The pattern continues. Fill in the blanks.

2 x 4 + 1 = 3 x 3

3 x 5 + 1 = 4 x 4

4 x 6 + 1 = __ + __

__ x 7 + 1 = __ x __

__ x __ + __ = __ + __

Describe patterns that you see.

What will the equation look like when the first term is 25?

When we look across each row of the table the pattern we observe is that the multiplication of the table leads to 12.

The quantity of space a three-dimensional item occupies is measured by its volume. Usually, it is expressed in cubic units like cubic metres or cubic feet. If an object has irregular or curved shapes, the volume can be determined by using its measurements, such as length, breadth, and height, or by employing more difficult mathematical calculations. In several disciplines, such as physics, engineering, and architecture, volume is a crucial notion.

From the table we see that the arrangement of the 12 cubes is made in different length and width, such that the multiplication of the three is 12.

Here we have,

Long    wide       tall

2            3             2

2             6            1

3             1             4

3             2            2

3             4            1

4              1            3

6              2            1

Hence, when we look across each row of the table the pattern we observe is that the multiplication of the table leads to 12.

Learn more about volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

The actual height of the statue is option C 231.2 feet.

A scale factor is a number used in mathematics to scale or multiply a quantity or measurement by another factor in order to establish a proportional relationship between two identical figures or objects.

In other terms, the scale factor is the ratio of the corresponding lengths, widths, or heights of the two figures or objects if they are similar, that is, they have the same shape but may range in size. This implies that you may determine the dimension of the second object by multiplying one dimension of one object by the scale factor.

Given that the scale factor is 230:1.

Thus,

actual height of statue / 230 = height of drawing / 1.2 feet

Now,

actual height of statue = (1.2 feet / 1.2 feet) * 230

actual height of statue = 230 feet

Hence, the actual height of the statue is option C 231.2 feet.

Learn more about scale factor here:

https://brainly.com/question/29464385

#SPJ1

Answer:1

1. is 2/7

2. is .5

3 is 1.94 repeating and

4 is 7/11

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

225 trains

Step-by-step explanation:

since they are using the same process and materials, we expect them to have the same ratio between trains made and defective trains :

600 / 30 = 20/1

one out of 20 is defect.

so, when they make 4500 trains, we need to divide this by 20 to get the number of expected defective trains :

4500 / 20 = 225

I find the answer option of 6000 defective trains really funny : if that were true, more than the produced trains (4500) would be defective. how ... ?

x=47°

The degree of a triangle is equal to 180°.

Since a triange=180°, you would subtract 180 by 102+31 because the other two angles are 102° and 31°.

180-102-31=47°

Therefore the answer would be x=47°

The distance from A to B is  724.64 ft

Consider the following figure.

In right triangle CDA, the sine of angle DAC would be,

sin(∠DAC) = CD/CA

sin(32°) = CD/1540

CD = 816.1 ft

Consider the tangent of angle DAC.

tan(∠DAC ) = CD/AD

tan(32°) = 816.1 / AD

AD = 816.1/ 0.63

AD = 1295.4

Let us assume that distance AB = x feet

In right triangle CDB, the tangent of angle CBD would be,

tan(∠CBD) = CD/DB

tan(∠CBD) = CD/(DA + AB)

tan(22°) = 816.1 / (1295.4+ x)

1295.4 + x = 816.1 / 0.4040

1295.4 + x = 2020.04

x = 2020.04 -  1295.4

x = 724.64 ft

Therefore, the required distance is  724.64 ft

Learn more about the sine of angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/3827723

#SPJ4

Find the complete question below.

Answer:

6.8 ounces

To set up a hypothesis test for this production process, we need to define the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the average amount of soda in each can is equal to 6.8 ounces, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the average amount of soda in each can is not equal to 6.8 ounces.

We can then collect data by taking regular random samples from the production process and calculate the sample mean and standard deviation. We can then perform a statistical test such as a t-test or z-test to determine whether we can reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

If we reject the null hypothesis, we can conclude that there is evidence that the average amount of soda in each can is different from 6.8 ounces. If we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we cannot conclude that there is evidence that the average amount of soda in each can is different from 6.8 ounces.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.

The given statement about developing quantitative and measurable usability tests is true.

Use cases can help with developing quantitative and measurable usability tests. Use cases are scenarios that describe how a user might interact with a system or product in a specific situation.

By developing use cases, researchers can identify specific tasks that users may need to perform and design usability tests to measure how well users can perform those tasks.

This can help make the usability tests more objective and measurable, as researchers can use metrics such as completion rates, task time, and errors to assess the usability of the system or product.

Learn more about usability tests.

brainly.com/question/28807738

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

7 + x = 2x, so x = 7

The amount of people infected after t weeks is modeled by the function presented as follows:

[tex]f(t) = \frac{675000}{1 + 4000e^{-t}}[/tex]

When the epidemic began, we have that t = 0, hence the number of people is given as follows:

f(0) = 675,000/(1 + 4000)

f(0) = 169 people.

Six weeks after the epidemic began, we have that t = 6, hence the number of people is given as follows:

f(6) = 675,000/(1 + 4000 x e^(-6))

f(6) = 61,841 people.

The limiting size of the infected population is the numerator of the fraction, which is 675,000, as the denominator goes to zero when t goes to infinity.

More can be learned about exponential functions at https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

The range for the data set is equal to 48.

In Mathematics and Statistics, a range is the difference between the highest number and the lowest number contained in a data set.

In Mathematics and Statistics, the range of a data set can be calculated by using this mathematical expression;

Range = Highest number - Lowest number

From the given data set, we have:

Highest number = 95.

Lowest number = 47.

By substituting, we have:

Range = 95 - 47

Range = 48.

Read more on range here: brainly.com/question/32352196

#SPJ2

The probability of the weekend being dry for the school picnic is approximately 23.4%.

First, let's define some terms:

1. Probability: The likelihood of a specific event happening
2. Picnic: The school event that is scheduled for a two-day weekend in May
3. Rainy: Refers to days with rain

Now, let's calculate the probability that the weekend will be dry:

There are 16 rainy days in May, and May has 31 days. So, there are (31 - 16) = 15 dry days in May.

Each weekend has two days. Since May has 31 days, there are (31 / 7) = approximately 4.43 weeks in May. To account for the remaining days, we round down to 4 weeks and add the remaining 2 days as another weekend, resulting in 5 weekends.

Now, we'll determine the probability of having a dry day on any given day in May:

Dry day probability = (number of dry days) / (total days in May) = 15 / 31 ≈ 0.484

Since we want the probability of having two consecutive dry days (the whole weekend), we'll multiply the probabilities of each day being dry:

Weekend probability of being dry = (dry day probability) * (dry day probability) ≈ 0.484 * 0.484 ≈ 0.234

So, the probability of the weekend being dry for the school picnic is approximately 23.4%.

Learn more about Probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The value of x at which f(x) is a minimum is 3/2.

To find the minimum value of f(x), we need to calculate its derivative and set it equal to zero.

So,

[tex]f(x) = ∫(x^2 - 3x - 2) e^(t^2) dt[/tex]

Taking the derivative of f(x) with respect to x, we get:

[tex]f'(x) = 2x e^(x^2 - 3x - 2) - 3 e^(x^2 - 3x - 2)[/tex]

Setting f'(x) equal to zero:

[tex]2x e^(x^2 - 3x - 2) - 3 e^(x^2 - 3x - 2) = 0[/tex]

Factorizing, we get:

[tex]e^(x^2 - 3x - 2) (2x - 3) = 0[/tex]

So, either e[tex]^(x^2 - 3x - 2)[/tex]= 0 (which is not possible), or

2x - 3 = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = 3/2

Therefore, the value of x at which f(x) is a minimum is 3/2.

Learn more about derivative

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ4

f'(x) changes from negative to positive at x = 2.105, we know that f(x) has a local minimum at x = 2.105.
Therefore, the answer is c. 2.

To find the value of x at which f(x) is a minimum, we need to find the critical points of f(x) and then determine whether each critical point is a minimum or maximum using the first derivative test.

To find the critical points of f(x), we need to find where f'(x) = 0. Using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and the Chain Rule, we can find that:

[tex]f'(x) = 2x - 3 - 2xe^{(x^2-3x-2t^2)}[/tex]

To find where f'(x) = 0, we need to solve the equation[tex]2x - 3 - 2xe^{x^2-3x-2t^2} = 0[/tex] for x. Unfortunately, this equation cannot be solved algebraically, so we need to use numerical methods. One way to do this is to use a graphing calculator or computer program to graph y = 2x - 3 and[tex]y = 2xe^{x^2-3x-2t^2)[/tex]and find their intersection(s).

Using this method, we can find that there is only one critical point, which is approximately x = 2.105. To determine whether this critical point is a minimum or maximum, we need to use the first derivative test. Since f'(x) changes from negative to positive at x = 2.105, we know that f(x) has a local minimum at x = 2.105.

Therefore, the answer is c. 2.

learn more about local minimum

https://brainly.com/question/10878127

#SPJ11

The range of f include the following: D. -5 ≤ f(x) ≤ 5.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a domain is the set of all real numbers for which a particular function is defined.

Additionally, the vertical extent of any graph of a function represents all range values and they are always read and written from smaller to larger numerical values, and from the bottom of the graph to the top.

By critically observing the graph shown in the image attached above, we can reasonably and logically deduce the following domain and range:

Domain = {-6, 5} or -6 ≤ x ≤ 5.

Range = {-5, 5} or -5 ≤ f(x) ≤ 5.

Read more on domain here: brainly.com/question/17440903

#SPJ1

To determine the sample size needed to have a % confidence that our sample mean will be within hours of the true mean, we would need to use a formula. Specifically, we would use the formula: n = (Z^2 * s^2) / E^2

Where n is the sample size needed, Z is the z-score associated with the desired confidence level, s is the standard deviation of the population, and E is the margin of error (in this case, the specified difference of hours between the sample mean and true mean).

Assuming we have information about the population standard deviation (s), we can plug in the values for Z, s, and E to find the necessary sample size. For example, if we wanted to be 95% confident that our sample mean would be within 2 hours of the true mean, we would use a Z-score of 1.96 (which corresponds to a 95% confidence level). Let's say the population standard deviation is 5 hours. Plugging in these values, we would get:

n = (1.96^2 * 5^2) / 2^2
n = 96.04

So we would need a sample size of at least 97 in order to be 95% confident that our sample mean would be within 2 hours of the true mean.
To determine the sample size needed to be confident that our sample mean will be within a specific number of hours of the true mean, we need to know the confidence level, standard deviation, and margin of error (in hours). The formula for calculating the sample size is:

n = (Z^2 * σ^2) / E^2

where:
n = sample size
Z = Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level
σ = population standard deviation
E = margin of error (in hours)

Once you provide the confidence level, standard deviation, and margin of error (hours), we can plug in the values and calculate the required

To learn more about  Z score- brainly.com/question/22210584

#SPJ11

The expressions that correctly show the value of the electronic book device after the holiday are B and D, which represent the percentage decrease of 15% as 0.85 (or 1-0.15).

The value of an electronic book device before a holiday is represented by the variable t. After the holiday, the value of the device decreased by 15%. To find the value of the device after the holiday, we need to multiply the original value by the percentage decrease, which is 0.85 (or 1-0.15). Therefore, the expressions that correctly show the value of the electronic book device after the holiday are B and D.

Option A (1.15) represents the percentage increase and not the decrease, so it is incorrect. Option C (-0.15) represents the percentage decrease, but it cannot be used alone to find the new value. Option E (-0.85) is the negative of the percentage decrease, so it is also incorrect. Finally, option F is equivalent to option D, so it is also correct.

In summary, the expressions that correctly show the value of the electronic book device after the holiday are B and D, which represent the percentage decrease of 15% as 0.85 (or 1-0.15).

to know more about electronic

brainly.com/question/1255220

#SPJ1

The probability that a randomly selected carton has a puncture or a smashed corner is 0.076, or 7.6%.

What is probability?

Probability is a measure of the likelihood of an event occurring. It is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 means the event is impossible and 1 means the event is certain to happen.

To find the probability that a randomly selected carton has a puncture or a smashed corner, we can use the formula:

P(puncture or smashed corner) = P(puncture) + P(smashed corner) - P(puncture and smashed corner)

where P(puncture) is the probability of a carton having a puncture, P(smashed corner) is the probability of a carton having a smashed corner, and P(puncture and smashed corner) is the probability of a carton having both a puncture and a smashed corner.

Substituting the given probabilities into the formula, we get:

P(puncture or smashed corner) = 0.03 + 0.06 - 0.014

P(puncture or smashed corner) = 0.076

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected carton has a puncture or a smashed corner is 0.076, or 7.6%.

To learn more about probability from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

To find the mean height of a football player on this Florida team, we need to know the mean of the normal distribution (Morlam) and the standard deviation of the Florida distribution. Since the Florida distribution is also approximately normal (Morlam) with a standard deviation of 2.9 inches, we can use the Empirical Rule to estimate the mean height.

According to the Empirical Rule, approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, approximately 95% within two standard deviations, and approximately 99.7% within three standard deviations. Since we know that the standard deviation of the Florida distribution is 2.9 inches, we can assume that the mean height falls within three standard deviations of the mean.

So, if we assume that the mean height is at the centre of the distribution, we can estimate it by adding and subtracting three standard deviations from it. Therefore, the mean height of a football player on this Florida team can be estimated to be:

Mean height = Mean of the Morlam distribution ± 3 x Standard deviation of the Florida distribution
Mean height = Mean of the Morlam distribution ± 3 x 2.9 inches

Without knowing the mean of the Morlam distribution, we cannot calculate the exact mean height. However, if we assume that the Morlam distribution has a mean height of 70 inches (a typical average height for a football player), then the mean height of a football player on this Florida team can be estimated to be:

Mean height = 70 ± 3 x 2.9
Mean height = 70 ± 8.7
Mean height = 61.3 to 78.7 inches

Therefore, we can estimate that the mean height of a football player on this Florida team is between 61.3 and 78.7 inches.

Learn more about Normal Distribution here: brainly.com/question/17199694

#SPJ11

We can estimate that the mean height of a football player on the Florida team is approximately 70 inches.

To find the mean height of a football player on the Florida team, we need to know the exact distribution of heights. However, since we only have information about the standard deviation and the fact that it is approximately normal, we can make an educated guess that the distribution is still normal with a mean somewhere close to the national average of 70 inches.
Using the empirical rule, we know that about 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean. In this case, one standard deviation is 2.9 inches.

So, we can assume that about 68% of the heights on the Florida team fall between (70-2.9) = 67.1 inches and (70+2.9) = 72.9 inches.
If we assume that the distribution is symmetric, we can estimate the mean height of the Florida team by taking the average of the lower and upper bounds of the interval: (67.1 + 72.9)/2 = 70 inches.

For similar question on mean.

https://brainly.com/question/23251787

#SPJ11

the equation of the ellipse with center at the origin, a vertex at (0, 6), and a co-vertex at (2, 0) is:(x² / 36) + (y² / 4) = 1

How to solve the question?

To write the equation of an ellipse in standard form when the center is at the origin, we need to use the following formula:

(x²/ a²) + (y² / b²) = 1

where a is the distance from the center to a vertex, and b is the distance from the center to a co-vertex.

In our problem, the center is at the origin, and a vertex is located at (0, 6), so the distance from the center to a vertex is 6. Therefore, we have:

a = 6

Similarly, a co-vertex is located at (2, 0), so the distance from the center to a co-vertex is 2. Therefore, we have:

b = 2

Substituting these values into the formula above, we get:

(x² / 6²) + (y² / 2²) = 1

Simplifying, we get:

(x² / 36) + (y² / 4) = 1

Therefore, the equation of the ellipse with center at the origin, a vertex at (0, 6), and a co-vertex at (2, 0) is:

(x² / 36) + (y² / 4) = 1

This is the equation in standard form for an ellipse with a horizontal major axis (since a is greater than b), and it represents an ellipse that is taller than it is wide. The major axis of the ellipse is the line passing through the vertices, which in this case is the y-axis, and the minor axis is the line passing through the co-vertices, which in this case is the x-axis.

To know more about vertex visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29476657

#SPJ1

The power series method can be used to solve a nonhomogeneous differential equation about an ordinary point by finding both a homogeneous and particular solution using a series expansion and the method of undetermined coefficients.

The power series method is a technique used to find a series solution of a differential equation. When applied to a nonhomogeneous differential equation, the method involves finding both a homogeneous solution and a particular solution.

Assuming that the nonhomogeneous differential equation has the form

y''(x) + p(x)y'(x) + q(x)y(x) = f(x)

where p(x), q(x), and f(x) are functions of x, we can begin by finding the solution to the associated homogeneous equation

y''(x) + p(x)y'(x) + q(x)y(x) = 0

Using the power series method, we can assume a solution of the form:

y(x) = a0 + a1(x - x0) + a2(x - x0)^2 + ...

where a0, a1, a2, ... are constants to be determined, and x0 is the ordinary point of the differential equation.

Next, we can find the coefficients of the power series by substituting the series solution into the differential equation and equating coefficients of like powers of (x-x0). This leads to a system of equations for the coefficients, which can be solved iteratively.

After finding the homogeneous solution, we can find a particular solution using a similar method. Assuming a particular solution of the form:

y(x) = u(x) + v(x)

where u(x) is a solution to the associated homogeneous equation, and v(x) is a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation, we can use the method of undetermined coefficients to find v(x). This involves assuming a form for v(x) based on the form of f(x), and then solving for its coefficients using the same technique as before.

Once we have found both the homogeneous and particular solutions, we can combine them to obtain the general solution to the nonhomogeneous differential equation.

Learn more about nonhomogeneous differential equation here

brainly.com/question/30876746

#SPJ4

Answer: Beth and Jose should leave a $6.15 tip.

Step-by-step explanation: We need to find 20% of $30.75 so you need to multiply 30.75 by 0.20 to find 6.15 to be 20% of 30.75.

Answer:

A) $6.15

Step-by-step explanation:

20%= 0.2
30.75 x 0.2 = 6.15

In the given triangle, α is equal to 67.36°.

What is a triangle's definition?

A triangle is a two-dimensional closed geometric form that has three sides, three angles, and three vertices (corners). It is the most basic polygon, produced by joining any three non-collinear points in a plane. The sum all angles of a triangle is always 180°. Triangles are classed according to their side length (equilateral, isosceles, or scalene) and angle measurement (acute, right, or obtuse).

Now,

Using Trigonometric functions

We can use the sine function

So,

Sin α=Perpendicular/Hypotenuse

Sin α = 12/13

α=67.36°

Hence,

           The value of α will be 67.36°.

To know more about triangles visit the link

brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

Answer:

(0, 0)

(4, 16)

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]y = 4x[/tex]

[tex]y = x^2[/tex]

Using substitution, we can replace y in the second equation with 4x from the first equation.

[tex]4x = x^2[/tex]

Now, we can move all the x's to one side and complete the square to solve for x.

[tex]0 = x^2 - 4x[/tex]

↓ adding 4 to both sides

[tex]4 = x^2 - 4x + 4[/tex]

↓ factoring the right side

[tex]4 = (x-2)^2[/tex]

↓ taking the square root of both sides

[tex]\sqrt4 = \sqrt{(x-2)^2[/tex]

[tex]\pm2 = x - 2[/tex]

↓ adding 2 to both sides

[tex]2 \pm 2 = x[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{x = 0 \ \ \ \text{or} \ \ \ x = 4}[/tex]

Then, we can solve for y by plugging both x-values into the first equation.

[tex]y = 4(0)[/tex]     or     [tex]y = 4(4)[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{y = 0 \ \ \ \text{or} \ \ \ y=16}[/tex]

Finally, we can form two ordered pairs that are the solutions to the system of equations.

[tex]\boxed{(0,0)}[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{(4,16)}[/tex]

The impact propensity can be interpreted as the slope coefficient for the tax personal exemption (pe) or its first lag in

the regression equation.

To determine the impact propensity in the regression of the general fertility rate (GFR) on the tax personal exemption

(PE) and its first lag, you should follow these steps:

Estimate the regression model using the available data. The model should look like this:

GFR = β0 + β1 × PE + β2 × PE_lag + ε

Where GFR is the general fertility rate, PE is the tax personal exemption, PE_lag is the tax personal exemption's first

lag, and ε is the error term.

Obtain the estimated coefficients (β0, β1, and β2) from the fitted regression model.

These coefficients will help you determine the impact propensity.

Calculate the impact propensity. The impact propensity in this context refers to the change in the general fertility rate

resulting from a one-unit increase in the tax personal exemption, taking into account both its current and lagged

effects.

To find the impact propensity, sum the coefficients for the tax personal exemption and its first lag:

Impact propensity = β1 + β2

for such more question on propensity

https://brainly.com/question/20376297

#SPJ11

The substance's half-life in days is 3 days.

What is exponential decay?

If a quantity declines at a pace proportionate to its current value, exponential decay may be present. The term "exponential decay" in mathematics refers to the process of a constant percentage rate reduction in an amount over time.

Here, we have

Given: An 18-gram sample of a substance that's a by-product of fireworks has a k-value of 0.215.

We have to find the substance's half-life in days.

Using the formula for the exponential decay that is N = N₀e⁻ⁿˣ,

we have N = 18/2, N₀ = 18, and n = 0.215.

N = N₀e⁻ⁿˣ

9 = 18e⁻⁰°²¹⁵ˣ

9/18 = e⁻⁰°²¹⁵ˣ

1/2 = e⁻⁰°²¹⁵ˣ

Taking logs on both sides, we get

㏑(1/2) = -0.215x

x = ㏑(1/2)/(-0.215)

x = -0.6931/(-0.215)

x = 3.22

Hence, the substance's half-life in days is 3 days.

To learn more about the exponential decay from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/31409569

#SPJ1

The total surface area of the given figure is 619.2 in², which is not listed in the provided options.

The surface area is known to be measure of the total area occupied by the surface of the object. Defining the surface area mathematically in the presence of a curved surface is better than defining the arc length of a one-dimensional curve, or the surface area of ​​a polyhedron (i.e. an object with flat polygonal faces). Much more complicated. For a smooth surface sphere such as the following, surface area is assigned using representation as a parametric surface. This surface definition is based on calculus and includes partial derivatives and double integrals.

The triangular face of the given figure represent an equilateral triangle of sides 12 in.

Area of the triangle = (√3/4) × a²

Area of the triangular face:

= (√3/4) × 12²

= (√3/4) × 144

= 57.6 in²

Area of the rectangle = Length × width

Area of the rectangular face:

= 12 × 14

= 168 in²

Area of the given figure:

= (2 × 57.6) + (3 × 168)

= 115.2 + 504

= 619.2 in²

To know more about polygonal faces, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16550007

#SPJ1

The explicit formula for an arithmetic sequence is:

an = a1 + (n-1)d

The explicit formula for a geometric sequence is:

an = a1 * [tex]r^{(n-1)}[/tex]

What is arithmetic sequence?

An arithmetic sequence is a sequence of numbers in which each term after the first is found by adding a fixed constant number, called the common difference, to the preceding term.

To write the explicit formula for both an arithmetic and geometric sequence, the following values must be known:

For an Arithmetic Sequence:

The first term (a1) of the sequence.

The common difference (d) between consecutive terms in the sequence.

The explicit formula for an arithmetic sequence is:

an = a1 + (n-1)d

Where:

an is the nth term of the sequence.

a1 is the first term of the sequence.

d is the common difference between consecutive terms.

n is the position of the term in the sequence.

For a Geometric Sequence:

The first term (a1) of the sequence.

The common ratio (r) between consecutive terms in the sequence.

The explicit formula for a geometric sequence is:

an = a1 * r^(n-1)

Where:

an is the nth term of the sequence.

a1 is the first term of the sequence.

r is the common ratio between consecutive terms.

n is the position of the term in the sequence.

Therefore, The explicit formula for an arithmetic sequence is:

an = a1 + (n-1)d

The explicit formula for a geometric sequence is:

an = a1 * [tex]r^{(n-1)}[/tex]

To learn more about arithmetic sequence from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/15412619

#SPJ1

On simplifying the expression (−1 3/4)²- √ [127−2(3)]  we get -127/16

Simplifying an expression:

To simplify the expression, we need to follow the order of operations, which is PEMDAS: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division (from left to right), and Addition and Subtraction (from left to right).

First, we simplify the exponent by squaring -1 3/4 to get 49/16. Then, we simplify the expression under the square root by subtracting 2 times 3 from 127 to get 121, and we take the square root of 121 to get 11.

Here we have

(−1 3/4)²- √ [127−2(3)]  

The above expression can be simplified as follows

=>  (−1 3/4)²- √ [127−2(3)]    

Convert the mixed fraction into an improper fraction  

=> 1 3/4 = 7/4    [ ∵ 4 × 1 + 3 = 7 ]  

So given expression can be

=>  (−7/4)²- √ [127−2(3)]      

=>  (49/16) - √ [121]      

=>  (49/16) - 11

=>  (49 - 176 /16)

=>  -127/16  

Therefore,

On simplifying the expression (−1 3/4)²- √ [127−2(3)]  we get -127/16

Learn more about Expression at

https://brainly.com/question/30148250

#SPJ1

The position of the image is approximately 1.71 cm from the ornament's surface.

To determine the position of the image, we need to use the mirror formula for a concave mirror, which is \frac{1}{f} = [tex]\frac{1}{do} + \frac{1}{di},[/tex] where f is the focal length, do is the object distance, and di is the image distance.

First, we need to find the focal length (f) of the spherical ornament. The radius of curvature (R) is half the diameter, so R = 6.00 cm / 2 = 3.00 cm. For a spherical mirror, the focal length is half the radius of curvature: f = R/2 = 3.00 cm / 2 = 1.50 cm.

Next, we need to find the object distance (do). The object is 19.0 cm from the center of the ornament, but we need the distance from the ornament's surface. Since the radius is 3.00 cm, we subtract that from the total distance: do = 19.0 cm - 3.00 cm = 16.0 cm.

Now, we can use the mirror formula:
\frac{1}{f} = [tex]\frac{1}{do} + \frac{1}{di},[/tex]
1/1.50 cm = 1/16.0 cm + 1/di

To solve for di, subtract 1/16.0 cm from both sides and then take the reciprocal:

1/di = 1/1.50 cm - 1/16.0 cm

di ≈ 1.71 cm

The position of the image is approximately 1.71 cm from the ornament's surface.

learn more about the mirror formula for a concave mirror,

https://brainly.com/question/3555871

#SPJ11

The position of the image is 20.8 cm from the center of the spherical ornament, counting from the ornament surface.

To find the position of the image, we can use the mirror equation:

1/o + 1/i = 1/f

where o is the object distance from the center of the spherical ornament, i is the image distance from the center of the spherical ornament, and f is the focal length of the ornament.

Since the ornament is a spherical mirror, the focal length is half the

radius of curvature, which is half the diameter of the ornament:

f = R/2 = 6.00 cm/2 = 3.00 cm

Substituting the given values, we get:

1/19.0 cm + 1/i = 1/3.00 cm

Solving for i, we get:

1/i = 1/3.00 cm - 1/19.0 cm = (19.0 cm - 3.00 cm)/(3.00 cm x 19.0 cm) = 0.0481 cm^-1

i = 1/0.0481 cm = 20.8 cm

Therefore, the position of the image is 20.8 cm from the center of the

spherical ornament, counting from the ornament surface.

for such more question on ornament surface

https://brainly.com/question/30938695

#SPJ11