The closest thing to codified laws in international law are ________.
A. Laws created by individual nations
B. There are none. International law does not exist.
C. Unilateral actions by sovereign nations
D. Declarations from the UN
E. Treaties and conventions

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Some principles of public international law are written, or "codified" in a series of treaties, but others are not written down anywhere. These are known as "customary" laws, and nations consent to them by doing nothing.

Explanation:

The answer should be E, treaties and conventions. I hope this helped you!


Related Questions

What might be unfair to an innocent person in the current arrest process? Explain and include specific details about the actual rules of arrest.



How can these issues be avoided or reduced?



What can innocent people do to avoid any risk of use of force from police officers in the making of an arrest?



Do you feel that a wrongly convicted, innocent person should be given compensation by the government? Why or why not?



I just need help with a very helpful website

Answers

Arrests made by police, which are the only arrests supported by evidence, are unfair to the innocent. Police officers and government workers could benefit from better training to help prevent these issues.

According to the argument, the risk is decreased when the police detain innocent persons. I think the government should compensate the victim in a defamation case who was unfairly convicted of a crime and forced to serve years of their lives in prison.

These are the unlawful arrests that the police make when they are the only arrests supported by evidence. By improving the training of the police and government employees, the problems can be averted.Police are involved in the claim, which leads to the arrest of an innocent person.

To learn more about government, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ4

T/F : In general, consumer protection law at the state level is more stringent than federal law.

Answers

In general, consumer protection law at the state level is more stringent than federal law is true.

The Consumer Protection Bill, of 1986, attempts to better protect the interests of consumers by providing for the formation of Consumer councils and other agencies for the resolution of consumer disputes and matters related thereto.

Consumer Protection Act of 2019. Long Title: An Act aimed at the protection of consumer interests and, for that purpose, to establish organizations for the early and effective handling and resolution of consumer disputes, as well as for matters connected with or incidental thereto.

Consumer Protection in India. Consumer rights are defined as "the right to obtain knowledge about the quality, strength, quantity, simplicity, price, and standard of goods or services," as the case may be.

learn more about consumer protection law here:

https://brainly.com/question/1862829

#SPJ4

One concept behind the tort of invasion of privacy is to:
a. encourage the public exposure of true privatte facts b. protect individual rights to solitude and freedom from unwarranted public exposure
c. allow the government to tap telephone conversations
d. place criminal sanstions on the use of a persons name without their permission e. product the publication of false light stories

Answers

The concept behind the tort of invasion of privacy is to protect individual rights to solitude and freedom from unwarranted public exposure.

This tort is designed to prevent people from intruding into the private lives of others without their permission. It also serves to prevent individuals from publicly disclosing private facts about another person, regardless of whether the facts are true or not.

Additionally, the tort seeks to protect people from being placed in a false light, which is when an individual is portrayed in a way that is not true or accurate.

By protecting individuals from these forms of invasion, it safeguards their right to privacy and ensures that their private lives are kept private.

Know more about private facts here

https://brainly.com/question/30847167#

#SPJ11

Answer b is the right response. Invasion of privacy is a tort that aims to safeguard people's right to private and freedom from inappropriate public exposure. Included in this are safeguards against encroachments on seclusion, the public exposure of personal information, publicity cast in a false light, and unauthorised use of one's name or likeness.

The concept behind the tort of invasion of privacy is to protect individual rights to solitude and freedom from unwarranted public exposure. This includes protection from intrusion upon seclusion, public disclosure of private facts, false light publicity, and appropriation of name or likeness without permission.

learn more about invasion of privacy here

https://brainly.com/question/2732893

#SPJ11

Refer to the article “The Future of Money” in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text.

How does the author best support the point that fraud and counterfeiting are nearly impossible when using cryptocurrency?

Drag the correct answer into the box.

by explaining how nodes interact with the blockchain to prevent cheating during financial transactions

by encouraging readers to compare the pros and cons of using cryptocurrency

by proving that people are easier to fool than machines when completing or conducting financial transactions

Answers

Answer:

by explaining how nodes interact with the blockchain to prevent cheating during financial transactions

Explanation:

mort transfers an instrument to neal. this is a negotiation if the transfer is

Answers

Mort transfers an instrument to Neal. this is a negotiation if the transfer is in such a form that Neal becomes a holder.

A mortgage transfer happens when I transfer your existing house loan to someone else, including the current price and terms. This permits the other individual to take over responsibility for the residence and the lender's lien without the need for a new mortgage.

The person who transfers property is referred to as a mortgagor, and the transferee is referred to as a mortgagee; the principal and interest on which payment has been guaranteed for the time being are referred to as mortgage money, and the document (if any) that ensures the transfer is performed is referred to as a mortgage-deed.

A mortgage is the transfer of interest in certain immovable property to secure the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by loan, a present or prospective debt, or the fulfillment of a contract.

Learn more about mortgages here:

https://brainly.com/question/30247642

#SPJ4

Mort transfers an instrument to Neal. This is a negotiation if the transfer is made for the purpose of giving Neal ownership of the instrument, and if the transfer is made in exchange for something of value, such as money or another instrument.

If these conditions are met, the transfer is considered a negotiation under the Uniform Commercial Code. Mort's transfer of an instrument to Neal can be considered a negotiation if the transfer is a delivery of the instrument with the intention of giving Neal the right to enforce it. This usually occurs in cases where the instrument is a negotiable instrument, such as a check or promissory note, and Neal becomes the holder of the instrument upon the transfer.

Know more about Mort transfers here:

https://brainly.com/question/31539136

#SPJ11

the supreme court over time has ruled that ap gov u3 readings 6th f18

Answers

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and plays a significant role in interpreting the Constitution and federal laws.

Over time, the Court has made landmark decisions that have shaped American society and government. These rulings, often referenced in AP Government Unit 3 readings, demonstrate the Court's power in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government and ensuring that individual rights are protected.

For example, the Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, leading to the desegregation of public schools and marking a significant milestone in the civil rights movement.

The Court's decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 established a woman's right to seek an abortion under the constitutional right to privacy, shaping the ongoing debate on reproductive rights in the United States.

The Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010 expanded the role of corporations in political campaigns, shaping campaign finance laws and the influence of money in politics.

The Supreme Court also plays a critical role in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government. Through its decisions, the Court can limit the powers of the executive and legislative branches and ensure that they do not exceed their constitutional authority.

This role is essential for maintaining the system of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution, which aims to prevent the concentration of power and protect individual rights.

To learn more about supreme court, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ11

Over time, the Supreme Court has rendered decisions in a number of cases that have profoundly influenced American politics and society. These judgements have dealt with a variety of topics, including abortion, voting rights, and civil rights. The most well-known cases include Citizens United v. FEC, Roe v. Wade, and Brown v. Board of Education. As the nation's top court, the Supreme Court's decisions are highly significant and frequently used as precedent in subsequent cases.

The Supreme Court has ruled on various cases over time that have had a significant impact on American government and society. These rulings have addressed issues such as civil rights, voting rights, abortion, and more. Some of the most notable cases include Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, and Citizens United v. FEC. As the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court's rulings carry a great deal of weight and are often cited as precedent in future cases.

learn more about supreme court here

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ11

In a real estate transaction, who is the decision maker on all things? The broker The buyer The client The seller

Answers

In a real estate transaction, the ultimate decision maker is typically the client.

client is the individual or entity who has hired the broker to represent them in the transaction. While the buyer and seller may have preferences and opinions, the client is the one who ultimately makes the final decisions.

The broker's role is to advise and assist the client in making informed decisions, but they do not have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the client without their explicit consent.

The buyer and seller may negotiate and make offers, but ultimately, it is the client who approves or rejects those offers. The client's decision-making power extends beyond just accepting or rejecting offers.

They also make decisions regarding the terms of the transaction, such as the price, closing date, and contingencies. The broker's role is to facilitate communication and negotiations between the parties, but the client has the final say in all matters.

Learn more about real estate here:

https://brainly.com/question/909993

#SPJ4

In a real estate transaction, the decision maker on all things is typically the client, who can be either the buyer or the seller. They make the final decisions regarding the transaction, while the broker assists and advises them throughout the process.

In a real estate transaction, the ultimate decision-maker on all things is typically the client. However, the broker, buyer, and seller may all have input and influence on certain aspects of the transaction, such as negotiating the terms of the sale or determining the content loaded into a listing. Ultimately, the client's preferences and goals will guide the decision-making process.

Know more about real estate transaction here:

https://brainly.com/question/31263149

#SPJ11

A formal written accusation submitted to a court by a prosecutor, alleging that a specified person has committed a specified offense, is known as a(n) ________.
bail bond
arraignment
indictment

Answers

A formal written accusation submitted to a court by a prosecutor, alleging that a specified person has committed a specified offense, is known as an indictment.

Legal Document: An indictment is a legal document that formally charges an individual with committing a crime. It is typically prepared by a prosecutor and presented to a grand jury or a judge, depending on the jurisdiction.

The indictment contains specific details of the alleged offense, including the charges, dates, and other relevant information.

Prosecutor's Accusation: An indictment is the prosecutor's accusation against an individual. It is based on the prosecutor's investigation and evaluation of the evidence and is presented to the court as a formal charging instrument.

The indictment outlines the charges that the prosecutor believes the accused individual has committed and serves as the basis for the criminal proceedings.

Allegations of Specific Offenses: An indictment specifies the offenses that the accused individual is alleged to have committed. It includes details such as the nature of the offense, the time and place of the alleged crime, and any other relevant facts.

The indictment must be sufficiently detailed to inform the accused of the specific charges against them so they can prepare a defense.

To learn more about allegations, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/30436565

#SPJ11

in an emergency situation, lori render said to mike, who needs help. mike would most likely be prohibited from suing lori for negligence under:

Answers

In an emergency situation, Lori Render said to Mike, "who needs help." If Mike was injured while receiving help from Lori, he would most likely be prohibited from suing her for negligence under the Good Samaritan laws.

Good Samaritan laws are laws that protect individuals who provide assistance to those who are injured or in danger from being sued for negligence. These laws vary by state, but they are generally designed to encourage people to provide assistance without fear of legal repercussions. However, there are limitations to Good Samaritan laws, and they do not provide blanket immunity from all types of lawsuits. For example, if Lori acted with gross negligence or intentional misconduct, she could still be held liable for any harm caused to Mike.The legal concept that may apply to Lori Render's actions is called "Good Samaritan" laws. These laws are intended to protect individuals who voluntarily provide assistance to those in need during emergency situations from being sued for negligence.

Learn more about emergency situations here:

https://brainly.com/question/31109378

#SPJ11

a departmental failure to develop adequate policies and guidelines for officers is an example of negligent ________.

Answers

A departmental failure to develop adequate policies and guidelines for officers is an example of negligent supervision.

Negligent supervision refers to a situation where a supervisor fails to provide adequate guidance, training, and oversight to their subordinates, leading to their negligent or reckless behavior.

In this case, the department's failure to develop proper policies and guidelines may result in officers acting negligently, which could lead to legal liabilities for the department.

Therefore, it is important for departments to have detailed policies and guidelines that are regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that officers are properly trained and supervised.

To know more about negligent supervision  click on below link :

https://brainly.com/question/14833032

#SPJ11

elements of business law creates the legal framework for the enforcement of criminal statutes. true false

Answers

False. Elements of business law create the legal framework for governing commercial transactions and business relationships, not the enforcement of criminal statutes.

Criminal law, on the other hand, deals with the enforcement of criminal statutes.

One important aspect of business law is the enforcement of criminal statutes that are relevant to commercial activities. Some business activities may be subject to criminal laws and regulations, and violations of these laws can result in criminal penalties, including fines, imprisonment, and other legal consequences.

For example, fraud, bribery, money laundering, insider trading, and antitrust violations are some of the criminal offenses that can fall under the purview of business law.

In addition, business law often intersects with criminal law in cases where businesses or individuals engage in illegal activities that harm the public interest or violate societal norms.

For example, environmental violations, product safety violations, and consumer protection violations can result in criminal charges, as well as civil liability.

In such cases, criminal law enforcement agencies may be involved in investigating and prosecuting the offenders, and business law provides the legal framework for addressing these criminal activities within the context of commercial transactions and business relationships.

Furthermore, business law also includes regulations and compliance requirements that are designed to prevent illegal activities and promote ethical business practices.

For example, regulations related to financial reporting, corporate governance, data protection, and anti-corruption are aimed at ensuring that businesses operate in a lawful and ethical manner. Violations of these regulations can result in legal consequences, including criminal charges and penalties.

To learn more about criminal law, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/1205493

#SPJ11

Name the agency of the Department of Justice charged with enforcing laws against narcotics trafficking.a. NCIC b. Secret Service c. DEA d. SSA

Answers

C. DEA agency of the Department of Justice charged with enforcing laws against narcotics trafficking.

The Drug Enforcement Administration is primarily a federal law enforcement organization in the United States that reports to the Department of Justice and is responsible for countering illicit drug trafficking and shipping within the country.

The DEA is America's tenacious combatant against the illicit supply of drugs. DEA Special Agents are on the hunt for the most notorious drug trafficking and narco-terrorist organizations that pose a threat to our country. Special Agent responsibilities include collecting and organizing evidence to assist in the prosecution of serious violators of US drug laws.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is a single-mission body tasked with enforcing drug prohibitions. The ATF's primary mission is to enforce federal weapons laws and to investigate arson and bombs. In scenarios in which our jurisdictions overlap, the FBI collaborates extensively with both agencies.

learn more about the DEA agency here:

https://brainly.com/question/29453276

#SPJ4

The buyer of stolen goods receives good title if he or she did not know the goods were stolen. True or False?

Answers

The buyer of stolen goods receives a good title if he or she did not know the goods were stolen is False.

The captain agreed to hand over the items on a condition, and if that requirement is not met, the buyer will be liable. If an owner of commodities is prevented from opposing the seller's permission to sell by the behavior, the buyer obtains a valid title.

To obtain a good title via estoppel, however, it must be demonstrated that the original owner deliberately endured or held out the buyer in question because a person authorized to sell the goods.

When the items are in a deliverable state & the seller gives the buyer notice, ownership/property in the goods is said that it has been transferred through the seller to the buyer. The seller retains possession of the item until it is no longer deliverable.

learn more about stolen goods here:

https://brainly.com/question/15178848

#SPJ4

Discuss 3 ways on how to get involved in human rights campaign

Answers

Answer:

There are several ways to get involved in human rights campaigns, including:

- Joining a human rights organization: There are many organizations that work on human rights issues, such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the American Civil Liberties Union. Joining one of these organizations can give you access to resources, events, and opportunities to take action on human rights issues.

- Educating yourself and others: Learning about human rights issues and sharing that knowledge with others can be a powerful way to raise awareness and promote change. You can read books, watch documentaries, attend lectures, and engage in discussions with others to deepen your understanding of human rights issues.

- Taking action: There are many ways to take action on human rights issues, depending on your interests and skills. You can write letters to elected officials, participate in protests and rallies, donate money to organizations working on human rights issues, and use social media to raise awareness and mobilize others.

a contract for car insurance is governed by: group of answer choices the restatement of torts all of the answers are correct the uniform commercial code common law

Answers

A contract for car insurance may be governed by different laws depending on the jurisdiction and the specific terms of the contract. However, it is most likely governed by the common law and state insurance regulations. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) typically applies to the sale of goods, not insurance contracts. The Restatement of Torts may be relevant in some cases if the insurance contract involves liability coverage for car accidents. Therefore, the correct answer is common law.

the amount of time during which a person can bring a lawsuit agains another person or company is nown as the

Answers

The amount of time during which a person can bring a lawsuit against another person or company is known as the "statute of limitations."

A statute of limitations is a law that sets a specific time period during which a person has the right to initiate legal action against another party.

This time period varies depending on the type of claim or jurisdiction. Once the statute of limitations has expired, the person loses their right to file a lawsuit.

The purpose of a statute of limitations is to ensure that claims are brought forward in a timely manner, promoting fairness and efficiency within the legal system.

This prevents individuals or companies from facing litigation over an extended period and helps ensure that evidence and witness testimonies are more reliable and accurate.

To determine the statute of limitations for a specific claim, one must consult the laws of their jurisdiction. Common types of claims and their respective statutes of limitations include personal injury, breach of contract, and defamation.

For example, in some jurisdictions, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims may be two years, while the statute of limitations for breach of contract claims may be four years.

In summary, the statute of limitations is the time frame during which a person can bring a lawsuit against another person or company.

This time period varies depending on the type of claim and jurisdiction, and its purpose is to promote fairness and efficiency within the legal system.

To know more about statute of limitations refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30507668#

#SPJ11

______ theory believes that law violators may have suffered damage to their personalities early in their development that renders them powerless to control their impulses.

Answers

The theory that believes that law violators may have suffered damage to their personalities early in their development that renders them powerless to control their impulses is the "psychodynamic theory".

The psychodynamic theory is a psychological perspective that emphasizes the role of early childhood experiences and unconscious motives in shaping behavior. This theory suggests that personality is shaped by the interactions between the id, ego, and superego, which are three components of the psyche that represent different aspects of our personality.

According to this theory, individuals who engage in criminal behavior may have experienced traumatic events or disruptions in their early development that have compromised their ability to regulate their impulses and behaviors. These individuals may have unresolved psychological conflicts or repressed emotions that lead them to act out in ways that violate the law.

learn more about psychodynamic theory here:

https://brainly.com/question/7804684

#SPJ4

this is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. A. Hearing
B. Diversion
C. Commitment

Answers

Hearing is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. The correct answer is A.

A hearing is a legal proceeding where evidence and arguments are presented to a judge to determine a factual or legal issue. Hearings are typically conducted in courtrooms or other official settings and may involve witnesses, testimony, and cross-examination.

Hearings can cover a variety of legal issues, such as motions to dismiss a case, bail hearings, or preliminary hearings to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. The purpose of a hearing is to allow both sides to present evidence and arguments to a judge, who will then make a decision based on the facts presented.

Unlike a trial, a hearing is typically held without a jury, and the judge is responsible for determining the outcome of the case.

To know more about legal issue, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30178117#
#SPJ11

according to the attitudinal model of judicial decision making, judges primarily

Answers

According to the attitudinal model of judicial decision-making, judges primarily judge ideological ideas and policy preferences may have a greater impact on their decision-making that the law.

The attitudinal model presumes that judgments are made by a judge upon the facts of the case and his genuine opinions and principles. The judge's ideological ideas and policy preferences may have a greater influence on his decision-making as the law.

The attitudinal approach emphasizes the judge's values and preferences. Finally, the approach known as strategic is a bit of a hybrid of the previous two. It is assumed that, while the judge may have personal preferences for policy and aims, he or she must achieve those within the legal limits that exist.

According to the attitudinal paradigm, judges make decisions based on their own unique tastes in a certain instance. It also states that decisions are based on the judge's intentions, regulations, and situations. When a judge has doubt.

learn more about the attitudinal model here:

https://brainly.com/question/9519920

#SPJ4

According to the attitudinal model of judicial decision-making, judges primarily make decisions based on their personal attitudes, beliefs, and values.

According to the attitudinal model of judicial decision-making, judges primarily base their decisions on their personal attitudes and beliefs toward the law and the case at hand. This means that the content loaded into a case may be interpreted differently depending on the judge's individual perspectives and predispositions. Therefore, the attitudinal model suggests that judicial decision-making is not solely based on legal precedent or objective analysis, but is also influenced by the judge's own political ideology and values.

Know more about attitudinal model here:

https://brainly.com/question/31537620

#SPJ11

TRUE OR FALSE The law presumes the deed has been delivered and accepted if it is in the hands of the grantee, not the grantor.

Answers

Answer: True

Explanation:

if you are convicted of dui for the fourth time, you will be fined at least

Answers

If you are convicted of DUI for the fourth time, you will be fined at least a certain amount, which varies depending on the jurisdiction you are in. In most places, the penalties for multiple DUI convictions become increasingly severe, including higher fines, longer jail sentences, and potential loss of your driver's license.

When you are convicted of DUI for the fourth time, it is considered a serious offense due to the repeated disregard for public safety. Authorities take this type of behavior very seriously, and the consequences are designed to discourage any further instances of driving under the influence.

The exact amount of the fine will depend on the specific laws in your area, but it is likely to be significant, potentially reaching thousands of dollars.

In addition to the fine, you may also face other penalties such as mandatory alcohol education or treatment programs, installation of an ignition interlock device in your vehicle, community service, probation, or even imprisonment.

To avoid these severe consequences, it is crucial to make responsible choices when it comes to alcohol and driving. If you have been drinking, always have a designated driver, use public transportation, or call a rideshare service to get home safely.

If you or someone you know is struggling with alcohol addiction or repeated DUI offenses, seek professional help from a counselor or support group to address the underlying issues and prevent further legal troubles.

To know more about DUI refer here

brainly.com/question/30418096#

#SPJ11

If you are found guilty of DUI for the fourth time, you'll probably be subject to harsh punishments, including fines.

Depending on the state where the offence happened and other variables, the precise amount of the fine may vary, although it is likely to be much larger than the fines levied for first or second offences. Fourth-time DUI offenders may also be subject to jail time, community service, required rehabilitation programmes, and other penalties in addition to fines. Recurring DUI offences are treated seriously by the legal system and can significantly affect a person's life and possibilities in the future.

learn more about DUI here

https://brainly.com/question/30418096

#SPJ11

Rusty is a forensic investigator examining the crime scene of a homicide. The medical examiner has determined that the victim died of a gunshot wound. However, there are no bullets or cartridge casings found at the scene. What type of evidence might show striations that might lead to a specific weapon?

A.

victim’s bones

B.

victim’s muscle tissue

C.

broken glass particles

D.

suspect’s clothing

Answers

Victim’s bones might show striations that might lead to a specific weapon. The correct option is "A".

When a bullet passes through a firearm barrel, it can leave unique marks, called striations, on the surface of the bullet. These marks are created by the imperfections in the barrel and are unique to that particular firearm.When a bullet passes through a victim's body, it may leave behind striations on the bones.

These marks can be examined by a forensic expert and compared to the marks made by a suspect weapon. This comparison can help identify the weapon used in the crime. Muscle tissue, broken glass particles, and suspect's clothing are unlikely to show striations that can help identify the weapon used in the crime.

The correct option is "A".

To know more about weapon, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/20291303

#SPJ4

a contract may violate public policy even if the agreement does not violate a statute

Answers

Yes, even if the agreement does not contravene a law, it is nevertheless conceivable for it to contradict public policy.

Public policy refers to the ideas and standards that society holds to be significant and which influence how laws are decided. Even if a contract is not expressly forbidden by law, it may be declared unenforceable if it violates certain principles and values. For instance, a contract that aims to restrict someone's fundamental rights, like their freedom of speech or their right to practise their religion, may be deemed to be against public policy. Similar to this, agreements that are regarded to be oppressive, unconscionable, or against the public interest may be deemed to be against public policy. As a result, it's critical for contract parties to make sure their agreement is not just legally valid, but also consistent with public policy.

learn more about public policy here

https://brainly.com/question/14616070

#SPH11

In some cases, a contract may be considered invalid and unenforceable if it goes against public policy, even if it does not violate any specific statute or law.

This is because contracts are expected to promote the greater good of society and not undermine public welfare.

A contract that is deemed to violate public policy is one that involves illegal or immoral activities or one that interferes with the interests of the public or the state.

Examples of contracts that violate public policy include those that promote discrimination, fraud, or illegal activities, and those that restrict a person's legal rights or obligations.

Even if both parties agree to the terms of a contract, if it is found to be against public policy, it will be considered null and void.

Therefore, it is important to ensure that any contract you enter into aligns with public policy and is in the best interests of society as a whole.

To know more about public policy refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/10715925#

#SPJ11

how does communismm, facism or nationalism challenge the existing political and or social order

Answers

Due to the divergent societal visions that each of these ideologies aspires to advance, there may be tensions and conflicts with pre-existing social and political systems.

Communism, fascism, and nationalism are all political ideologies that can challenge the existing political and social order in different ways.

Communism, for example, challenges the existing order by advocating for the abolition of private property and a classless society. This directly challenges the capitalist system and can lead to tensions between those who support communism and those who support capitalism. Additionally, communism often advocates for the centralization of power in the state, which can challenge existing political systems that are based on democratic principles.

Fascism, on the other hand, challenges the existing order by promoting extreme nationalism and a strong authoritarian leader. This can lead to tensions with existing political systems that are based on individual freedoms and democratic principles. Fascism often seeks to suppress dissenting voices and limit civil liberties, which can further challenge the existing social order.

Nationalism, while not as extreme as communism or fascism, can still challenge the existing political and social order by emphasizing the importance of a particular nation or ethnic group over others. This can lead to tensions with existing political systems that are based on multiculturalism and inclusivity. Additionally, nationalism can lead to the exclusion and mistreatment of minority groups, which can further challenge the existing social order.

Overall, communism, fascism, and nationalism all present challenges to the existing political and social order in different ways. Each of these ideologies seeks to promote a different vision for society, which can lead to tensions and conflict with existing political and social structures.

Learn more about political systems here

https://brainly.com/question/30814255

#SPJ11

An informal and relatively open network of public officials and lobbyists who come together in response to a proposed policy in an area of interest to each of them. Unlike an iron triangle an issue network disbands after the issue is resolved. What is a group including lobbyists and politicians who work together temporarily to resolve problems with a political party?

Answers

The group that includes lobbyists who work together temporarily to resolve problems with a political party is not specifically defined by a commonly used term. However, it may be described as a temporary coalition or alliance to address political issues within a party.

These groups may include politicians, party officials, interest groups, and lobbyists who share a common goal or agenda. Unlike issue networks, which form in response to proposed policies, these groups may form in response to internal party conflicts, leadership struggles, or other pressing concerns.

The formation of these groups is often influenced by factors such as ideology, personal relationships, and strategic calculations, and their effectiveness depends on their ability to mobilize support within the party and negotiate with other groups and stakeholders.

To know more about lobbyists, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/509906#
#SPJ11

You are probably referring to an issue network, which is a loose alliance of lobbyists and public officials that band together to discuss a particular policy subject that interests them. Issue networks disappear once the current problem has been fixed, in contrast to an iron triangle, which is a longer-lasting and closed network. To address issues or issues within a political party and collaborate on finding answers, lobbyists and politicians may create an issue network.

The group you are referring to is likely an issue network, which is an informal and temporary coalition of public officials and lobbyists who come together to address a specific policy issue of interest to them. Unlike an iron triangle, which is a more permanent and closed network, issue networks dissolve once the issue at hand has been resolved. In the case of a political party, lobbyists and politicians may form an issue network to address concerns or problems within the party and work together to find solutions.

learn more about issue network here

https://brainly.com/question/31358783

#SPJ11

duty of disclosure is based on the notion that the principal is bound by the agent's actions, disclosing negatives and keeping the principal informed

Answers

Duty of disclosure is based on the notion that the principal is bound by the agent's actions, disclosing negatives and keeping the principal informed Agency relationships.

An agency relationship exists between a principle and an agent in which the principal grants the agent legal authority to act in the principal's behalf. The agency relationship is the one that exists between an individual and the principal. This is a legally binding connection that is subject to agency laws.

The client-agency connection is a huge driver of how successful the job is, how satisfied the client is with the end result, and how much staff members on both sides look forward to coming to work in the morning.

According to the Contract Act of 1950, there are five methods for an agency to arise: express appointment through the principal, implicit appointment by the principle, ratification with the principal, and ratification by the principal.

learn more about agency relationships here:

https://brainly.com/question/15129864

#SPJ4

The duty of disclosure is based on the notion that the principal is bound by the agent's actions, which means that the agent is responsible for providing all relevant information, including any negatives, to the principal. This duty ensures that the principal is well-informed about the situation and can make informed decisions.

The duty of disclosure is a legal obligation that agents owe to their principals. It is based on the notion that the principal is bound by the agent's actions, and therefore, the agent must disclose any negatives or material information that may affect the principal's interests. This duty requires the agent to act in good faith and keep the principal informed of any developments that may impact the principal's rights or obligations. The agent must disclose any information that they have or reasonably should have known that is relevant to the principal's decision-making process. Failure to fulfill this duty can result in legal liability for the agent and can also jeopardize the principal's position. Therefore, it is essential for agents to take their duty of disclosure seriously and act in the best interests of their principal.

Know more about duty of disclosure here:

https://brainly.com/question/30324354

#SPJ11

___________ rules prescribe which law a state court should apply in a multistate litigation.

Answers

In a multistate litigation, Conflict of Laws rules prescribe which law a state court should apply.

These rules help resolve legal disputes that involve different jurisdictions by determining the applicable law and jurisdiction.

The main purpose of Conflict of Laws rules is to determine the applicable law in cases where multiple legal systems may have a legitimate interest in governing a particular dispute.

For example, if a contract is formed in one state, but the performance of the contract occurs in another state, and a dispute arises between the parties, it may not be clear which state's law should govern the dispute. Conflict of Laws rules provide criteria and principles to resolve such conflicts and determine which law should apply.

Conflict of Laws rules can vary among jurisdictions and may be statutory, common law, or a combination of both. These rules take into consideration various factors, such as the domicile or residence of the parties, the place of contract formation, the place of performance, the location of the subject matter of the dispute, and the public policy of the relevant jurisdictions.

Courts use these rules to determine which jurisdiction's law should apply to the dispute at hand.

One common approach in Conflict of Laws is the "most significant relationship" or "center of gravity" doctrine, which seeks to determine the law that has the closest connection or relationship to the dispute.

Under this doctrine, courts consider a variety of factors, such as the location of the parties, the place of contract formation, the place of performance, and the place where the injury occurred, among others, to determine which law should be applied.

To learn more about gravity, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/31321801

#SPJ11

In a trust deed state, title to a property is vested in the __________ until the mortgage lien is satisfied.
mortgagor
grantee
grantor
trustee

Answers

Answer:

D.Trustee

Explanation:

Deed of trust. Title is vested in a third party, the trustee, until the mortgage lien is satisfied.

a tax is a payment required by a(n) that is unrelated to any specific benefit or service received by the taxpayer. (enter only one word per blank.)

Answers

Answer:

government or government agency

Explanation:

Identificamos nuestros puntos de mejora personales para desarrollar el plan de vida - dpcc 1 y 2 de secundaria semana 32 de la radio

Answers

"We identify our personal improvement points to develop our life plan - DPCC 1 and 2 of secondary school, week 32 of the radio."

This statement suggests that students in DPCC 1 and 2 of secondary school are working on developing their life plans by identifying their personal improvement points. This may involve self-reflection and goal-setting to improve various aspects of their lives, such as academic performance, personal relationships, or physical health.

By identifying these areas for improvement and creating a plan to address them, students may be better equipped to achieve their goals and lead fulfilling lives. The fact that this activity is being done through a radio program suggests that it may be part of a larger educational initiative to promote personal development and well-being among students.

To learn more about personal improvement, here

https://brainly.com/question/15571975

#SPJ4

Other Questions
Steven has a bag of 20 pieces of candy. Five are bubble gum, 8 are chocolates, 5 are fruit chews, and the rest are peppermints. If he randomly draws one piece of candy what is the probability that it will be chocolate? A. 0. 4 B. 0. 45 C. 0. 2 D. 0. 8 minimum wage laws a. may encourage some teenagers to drop out and take jobs. b. create labor shortages. c. have the greatest impact in the market for skilled labor. d. all of the above are correct. according to political scientist melinda jackson, why does college seem to be important in voting? the type of nephron responsible for renal concentration is the:A. CorticalB. Juxtaglomerular what is jeanettes earliest memory Cual es el ambiente en el que se desarrolla en la obra 2 pesos de agua an analyst is working with a dataset of financial data. the numerical data is correct but it is formatted as u.s. dollars, and the analyst needs it to be in british pounds. what spreadsheet tool can help them select the right format? in follow-ups of asch's studies of conformity, participants who made their responses anonymously group of answer choices conformed significantly more than those who made their responses publicly. it is the responsibility of infosec professionals to understand state laws and standards. ____________ (True or False) essay about how to manage household tasks (epp) Divide and give your answer as a decimal. Round your answer to the nearest thousandth (3 digits behind the decimal).2/9 Which condition is correct for a firm wanting to maximize profit: A.MPL = MRP B.MPK > MRPK C.MRP = MC D.MPL = MC Identify the first term and common difference, then writea recursive rule for each of the sequences below:a) 1, -4,-9, -14, ....b) 11, 23, 35, 47, .... high-quality documentation reportoedly leads to a percent reduction in the system maintenance effort when compared A. 50 B. 80 C. 70 D. 60 anxiolytics have which effect? question 30 options: a) reduce hallucinations b) produce relaxation c) eliminate delusions d) elevate mood Is the gnashes of northern winds are the best norwegian winds to him a simile or a metaphor The table below shows carbon dioxide emissions and world population data for several years between 1800 and 2004.Year World Population(billions) Carbon Dioxide Emissions(metric tons carbon per year)1800 1 1001850 1.3 1751900 1.7 5001950 2.5 18002004 6 8000Based on the table above, how has population growth in the recent past most likely impacted the composition of the Earth's atmosphere? according to this figure, at what time in the evolutionary history of plants did vascular systems likely first evolve? 2. calculate the ph of a solution prepared by mixing 25.0 ml of 0.60 m hc2h3o2 and 15.0 ml of 0.60 m naoh? A company is forecasted to generate free cash flows of $23 million next year and $28 million the year after. After that, cash flows are projected to grow at a stable rate in perpetuity. The company's cost of capital is 12.3%. The company has $61 million in debt, $13 million of cash, and 28 million shares outstanding. Using an exit multiple for the company's free cash flows (EV/FCFF) of 19, what's your estimate of the company's stock price?a. 30.8b. 26.8c. 14.9d. 10.6e. 18.0