There is different Constitutional eligibility requirements and terms for office for a member of the House of Representatives, a Senator, The President and a Supreme Court Justice.
1. Members of the House must be at least 25 years old, a resident of the state they have chosen and have been a citizen for at least 7 years.
2. Persons chosen for the role of Senator must be at least 30 years old, a resident of the state they have chosen, and a citizen for at least 9 years.
3. The Constitution establishes the eligibility conditions for the position of President as being a native-born American, a resident of the United States for 14 years, and being at least 35 years old.
4. The Constitution makes no mention of age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship as criteria for Justices. A Justice is not required to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, although all Justices have received legal training.
To learn more on member of the House of Representatives, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10750169
#SPJ1
Section #4: 8 points
According to your textbook, what is a “Tradeoff” in government? Include an example of your own.
Using a quote from your book and your own words, explain “Common Goods” in a few sentences.
o Find a news article that deals with the issue of “Common Goods” in the United States in the last
Five years. Summarize it here and include the news article link.
A trade-off is a situational decision in which one quality, quantity, or feature of a set or design is reduced or lost in exchange for gains in other areas.
In economics, common goods are items that are competitive and non-excludable.
A tradeoff occurs when one thing increases while another must decline. Tradeoffs result from a variety of constraints.
A common good is anything that benefits society as a whole. The bus, the roads, and the school are all common goods because they benefit everyone and are available to everyone.
A news article on Common goods state that on September 24, 2021 a Craft by Common Goods will be held at a relatively new coffee shop on Youngstown's west side. Common Goods Studio already sells a wide range of handcrafted and local artisan goods, but this weekend will feature over 50 vendors. This event was free for everyone and ran from 11 am to 4 pm.
To learn more on tradeoff, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10895386
#SPJ1
when you put the answer, make sure its in a list format.
Example:
1.A
2.B
3.C
The correct match for the definitions provided are
1. E. Claim 2. L. Legally liable 3. N. No-fault insurance 4. A. Collision insurance 5. O. Deductible 6. K. Comprehensive insurance 7. D. Medical payments insurance 8. M. Bodily injury liability insurance 9. F. Property damage liability insurance 10. I. Uninsured motorist insurance
11. B. Financial responsibility laws 12. J. Automobile Insurance Plan
13. G. Rating territory 14. H. Policy limits 15. C. Premium
What is Automobile Insurance Plan all about?The Automobile Insurance Plan is about making sure that all drivers have access to insurance coverage, despit their driving history or other risk factors.
This insurance is particularly helpful for high-risk drivers that might find it difficult to get coverage through normal insurance providers.
Find more exercises on Automobile Insurance ;
https://brainly.com/question/30138739
#SPJ1
if people do not pay property tax, can a municipal commissioner file the case in court?
a SART examiner is also trained to
A SART examiner is also trained to gather biological evidence that may identify the perpetrator.
Who is a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner ?A Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner can be considered as a nurse or physician Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner.
Ity should be noted that they beeing trained so that they can specialized on the provision of the forensic evidentiary examination and medical support whever it is needed under the leagal procvess, they are people that are being trained so that they can gather biological evidence which is needed duriung investigation that may identify the perpetrator in any case.
Learn more about SART examiner at:
https://brainly.com/question/23446519
#SPJ1
missing options:
gather biological evidence that may identify the perpetrator
make accurate records regarding the crime
talk to the police about the crime
compassionately comfort the victim
Section #1: 9 points
Major Judicial Decisions - List three major Judicial decisions made by the Supreme Court and indicate
the impact/precedent established by the decision. Make sure that you include:
1. The name of the case and the year it was decided.
2. The background of the case...what was the case about?
3. The decision by the Supreme Court
4. The impact/precedent established by the decision.
Some of the major judicial decisions of the Supreme Court are Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland and Dred Scott v. Sandford .
Marbury v. Madison (1803) :
The case was about who can ultimately decide what the law is.
It was decided that determining what the law is is explicitly the province and obligation of the Judicial Department.
This judgement provided the Court the authority to overturn legislation on the basis that they are unconstitutional, a power known as judicial review.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
The case was on whether Congress can establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank.
The Court ruled that Congress has implied powers to establish a national bank under the U.S. Constitution's "necessary and proper" provision. The Court also ruled that federal laws supersede state ones, and hence a state could not tax the national bank.
The McCulloch case established two significant constitutional law doctrines that are still in effect today: implied powers and federal supremacy.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
The question of this case was whether Congress had the constitutional power to prohibit slavery in free territories. A second question was whether the Constitution gave African Americans the right to sue in federal court.
The Court ruled in 1857 that Congress could not outlaw slavery in territories, and that African Americans had no right to litigate in federal court. Slaves, the Court reasoned, were "property" and hence could not be seized from their owners without due process.
The Dred Scott case became a significant issue in the argument over the expansion of slavery, fueling the fires that led to the Civil War.
To learn more on Marbury v. Madison , here:
https://brainly.com/question/29268440
#SPJ1