Answer:
National pride, military rule and racial purity
Explanation:
The Nazi Party was a fascist movement that appealed to the poor and humiliated people of Germany. The ideas that this movement was based upon were National pride, military rule, and racial purity. The correct option is c.
The Nazi Party's beliefs were fundamentally misguided, resulting in great suffering, human rights violations, and the Holocaust. During World War II, the Nazi regime's quest for racial purity and aggressive expansionism resulted in massive devastation and loss of life.
After the catastrophic defeat in World War I and the harsh conditions of the Treaty of Versailles, the Nazi Party espoused strong nationalism and attempted to restore Germany's prestige and honor. The Nazis believed in a militarised society's strength and power. The Nazi Party promoted Aryan racial superiority and wanted to establish a racially pure society.
Thus, the ideas that this movement was based upon were National pride, military rule, and racial purity.
Learn more about nazi party, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1103582
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete but the complete question most probably was:
The Nazi Party was a fascist movement that appealed to the poor and humiliated people of Germany. What ideas was this movement based upon?
A Industrial strength, economic independence and socialism
B Racial purity, strong currency and limited government
C National pride, military rule and racial purity
D National pride, military rule and racial equality
BRAINLIST WILL BE GIVEN FOR THE CORRECT ANSWER
Which inference is best supported by the table?
F The South's population primarily lived in large cities.
G The South had a higher standard of living than the North.
H The North depended upon foreign imports to feed its population.
J The North was more industrial while the South was mostly agricultural.
Answer:
J
because the south mainly produces cotton using slaves, which is agricultural, while the north produced more machinery
ITS DUE VERY SOON GIVING BRAINLIEST FOR THE MOST DETAILED ANSWER
It is a debate
Was the treaty of Versailles was too harsh to place on Germany following defeat in ww1?
Answer:
The treatment Germany received was a bit too harsh, as the country could not feed and clothe her people, or provide jobs and security.
Answer:
The Treaty of Versailles, signed in June 1919 at the Palace of Versailles in Paris at the end of World War I, codified peace terms between the victorious Allies and Germany. The Treaty of Versailles held Germany responsible for starting the war and imposed harsh penalties in terms of loss of territory, massive reparations payments and demilitarization. Far from the “peace without victory” that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson had outlined in his famous Fourteen Points in early 1918, the Treaty of Versailles humiliated Germany while failing to resolve the underlying issues that had led to war in the first place. Economic distress and resentment of the treaty within Germany helped fuel the ultra-nationalist sentiment that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party, as well as the coming of a World War II just two decades later.
The Fourteen Points
In a speech to Congress in January 1918, Wilson laid out his idealistic vision for the post-war world. In addition to specific territorial settlements based on an Entente victory, Wilson’s so-called Fourteen Points emphasized the need for national self-determination for Europe’s different ethnic populations. Wilson also proposed the founding of a “general association of nations” that would mediate international disputes and foster cooperation between different nations in the hopes of preventing war on such a large scale in the future. This organization eventually became known as the League of Nations.
Wilson’s Fourteen Points are summarized below:
1. Diplomacy should be public, with no secret treaties.
2. All nations should enjoy free navigation of the seas.
3. Free trade should exist among all nations, putting an end to economic barriers between countries.
4. All countries should reduce arms in the name of public safety.
5. Fair and impartial rulings in colonial claims.
6. Restore Russian territories and freedom.
7. Belgium should be restored to independence.
8. Alsace-Lorraine should be returned to France and France should be fully liberated.
9. Italy’s frontiers should be drawn along clearly recognizable lines of nationality.
10. People living in Austria-Hungary should be granted self-determination.
11. The Balkan states should also be guaranteed self-determination and independence.
12. Turks and those under Turkish rule should be granted self-determination.
13. An independent Poland should be created.
14. A general association of nations must be formed to mediate international disputes.
When German leaders signed the armistice ending hostilities in World War I on November 11, 1918, they believed this vision articulated by Wilson would form the basis for any future peace treaty. This would not prove to be the case.
The Paris Peace Conference
The Paris Peace Conference opened on January 18, 1919, a date that was significant in that it marked the anniversary of the coronation of German Emperor Wilhelm I, which took place in the Palace of Versailles at the end of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. Prussian victory in that conflict had resulted in Germany’s unification and its seizure of Alsace and Lorraine provinces from France. In 1919, France and its prime minister, Georges Clemenceau, had not forgotten the humiliating loss, and intended to avenge it in the new peace agreement.
The Terms of the Versailles Treaty
The “Big Four” leaders of the victorious Western nations—Wilson of the United States, David Lloyd George of Great Britain, Georges Clemenceau of France and, to a lesser extent, Vittorio Orlando of Italy—dominated the peace negotiations in Paris. Germany and the other defeated powers, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey, were not represented at the conference; nor was Russia, which had fought as one of the Allied powers until 1917, when the country’s new Bolshevik government concluded a separate peace with Germany and withdrew from the conflict.
The Big Four themselves had competing objectives in Paris: Clemenceau’s main goal was to protect France from yet another attack by Germany. He sought heavy reparations from Germany as a way of limiting German economic recovery after the war and minimizing this possibility. Lloyd George, on the other hand, saw the rebuilding of Germany as a priority in order to reestablish the nation as a strong trading partner for Great Britain. For his part, Orlando wanted to expand Italy’s influence and shape it into a major power that could hold its own alongside the other great nations. Wilson opposed Italian territorial demands, as well as previously existing arrangements regarding territory between the other Allies; instead, he wanted to create a new world order along the lines of the Fourteen Points. The other leaders saw Wilson as too naive and idealistic, and his principles were difficult to translate into policy.
What organization was created by this executive order? O AmeriCorps O National Organization of Women O Peace Corps O Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
Answer:
Peace Corps
Explanation:
From the available options, the organization that was created by this executive order is "Peace Corps."
This is evident in the fact that Peace Corps was founded by Executive Order 10924 issued by President John F. Kennedy in March 1961.
It is a volunteer program managed by the United States Government to give international social and economic development aid and services.
When did the war end & what did Britain gain?
Answer:
the war ended in 1763 and britain gained in 1803
According to the 19th-century concept of manifest destiny, who should possess the North American continent? *
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.
According to the 19th-century concept of manifest destiny, who should possess the North American continent?
Answer: the United States.
United States President James F. Polk took Manifested Destiny as a flag for his administration and follow through with this idea that was God's will to expand and control the North American territory in order to instill democracy and Capitalism in the territory.
This belief system was the cause of international conflict as was the case of the Mexican-American War in which the United States received the territories of California, Arizona, and New Mexico, after its victory over the Mexican Army.
What did Muhammad say that every Muslim should to do in his lifetime, if he is able?
complete the hajj, a pilgrimage to Mecca
memorize the Quran, or Koran
join a jihad, or holy war
meet a caliph in person
Answer:
Believing that God had chosen him as his messenger Muhammad began to preach what God had revealed to him. The simple and clear-cut message of Islam, that there is no God but Allah, and that life should be lived in complete submission to the will of Allah, was attractive to many people, and they flocked to hear it.
.
.
All able Muslims must make a pilgrimage (hajj) to Mecca at least once in their lifetimes.
PLEASE HELP ME!!
How should we interpret who had status during the time of the constitution?
Answer:
"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW"-These words, written above the main entrance to the Supreme Court Building, express the ultimate responsibility of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function," as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. Few other courts in the world have the same authority of constitutional interpretation and none have exercised it for as long or with as much influence. A century and a half ago, the French political observer Alexis de Tocqueville noted the unique position of the Supreme Court in the history of nations and of jurisprudence. "The representative system of government has been adopted in several states of Europe," he remarked, "but I am unaware that any nation of the globe has hitherto organized a judicial power in the same manner as the Americans. . . . A more imposing judicial power was never constituted by any people."
The unique position of the Supreme Court stems, in large part, from the deep commitment of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government. The United States has demonstrated an unprecedented determination to preserve and protect its written Constitution, thereby providing the American "experiment in democracy" with the oldest written Constitution still in force.
The Constitution of the United States is a carefully balanced document. It is designed to provide for a national government sufficiently strong and flexible to meet the needs of the republic, yet sufficiently limited and just to protect the guaranteed rights of citizens; it permits a balance between society’s need for order and the individual’s right to freedom. To assure these ends, the Framers of the Constitution created three independent and coequal branches of government. That this Constitution has provided continuous democratic government through the periodic stresses of more than two centuries illustrates the genius of the American system of government.
The complex role of the Supreme Court in this system derives from its authority to invalidate legislation or executive actions which, in the Court’s considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution. This power of "judicial review" has given the Court a crucial responsibility in assuring individual rights, as well as in maintaining a "living Constitution" whose broad provisions are continually applied to complicated new situations.
While the function of judicial review is not explicitly provided in the Constitution, it had been anticipated before the adoption of that document. Prior to 1789, state courts had already overturned legislative acts which conflicted with state constitutions. Moreover, many of the Founding Fathers expected the Supreme Court to assume this role in regard to the Constitution; Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, for example, had underlined the importance of judicial review in the Federalist Papers, which urged adoption of the Constitution.
Hamilton had written that through the practice of judicial review the Court ensured that the will of the whole people, as expressed in their Constitution, would be supreme over the will of a legislature, whose statutes might express only the temporary will of part of the people. And Madison had written that constitutional interpretation must be left to the reasoned judgment of independent judges, rather than to the tumult and conflict of the political process. If every constitutional question were to be decided by public political bargaining, Madison argued, the Constitution would be reduced to a battleground of competing factions, political passion and partisan spirit.
Despite this background the Court’s power of judicial review was not confirmed until 1803, when it was invoked by Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison. In this decision, the Chief Justice asserted that the Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary consequence of its sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. That oath could not be fulfilled any other way. "It is emphatically the province of
Is the democratic-Republican Party a republican or democratic?
HELLLLLLPPPPPP I need help:
how did the Aztec empire treat their slaves?
Slaves were bound to their master's lands, until one's debt was paid to his master. Barring being a captive, being punished for committing a crime, or failing to pay an outstanding gambling debt, slavery was an institution one could enter into freely.
What caused America’s economy to get worse after the French and Indian War?
Answer:
A flood of cheap British manufactured imports that sold cheaper than comparable American-made goods made the post-war economic slump worse. Finally, the high level of debt taken on by the states to fund the war effort added to the economic crisis by helping to fuel rapid inflation.
Explanation:
light work
4. ________________________________________ are organisms that break down dead matter in an ecosystem.
Answer:
hears the answer hope it helps
You are stumped on an important math test and you have the perfect opportunity to cheat without getting caught.
What do you do, and how do you explain your decision?
give me 3-5 sentences
Answer:
UMMMM i cheat by going to the bathroom (saying MAY I) and asking people for the answers. I then go back (LIKE A BOSS), and answer the questions. If things go sideways like, if i cant go to the bathroom, i put my hands on my forehead while my eyes look for answers
Explanation:
Answer:I dont, I would not do this because how will you learn? Bad karma could come back to you. The kid your cheating off of could have it wrong him/her self.
Explanation:
uh
An device with a magnetic needle which spins freely and generally points north
Helrprprrprprpprprprppr
question 4. The Civil Rights movement changed from peaceful and passive to more violent for what reason?
Answer:
itz blurry-
Explanation:
Most drug lords to gain protection and political influence/leverage use money for corrupting who?
can some body help me find thegreatfact
Explanation:
yes I can help you
tell me
What role is the governor fulfilling when he calls the Virginia National
Guard to respond to flooded areas?
A Chief of state
B Commander-in-chief
C Chief legislator
D chief of party
What is the significance of the Holocaust?
Discern means to see a difference and make a distinction.
True
False
Answer:
true if right please mark as brainly
Answer: True
Explanation:
Discern means perceive or recognize (something), and distinction means difference.
Within 3 months after D Day how many troops and vechicles had the allies landed in France?
Answer:
By the end of June, the Allies had seized the vital port of Cherbourg, landed approximately 850,000 men and 150,000 vehicles in Normandy, and were poised to continue their march across France.
Explanation:
How were rights limited under the California Constitution of 1850?
Answer:
Robins, in which "free speech" rights beyond those addressed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution were found in the California Constitution ...
Explanation:
What did it mean to boycott British goods
Answer:
boycotting British goods meant that people refused to use them
Explanation:
people stopped using tea reading the newspaper amongst other things
Have a great day!
Answer:
Explanation:
Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. ... They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens. The colonists started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods.
Who was the Italian explorer who suggested that Columbus had found a "new world"?
a. Ferdinand Magellan
C. Bartholomeu Dias
b. Jacques Cartier
d. Amerigo Vespucci
Answer:
Vespucci
Explanation:
And that was the realization that what he was looking at was not India at all, but an entirely new continent. He verified the fact by following the coast of South America down to within 400 miles of Tierra del Fuego. Columbus found the new world, but Vespucci was the man who recognized that it was a new world.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Which title would apply to both the Tsarist(Czarist) government of Russia and the government
of the Soviet Union?
is it multiple choice?-
Question 37
Which of the following foreign policies warned the world that interfering in Latin America meant interfering with the United States? (SSUSH145)
А
Treaty of Versailles
B
Adams-Onis Treaty
С
Missouri Compromise
Roosevelt Corollary
Plzzzz hurry
During World War II, both the West and East coasts saw a major increase in which of the following? A. shipbuilding B. fortifications C. immigrants
Answer:
A. shipbuildingExplanation:
During World War II, both the West and East coasts saw a major increase in shipbuilding. Thus the correct option is A.
What are the causes of world war II?World War II was mainly caused by the invasion of Poland by Hitler leader of Germany. It was also caused due to the revenge-seeking attitude of Germany after treaty of Versailles which restricts their arms and military capacity to avoid conflicts.
During World War II, both the West and East coasts saw a major increase in shipbuilding because ships are used for transporting materials, and equipment from one place to another as well as played a significant role in trade and commerce.
As 70% of its industrial sector was destroyed by the war, post-World War II Europe is characterized as being bankrupt and poor. The country's economy collapsed as a result of having a significant debt to the US.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about World War II, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1286856
#SPJ2
which letter is pointing to the country that is classified as federal form of government
Need ASAP
Answer:
B I think
Explanation:
What did government regulations, like the factory act, attempt to fix? A. Product quality B. Unsafe work conditions C. Business profits D. Employee efficiency
Answer:
Letter D. employee efficiency
In which city did the Renaissance first flourish ?
A.) Venice
B.) Rome
C.) Florence
D.) Genoa
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Imagine that you’re a Native American judge serving on a court in Indian Territory. A person suspected of committing a crime in the United States has fled to the territory. Would you hear the case? Would you order the accused to be sent back to the United States? Or would you ignore the case entirely? Explain and defend your answer in 50–100 words.
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
If I were a judge in Indian Territory, I would order the accused to be sent to Fort Smith for trial. Tribal courts have no real jurisdiction over people from the United States who have committed crimes. If the accused isn’t a tribal citizen, I can’t hear the case. But I also can’t simply ignore the case. To do so might endanger other people or the community. At Fort Smith, the person who committed the crime will face a fair trial and, if found guilty, a fair punishment.
Explanation: