The graph below shows y is a function of x.

Answer:

11/200

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the correct answer boo

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this helps you! :)

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

When you are subtracting frations with the same denominator, you would only subtract the numerator and keep the denominator the same.

Answer:

4838388.34?

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\large\underline{\bf \red{Step \:by\: Step \:Explanation:}}[/tex]

Given two equations are :

We may write them as ,

Multiplying equⁿ (i) by 2 :

⇒ 2(2x + y - 6 ) = 0.

⇒ 4x + 2y - 12 = 0 .....................(iii) .

Subtract equⁿ (ii) from equⁿ (iii) :-

⇒ 4x + 2y - 12 = 0

ㅤ- 4x + 3y - 8 = 0 [ Sign changes ]

__________________

⇒ 5y - 20 = 0.ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

⇒ 5y = 20.

⇒ y = 20/5.

⇒ y = 4

Put this value in (i) to obtain x .

⇒ 2x + y - 6 = 0.

⇒ 2x +4 - 6 = 0.

⇒ 2x - 2 = 0.

⇒2x = 2 .

⇒ x = 2/2.

⇒ x = 1 .

Hence the value of x is 1 & y is 4.

[tex]\boxed{\purple{\bf\pink{\dag}\:Hence\:the\: correct\: option\:is\:[b]\:(1,4)}}[/tex]

Answer:

0.350 km

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there !

35000 cm = 35000/100 m = 350 m

350 m = 350/1000 km = 0.350 km

Good luck !

i'm sorry wheres the picture?

Answer:    15 an ummm  fine

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15 is the correct answer

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

By solving (x+6)(x-9), we get x^2 - 3x - 54. By looking at our y-intercept, we can see that only option A has the correct intercept.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3.55 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

You add the mileage of the two trails which is 1.75+1.8=3.55 miles

Answer:

82

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex] is the slope of the line

Step-by-step explanation:

When two lines are perpendicular, their slopes are inverse.

[tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex] becomes [tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex] because they are inverse. Just flip the numerator (top number) and denominator(bottom number).

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Hi ___

A ratio is created from two numbers it can also be a fraction.

To find a ratio you have to have 2 numbers

You can take these 2 numbers and divide them so they are a unit ratio

For example 3:6 can be reduced to 1:3

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps please give brainliest

Answer:

21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Answer choice on the top right.

Step-by-step explanation:

A function of points can not share the same x value.

Answer:

The height of the plane is 405 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Trigonometric Ratios

The situation can be represented as shown in the image below. The ground, the height H, and the direct distance to the plane to the shipwreck form a right triangle, where the trigonometric ratios stand.

Since the known distance is adjacent to the angle, and the required height is opposite to the given angle, we use the tangent ratio, defined as:

[tex]\displaystyle \tan\ x=\frac{\text{opposite leg}}{\text{adjacent leg}}[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle \tan 5^\circ=\frac{H}{4629}[/tex]

We need to find H, so we solve for H:

[tex]H=4629\cdot\tan5^\circ[/tex]

H=405 m

The height of the plane is 405 meters

Answer:

−n−323

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0

There is no x or number with an x (example: y= 2x+3, the 2 would be the slope)

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than 1 of the 20 individuals is equal to:

P = 1 - P(1) - P(0)

Where:

P(1) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in one individual

P(0) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in 0 individuals.

The probability that the vaccine is effective is 0.95

Then the probability that the vaccine is not effective is 0.05.

Then to calculate P(1), suppose that the vaccine is not effective in the first case and then is effective 19 times, this is:

p(1) = (0.05^1)*(0.95^19)

But this only for one case, we have 20 possible permutations (the vaccine is not effective in the first case, the second case, third case, etc)

Then the actual probability is:

P(1) = 20*((0.05^1)*(0.95^19)) = 0.377

And P(0) is easy to compute:

P(0) = (0.05^0)*(0.95^20) = 0.358

And here we have only one possible permutation, so we do not worry about that.

Then P = 1 - P(1) - P(0) = 1 - 0.377 - 0.358 = 0.265

This means that the probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than one individual is of 0.265 (or 26.5% in percentage form)

here is the Answer:

5(x+4)

Hope it helps

Answer:

525 ml

Step-by-step explanation:

12 : 175 ml

36 : x

= 175 × 36

= 6300

x = 6300/12

= 525 ml

The amount of milk that is used while baking 36 scones will be 525 mL.

A ratio is a group of sequentially ordered numbers a and b expressed as a/b, where b is never equal to zero. When two objects are equal, a statement is said to be proportional.

Chloe runs the after-school cookery club. The group will be baking 36 scones using the following recipe.

Recipe for 12 scones:

The amount of milk that is used while baking 36 scones will be given as,

⇒ 175 x 36 / 12

Simplify the expression, then we have

⇒ 175 x 36 / 12

⇒ 175 x 3

⇒ 525 mL

The amount of milk that is used while baking 36 scones will be 525 mL.

More about the ratio and the proportion link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/14335762

#SPJ5

Answer:

392984

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The component of [tex]\vec u[/tex] orthogonal to [tex]\vec a[/tex] is [tex]\vec u_{\perp\,\vec a} = \left(\frac{9}{5},\frac{6}{5},\frac{9}{10},\frac{21}{10}\right)[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

Let [tex]\vec u[/tex] and [tex]\vec a[/tex], from Linear Algebra we get that component of [tex]\vec u[/tex] parallel to [tex]\vec a[/tex] by using this formula:

[tex]\vec u_{\parallel \,\vec a} = \frac{\vec u \bullet\vec a}{\|\vec a\|^{2}} \cdot \vec a[/tex] (Eq. 1)

Where [tex]\|\vec a\|[/tex] is the norm of [tex]\vec a[/tex], which is equal to [tex]\|\vec a\| = \sqrt{\vec a\bullet \vec a}[/tex]. (Eq. 2)

If we know that [tex]\vec u =(2,1,1,2)[/tex] and [tex]\vec a=(4,-4,2,-2)[/tex], then we get that vector component of [tex]\vec u[/tex] parallel to [tex]\vec a[/tex] is:

[tex]\vec u_{\parallel\,\vec a} = \left[\frac{(2)\cdot (4)+(1)\cdot (-4)+(1)\cdot (2)+(2)\cdot (-2)}{4^{2}+(-4)^{2}+2^{2}+(-2)^{2}} \right]\cdot (4,-4,2,-2)[/tex]

[tex]\vec u_{\parallel\,\vec a} =\frac{1}{20}\cdot (4,-4,2,-2)[/tex]

[tex]\vec u_{\parallel\,\vec a} =\left(\frac{1}{5},-\frac{1}{5},\frac{1}{10},-\frac{1}{10} \right)[/tex]

Lastly, we find the vector component of [tex]\vec u[/tex] orthogonal to [tex]\vec a[/tex] by applying this vector sum identity:

[tex]\vec u_{\perp\,\vec a} = \vec u - \vec u_{\parallel\,\vec a}[/tex] (Eq. 3)

If we get that [tex]\vec u =(2,1,1,2)[/tex] and [tex]\vec u_{\parallel\,\vec a} =\left(\frac{1}{5},-\frac{1}{5},\frac{1}{10},-\frac{1}{10} \right)[/tex], the vector component of [tex]\vec u[/tex] is:

[tex]\vec u_{\perp\,\vec a} = (2,1,1,2)-\left(\frac{1}{5},-\frac{1}{5},\frac{1}{10},-\frac{1}{10} \right)[/tex]

[tex]\vec u_{\perp\,\vec a} = \left(\frac{9}{5},\frac{6}{5},\frac{9}{10},\frac{21}{10}\right)[/tex]

The component of [tex]\vec u[/tex] orthogonal to [tex]\vec a[/tex] is [tex]\vec u_{\perp\,\vec a} = \left(\frac{9}{5},\frac{6}{5},\frac{9}{10},\frac{21}{10}\right)[/tex].

Answer:

53.32114

Step-by-step explanation:

The experiment is messed up. Business and rental drivers are usually much more careful in their driving patterns because the car isn't theirs. They are usually adults, experienced drivers who don't put themselves into risky driving situations. =  Speeding, cutting off others etc.. It also didn't tell how  much the cars were driven. There may have been a down turn in the economy and thus less business driving and same with the rentals. If they were used less after the installation then the study wasn't really valid. What was the price of gas before and after the instillation. Who did the study? Did the  previous testers have any reason to skew the study? Did they own stock in the third light business?  Was it the same people who did the study before who did the study afterwords? What was the average age of the drivers before and after? The study group may have aged and calmed down a bit more? What were the technology changes that occurred about the same time? Anti skid brakes, better material and tread designs for the tires, what about the design of the gages and their lighting.  How about the window styles and size..larger windows mean better view and potentially less accidents. What were the safety aspects of the cars before compared to the cars after, were they the same makes and Models or did the rental and business learn that certain cars were safer than others and move to the safer Models? so many variables to consider but did the tester consider them all-probably not. Random studies study only a certain percentage of the total. Who's to say the second random study didn't get less experienced drivers to study? All good what ifs'.

This is the step-by-step explanation