The cases of New Jersey v. T.L.O and Vernonia School District v. Acton both involved which topic?
Freedom of speech
Freedom of the press
Search and seizure
Cruel and unusual punishment

The topic that the cases of New Jersey v. T.L.O and Vernonia School District v. Acton both involve was C. Search and seizure.

A search and seizure investigation is an examination of a person's home, vehicle, or business for evidence of a crime.

In New Jersey v. T.L.O, the Supreme Court established "the standard of reasonableness for searches of students in a school environment.

In Vernonia School District v. Acton, the court established that random drug testing did not violate the constitutionally guaranteed privacy.

Thus, the topic that the cases of New Jersey v. T.L.O and Vernonia School District v. Acton both involve was C. Search and seizure.

Learn more about the authority of law enforcement officers at https://brainly.com/question/10902423

#SPJ2

Answer: rights of students

sExplanation:

Assume Plaintiff (P) is a Georgia resident. While driving through Birmingham, Alabama, P is involved in an accident with D, an Alabama resident. P alleges more than $75,000 in personal and property injuries. Does a federal court in Georgia have subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute based on the diversity of citizenship of the parties

The previous Activities have provided you with an economic and

ethical basis for evaluating kidney-transplant policies. Now it is time for you

to be the policy maker. Read the following information and then decide which

policy you support. Be ready to justify your decision. Which policy saves the

most lives? Which conforms most closely to the ethical framework you find most

acceptable?

OPTION 1: THE CURRENT SYSTEM

A national law makes it illegal to sell human organs. Anyone who sells a kidney

faces jail, fines or both. People may donate kidneys, however, and doctors dis-

tribute donated kidneys on the basis of need. Some of the factors they consider

in allocating kidneys are the patient’s age and medical condition, how long the

patient has been on a waiting list and whether the donor is in the local area.

Under this system, there is a shortage of kidneys, and many people are on a

waiting list for years. During this time they receive costly dialysis treatment,

and many people die.

OPTION 2: AN OPEN MARKET

Create an open market in kidneys. People may sell their kidneys on the mar-

ket for the highest price they can get. They may sell and deliver a kidney while

they are still alive, or they may sell for delivery after they die. Brokerage firms

match buyers and sellers. People could even sell kidneys on eBay. Recipients

would pay for the kidney the same way they pay for other medical care: with

their own funds or through insurance, government programs and charity.
OPTION 3: A REGULATED MARKET

Create a market in which anyone may sell a kidney, but only authorized insti-

tutions such as hospitals may legally buy. This option reduces the possibility

of acquiring kidneys through involuntary means such as theft or murder. The

institutions would allocate the kidneys on a basis similar to the way kidneys

are allocated today using age, medical need or time spent on a waiting list.

Recipients would pay for the kidneys with private funds, insurance,

government assistance and charity.

OPTION 4: A COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH

This approach uses nonmarket mechanisms to increase the supply in

several ways.

A marketing campaign would increase people’s awareness of the issue and alter

their preferences for organ donation through moral persuasion. The slogan for a

national television campaign might be “Friends don’t let friends waste the gift

of life.” This is not an appeal to altruism but to people’s sense of moral obliga-

tion and duty.

A more authoritarian policy would legally mandate that when people die, all

their organs will be donated unless they indicate otherwise. People who don’t

want to donate must take the extra step to note this in advance on their driv-

er’s license. Today people must agree in advance for their organs to be donated.
2 -3 paragraphs ​

You overhear your friend complaining that he's upset there's no way to change the constitution

Niki donated 4 5/8 pounds of beans to the food drive and Annie donated 3 2/3 pounds of beans to the food drive. Together, how much food did they donate?

what is the reason to regulate minimum wage?

There should not bullies because there is no reason to bully.So, If you are a bully(IF),Gust do not do things you support and respect your victims and be people not animals.OK?!

finish the lyrics

Cause you make my ____ quake

A. earth
B. Earf
C. oats
D. heart

A case comes before a Wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the Internet. It is a case of first impression, meaning that no case involving the same issue has been decided by the Wisconsin courts. In deciding such a case, it would not be considered proper for the judge to consider:

Noisy traffic and fear of the officer are examples of which of the following

What did John Adams mean when he said that the United States was “a nation of laws and not men”? Write two or three sentences for your answer.

Ano po ito? Nagalaw kasi!

(What is this? It's moving that's why)​

50 points :)

Using materials covered in class today, answer how the legislative process works.

The materials are the docs below.

Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. For each selected case, lawyers for both parties are allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. The justices then deliberate and argue the facts of the case. They produce opinions, which can include majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions. The justices vote on which opinion they support, and the opinion with the most votes becomes the final verdict.

Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process?

A. The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it.
B. Justices do not vote on particular opinions, but rather on the final ruling.
C. Lawyers are not allowed to attempt to influence the justice's opinions in any way.
D. Only appellate court judges are charged with writing dissenting opinions.

Marco is charged with kidnapping a young girl and carrying her across state lines. Marco is convicted of kidnapping and he wants to appeal.

For a former convict, the lifetime effects of incarceration can negatively impact _____.
job availability

credit worthiness

lifetime earnings

marriage

THIS IS MULTIPLE CHOICE

Has any male ever been protected under Title IX? The essential right to education. When college discriminates against an adult male to go to college. Has Title IX ever protected any adult male with their right to go to college?