setting up squares of known dimension over the entire pattern describes what method of documentation?

Therefore, the best measure of center for this data is the median, and its value is 3.

The median is a measure of central tendency that represents the middle value of a set of data when it is arranged in order from lowest to highest (or highest to lowest). It is the value that divides the data set into two equal halves, with half of the values above and half below the median.

Here,

The median is the best measure of center for this data because it is skewed and not symmetrical. The value of the median can be found by ordering the data from smallest to largest: 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 10. The median is the middle value, which is 3.

To know more about median,

https://brainly.com/question/29156884

#SPJ1

If the population growth rate is 3.5 percent every year then the population of the town after 7 years would be 14940.

Given that population grows 3.5 percent every year.

So, the increase in population after one year

= 3.5% of 12000

= (3.5/100) × 12000

= 420

Thus the increase in population after 7 year would be,

= population increase in one year × 7

= 420×7 = 2940

Hence population of the town after 7 years = (present population + increase in population)

= 12000 + 2940

= 14940

So the population of the town after 7 years with 3.5 % growth every year would be 14490.

Visit here to learn more about the percent: https://brainly.com/question/28670903

#SPJ4

Looks like your question already has an answer! https://brainly.com/question/22200751

Answer:

1500 g

Step-by-step explanation:

part a) is correct

part b)
The ratio of syrup to oats for one flapjack is 1:4

That means for each g of syrup you will require 4 g of oats

For 12 flapjacks you require 250 g

Therefore quantity of oats needed for 12 flapjacks = 250 x 4 = 1000 g

If you were to make 18 flapjacks then you would need 18/12 x quantity needed for 12 flapjacks

18/12 = 3/2  (dividing numerator and denominator by 6)

Quantity of oats needed for 18 flapjacks
= 18/12 x 1000

= 3/ 2 x 1000
= 3 x 500
= 1500 g

The test static for sample of 50 men, 44 said that they had less leisure time today than they had 10 years ago is 0.2377.

A number derived from a statistical test of a hypothesis is the test statistic. It displays how closely your actual data fit the distribution predicted by the statistical test's null hypothesis.

In order to determine whether to accept or reject your null hypothesis, the test statistic is utilised to calculate the p value of your findings.

In a sample of 50 men, 44 said that they had less leisure time today than they had 10 years ago.

In a sample of 50 women, 48 women said that they had less leisure time than they

had 10 years ago.

p-hat men:: 44/50 = 0.22

p-hat women:: 48/50 = 0.24

Test Stat:

z(0.24-0.22) =[tex]\frac{0.02}{\sqrt{[(0.22*0.78/50)+(0.24*0.76/50)]} }[/tex] = 0.2377

At [tex]\alpha[/tex] = .05, is there a difference in the proportions between the men and women

[tex]p-value = 2*P(z > 0.2377) = 0.8121[/tex]

Since the p-value is greater than 5%, fail to reject H.

H: p(men)-p(women) = 0

Ha: p(men)-p(women) # 0 = .05, is there a difference in the proportions between the men and women

p-value = 2*P(z > 0.2377) = 0.8121

Since the p-value is greater than 5%, fail to reject H.

H: p(men)-p(women) = 0

Ha: p(men)-p(women) # 0

Learn more about Test statistic:

https://brainly.com/question/15110538

#SPJ4

Complete question:

In a sample of 50 men, 44 said that they had less leisure time today than they had 10 years ago. In a sample of 50 women, 48 women said that they had less leisure time than they had 10 years ago. What is the test statistic? At  [tex]\alpha[/tex] = .05, is there a difference in the proportions between the men and women?

The conditional probability that Eric is a high-risk driver, given that he has had no traffic accidents in the past three years, is very low. Generally, insurance companies use the number of traffic violations and/or the number of claims a driver has had within a certain time period as indicators of their riskiness.

As Eric has had no accidents or traffic violations, the probability that he is a high-risk driver is very low. However, this does not mean that the probability is zero. There are many other factors which can contribute to a driver's risk, such as age, gender, experience, and location.

If Eric is an experienced driver, who has been driving for many years with no traffic accidents, then the probability of him being a high-risk driver will be lower than the average driver. On the other hand, if Eric is a new driver, or is located in an area with a high rate of traffic accidents, then the probability of him being a high-risk driver may be higher than the average driver.

Overall, the conditional probability that Eric is a high-risk driver, given that he has had no traffic accidents in the past three years, is very low. However, this probability can change depending on other factors, such as his age, experience, and location.

See more about conditional probability at: https://brainly.com/question/23382435

#SPJ11

Thus, Camilla's onion weighs about 28 grammes per ounce in terms of grammes to ounces.

Weight is the force of gravity that pulls objects towards the centre of the Earth. The resulting force that pulls a substance towards Earth is known as gravity. In contrast to gravity force, which occurs among any two masses, this only occurs between Planet and a mass.

To convert from grams to ounces, we can use the conversion factor of 1 ounce = 28.35 grams. Therefore:

1 gram = 1/28.35 ounces

To find the ratio of grams to ounces for Camilla's onion, we can divide the weight in grams by the weight in ounces:

112 grams ÷ 4 ounces ≈ 28 grams per ounce

So the ratio of grams to ounces for Camilla's onion is approximately 28 grams per ounce.

To know more about Weight visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25973294

#SPJ1

The correlation coefficient between heights from the ground of two people on the opposite ends of a seesaw would depend on the weight of the people and their distance apart.

When the seesaw is in equilibrium, the height of the people will be related inversely proportional to their weight. If the weight of one person increases, the height of the other person would decrease and vice versa.

The correlation coefficient will be negative and can range from -1 to 0, with -1 being the highest correlation. The closer the correlation coefficient is to -1, the more closely related the heights of the two people will be. The correlation coefficient will be zero when the people are not in equilibrium.

This is because the height of the people is not related in any way when the seesaw is not in equilibrium. Therefore, the correlation coefficient between heights from the ground of two people on the opposite ends of a seesaw is negative and ranges from -1 to 0.

Know more about correlation here

https://brainly.com/question/27226153#

#SPJ11

a) The sum of the given series is 7 / (1 + 2z)

b) The domain of convergence is (-∞, -1/2) U (1/2, ∞).

The given series can be expressed as

7 – 14z + 28z^2 - 56z^3 + ...

This is a geometric series with first term (a) = 7 and common ratio (r) = -2z. The formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series is

sum = a / (1 - r)

Substituting the values of a and r, we get

sum = 7 / (1 + 2z)

So, the sum of the given series is 7 / (1 + 2z).

For the series to converge, the absolute value of the common ratio must be less than 1. That is,

|r| = |−2z| < 1

Simplifying this inequality, we get

1/2 < |z|

So, the domain of convergence of the given series is (-∞, -1/2) U (1/2, ∞).

Learn more about infinite geometric series here

brainly.com/question/28585723

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The number c that satisfies the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem for the function f(x) = x + 3/x on the interval [1, 14] is approximately c = 3.75.

To find the number c that satisfies the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem for the function f(x) = x + 3/x on the interval [1, 14], follow these steps:

1. Verify the conditions of the Mean Value Theorem:
  The function f(x) = x + 3/x is continuous on the closed interval [1, 14] and differentiable on the open interval (1, 14).

2. Calculate the average rate of change of the function on the interval:
  f(14) = 14 + 3/14 ≈ 14.214
  f(1) = 1 + 3/1 = 4
  Average rate of change = (f(14) - f(1)) / (14 - 1) ≈ (14.214 - 4) / 13 ≈ 0.786

3. Differentiate the function to find the instantaneous rate of change:
  f'(x) = 1 - 3/x²

4. Set f'(x) equal to the average rate of change and solve for x:
  1 - 3/x² = 0.786
  x² = 3 / (1 - 0.786)
  x² ≈ 14.056
  x ≈ √14.056 ≈ 3.75

The number c that satisfies the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem for the function f(x) = x + 3/x on the interval [1, 14] is approximately c = 3.75.

To learn more about Mean Value Theorem visit :   https://brainly.com/question/19052862

#SPJ11

Answer:

x

=

−

y

2

+

10

Step-by-step explanation:

If we repeated a hypothesis test 1000 times, the number of times we would expect to commit a Type I error, assuming the null hypothesis were true, would depend on the significance level (α) of the test.

A Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. The significance level of a test (α) is the probability of making a Type I error when the null hypothesis is true. In other words, if we set a significance level of α = 0.05, we are saying that we are willing to tolerate a 5% chance of making a Type I error.

Assuming a significance level of α = 0.05, if we repeated the test 1000 times, we would expect to make a Type I error in approximately 50 tests (0.05 x 1000 = 50). This means that in 50 out of the 1000 tests, we would reject the null hypothesis even though it is actually true.

However, it is important to note that the actual number of Type I errors we make in practice may differ from our expectation, as it depends on the specific characteristics of the population being tested and the sample sizes used in each test.

For more details about hypothesis click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29519577#

#SPJ11

Answer:

diameter = 34 radius = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

Look at the line in the middle of the circle that is the diameter, diameter is a straight line passing from side to side through the center of a circle.

radius is the distance from the center of the circle to any point on its circumference.

Answer:

16x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify by combining like terms.  Add the terms with x, then add the integers.

8x + 8x + 4 - 1 = 16x + 3

The composite function (f + g)(3) when evaluated from f(x) = −3x² + 3x and g(x) = 2x+5 is -7

Given that

f(x) = −3x² + 3x and

g(x) = 2x+5

To perform the operation (ƒ + g)(3), we need to add the functions ƒ(x) and g(x) first, and then evaluate the sum at x = 3.

ƒ(x) = −3x² + 3x

g(x) = 2x + 5

To add the functions, we simply add their corresponding terms:

(ƒ + g)(x) = ƒ(x) + g(x) = (−3x² + 3x) + (2x + 5)

When the like terms are evaluated, we have

(ƒ + g)(3) = −3x² + 5x + 5

Now, we can evaluate the sum at x = 3:

(ƒ + g)(3) = −3(3)² + 5(3) + 5

So, we have

(ƒ + g)(3) = −27 + 15 + 5

Lastly, we have

(ƒ + g)(3) = -7

Therefore, (ƒ + g)(3) = -7.

Read more about composite function at

https://brainly.com/question/10687170

#SPJ1

Answer: Inequality 1

Step-by-step explanation: Let's solve each inequality first.

4(2.8z+175 )>-26.6

let's distribute the 4.

4(2.8z)+4(175)

11.2z+700>-26.6

Now let's isolate the variable by subtracting 700 on each side.

11.2z>-726.6

Now let's divide both sides by 11.2

z>-64.875

Oh? This one already has 5 as a solution as 5 is more than -64.875!

Answer: (-3,-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

y²+2y+11 = 5-3y

y^2+2y+11-5+3y =0

y^2+5y+6=0

y^2+3y+2y+6=0

y(y+3)+2(y+3)=0

(y+3)(y+2)=0

y= -3, -2

All you do is plug in the x value to the equation

Hope it helps:)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use algebra to solve this problem.

Let's start by assigning variables to the unknown quantities. Let G be the initial number of green beads and Y be the initial number of yellow beads.

We know that the number of green beads is 1/3 the number of yellow beads:

G = (1/3)Y

After giving away some beads, he had 42 green beads and 270 yellow beads left. So we can set up two equations using this information:

G - 2f = 42

Y - 3f = 270

where f is the number of friends he gave the beads to.

Now we can substitute G = (1/3)Y into the first equation:

(1/3)Y - 2f = 42

Multiplying both sides by 3, we get:

Y - 6f = 126

Now we have two equations that we can solve simultaneously:

Y - 3f = 270

Y - 6f = 126

Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:

3f = 144

So f = 48. He gave the beads to 48 friends.

To find the total number of beads he had at first, we can use the equation G = (1/3)Y:

G + Y = (4/3)Y = (4/3)(270) = 360

So he had a total of 360 beads at first.

The answer based on debt to assets ratio for east and west company are,

East company debt to assets ratio is equal to 0.44.

West company debt to assets ratio is equal to 0.28.

After comparing both the company debt to assets ratio East company is at higher level of financial risk.

Assets = Liabilities + Equity

For East company,

206,000 =  91,000 + 115,000

Assets = 206,000

liabilities = 91,000

Equity = 115,000

For West company,

603,000 =  169,000 + 434,000

Assets = 603,000

liabilities = 169,000

Equity = 434,000

Debt-to-assets ratio = Total liabilities divided by the total assets.

Debt-to-assets ratio for East

= 91,000 / 206,000

= 0.44

Debt-to-assets ratio for West

= 169,000 / 603,000

= 0.28

Comparing the two ratios,

0.44 > 0.28

This implies,

Company East has a higher debt-to-assets ratio is greater than the compared to Company West.

This represents that Company East has a higher level of financial risk.

As larger proportion of their assets are financed through debt.

This shows it is difficult to repay if the company experiences financial difficulties.

Company West has a lower level of financial risk as smaller proportion of their assets are financed through debt.

Therefore, the answer of the following questions are,

Debt to asset ratio of east company = 0.44

Debt to asset ratio of west company = 0.28

Company east has a higher financial risk level .

learn more about debt to asset ratio here

https://brainly.com/question/18648883

#SPJ4

As a result, we should not be concerned that the sample does not accurately reflect the population.

We can learn more about average, population, and sample.

What is the population?

The entire group of people, items, or objects that we want to draw a conclusion about is known as the population. For example, if we want to learn about the average age of people in the United States, then the entire population is every individual in the United States.

What is a sample?

A smaller group of individuals, objects, or items that are selected from the population is known as a sample. A random sample is a sample in which every individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

What is an average?

A statistic that summarizes the central tendency of a group of numbers is known as an average.

The mean is the most commonly used average in statistics. The mean is calculated by adding up all the numbers in a group and then dividing by the number of numbers in the group. If we want to learn about the average salary of all teachers in the United States, we'd have to sample every teacher. That's not a feasible option. Instead, we take a smaller sample, which should be representative of the population, and then use the information gathered from that sample to make predictions about the population as a whole.

If we assume that the five teachers in the example are a random sample of all teachers in the United States, then we can conclude that the average salary of all teachers in the United States is around $49,000. As a result, we should not be concerned that the sample does not accurately reflect the population.

To know more about average: https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ11

The probability that 10 or more of 15 marketing personnel are extroverts is 0.719.

Since 80% of all marketing personnel are extroverts, the probability of any single marketing personnel being an extrovert is 0.8. The probability that 10 or more marketing personnel at the party of 15 are extroverts can be calculated using the Binomial Distribution formula:

P(X>=10) = 1 - [P(X=0) + P(X=1) + P(X=2) + P(X=3) + P(X=4) + P(X=5) + P(X=6) + P(X=7) + P(X=8) + P(X=9)]

P(X>=10) = 1 - [15C0*0.80*0.215 + 15C1*0.81*0.214 + 15C2*0.82*0.213 + 15C3*0.83*0.212 + 15C4*0.84*0.211 + 15C5*0.85*0.210 + 15C6*0.86*0.29 + 15C7*0.87*0.28 + 15C8*0.88*0.27 + 15C9*0.89*0.26]

P(X>=10) = 0.719

Therefore, 0.79 is the probability that 10 or more of the 15 marketing personnel at the party are extroverts.

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1596693#

#SPJ11

The answer to subtracting the two polynomials is 2x2 - 10x - 7.  The process of subtracting polynomials is like that of subtracting any other type of numerical expression.

Polynomials are mathematical expressions consisting of variables, coefficients, and exponents. They are used to represent a variety of functions, such as polynomial equations, rational equations, and trigonometric functions.

In this case, our like terms are 2x2 and 4x2, and -6x and -4x, and -4 and +3. We begin by subtracting the coefficients of the like terms. We subtract the coefficient of the term with the highest power first. In this case, that is 2x2 and 4x2, we subtract 2 from 4 to get 2. Next, we subtract the coefficients of the terms with the second highest power. This is -6x and -4x, so we subtract -6 from -4 to get -2. Thus, our answer now reads 2x2 -2x.

Finally, we subtract the coefficients of the terms with the lowest power. This is -4 and +3, so we subtract -4 from 3 to get -7. Thus, our answer now reads 2x2 -2x -7.

This answer can then be placed in the proper position on the grid.

For more questions related to coefficients

https://brainly.com/question/28872453

#SPJ1

Julie hourly rate of pay from the given different rates of the day with total earning of $612 is equal to $12per hour.

Total number of hours Julie works in a week is equal to,

On Sunday = 10 hours

On Monday = 10 hours

On Tuesday = 7 hours

On Wednesday = 10 hours

On Thursday = 7 hours

On Friday = 7 hours

On Saturday = 0 hours

Total hours worked in whole week is

= 10 + 10 + 7 + 10 + 7 + 7 + 0

= 51 hours

Total money earned by Julie in whole week = $612

Hourly rate of pay = Weekly earnings / Total hours worked

Substitute the value we have,

⇒ Hourly rate of pay = $612 / 51 hours

⇒ Hourly rate of pay = $12 per hour

Therefore, Julie's hourly rate of pay is $12 per hour.

Learn more about rate of pay here

brainly.com/question/14458921

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete , the complete question is:

Julie works Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday for 10 hours each day. On Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, she works 7 hours each day. She does not work on Saturday. Her weekly total earnings are $612. What is Julie's hourly rate of pay, in dollars?

The sector area of a circle is quadrupled when the radius is doubled. When the radius is doubled, the arc length of a circle is also doubled. This happens because the sector area and arc length are both dependent on the radius of a circle. Therefore, any change in the radius of a circle affects both its sector area and arc length.

Let us understand both these concepts in detail:

Sector area of a circle: A sector is a region of a circle, and the area enclosed by two radii and an arc is known as a sector area. The formula for the sector area of a circle is given by:

Sector Area = (θ/360)πr²

where θ is the central angle in degrees,

r is the radius of the circle,

and is a constant value.

If we double the radius of a circle, the sector area increases by a factor of 4. This is because the sector area is directly proportional to the square of the radius.

Hence, doubling the radius of a circle results in an increase in the sector area by a factor of 22 (four).

Arc length of a circle: The length of an arc is the distance between two points on a circle. The formula for the arc length of a circle is given:

Arc Length = (θ/360)2πr

where θ is the central angle in degrees,

r is the radius of the circle,

and 2pie is a constant value.

If we double the radius of a circle, the arc length also doubles.

This is because the arc length is directly proportional to the radius.

Hence, doubling the radius of a circle results in an increase in the arc length by a factor of 2.

To learn more about “Sector Area” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/22972014

#SPJ11

Answer:

Let's call the length of the hypotenuse SD as x.

Since the altitude from T to SD divides SD into two parts, let the length of the shorter part be y. Then the length of the longer part is x-y.

Using similar triangles, we have:

TU/TS = ST/TD

Substituting the values we have:

TU/(3√5) = √5/UD

TU = (3/5)UD

Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUS, we have:

TU² + (3√5)² = TS²

(3/5 UD)² + 45 = ST²

9/25 UD² + 45 = ST²

Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUD, we have:

TU² + UD² = TD²

(3/5 UD)² + UD² = x²

9/25 UD² + UD² = x²

34/25 UD² = x²

UD² = (25/34)x²

Substituting the value of UD² in the equation ST² = 9/25 UD² + 45, we get:

ST² = 9/25 (25/34)x² + 45

ST² = 45/34 x² + 45

Since y = x-y-1, we have y = (x-1)/2.

Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUD, we have:

(1/4) (x-1)² + UD² = x²

(1/4) (x² - 2x + 1) + (25/34)x² = x²

(1/4)(x²) + (25/34)x² - (1/2)x + (1/4) = 0

(59/68)x² - (1/2)x + (1/4) = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

x = [1/2 ± √(1/4 - 4(59/68)(1/4))]/(2(59/68))

x = [1/2 ± (3√34)/17]/(59/34)

x = 17/59 ± 6√34/59

Since x is the hypotenuse SD, we have:

UD² = (25/34) x²

UD² = (25/34) [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²]

UD² = 136/59 ± 204√34/295

Therefore, the exact lengths of the two parts of the hypotenuse are:

SD = x = 17/59 ± 6√34/59

SU = x-y = (x-1)/2 = 8/59 ± 3√34/59

UD = y = (x-1)/2 = 8/59 ± 3√34/59

TU = (3/5) UD = (3/5) [8/59 ± 3√34/59] = 24/295 ± 9√34/295

ST² = 45/34 x² + 45 = 45/34 [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²] + 45

ST = √[45/34 [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²] + 45]

Answer:

No, q=15 is not a solution to the inequality.

Step-by-step explanation:

As given, q=15. So, substituting is the best way to solve this problem.

Step 1: Substitute

[tex]\frac{15}{5}=3[/tex]

[tex]15-20=-5[/tex]

Step 2: Substitute values into inequality

[tex]3 < -5[/tex]

Equation is false since 3 is a bigger value than -5.

Hope this helps ya!

The value for a is 1 and the remainder when P(x) is divided by x - 1 is 2.

What is polynomial remainder theorem?

It states that the remainder of the division of a polynomial f(x) by a linear polynomial x-r is equal to f(r).

The divisor in this case is x - a, where "a" is the value we need to determine.

We can see that the given polynomial 2x³ + 5x² - 12x + 9 + x - 3 has a term of x in addition to the other terms. This means that the divisor must also have a term of x in it.

So, we can write the divisor as x - a and set x - a = 0 to solve for "a":

x - a = 0

=> x = a

Therefore, "a" must be equal to 1 since there is a term of x in the polynomial.

To find the remainder, we need to evaluate P(a) where P(x) = 2x³ + 5x² - 12x + 9 + x - 3 and a = 1.

P(a) = 2(1)³ + 5(1)² - 12(1) + 9 + (1) - 3 = 2 + 5 - 12 + 9 + 1 - 3 = 2

So, the remainder when P(x) is divided by x - 1 is 2.

Learn more about polynomials on:

https://brainly.com/question/1496352

#SPJ1

Serena's overall grade in the course is 75.5%. It's important to note that in a weighted grading system like this, the final exam is often a major determinant of the final grade.

To calculate Serena's overall grade, we need to first determine the weight of the final exam. We know that the assignments are worth 45% and the quizzes are worth 40%, which leaves 100% - 45% - 40% = 15% for the final exam.

Next, we can calculate Serena's grade for each component of the course. Her grade for assignments is 78% and her grade for quizzes is 65%. We can calculate her grade for the final exam by multiplying her score of 96% by the weight of the final, which is 15%:

Final grade = (0.45 * 78%) + (0.4 * 65%) + (0.15 * 96%)

Final grade = 35.1% + 26% + 14.4%

Final grade = 75.5%

Therefore, Serena's overall grade in the course is 75.5%. It's important to note that in a weighted grading system like this, the final exam is often a major determinant of the final grade. In this case, Serena's strong performance on the final exam helped to boost her overall grade, even though her scores on the assignments and quizzes were not as high. It's also worth noting that this calculation assumes that all assignments, quizzes, and the final exam were weighted equally within their respective categories (i.e., each assignment was worth the same percentage of the assignment grade).

To know more about determinant click here:

brainly.com/question/15362698

#SPJ4