the Edicts of Ashoka.
They (my officers) work among soldiers, chiefs,
householders, the poor, the aged- for their welfare
and happiness-so that they may be free from
harassment. The officers work for the proper
treatment of prisoners, towards their unfettering, and if
the officers think, "This one has a family to support,"
"That one has been bewitched," "This one is old,"
then they work for the release of such prisoners. They
work here, in outlying towns, in the women's quarters
belonging to my brothers and sisters, and among my
other relatives. They are occupied everywhere.
What is the main idea of the edict?
O Women, the elderly, and prisoners should be given
special treatment.
Ashoka's officers have the power to make
decisions on their own.
O Ashoka's officers are watching what people are
doing all the time.
O Ashoka's officers would treat all citizens with
respect regardless of status.
Option (d), No of their position, Ashoka's officers would treat them with dignity.
Whom did Ashoka appoint as special agents charged with promoting and upholding the Dhamma across his empire?Ashoka appointed specialized officers known as dhammamahamatras to defend and advance Buddhism across the realm. He had the precepts of the dhamma etched onto rocks, pillars, and cave walls in Prakrit so that the common people can read and apply them.
What rules did Ashoka give his officials to follow?Ashoka also had his messages engraved on pillars and rocks, and he instructed his officials to read them to anybody who was unable to do it on their own. Ashoka also sent emissaries to Syria, Egypt, Greece, and Sri Lanka in order to spread the dhamma to these nations.
Learn more about Ashoka: https://brainly.com/question/13619538
#SPJ1
what changed brought about by rescinding apartheid laws in 1994
The rescinding of apartheid laws in 1994 brought about significant changes in South Africa, including the end of legalized racial segregation, political reforms, social and economic changes, efforts towards reconciliation and nation-building, and improved international relation.
What is Law?
Law refers to a set of rules and regulations established by a governing body or authority to regulate human behavior and maintain order in a society. It is a system of rules that are enforced through social institutions, such as courts, to ensure compliance and resolve disputes. Law is designed to provide a framework for the orderly conduct of individuals and groups, and it encompasses various areas such as criminal law, civil law, administrative law, and international law, among others.
End of Legalized Racial Segregation: Apartheid laws, which enforced racial segregation and discrimination, were repealed, bringing an end to the legalized system of racial separation in South Africa.
Political Reforms: The end of apartheid led to political reforms, including the establishment of a multi-racial democracy in South Africa.
Learn more about Law from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ9
Which resource in Poland is one of the most important in the world? Question 4 options: 1 iron ore 2 bauxite 3 sulfur 4 oil
Answer:
Poland is one of the major producers of copper and silver in the world. It is also a significant producer of coal, zinc, lead, and other industrial minerals. The mining industry is an important part of the Polish economy, with mining and quarrying accounting for around 3% of the GDP and providing jobs for over 100,000 people. Poland's natural resources have contributed significantly to its economic development and continue to play a significant role in its growth.
Therefore, the answer is 1. Iron Ore.
Why are the supply curve and the market supply curve the same except for quantity supplied?
The supply curve represents the relationship between the price of a product and the quantity of that product that producers are willing to offer for sale in the marketplace. The market supply curve, on the other hand, represents the aggregate of all individual supply curves for a particular product.
The difference -Assuming that there are no additional changes in market conditions or the behavior of individual producers, the market supply curve is the total quantity of the product that is supplied at each price level. Therefore, the slope and shape of the market supply curve would be the same as those for the individual supply curve, with the only difference being a higher quantity supplied at each price level.
In other words, at any given price point, the market supply curve simply sums up the quantity supplied by all producers in the market, which is the sum total of all the individual producer's quantity supplied at that same price point. This is why the supply curve and the market supply curve have the same slope and shape, but the market supply curve represents a broader view of the entire market, taking into account the supply decisions of all producers.
To know more about supply curve and the market supply curve -
https://brainly.com/question/30040562
#SPJ1
Conclusion of migrant labour system
The historical system of migrant labor was established by capitalist, colonial, and apartheid authorities in order to balance the conflicting needs for cheap labor in the mines and cities of "white" South Africa with the goal of relegating black people to rural areas distant from the "white" metropolis.
What effect did the migrant labor system have?Fathers were absent from their children's homes because of the migrant labor system since they were working in low-paying jobs in the city and only seeing them once a year. Taverns were conveniently located for these migratory workers by the apartheid planners.
What function does migrant labor serve?While the variables that drive the demand for migrant labor may change, those that drive its supply are often constant: most often, migrant laborers travel to their places of employment due to unfavorable economic and social conditions in their home regions.
Learn more about migrant labor: https://brainly.com/question/15819762
#SPJ1
What are some examples of a statistic about the civil war
Answer:
During the Civil War, 2% of the U.S. population died. This is equivalent to 6 million men today. While rifles were the deadliest weapons during the war, disease killed more men. Camps became breeding grounds for measles, chicken pox, and mumps. One million Union solders contracted malaria.
Explanation:
ing events in order (1-5) from earliest to latest: Alexander the Great conquers the Persian empire Greeks colonize parts of the Mediterranean Greeks revolt against Persian rulers Mycenaeans conquer Minoans and control the Aegean The Peloponnesian War begins
Minoans conquered by the Mycenaeans and control the Aegean, Greeks colonize parts of the Mediterranean, Greeks revolt against Persian rulers, Alexander the Great conquers Persian empire, Peloponnesian War begins.
What is revolt?Revolt refers to a violent or nonviolent uprising against authority or government, typically motivated by a desire for political, social, or economic change. Revolts can take many forms, ranging from peaceful protests and civil disobedience to armed resistance and insurrection. Revolts often arise when people feel that their rights and freedoms are being violated, or when they are facing social or economic injustice. They can be sparked by a variety of factors, including corruption, oppression, discrimination, or lack of representation. Revolts have played a significant role in shaping history, often leading to significant changes in political and social systems and are a manifestation of people's desire for self-determination and autonomy.
To learn more about revolt, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5470519
#SPJ1
Graded Assignment – The American Dream 30 points CA-HIST-SS: 11.8: Students analyze the economic boom and social transformation of post–World War II America. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.2: Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas. Background Information: The threat of invasion and subversion in the Cold War era led Americans to seek consensus and conformity, in politics and in culture. The rise of consumer culture in the same period, driven by an economic boom, a population surge, and suburban development gave rise to a middle class with certain expectations about material culture and behavior. Many television programs, magazines, songs, and other forms of popular culture reflected accepted social patterns and defined “The American Dream.”
After years of wartime rationing, American consumers were willing to spend money and factories switched from wartime to peacetime production.
Give a brief account on The Post World War II Boom.In the summer of 1945, since World War II drew to a close, the U.S. economy was on the brink of an uncertain future. At the height of her war effort in late 1943 and early 1944, the United States produced about as much munitions as all of its allies and enemies combined.
Fueled by growing consumer demand and the continued expansion of the post-Cold War military-industrial complex, the United States reached new heights of prosperity in the years following World War II. Gross National Product (GNP), which analyze all goods and services produced, increased from just $200 billion in 1940 to $300 billion in 1950. By 1960, it exceeded $500 billion, making the United States as the richest and most powerful nation in the world.
To know more about World War II, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7745710
#SPJ1
What space events happened in 1980's?
Answer:
Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, and Atlantis.
Explanation:
The saddest and most tragic one was the Challenger explosion.
Nazis turned Germany into a totalitarian dictatorship.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
It was 99.5% totalitarian, and later 100% totalitarian. In his book Panzer Leader, Heinz Guderian writes of a top general Hitler fired when Hitler found out the general criticized “civilian control” of the military, and Hitler thought the general was talking about him. So, Hitler fired the general, kicked him out of the German Army, deprived him of the right to wear his decorations and took away his Army pension. Two brave lawyers for the OKW and OKH filed suit against the Third Reich to get the general’s pension restored, because Army regulations said pensions could only be taken away after a hearing … and this general would have prevailed at a hearing before other Wehrmacht officers. The Reichstag, Hitler’s rubber stamp, then changed the Enabling Act to let Hitler do what he did, essentially creating total despotism not beholden to any law.