the ratio of 12 year old to 13 year old in Mr. Wu's class is 5;3. if there are 24 students in the class, how many students are 13 years old?

In a Taylor series, the polynomial t3(x) represents the third degree Taylor polynomial of a function. It is an approximation of the function near a specific point, obtained by taking the first three terms of the Taylor series expansion.

The polynomial t3(x) is given by t3(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + (f''(a)/2!)(x-a)^2 + (f'''(a)/3!)(x-a)^3, where f(a) is the value of the function at the point a, f'(a) is its first derivative, f''(a) is its second derivative, and f'''(a) is its third derivative.

In the context of Taylor series, polynomial T3(x) refers to the third-degree Taylor polynomial. It is an approximation of a given function using the first four terms of the Taylor series expansion. The general formula for the Taylor series is:

f(x) ≈ f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3! + ...

For T3(x), you'll consider the first four terms of the series:

T3(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3!

Here, f(a) represents the function value at the point 'a', and f'(a), f''(a), and f'''(a) represent the first, second, and third derivatives of the function evaluated at 'a', respectively. The T3(x) polynomial approximates the given function in the vicinity of the point 'a' up to the third degree.

Learn more about polynomial at: brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

The function that is represented in the diagram is y/-1 = f(x + 5).

As per the information provided, it is given that there are two graphs

There are two diagrams available in black and white.

Let the graph of the function is y = f(x).

If the function is shifted vertically to the left, then the function can be rearranged as,

y = f(x + k), k > 0.

The function is shifted vertically 5 units to the left.

Therefore, the function can be rewritten as,

y = f(x + 5).

Now, the red part of the function is symmetric about the x-axis with respect to y.

Therefore, the function can be rewritten as,

y/-1 = f(x + 5).

To learn more about the transformation on the graphs;

https://brainly.com/question/19040905

#SPJ1

The complete question:

The black graph is the graph of y = f(x). Choose the equation for the red graph. A. y - 5 = f() B. = f(x + 5) C. = f(x - 5) D. y + 5 = f(x/-1)​

The cost of refinishing a hexagonal floor with a radius of 5.5 feet would be approximately $196.47.

To find the cost of refinishing a hexagonal floor with a radius of 5.5 feet, we first need to find the area of the hexagonal floor.

We know that the hexagon is made up of six congruent equilateral triangles, each with a side length equal to the radius of the hexagon.

We know that the formula for the area of an equilateral triangle is:

A = √3/4 × s²

Since the radius of the hexagon is 5.5 feet, the length of each side of the equilateral triangle is also 5.5 feet.

Therefore, the area is:

A = √3/4 × (5.5)²

= 13.098 ft²

Since there are six of these triangles, the total area of the hexagonal floor is:

Total Area = 6 × 13.098

= 78.588 ft²

To find the cost of refinishing the floor, we multiply the area by the cost per square foot:

Cost = 78.588 × 2.50 = $196.47

Therefore, the cost of refinishing a hexagonal floor with a radius of 5.5 feet would be approximately $196.47.

Learn more about Area of equilateral triangle here

https://brainly.com/question/10681095

#SPJ4

Therefore, False. The population linear regression line is composed of infinitely many population data points, not means of the normal density function.

Explanation:
The population linear regression line is composed of infinitely many population data points, not means of the normal density function. The line is determined by the relationship between two variables and is used to make predictions about one variable based on the other.


Therefore, False. The population linear regression line is composed of infinitely many population data points, not means of the normal density function

To know more about statement visit :

https://brainly.com/question/27839142

#SPJ11

To find the length of the curve described by the parametric equations, we use the formula. Therefore, the exact length of the curve described by the parametric equations is 16√17 - 2/3 units.

L = ∫[a, b] sqrt[(dx/dt)^2 + ( dy/dt)^2] dt

where a and b are the bounds of the parameter t.

Using the given parametric equations, we have:

x(t) = 8 + 3t^2

y(t) = 7 + 2t^3

Taking the derivatives with respect to t, we have:

dx/dt = 6t

dy/dt = 6t^2

Substituting these expressions into the formula for L, we get:

L = ∫[0,4] sqrt[(6t)^2 + (6t^2)^2] dt

= ∫[0,4] sqrt[36t^2 + 36t^4] dt

= ∫[0,4] 6t sqrt(1 + t^2) dt

To evaluate this integral, we use the substitution u = 1 + t^2, du/dt = 2t, and dt = du/2t. This gives:

L = ∫[1,17] 3 sqrt(u) du

= 2[u^(3/2)/3]∣[1,17]

= 2[(17^(3/2) - 1^(3/2))/3]

= 2(8√17 - 1/3)

Therefore, the exact length of the curve described by the parametric equations is 16√17 - 2/3 units.

Visit here to learn more parametric equations:

brainly.com/question/28537985

#SPJ11

[tex]\tan(A )=\cfrac{\stackrel{opposite}{9}}{\underset{adjacent}{3}} \implies \tan( A )= 3\implies A =\tan^{-1}\left( 3 \right)\implies A \approx 71.57^o[/tex]

Make sure your calculator is in Degree mode.

The slope of the line is a positive slope. The value of the slope is 2/3.

From the question, we are to determine if the slope of the line is positive, negative, undefined, or zero

First, we will calculate the slope of the line ,

Using the formula,

Slope = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

Pick two points: (0, -3) and (3, -1)

Thus,

Slope = (-1 - (-3)) / (3 - 0)

Slope = (-1 + 3)) / (3)

Slope = (2) / (3)

Slope = 2/3

Since the value of the slope is positive, the slope is a positive slope.

Hence,

The slope is positive.

Learn more on Slope here: brainly.com/question/29044610

#SPJ1

The equation that matches the number of bacteria in the population after 3 hours is:

N = 500 x 3^3 = 13,500

Therefore, the equation N = 500 x 3^3 = 13,500 accurately represents the growth of the bacterial population over three hours.

In this equation, N represents the number of bacteria, 500 is the initial population, and 3 is the growth factor (i.e., the factor by which the population is multiplied each hour).

To understand why this equation works, it's helpful to consider what's happening to the bacteria over time. Initially, there are 500 bacteria in the population. After the first hour, each bacterium has tripled, so there are now 500 x 3 = 1500 bacteria. After the second hour, each of the 1500 bacteria has tripled again, so there are now 1500 x 3 = 4500 bacteria. After the third hour, each of the 4500 bacteria has tripled again, so there are now 4500 x 3 = 13,500 bacteria.

Learn more about equation here: brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

B. With test statistics of 2.40 and a critical value of 2.326, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. The manufacturer's claim cannot be rejected.

To test whether the sample information supports the manufacturer's claim that their 12-ounce cans do not contain more than 30 calories on average, we can use a one-sample t-test. The null hypothesis is that the true mean calorie content of the cans is equal to or less than 30 calories, while the alternative hypothesis is that it is greater than 30 calories.
Using the sample mean of 31.8 calories, the sample standard deviation of 3 calories, and a sample size of 16, we can calculate the t-value as follows:
t = (31.8 - 30) / (3 / √(16)) = 2.40
The degree of freedom for this test is 15 (n - 1). Using a significance level of alpha = 0.01 and a one-tailed test, the critical t-value is 2.602.
Comparing the calculated t-value of 2.40 to the critical t-value of 2.602, we can see that it falls within the non-rejection region. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the sample information does not provide enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim that their 12-ounce cans contain, on average, less than or equal to 30 calories. The correct answer is B: with test statistics of 2.40 and a critical value of 2.326, we failed to reject the null hypothesis. The manufacturer's claims cannot be rejected.

Learn more about evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/15880833

#SPJ11

f(x) has a local maximum at x = 1.

To find the values of x for which f(x) has a local maximum, we used critical points and the first derivative test. The critical points are the values of x where the derivative of f(x) is equal to zero or undefined.

The first derivative test involves analyzing the sign of the derivative on either side of a critical point to determine the local behavior of the function (increasing or decreasing) and therefore whether the critical point is a local maximum or minimum.

Here we have

for f(x) = x− lnx, and 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 2

To find the local maximum of f(x), we need to look for the critical points where the derivative of f(x) is equal to zero or undefined.

So, let's start by finding the derivative of f(x):

=> f'(x) = 1 - (1/x) = (x-1)/x

Now find the values of x for which f'(x) = 0 or f'(x) is undefined.

f'(x) = 0 when (x-1)/x = 0, which is equivalent to x-1 = 0 or x = 1.

f'(x) is undefined when x = 0 (because of the term 1/x),

but this value is not in the given interval [0.1, 2].

So, the only critical point in the given interval is x = 1.

Next, we need to check the behavior of f(x) around x = 1 to determine if it is a local maximum or minimum.

When x is slightly less than 1 (e.g., 0.9), f'(x) is negative, which means that f(x) is decreasing.

When x is slightly greater than 1 (e.g., 1.1), f'(x) is positive, which means that f(x) is increasing.

Therefore,

f(x) has a local maximum at x = 1.

Learn more about Local maximum at

https://brainly.com/question/14319836

#SPJ4

Answer:

Steve is correct

After the point pass 3 miles on the x - axis the yellow car is more expensive because the yellow line is above the blue line indicating it's price was more. Before the 3 Mile mark theblue line was above the yellow.

The distance between the poles is 100.38 ft.

Let's the distance between the poles as "d".

According to the Law of Cosines,

d² = (74.8)² + (66.7) - 2 × 74.8 × 66.7 × cos(103.6°)

d² = 5580.64 + 4458.89 - 2 × 74.8 × 66.7 × cos(103.6°)

d² = 10039.53 - 10039.38 × cos(103.6°)

d ≈ 10039.53 - (-36.57)

d² ≈ 10076.10

Taking the square root of both sides:

d ≈ 100.38 ft

Therefore, the distance between the poles is 100.38 ft.

Learn more about Law of cosine here:

https://brainly.com/question/30766161

#SPJ1

Molly has 12 quarters and 20 nickels in her collection of coins. This can be determined by using a system of equations to solve for the number of quarters and nickels.

To begin, let x represent the number of quarters Molly has. Since she has 8 more nickels than quarters, the number of nickels she has can be represented as x + 8. The value of her quarters is 25x cents (since each quarter is worth 25 cents), and the value of her nickels is 5(x + 8) cents (since each nickel is worth 5 cents). The total value of her coins is $5.20, which is equivalent to 520 cents.

We can now set up an equation using the values we've determined:

25x + 5(x + 8) = 520

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

30x + 40 = 520

30x = 480

x = 16

So Molly has 16 quarters, and since she has 8 more nickels than quarters, she has 16 + 8 = 24 nickels. Therefore, Molly has 12 quarters and 20 nickels in her collection of coins.

In summary, Molly has 12 quarters and 20 nickels in her collection of coins, which add up to a total value of $5.20. To find this answer, we used a system of equations to represent the number and value of quarters and nickels in terms of x (the number of quarters). We then solved for x and used that value to determine the number of quarters and nickels Molly has.

Learn more about Quarter:

brainly.com/question/1253865

#SPJ11

a)This is a contradiction since n²=3m-1 is not possible for any integer m. Therefore, we conclude that 3 must divide n. b)Therefore, 3 must be irrational.

(a) Let's prove that if 3 divides n², then 3 divides n. Suppose by contradiction that 3 does not divide n. Then n can be written as 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k. Squaring these expressions yields n²=9k²+6k+1 or n²=9k²+12k+4, respectively. In either case, we can factor out 3 from the first two terms of the right-hand side to get n²=3(3k²+2k)+1 or n²=3(3k²+4k+1)+1. Since n² is divisible by 3, it must be of the form 3m for some integer m. But this is a contradiction since n²=3m-1 is not possible for any integer m. Therefore, we conclude that 3 must divide n.

(b) To prove that 3 is irrational, suppose by contradiction that 3 can be expressed as a fraction m/n in lowest terms, where m and n are integers. Then we have 3n = m, which implies that 3 divides m. Let m = 3k for some integer k. Substituting this into the fraction gives 3n = 3k, which simplifies to n = k. Therefore, m and n have a common factor of 3, contradicting the assumption that the fraction was in lowest terms. Therefore, 3 must be irrational.

Learn more about irrational here:

https://brainly.com/question/29204809

#SPJ11

To find the Taylor series for f centered at 4, we need to compute the derivatives of f at x = 4 and then evaluate them at x = 4. The Taylor series for f centered at 4 is given by:

f(x) = f(4) + f'(4)(x - 4) + (f''(4)/2!)(x - 4)^2 + (f'''(4)/3!)(x - 4)^3 + ...

To compute the derivatives of f at x = 4, we need to use the given formula:

f(n)(4) = (-1)^n n! / (8^n (n+7))

Using this formula, we can compute the derivatives of f as follows:

f(4) = f(4) = (-1)^0 0! / (8^0 (0+7)) = 1/7

f'(4) = (-1)^1 1! / (8^1 (1+7)) = -1/64

f''(4) = (-1)^2 2! / (8^2 (2+7)) = 3/2048

f'''(4) = (-1)^3 3! / (8^3 (3+7)) = -5/32768

Substituting these values into the Taylor series formula, we get:

f(x) = 1/7 - (1/64)(x - 4) + (3/2048)(x - 4)^2 - (5/32768)(x - 4)^3 + ...

This is the Taylor series for f centered at 4. We can use this series to approximate the value of f at any point near x = 4. The more terms we include in the series, the better the approximation will be.

Learn more about derivatives here: brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The answer is explained below.

The formula for determining the confidence interval for the difference of two population means is expressed as,

Confidence interval = (x1 - x2) ± z√(s²/n1 + s2²/n2)

Where

x1 = mean sale amount for mail order sales = 82.70

x2 = sale amount for internet sales = 66.9

s1 = sample standard deviation for mail order sales = 16.25

s2 = sample standard deviation for internet sales = 20.25

n1 = number of mail order sales = 17

n2 = number of internet sales = 10

For a 99% confidence interval, we would determine the z score from the t distribution table because the number of samples are small

Degree of freedom =

(n1 - 1) + (n2 - 1) = (17 - 1) + (10 - 1) = 25

z = 2.787

Margin of error =

z√(s²/n1 + s2²/n2) = 2.787√(16.25²/17 + 20.25²/10) = 20.956190

Learn more about random samples click;

https://brainly.com/question/30759604

#SPJ1

If the exchange rate were 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost 125 Egyptian pounds.

The exchange rate is the price at which one currency can be exchanged for another. In this case, the exchange rate is 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar. This means that one US dollar can be exchanged for 5 Egyptian pounds.

To find out how much a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost in Egyptian pounds, we need to multiply the cost in US dollars by the exchange rate:

$25 x 5 = 125 Egyptian pounds

Therefore, if the exchange rate were 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost 125 Egyptian pounds.

Learn more about exchange rate here:

brainly.com/question/17906368

#SPJ11

Monetary Unit Sampling ensures larger dollar components are selected for examination by using stratification and probability theory, which improves the effectiveness of the audit and saves time and resources.

Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS) is a statistical sampling method used in auditing to estimate the number of monetary errors in a population of transactions. MUS ensures that larger dollar components are selected for examination by using probability theory and stratification techniques.

In MUS, each individual transaction is assigned a dollar value or monetary unit. The auditor then selects a sample of transactions using a random sampling method, with a higher probability of selecting larger monetary units. This is achieved by stratifying the population into different strata or layers based on their monetary value.

For example, the population may be divided into strata such as transactions under $1,000, transactions between $1,000 and $10,000, and transactions over $10,000. The auditor can then assign different sampling rates to each stratum, with a higher sampling rate for the larger stratum.

By selecting larger dollar components for examination, MUS can improve the effectiveness of the audit by focusing on transactions with a higher potential for material misstatement. This can also reduce the sample size required for the audit, saving time and resources while still providing a reasonable estimate of the monetary errors in the population.

To learn more about Monetary Unit Sampling

https://brainly.com/question/29440137

#SPJ4

The height of the trapezoid is 98 units

The space enclosed by the boundary of a plane figure is called its area.

A trapeziod is a closed shape or a polygon, that has four sides, four corners/vertices and four angles

The area of a trapezoid is expressed as;

A = 1/2( a+b)h

where a and b are the bases length of the trapezoid.

245= 1/2 ( 14+21)h

490 = 35h

divide both sides by 35

h = 490/35

h = 98 units

Therefore the height of the trapezoid is 98 units

learn more about area of trapezoid from

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ1

A player would need to hit approximately 56 home runs in the 2001 season to claim they were as dominant as Duke Snyder was during his 1956 season.

What is the mean and standard deviation?

The standard deviation is a summary measure of the differences of each observation from the mean. If the differences themselves were added up, the positive would exactly balance the negative and so their sum would be zero. Consequently, the squares of the differences are added.

To compare the dominance of Duke Snyder's 1956 MLB season to a player's 2001 MLB season, we need to calculate the number of standard deviations above the mean that Duke Snyder's 43 home runs represents and then find the number of home runs that a player in 2001 would need to hit to achieve the same number of standard deviations above the mean.

To do this, we can use the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where:

z is the number of standard deviations above the mean

x is the number of home runs

μ is the mean number of home runs

σ is the standard deviation

For Duke Snyder's 1956 season, we have:

z = (43 - 13.34) / 9.39 = 2.99

This means that Duke Snyder's 43 home runs were 2.99 standard deviations above the mean for that season.

To find the number of home runs that a player in 2001 would need to hit to achieve the same number of standard deviations above the mean, we can rearrange the formula:

x = μ + z * σ

For the 2001 season, we have:

x = 18.03 + 2.99 * 13.37 = 55.84

Therefore, a player would need to hit approximately 56 home runs in the 2001 season to claim they were as dominant as Duke Snyder was during his 1956 season.

To learn more about the mean and standard deviation visit:

brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ4

Add up the 3 items for subtotal.

Then take that subtotal and multiply by 0.20 (which is the same as 20%). That's your tip.

Add subtotal + tip and there's your total bill.

See attached screenshot.

Hope you have a good afternoon : )

If the integral ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx = 5 and ∫₀⁵g(x) dx = 12, then the value of

(a) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx = 17

(b) ∫₅⁰g(x) dx = -12

(c) ∫₀⁵(2f(x) - 13g(x))dx = -146

(d) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x) dx = -15/2

Part (a) : Using linearity of integrals, we have:

∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx = ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx + ∫₀⁵ g(x) dx

Substituting the value of integrals,

We get,

= 5 + 12 = 17.

So, ∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx = 17.

Part (b) : The integral ∫₅⁰g(x) dx can be written as -∫₀⁵g(x) dx

So, substituting the values,

We get,

= - 12.

So, ∫₅⁰g(x) dx = -12.

Part (c) : Using linearity of integrals, we have:

∫₀⁵ (2f(x) - 13g(x))dx = 2∫₀⁵ f(x) dx - 13∫₀⁵g(x) dx = 2(5) - 13(12) = -146.

So, ∫₀⁵ (2f(x) - 13g(x))dx = -146.

Part (d) : Using linearity of integrals, we have:

∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x)dx = ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx - ∫₀⁵ x dx

The integration of x is x²/2, so:

∫₀⁵ x dx = [x²/2]₀⁵ = (5²/2) - (0²/2) = 25/2.

Substituting this result and the value of ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx = 5,

We get,

∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x)dx = 5 - 25/2 = -15/2,

Therefore, ∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x)dx = -15/2.

Learn more about Integral here

https://brainly.com/question/27746495

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Suppose that ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx = 5 and ∫₀⁵g(x) dx = 12, Calculate the following integrals.

(a) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx

(b) ∫₅⁰g(x) dx

(c) ∫₀⁵(2f(x) - 13g(x))dx

(d) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x) dx

The point on the curve y=tanh(x) at which the tangent has slope 16/25 is approximately (1.075, 0.789).

To find this point, we start by taking the derivative of y=tanh(x) to get y' = sech^2(x). We then set sech^2(x) equal to 16/25 and solve for x to get x = arccosh(sqrt(9/16)). This gives us the x-coordinate of the point on the curve where the tangent has slope 16/25. To find the corresponding y-coordinate, we evaluate y = tanh(arccosh(sqrt(9/16))) to get approximately 0.789. Therefore, the point on the curve where the tangent has slope 16/25 is approximately (1.075, 0.789).

Learn more about derivative here: brainly.com/question/3405774

#SPJ11

The p-value for a right-tail hypothesis test in the t-distribution with 11 degrees of freedom and a test statistic of 2.201 is approximately 0.023.

In a hypothesis test, the p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed one, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. In this case, since we are performing a right-tail test, we are interested in the probability of getting a t-value greater than 2.201. We can use a t-distribution table or a calculator to find that the corresponding area to the right of 2.201 with 11 degrees of freedom is approximately 0.023. Therefore, if the significance level (alpha) of the test is less than 0.023, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the alternative hypothesis is supported.

Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/14309613

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]14[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

if you have any questions tag it on comments

hope it helps!!!

The area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 is approximately 0.0359, which corresponds to answer choice b.

The area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 can be calculated using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator with a normal distribution function.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the area under the curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 in the body of the table, where the rows represent the tenths and hundredths digits of z, and the columns represent the hundredths digits of the area.

Looking up z = 0.0, we find the area to be 0.5000. Looking up z = 1.79, we find the area to be 0.4641. To find the area between these two values, we can subtract the smaller area from the larger area:
0.4641 - 0.5000 = -0.0359

However, since we are looking for the area under the curve (which cannot be negative), we need to take the absolute value of this result:
| -0.0359 | = 0.0359

Therefore, the area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 is approximately 0.0359, which corresponds to answer choice b.

Know more about the area here:

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

If we have 90 balls in a basket, 30 of which are red and the rest are yellow and black, we can calculate the probability of drawing a yellow ball by dividing the number of yellow balls by the total number of balls in the basket.

Since we know that there are 30 red balls in the basket, the remaining 60 balls must be either yellow or black. We don't know how many of these 60 balls are yellow or black, so we need to calculate the probability of drawing a yellow ball without this information.

The probability of drawing a yellow ball is the number of yellow balls divided by the total number of balls in the basket. Therefore, the probability of drawing a yellow ball can be calculated as:

Probability of yellow ball = Number of yellow balls / Total number of balls

Since we know there are 30 red balls, we subtract this number from the total number of balls to get:

Total number of yellow and black balls = 90 - 30 = 60

We don't know how many of these 60 balls are yellow, but we know that all of them are either yellow or black. Therefore, the probability of drawing a yellow ball can be calculated as:

Probability of yellow ball = Number of yellow balls / Total number of yellow and black balls

Since we don't know the number of yellow balls, we can assume that all of the remaining 60 balls are yellow. Therefore, the probability of drawing a yellow ball can be calculated as:

Probability of yellow ball = Number of yellow balls / Total number of yellow and black balls = 60 / 90 = 2/3

This means that the probability of drawing a yellow ball from the basket is 2/3, or approximately 0.67.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/32066441

#SPJ11

There are 24 possible outcomes  in the experiment

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

There are 6 faces in the die and 4 sections in the spinner

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Face = 6

Sections = 4

The outcomes that are possible is calculated as

outcomes = Face * Sections

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

outcomes = 6* 4

Evaluate

outcomes =24

Hence, there are 24 outcomes that are possible

Read more about sample size at

https://brainly.com/question/17203075

#SPJ1

The equation with a degree of 4 and x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0) and a y-intercept located at (0,168) is y=(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x+1).

Explanation:

The given equation has x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0). This means that the factors of the equation must be (x+3), (x-7), and (x+8). Further, the y-intercept of the equation is located at (0,168), which means that the constant term in the equation must be 168.

Thus, the equation can be written as y = a(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x+b), where a and b are constants to be determined. To find the values of a and b, we can use the fact that the y-intercept of the equation is located at (0,168). Substituting x=0 and y=168 in the equation, we get:

168 = a(0+3)(0-7)(0+8)(0+b)

168 = -a378b

b = -3/2

Substituting this value of b in the equation, we get:

y = a(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

Now, to determine the value of a, we can use any of the given x-intercepts. Let's use the x-intercept (-3,0). Substituting x=-3 and y=0 in the equation, we get:

0 = a(-3+3)(-3-7)(-3+8)(-3-3/2)

0 = a*(-7)5(-9/2)

a = 0

Thus, the value of a is 0. Substituting this value of a in the equation, we get:

y = 0(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

y = (x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

Therefore, the equation with a degree of 4 and x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0) and a y-intercept located at (0,168) is y=(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2).

To learn more about y-intercept  click here, brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ11

The amount that must be paid each year to repay a $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually is approximately $12,057.

To calculate the amount that must be paid each year to repay the $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually, we can use the formula for the present value of an annuity. This formula is given as:

PV = PMT x ((1 - (1 + r/n)^(-nt))/(r/n))

where PV is the present value of the annuity (in this case, the loan amount), PMT is the payment made each period (which is what we want to calculate), r is the annual interest rate (4%), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year (1, since it is compounded annually), and t is the number of periods (25 years).

Plugging in the values, we get:

$200,000 = PMT x ((1 - (1 + 0.04/1)^(-1*25))/(0.04/1))

Solving for PMT, we get:

PMT = $200,000 / ((1 - (1 + 0.04/1)^(-1*25))/(0.04/1))

PMT = $12,057 (rounded to the nearest dollar)

Therefore, the amount that must be paid each year to repay the $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually is approximately $12,057.

To learn more about present value of the annuity click here: brainly.com/question/30408707

#SPJ11